Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Howard Cedar

Publications and source records attributed to Howard Cedar.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

A multistep mechanism for the activation of rearrangement in the immune system.

Rearrangement of immune receptor loci is a developmentally controlled process that takes place exclusively in lymphoid cells. We have used a stable transfection system in pre-B cells to show that DNA methylation brings about histone underacetylation, histone H3(K9) methylation, DNaseI resistance, and strong inhibition of both transcription and recombination. Strikingly, this repression is maintained in dividing cells even after removal of the original methyl groups responsible for its establishment, but in this state, rearrangement can now be induced by reacetylation of local histones using the drug Trichostatin A. This same combination of demethylation and histone acetylation is also required to activate germline transcription and recombination from the endogenous kappa locus in vivo. These results indicate that the regulation of rearrangement is carried out by a multilayered synergistic process.

Animals↗

Biallelic germline transcription at the kappa immunoglobulin locus.

Rearrangement of antigen receptor genes generates a vast array of antigen receptors on lymphocytes. The establishment of allelic exclusion in immunoglobulin genes requires differential treatment of the two sequence identical alleles. In the case of the kappa immunoglobulin locus, changes in chromatin structure, methylation, and replication timing of the two alleles are all potentially involved in regulating rearrangement. Additionally, germline transcription of the kappa locus which precedes rearrangement has been proposed to reflect an opening of the chromatin structure rendering it available for rearrangement. As the initial restriction of rearrangement to one allele is critical to the establishment of allelic exclusion, a key question is whether or not germline transcription at the kappa locus is monoallelic or biallelic. We have used a sensitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay and an RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to show that germline transcription of the kappa locus is biallelic in wild-type immature B cells and in recombination activating gene (RAG)-/-, mu+ B cells. Therefore, germline transcription is unlikely to dictate which allele will be rearranged first and rather reflects a general opening on both alleles that must be accompanied by a mechanism allowing one of the two alleles to be rearranged first.

Alleles↗

Regulation of imprinting: A multi-tiered process.

Although most mammalian genes are expressed from both alleles, there is a small group of special genes which are imprinted so that only one of the parental alleles is actually expressed in target cells. This epigenetic process involves regulation at a number of different stages of development and is very complex. In principle, imprinted gene regions must be marked in cis in the gametes using epigenetic features capable of being maintained through cell division and able to direct multigenic monoallelic expression in differentiated cells of the mature organism. The difference between alleles must be erased during early gametogenesis to allow the imprint to be reset in the mature gametes. In this review we will summarize what is currently known about the molecular mechanisms which mediate these steps.

Alleles↗

Epigenetic mechanisms that regulate antigen receptor gene expression.

Functional immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes are generated from germline V, D and J gene segments by a series of site-specific recombination events. This process is regulated by the availability of recombination machinery and by the ordered accessibility of appropriate target gene segments. Recent studies highlight the importance of chromatin remodelling and locus positioning for controlling antigen receptor gene expression and recombination.

Acetylation↗

The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development.

DNA methylation inhibits gene expression in animal cells, probably by affecting chromatin structure. Biochemical studies suggest that this process may be mediated by methyl-specific binding proteins that recruit enzymatic machinery capable of locally altering histone modification. To test whether DNA methylation actually has a role in the assembly of chromatin during normal development, we used cell transfection and a transgene construct genetically programmed to be either methylated or unmethylated in all cell types of the mouse. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis shows that the presence of DNA methylation brings about the deacetylation of histone H4 and methylation of Lys9 of histone H3 (H3 Lys9) and prevents methylation of Lys4 of histone H3 (H3 Lys4), thus generating a structure identical to that of methylated sequences in the genome. These results indicate that the methylation pattern established in early embryogenesis is profoundly important in setting up the structural profile of the genome.

Acetylation↗

Replicating by the clock.

The eukaryotic genome is divided into well-defined DNA regions that are programmed to replicate at different times during S phase. Active genes are generally associated with early replication, whereas inactive genes replicate late. This expression pattern might be facilitated by the differential restructuring of chromatin at the time of replication in early or late S phase.

Animals↗

Establishment of transcriptional competence in early and late S phase.

In animal cells, the process of DNA replication takes place in a programmed manner, with each gene region designated to replicate at a fixed time slot in S phase. Housekeeping genes undergo replication in the first half of S phase in all cell types, whereas the replication of many tissue specific genes is developmentally controlled, being late in most tissues but early in the tissue of expression. Here we employ nuclear DNA injection as an experimental system to test whether this phenomenon is due to differences in the ability to set up transcriptional competence during S phase. Our results show that, regardless of sequence, exogenous genes are a better template for transcription when injected into nuclei of cells in early as opposed to late S phase, and this expression state, once initiated, is preserved after cell division. DNA injected in late S phase is apparently repressed because it is packaged into chromatin containing deacetylated histones, and the same is true for late replicating chromosomal DNA. These findings suggest a mechanistic connection between replication timing and gene expression that might help to explain how epigenetic states can be maintained in vivo.

Acetylation↗

The imprinting mechanism of the Prader-Willi/Angelman regional control center.

The 2 Mb domain on chromosome 15q11-q13 that carries the imprinted genes involved in Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes is under the control of an imprinting center comprising two regulatory regions, the PWS-SRO located around the SNRPN promoter and the AS-SRO located 35 kb upstream. Here we describe the results of an analysis of the epigenetic features of these two sequences and their interaction. The AS-SRO is sensitive to DNase I, and packaged with acetylated histone H4 and methylated histone H3(K4) only on the maternal allele, and this imprinted epigenetic structure is maintained in dividing cells despite the absence of clearcut differential DNA methylation. Genetic analysis shows that the maternal AS-SRO is essential for setting up the DNA methylation state and closed chromatin structure of the neighboring PWS-SRO. In contrast, the PWS-SRO has no influence on the epigenetic features of the AS-SRO. These results suggest a stepwise, unidirectional program in which structural imprinting at the AS-SRO brings about allele-specific repression of the maternal PWS-SRO, thereby preventing regional activation of genes on this allele.

Base Sequence↗

Differential accessibility at the kappa chain locus plays a role in allelic exclusion.

Gene rearrangement in the immune system is always preceded by DNA demethylation and increased chromatin accessibility. Using a model system in which rearrangement of the endogenous immunoglobulin kappa locus is prevented, we demonstrate that these epigenetic and chromatin changes actually occur on one allele with a higher probability than the other. It may be this process that, together with feedback inhibition, serves as the basis for allelic exclusion.

Alleles↗

Analysis of putative RNase sensitivity and protease insensitivity of demethylation activity in extracts from rat myoblasts.

The mechanism for demethylation of DNA in rat myoblasts has recently been studied using a new in vitro system that monitors demethylation in whole cell extracts. Previous investigations using this system had indicated that demethylation is resistant to conditions that are normally assumed to denature or digest proteins. Remarkably, it was reported that the activity appeared to be sensitive to the action of ribonuclease, suggesting a role for RNA in the demethylation of DNA. This manuscript reports that, upon further purification of the extract, demethylation activity has properties that are different. When subjected to more rigorous procedures for digestion of proteins, the demethylase activity disappears. Furthermore, RNase sensitivity of the extract disappears when a quantity of unmethylated competitor DNA is added to the reaction mix or when extracts treated with RNase are subsequently treated with protease. Although a role for RNA cannot be completely discounted, it is unlikely that this demethyl-ation reaction involves RNA cofactors or ribozyme components. These results have important implications for the mechanism of DNA demethylation and they exemplify the potential pitfalls of experiments in which new biological roles for RNA are evaluated using RNase sensitivity experiments.

Animals↗