Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Helen A Baghdoyan

Publications and source records attributed to Helen A Baghdoyan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Nitric oxide in B6 mouse and nitric oxide-sensitive soluble guanylate cyclase in cat modulate acetylcholine release in pontine reticular formation.

ACh regulates arousal, and the present study was designed to provide insight into the neurochemical mechanisms modulating ACh release in the pontine reticular formation. Nitric oxide (NO)-releasing beads microinjected into the pontine reticular formation of C57BL/6J (B6) mice significantly (P < 0.0001) increased ACh release. Microdialysis delivery of the NO donor N-ethyl-2-(1-ethyl-2-hydroxy-2-nitrosohydrazino)-ethanamine (NOC-12) to the mouse pontine reticular formation also caused a concentration-dependent increase in ACh release (P < 0.001). These are the first neurochemical data showing that ACh release in the pontine reticular formation of the B6 mouse is modulated by NO. The signal transduction cascade through which NO modulates ACh release in the pontine reticular formation has not previously been characterized. Therefore, an additional series of studies quantified the effects of a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) inhibitor, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo-[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), on ACh release in the cat medial pontine reticular formation. During naturally occurring states of sleep and wakefulness, but not anesthesia, ODQ caused a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in ACh release. These results show for the first time that NO modulates ACh in the medial pontine reticular formation of the cat via an NO-sensitive sGC signal transduction cascade. Isoflurane and halothane anesthesia have been shown to decrease ACh release in the medial pontine reticular formation. The finding that ODQ did not alter ACh release during isoflurane or halothane anesthesia demonstrates that these anesthetics disrupt the NO-sensitive sGC-cGMP pathway. Considered together, results from the mouse and cat indicate that NO modulates ACh release in arousal-promoting regions of the pontine reticular formation via an NO-sensitive sGC-cGMP pathway.

Acetylcholine↗

Dialysis delivery of an adenosine A2A agonist into the pontine reticular formation of C57BL/6J mouse increases pontine acetylcholine release and sleep.

In vivo microdialysis in C57BL/6J (B6) mouse was used to test the hypothesis that activating adenosine A(2A) receptors in the pontine reticular formation (PRF) increases acetylcholine (ACh) release and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Eight concentrations of the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680; CGS) were delivered to the PRF and ACh in the PRF was quantified. ACh release was significantly increased by dialysis with 3 mum CGS and significantly decreased by dialysis with 10 and 100 microm CGS. Co-administration of the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385; 30 nM) blocked the CGS-induced increase in ACh release. In a second series of experiments, CGS (3 microm) was delivered by dialysis to the PRF for 2 h while recording sleep and wakefulness. CGS significantly decreased time in wakefulness (-51% in h 1; -54% in h 2), increased time in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep (90% in h 1; 151% in h 2), and increased both time in REM sleep (331% in h 2) and the number of REM sleep episodes (488% in h 2). The enhancement of REM sleep is consistent with the interpretation that adenosine A(2A) receptors in the PRF of the B6 mouse contribute to REM sleep regulation, in part, by increasing ACh release in the PRF. A(2A) receptor activation may promote NREM sleep via GABAergic inhibition of arousal promoting neurons in the PRF.

Acetylcholine↗

Hypocretin (orexin) receptor subtypes differentially enhance acetylcholine release and activate g protein subtypes in rat pontine reticular formation.

The hypothalamic peptides hypocretin-1 (orexin A) and -2 (orexin B) promote wakefulness by mechanisms that are not well understood. Defects in hypocretinergic neurotransmission underlie the human sleep disorder narcolepsy. Hypocretins alter cell excitability via two receptor subtypes, hypocretin receptor subtype 1 (hcrt-r1) and hypocretin receptor subtype 2 (hcrt-r2). This study aimed to identify G protein subtypes activated by hypocretin in rat pontine reticular nucleus oral part (PnO) and the hypocretin receptor subtype modulating acetylcholine (ACh) release in the PnO. G protein activation was quantified using in vitro [(35)S]guanylyl-5'-O-(gamma-thio)triphosphate autoradiography. ACh release was measured using in vivo microdialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography. Hypocretin-1-stimulated G protein activation was significantly decreased by pertussis toxin, demonstrating that some hypocretin receptors in rat PnO activate inhibitory G proteins. Hypocretin-1-stimulated ACh release was not blocked by pertussis toxin, supporting the conclusion that the hypocretin receptors modulating ACh release in rat PnO activate stimulatory G proteins. Hypocretin-1 and -2 each caused a concentration-dependent increase in ACh release with similar potencies, indicating that hcrt-r2 modulates ACh release in PnO. Hypocretin-1 caused a significantly greater increase in ACh release than hypocretin-2, suggesting a role for hcrt-r1 in the modulation of PnO ACh release. Taken together, these data provide the first evidence that hypocretin receptors in rat PnO signal via inhibitory and stimulatory G proteins and that ACh release in rat PnO is modulated by hcrt-r2 and hcrt-r1. One mechanism by which hypocretin promotes arousal may be to increase ACh release in the pontine reticular formation.

