Biomedical subjects

Hermann Wrigge

Publications and source records attributed to Hermann Wrigge.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on renal perfusion and function in patients with acute lung injury.

OBJECTIVE: Controlled mechanical ventilation can impair systemic and renal blood flow and function, which may be aggravated by respiratory acidosis. We hypothesized that partial ventilatory support using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with spontaneous breathing provides better cardiopulmonary and renal function than full ventilatory support using APRV without spontaneous breathing. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with acute lung injury (ALI). INTERVENTIONS: Airway pressure release ventilation with and without spontaneous breathing, maintaining either the same minute ventilation (V(E)) or the same airway pressure (Paw) limits. MEASUREMENTS: Systemic hemodynamics were estimated by double-indicator dilution, effective renal blood flow (ERBF) by para-aminohippurate, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by inulin clearance. RESULTS: Compared to APRV with spontaneous breathing, cardiac index (CI) was decreased when the upper Paw limit was increased to provide the same V(E) (4.26+/-1.21 l min(-1) m(-2)vs 3.72+/-0.99 l min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05) while CI was increased when Paw limits were held constant (4.91+/-1.41 l min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05). Effective renal blood flow and GFR were higher during APRV with spontaneous breathing (858+/-388 ml min(-1) m(-2) and 94+/-47 ml min(-1) m(-2)) than during APRV without spontaneous breathing and the same V(E) (714+/-236 ml min(-1) m(-2)and 82+/-35 ml min(-1) m(-2)) or the same Paw (675+/-287 ml min(-1) m(-2) and 80+/-41 ml min(-1) m(-2); p<0.05). Urine volume did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous breathing during APRV was associated with better renal perfusion and function than APRV without spontaneous breathing applying either the same V(E) or the same Paw limits. Maintaining spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support may, therefore, be advantageous in preventing deterioration of renal function in patients with ALI.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Controlled versus assisted mechanical ventilation.

On the basis of currently available data, it can be suggested that maintained spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation should not be suppressed even in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction if no contraindications, such as increased intracranial pressure, are present. Improvements in pulmonary gas exchange, systemic blood flow, and oxygen supply to tissues, which have been observed when spontaneous breathing was allowed during ventilatory support, are reflected in the clinical improvement in the patient's condition, as indicated by significantly fewer days with ventilation, earlier extubation, and shorter stays in the intensive care unit. The positive effects of spontaneous breathing have been documented only for some of the available partial ventilatory support modalities. If ventilatory modalities are limited to those whose positive effects have been documented, then partial ventilatory support can be used as a primary modality even in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction. Whereas controlled mechanical ventilation followed by weaning with partial ventilatory support modalities has been the earlier standard in ventilation therapy, this approach should be reconsidered in view of the available data.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

Prone positioning, systemic hemodynamics, hepatic indocyanine green kinetics, and gastric intramucosal energy balance in patients with acute lung injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of prone positioning on systemic hemodynamics, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (PDR(ICG)), and gastric intramucosal to arterial PCO2 difference (Pi-aCO2). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized study in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 12 mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable patients with acute lung injury. INTERVENTION: Positioning supine and prone for 3 h in random order. MEASUREMENTS: Systemic hemodynamics were determined by transpulmonary double-indicator dilution technique using an integrating fiberoptic monitoring system. The same monitoring system was used to measure PDR(ICG). IAP was measured in the urinary bladder and gastric intramucosal PCO2 was evaluated by automated recirculation gas tonometry. RESULTS: IAP increased from 10 +/-3 in the supine to 13+/-4 mmHg in the prone position. Cardiac index increased from 3.8+/-0.9 (supine) to 4.2+/-0.6 l/m(2) per minute (prone), mean arterial pressure from 75+/-10 (supine) to 81+/-11 mmHg (prone), PaO2/FIO2 from 194+/-66 (supine) to 269+/-68 mmHg (prone), and oxygen delivery from 558+/-122 (supine) to 620+/-74 ml/m(2) per minute (prone). No other parameters, including PDR(ICG) and Pi-aCO2, differed between the two positions. CONCLUSIONS: Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury, despite a small increase in IAP, does not negatively affect the hepatic capacity to eliminate ICG and gastric intramucosal energy balance when systemic blood flow and oxygenation are improved.

APACHE↗