Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I D Gilchrist

Publications and source records attributed to I D Gilchrist.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Saccade selection in visual search: evidence for spatial frequency specific between-item interactions.

We present two experiments in which subjects were required to make a saccade to a target amongst distractors. Targets were oriented Gabor patches. Analysis of errors, when subjects fail to make a saccade to the target, showed two interesting features. First, most error saccades were directed towards a distractor and not to the blank space between distractors. This suggests that although the location of the target may not be encoded correctly, the locations of the items in the display are encoded. Second, when the display items were all of the same spatial frequency, a long-range effect occurred whereby the likelihood of an error saccade in a specific direction decreased systematically as the distance from the target increases. This systematic influence of the target location extended over practically the whole display. The long-range effect appeared whenever all display items had the same spatial frequency and showed little dependence on the spatial frequency of the display items. However, when the items had different spatial frequencies the long-range effects were absent.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Using the eye-movement system to control the head.

We tested the hypothesis that A.I., a subject who has total ophthalmoplegia, resulting in a lack of eye movements, used her head to orientate in a qualitatively similar way to eye-based orientating of control subjects. We used four classic eye-movement paradigms and measured A.I.'s head movements while she performed the tasks. These paradigms were (i) the gap paradigm, (ii) the remote-distractor effect, (iii) the anti-saccade paradigm, and (iv) tests of saccadic suppression. In all cases, A.I.'s head saccades were qualitatively similar to previously reported eye-movement data. We conclude that A.I.'s head movements are probably controlled by the same neural mechanisms that control eye movements in unimpaired subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Luminance and edge information in grouping: a study using visual search.

Preattentive grouping is supported by 2 systems, a brightness system that is contrast polarity sensitive and an edge system that is relatively insensitive to contrast polarity. Search was spatially parallel for pairs of same contrast polarity vertically aligned circles, among horizontal pairs, and serial for pairs of circles that had the opposite contrast polarity (Experiments 1-3). By replacing the circles with squares, the authors investigated the effect of adding collinear edge information. When collinear edges were present, the polarity difference between paired items did not disrupt grouping (Experiments 4-6). These results support models of grouping in which brightness and edge information are processed separately (e.g., S. Grossberg & E. Mingolla, 1985) and models of visual search in which complex relations between stimuli can be computed in parallel across the display.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Spatial scale and saccade programming.

The global effect in eye orienting occurs when saccades land at the 'centre of gravity' of a target stimulus configuration. Short-latency saccades are particularly prone to this effect whereas longer-latency saccades may show more influence of fine detail. Alternative explanations of these effects are considered and data are presented from an experiment in which the influence of different stimulus features on the global effect in a search task was examined. The effect shows a substantially different time course for target-distractor combinations differing in contrast polarity (black vs white) than for combinations differing in shape (circle vs square). It is concluded that the global effect cannot be explained either as a high-level strategic effect or as an effect of automatic fast processing of low-spatial-frequency information in early sensory channels. Instead it is suggested that the visual-spatial-integration characteristic of the global effect is an integral and unavoidable part of the process of selection of saccadic response.

Humans↗