Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Hiroji Iwata

Publications and source records attributed to Hiroji Iwata.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in participants in Asia with early triple-negative breast cancer: An updated subgroup analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR and EFS results in participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population. We report OS, updated EFS, and safety outcomes in participants enrolled in Asia. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC (T1c [N1‒N2] or T2‒T4 [N0‒N2] per AJCC 7th edition) were randomized 2:1 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo plus chemotherapy. After definitive surgery, participants received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo for ≤9 cycles. Primary endpoints were pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1174 randomized participants, 216 were enrolled in Asia. At data cutoff (March 22, 2024), EFS events occurred in 18/136 participants (13.2%) in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy group versus 22/80 (27.5%) in the placebo + chemotherapy group (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23‒0.81]); 60-month EFS rates (95% CIs) were 87.4% (80.6%‒92.0%) and 72.1% (60.7%‒80.6%), respectively. In the respective groups, 12/136 (8.8%) and 16/80 participants (20.0%) died (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19‒0.86]); 60-month OS rates (95% CIs) were 91.9% (85.8%‒95.4%) and 81.1% (70.5%‒88.1%). Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 19/136 participants (14.0%) with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and 7/79 (8.9%) with placebo + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: OS and updated EFS outcomes in KEYNOTE-522 participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population and support use of perioperative pembrolizumab + neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard-of-care treatment in this setting.

Adjuvant

Trastuzumab deruxtecan rechallenge in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: EN-SEMBLE.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a key treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC); however, data on T-DXd rechallenge remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This post-hoc subgroup analysis evaluated T-DXd rechallenge in patients with HER2-positive mBC using data from EN-SEMBLE, a nationwide cohort study in Japan (N = 664). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Median real-world progression-free survival, real-world time to treatment failure, and overall survival were 6.5, 4.9, and 14.2 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 27%. Patients who discontinued initial T-DXd without progressive disease had numerically longer real-world progression-free survival. No interstitial lung disease occurred during rechallenge. CONCLUSION: T-DXd rechallenge may have clinical activity in selected patients with HER2-positive mBC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1030220506.

Humans

Quality of life with palbociclib plus tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from PATHWAY, an Asian international, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Asian international PATHWAY trial, palbociclib-tamoxifen demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with placebo-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). This analysis compared quality of life (QoL) between treatment arms. METHODS: Pre/peri or postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed on day 1 of cycles 1 (baseline), 4, and 7, and at the end of treatment (EOT) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Least-square mean (LSM) changes in scores from baseline were calculated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate time to deterioration (TTD) in the minimally important difference (MID) in the pain subscale. RESULTS: In the comparison between treatment arms, no significant differences were observed in LSM changes in scores from baseline in global QoL (cycle 4: 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): -5.00, 6.41]; cycle 7: 2.17 [95% CI: -4.14, 8.48]; EOT: -5.19 [95% CI: -11.64, 1.26]). For both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 functional and symptom subscales, no clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms were found in the LSM changes in scores from baseline. Median TTD in the MID in the pain subscale was 32.5 months (95% CI: 11.7, not estimable) for the palbociclib-tamoxifen arm and 21.2 months (95% CI: 5.5, 43.5) for the placebo-tamoxifen arm (hazard ratio = 0.729 [95% CI: 0.467, 1.138]). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of palbociclib and tamoxifen delayed deterioration in patients' QoL while they experienced reduced risk for disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03423199; study registration date: February 6, 2018.

Humans

Neoadjuvant palbociclib in women with operable, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

The addition of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor to endocrine therapy augments biological response in breast cancer. This phase III randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of adding palbociclib to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for operable, hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Patients randomly received 16 weeks of endocrine therapy (letrozole for postmenopausal and tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression for pre-/perimenopausal patients) plus palbociclib or placebo. The co-primary endpoints included preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score and EndoPredict (EPclin) risk score according to the gatekeeping procedure. Of 141 randomized patients, 130 completed the treatment with surgical samples evaluable for endpoints in 126 patients. The proportion of patients with a low, moderate, and high PEPI score was 15.2, 50.0, and 34.8% in the palbociclib arm and 13.3, 55.0, and 31.7% in the placebo arm, respectively, with no statistical difference (one-sided P = 0.563). Statistical analysis was not performed on EPclin risk score. No new safety signals were reported. Permanent treatment discontinuation by adverse events was reported for seven (9.7%) and zero patients in the palbociclib and placebo arms, respectively. In conclusion, the addition of palbociclib to NET did not improve the efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03969121.

Humans