Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hideyuki Shimazaki

Publications and source records attributed to Hideyuki Shimazaki.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the parameters related to the effective selection of patients who could receive prognostic benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection. BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative diagnosis of lateral nodal involvement (LNI) remains difficult, and the indications for lateral lymph node dissection have been controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 244 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery with lateral dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer (1985-2000) were reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on various parameters, and the therapeutic value index for survival benefit was compared among groups. The therapeutic index of lateral dissection was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to the lateral area and the cancer-related 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to the lateral area, irrespective of metastasis to other areas (mesorectal, superior rectal artery [SRA], and inferior mesenteric artery [IMA] areas). RESULTS: LNI was observed in 41 patients (17%); and 88% of them had nodal involvement in the region along the internal iliac/pudendal artery or in the obturator region ("vulnerable field"). The cancer-related 5-year survival rate among the patients with LNI was 42%; the therapeutic index for lateral dissection was calculated as 7.0 patients, which was much higher than that of lymphadenectomy of the SRA area (1.6 patients) and the IMA area (0.4 patients), and almost comparable to that of lymphadenectomy of the upward mesorectal area (6.9 patients). Although it was possible to select groups at high and low risk for LNI based on several parameters related to tumor aggressiveness, such as tumor differentiation in biopsy specimens, the therapeutic value index was not significantly different between these groups. Unlike these parameters, the diameter of the largest lymph node in the "vulnerable field," which was positively correlated with the rate of LNI but irrelevant to the prognosis, was able to successfully stratify patients by therapeutic index. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced lower rectal cancer patients having LNI in the lateral pelvic area are likely to receive prognostic benefit from lymphadenectomy. The most efficient means of determining the effectiveness of lateral dissection preoperatively is to estimate the nodal diameter in the "vulnerable" lateral regions by diagnostic imaging.

Disease-Free Survival↗

Extramural cancer deposits without nodal structure in colorectal cancer: optimal categorization for prognostic staging.

To establish an optimal categorization of cancer deposits without lymph node structure (extranodal cancer deposits [EX]) in a prognostic staging system, we analyzed 1,027 cases in which patients underwent potentially curative surgery for advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. EX was classified as vascular invasion-type (VAS) or non-VAS.A total of 512 foci of EX were identified in 205 patients (20.0%), with VAS and non-VAS found in 68 and 182 patients, respectively. The hazard ratio for patients with nodal involvement was 3.6 and for patients with VAS and non-VAS, 2.5 and 4.7, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis of these 3 parameters, only nodal involvement and non-VAS were significant prognosticators. By using the Akaike information criterion, N staging was capable of predicting survival outcome with the highest accuracy when both nodal involvement and non-VAS were treated together as an N factor and VAS was treated as a T factor ("new categorization"). The clinical significance of the TNM grading system for colorectal cancer would be enhanced if we treat EX as a new categorization.

Adult↗

T1 neuroendocrine carcinoma of anal canal after transanal resection for intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the anal canal are rare, representing 1% of malignant tumors of the anal canal. This tumor behaves aggressively and leads to poor outcomes. The majority of tumors are found with distant metastases. We describe the case of a 63-year-old female with T1 neuroendocrine carcinoma of the anal canal arising from the site of a previous transanal excision performed 13 months earlier for intramucosal adenocarcinoma of the anal canal. The patient did not have any distant metastases on preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. She underwent abdominoperineal resection after the initial diagnostic transanal excision of the neuroendocrine carcinoma, which had shown submucosal invasion. No lymph node metastasis was found in pathological examination. In this case, it is likely that the neuroendocrine tumor, which infiltrated into the submucosal layer with venous invasion, had developed over the intervening 13 months following the original transanal excision of the adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Various histologic findings exist for managing patients with malignant polyps. Our goal was to determine the criteria for a conservative approach to patients with locally excised early invasive carcinoma. METHODS: In 292 early invasive tumors (local resection followed by laparotomy [80 tumors, group A], local resection only [41 tumors, group B], and primarily laparotomy [171 tumors, group C], potential parameters for nodal involvement were analyzed. The status of the endoscopic resection margin also was examined for the risk for intramural residual tumor. RESULTS: Unfavorable tumor grade, definite vascular invasion, and tumor budding were the combination of qualitative factors that most effectively discriminated the risk for nodal involvement in patients in groups A-C. The nodal involvement rate was 0.7%, 20.7%, and 36.4% in the no-risk, single-risk, and multiple-risks group, respectively. Thirty-two and 9 patients from group B were assigned to the no-risk and one-risk group, respectively; extramural recurrence occurred in 2 patients with risk factors. Considering quantitative risk parameters for submucosal invasion (i.e., width > or =4000 microm or depth > or =2000 microm), nodal involvement (including micrometastases) was not observed in the redefined no-risk group that accounted for about 25% of the patients from groups A and C. An insufficiency of endoscopic resection could be evaluated most precisely based on the coagulation-involving tumor, rather than the 1-mm rule for the resection margin. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that the criterion of sufficient excision is satisfied, the absence of an unfavorable tumor grade, vascular invasion, tumor budding, and extensive submucosal invasion would be the strict criteria for a wait-and-see policy.

Adenocarcinoma↗