Should scientists remain objective?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Howard H Kendler.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Three fundamental issues separate Jackson's (2003) methodological views from mine. One, whereas he believes an absolute moral view can prevail in a democracy, I assume moral pluralism is an inevitable byproduct of an open society. Two, Jackson feels that psychology can identify a correct moral position, whereas I postulate natural science psychology is only capable of revealing the empirical consequences of competing social policies and their moral implications. Three, Jackson espouses a politically active psychology that from my perspective is antithetical to a democratic and scientific ethic. In sum, Jackson's coupling of science with political advocacy will lead to a mistrust of psychology that will deny a democracy the opportunity to base its social policies on reliable psychological information.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.