Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I C Chetter

Publications and source records attributed to I C Chetter.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Correlating clinical indicators of lower-limb ischaemia with quality of life.

The objectives of the study were to analyse the impact of increasing lower-limb ischaemia upon quality of life and to assess the correlation between clinical indicators of lower-limb ischaemia and such quality. A prospective observational study of a consecutive series of 235 patients (144 men and 91 women; median age 68 (range 41-87) years presenting with varying degrees of lower-limb ischaemia graded according to ISCVS criteria was performed. Data was collected at interview before any intervention. Clinical indicators of lower-limb perfusion included: intermittent claudication and maximum walking distance on standardized treadmill testing; ankle:brachial pressure indices and isotope limb blood flow. Quality of life analysis was performed using the EuroQol (EQ) questionnaire. This is a standardized generic instrument for describing health-related quality of life and consists of a descriptive system of five dimensions, each measured on three levels. Thus, a profile and two single indices of quality of life were derived using different methods. Increasing lower-limb ischaemia results in a statistically significant deterioration in both global quality of life and in all EQ-measured quality of life dimensions (P < 0.01 Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA). The correlation between clinical indicators and quality of life is statistically significant but not sufficiently close (correlation coefficients < 0.6) to assume that variations in clinical indicators result in reciprocal variations in quality of life. In conclusion, as might be expected, a significant correlation exists between clinical indicators of lower-limb ischaemia and health-related quality of life. However, the low correlation coefficients emphasize how tenuous the association is. Thus, a significant improvement in the clinical indicators of lower-limb ischaemia cannot be assumed to impart a similar benefit on quality of life. The latter concept must therefore be analysed independently.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Quality of life analysis in patients with lower limb ischaemia: suggestions for European standardisation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In this era of evidence-based medicine and limited resources we seem obliged, on clinical and economic grounds, to demonstrate that we improve not only patient survival but also the quality of patients' lives. This study aims to determine the impact of increasing lower limb ischaemia on quality of life (QOL) and which of three commonly used generic QOL instruments is the most valid, reliable, and responsive to change in patients with lower limb ischaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-five patients, 144 men and 91 women, median age 68 years (range 41-87 years) were graded according to ISCVS suggested reporting standards, i.e. 16 mild, 116 moderate and 25 severe claudicants; 33 patients had rest pain and 45 tissue loss. Patients completed Short Form 36 (SF36), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires at interview. Additional copies of questionnaires were posted to 80 patients prior to attendance. Correlation between the two sets of responses reflects test-retest reliability. Correlation between domains measured by the three instruments reflects convergent and divergent validity. Kruskal Wallis ANOVA detected QOL changes across the whole group. Spearman Rank was used to analyse validity and reliability. Responsiveness was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Increasing lower limb ischaemia confers significant (p < 0.05) deterioration in: SF36 measured: physical functioning, physical role, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning and mental health. EQ-5D measured: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and anxiety/depression. NHP measured: energy, pain, emotional reaction, sleep, social isolation and physical mobility. All three instruments are significantly reliable (rs > 0.7). The validity of SF36 and NHP (rs = 0.68-0.78) is superior to EQ-5D (rs = 0.37-0.7). SF36 & NHP are equally responsive to changes in physical activity and pain. SF36 and EQ-5D are most responsive to changes in social activity. SF36 is most responsive to changes in psychological status. CONCLUSIONS: QOL deteriorates markedly with increasing lower limb ischaemia. The SF36 would appear to be the most appropriate generic QOL analysis tool for these patients. We recommend its widespread adoption throughout Europe, thus providing a standardised tool for reporting generic QOL.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The regulation of neutrophil activation and adhesion during femorodistal bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect that revascularising chronic critically ischaemic legs has no neutrophil activation and adhesion. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University Hospital. MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients, 16 men and nine women undergoing femorodistal surgery. CHIEF OUTCOME MEASURES: Venous blood assays for neutrophils expression of CD11b, neutrophil adhesion, and the plasma concentration of the shed endothelial adhesion receptor, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1). Urinary microalbuminaemia was measured and expressed as an albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), as a marker of vascular permeability and plasma neutrophil elastase as evidence of neutrophil activation. Venous blood was taken preoperatively, during surgery and for the first 7 days postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: Neutrophil CD11b expression fell following reperfusion of the limb (21.4 mcf to 9.7 mcf, p < 0.02 Mann Whitney U-test) as did neutrophil adhesion (preop. 75% adhesion, postop. 28% p < 0.01). However, the plasma elastase levels rose from 95 micrograms/l to 345 micrograms/l at 4 h and the ACR increased from 5.3 mg/ml to 304.2 mg/ml. The concentration of sICAM-1 fell following reperfusion (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The change in CD11b, sICAM-1 and adhesion may represent a normal immunological response to ischaemia/reperfusion.

Aged↗

Allogeneic versus autologous blood during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if cell-salvaged autologous blood can serve as an alternative to homologous blood, and to examine the incidence of infected complications and length of postoperative stay. DESIGN: A prospective randomised study comprising autologous and homologous blood transfusions in patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing AAA surgery were prospectively randomised to homologous blood (n = 27), or autologous blood transfusion (n = 23), using a cell salvage autotransfusion device. RESULTS: The haemoglobin at the time of hospital discharge was similar for both groups (11.0 vs. 10.8 g/dl) with no difference in perioperative mortality. The length of stay was reduced in those patients who received autologous blood (9 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). There were four infected cases in the autologous group and 12 in the homologous group (p = n.s., Fisher's exact probability test). However, patients who received 3-4 units of homologous blood had an increased risk of infection compared to those who received a similar amount of autologous blood (50% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Cell salvage autologous blood can safely replace, or at least decrease, exposure to homologous blood transfusion, with a reduction in the mean hospital stay.

Aged↗