The preimplantation conceptus of the mouse at 90 hours post coitum.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to I B Wilson.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We are examining the substrate specificity of atrial dipeptidyl carboxyhydrolase, a membrane-bound metallo enzyme that we isolated from bovine atrial tissue homogenates. This enzyme readily removes the dipeptide, Phe-Arg, from Bz-Gly-Ser-Phe-Arg, a stand-in substrate for atriopeptin II, one of several atrial natriuretic factors. We now report that the atrial enzyme cleaves the C-terminal dipeptide, Phe-Arg, from atriopeptin II to form atriopeptin I. The km (pH 7.5) is 25 microM and the ratio of relative Vmax/km as a measure of substrate specificity indicates that atriopeptin II is a 240-fold better substrate than Bz-Gly-His-Leu. Only Phe-Arg was detected as a hydrolysis product, indicating that sequential cleavage of Asn-Ser from atriopeptin II does not occur, and that atriopeptin I is not a substrate. Bz-Gly-Asn-Ser was as good a substrate for the atrial enzyme as Bz-Gly-His-Leu, but Bz-Cys(bzl)-Asn-Ser was not hydrolyzed. This result suggests that the presence of an intact disulfide bond or an S-alkylated residue in the P1 position of a substrate (as in atriopeptin I) prevents hydrolysis by the atrial enzyme. Comparative studies were made with the angiotensin I converting enzyme. Atriopeptin II was not a substrate. The stand-in substrates for atriopeptin I, Bz-Cys(bzl)-Asn-Ser and Bz-Gly-Asn-Ser were barely hydrolyzed, which by itself suggests that atriopeptin I is not a substrate of the angiotensin converting enzyme. Our results strongly suggest that atriopeptin II is converted to atriopeptin I and that hydrolysis is mediated by the atrial enzyme. The angiotensin I converting enzyme plays no role in processing these peptides. We suggest that the atrial enzyme be named atrial peptide convertase.
We have partially purified a thiol-dependent protease from bovine atrial tissue that cleaves the Arg98-Ser99 bond of rat natriuretic peptide (Gly96-Tyr126) to produce the natriuretic Ser99-Tyr126 peptide (cardionatrin I). This was the only hydrolytic product we detected. The existence of the atrial natriuretic peptide system implicates the mammalian heart as an endocrine organ which participates in the hormonal regulation of extracellular fluid volume, electrolyte balance and vascular tone. This enzyme appears to be part of that system. The atrial protease also hydrolyzes the Arg-2-Napthylamide bond of natriuretic peptide stand-in substrates; on the basis of relative Vmax/Km as a measure of substrate specificity, Bz-Leu-Arg-Arg-2-Napthylamide (NA) greater than Bz-Leu-Arg-2-NA greater than Arg-2-NA. There is little or no cleavage between the Arg-Arg pair of the first substrate. Since in the Gly96-Tyr126 peptide the Arg-Arg pair is not the principle cleavage site for this enzyme, it is very unlikely that it is a principle cleavage site for this enzyme in pro-atrial natriuretic factor. It is possible that it is a cleavage site for a different enzyme or the pair may serve as a signal for cleavage at Arg98.
We examined the specificity of a bovine hypothalamic neurosecretory granule enzyme which we discovered and which is capable of processing pro-gonadotropin releasing hormone precursor protein to yield gonadotropin associated peptide and a C-terminal extended form of gonadotropin releasing hormone (Palen et al.). The sequence in the precursor protein that separates the two active peptides is -Gly-Gly-Lys-Arg- where the pair of basic residues, -Lys-Arg-, is the anticipated cleavage site. On the basis of Vmax/Km as the measure of substrate specificity, Benzoyl(Bz)-Gly-Gly-Lys-Arg-2-Napthylamide (NA) greater than Bz-Gly-Gly-Arg-Lys-2-NA much greater than Bz-Gly-Gly-Arg-Arg-2-NA approximately equal to Bz-Gly-Gly-Lys-Lys-2-NA. Bz-Gly-Gly-Lys(N(epsilon)-acetyl)-Arg-2-NA is a very poor substrate. Our results indicate that the composition and sequence of the pair of basic residues at the primary cleavage site is important for enzyme specificity and that changes in the P1 or P2 residues of a potential substrate may affect both Km and Vmax. Hydrolysis of all substrates occurs at the P1-2-NA bond. We had previously shown that there is no cleavage between the pair of basic residues. With longer peptide substrates, Bz-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-Gly-Lys-Arg-2-NA greater than Bz-Gly-Leu-Arg(NO2)-Pro-Gly-Gly-Lys-Arg-2-NA greater than Bz-Gly-Gly-Lys-Arg-2-NA. Extending the substrate sequence to more closely resemble the amino acid sequence in the precursor protein improves Km 10-fold and Vmax about 5-fold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Phosphate, borate, and Tris inhibit angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), but HEPES buffer is inert. Measurements of substrate inhibition were made in HEPES buffer at pH 7.0 and 25 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Substrate inhibition was marked and goes to completion. A new equation for substrate inhibitions enables one, under favorable circumstances, to determine whether there is cooperativity in the binding of substrate to the inhibitory and active sites. Cooperativity does occur with ACE using Hipp-His-Leu as substrate. The kinetic parameters were measured (Km = 0.21 mM, K* = 0.65 mM at 37 degrees C). The enzyme concentration (1.94 X 10(-8) M) was determined by titration with lisinopril so that kcat (5 X 10(3) at 37 degrees C) could be determined. Using this value and the molecular weight the specific activity of ACE was calculated for different common buffers. The specific activity in HEPES calculated from Vmax was 33.7 units/mg at 37 degrees C.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that physicians do not accurately assess patients' health status or treatment preferences. Little is known, however, about how physicians' levels of training or experience relate to their abilities to assess these preferences. To better understand this phenomenon, the authors compared the abilities of medical interns and attending physicians to predict the choices of their adult patients for end-of-life care. METHODS: 230 seriously-ill adult inpatients were surveyed about their desires for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, their current quality of life, and their attitudes toward six other common adverse outcomes. The medical intern and attending physician who cared for these patients were asked to estimate the patient's responses for all of the same items. Agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: Compared with interns, attending physicians had known patients longer, had talked with patients more frequently about prognosis, and felt they knew more about their patients' preferences (all p < .0001). Despite this, the attending physicians were no more accurate than the interns in assessing patients' preferences. Both interns and attending physicians had only a fair understanding of patients' preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or their quality of life (kappa statistics 0.32 to 0.47), and even less understanding of their willingness to tolerate adverse outcomes (kappa statistics -0.03 to 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: For this cohort of seriously ill patients, neither medical interns nor their attending physicians were consistently accurate in assessing patients' preferences, and attending physicians were not more accurate than medical interns. Attending physicians should not assume that they can infer patients' preferences any better than the interns caring for these hospitalized patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.