Acetylcholine↗

Morphine inhibits acetylcholine release in rat prefrontal cortex when delivered systemically or by microdialysis to basal forebrain.

BACKGROUND: Cortical acetylcholine originates in the basal forebrain and is essential for maintaining normal cognition and arousal. Morphine impairs these cholinergically mediated cortical functions. The current study tested the hypothesis that morphine decreases prefrontal cortical acetylcholine release by acting at the level of the basal forebrain. METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 18) were anesthetized with isoflurane. One microdialysis probe was placed in the substantia innominata region of the basal forebrain and perfused with Ringer's solution (control) followed by one concentration of morphine (1, 10, 100, or 1,000 microm) or morphine (1,000 microm) plus naloxone (100 microm). A second microdialysis probe was placed in the prefrontal cortex for measuring acetylcholine. In a second series of experiments, rats (n = 6) were implanted with electrodes for recording states of arousal, a guide cannula positioned above the prefrontal cortex for inserting a microdialysis probe, and an indwelling jugular vein catheter. The effects of administering intravenous morphine (30 mg/kg) versus normal saline (0.9%) on prefrontal cortical acetylcholine release, cortical electroencephalographic power, and behavior were quantified. RESULTS: Dialysis delivery of morphine to the substantia innominata caused a concentration-dependent, naloxone-sensitive decrease in acetylcholine release within the prefrontal cortex. The maximal decrease in acetylcholine was 36.3 +/- 11.5%. Intravenous morphine administration significantly decreased cortical acetylcholine release, increased electroencephalographic power in the 0.5- to 5-Hz range, and eliminated normal wakefulness. CONCLUSION: Morphine causes obtundation of arousal and may cause cognitive impairment by acting at the level of the substantia innominata to disrupt cortical cholinergic neurotransmission.

Acetylcholine↗

Sleep, anesthesiology, and the neurobiology of arousal state control.

Sleep, like breathing, is a biologic rhythm that is actively generated by the brain. Neuronal networks that have evolved to regulate naturally occurring sleep preferentially modulate traits that define states of sedation and anesthesia. Sleep is temporally organized into distinct stages that are characterized by a unique constellation of physiologic and behavioral traits. Sleep and anesthetic susceptibility are genetically modulated, heritable phenotypes. This review considers 40 yr of research regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to arousal state control. Clinical and preclinical data have debunked and supplanted the primitive view that sleep need is a weakness. Sleep deprivation and restriction diminish vigilance, alter neuroendocrine control, and negatively impact immune function. There is overwhelming support for the view that decrements in vigilance can negatively impact performance. Advances in neuroscience provide a foundation for the sea change in public and legal perspectives that now regard a sleep-deprived individual as impaired.

Anesthesia↗

Pontine and basal forebrain cholinergic interaction: implications for sleep and breathing.

Pontine and forebrain cholinergic nuclei contribute to the regulation of breathing and arousal. This report summarizes experiments in rat (n = 20) concerning the cholinergic interaction between pons and basal forebrain. In vitro [(35)S]guanylyl-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) autoradiography quantified carbachol-stimulated guanine nucleotide binding (G) protein activation in seven basal forebrain nuclei. Carbachol significantly increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in the vertical and horizontal limbs of the diagonal band of Broca, medial and lateral septum, and nucleus basalis (B)/substantia innominata (SI). In vitro receptor autoradiography demonstrated muscarinic receptors in the same nuclei where carbachol caused G protein activation. In vivo experiments showed that carbachol administered to the pontine reticular formation (PnO) significantly decreased the number of 7-14Hz spindles in the electroencephalogram (EEG), decreased acetylcholine release in SI, and decreased respiratory rate. Carbachol microinjection into SI did not alter the number of EEG spindles or respiratory rate. The results help clarify that EEG and rate of breathing are more effectively modulated by cholinergic neurotransmission in PnO than in SI.

Acetylcholine↗

C57BL/6J and B6.V-LEPOB mice differ in the cholinergic modulation of sleep and breathing.

Respiratory and arousal state control are heritable traits in mice. B6.V-Lep(ob) (ob) mice are leptin deficient and differ from C57BL/6J (B6) mice by a variation in the gene coding for leptin. The ob mouse has morbid obesity and disordered breathing that is homologous to breathing of obese humans. This study tested the hypothesis that microinjecting neostigmine into the pontine reticular nucleus, oral part (PnO), of B6 and ob mice alters sleep and breathing. In B6 and ob mice, neostigmine caused a concentration-dependent increase (P < 0.0001) in percentage of time spent in a rapid eye movement (REM) sleeplike state (REM-Neo). Relative to saline (control), higher concentrations of neostigmine increased REM-Neo duration and the number of REM-Neo episodes in B6 and ob mice and decreased percent wake, percent non-REM, and latency to onset of REM-Neo (P < 0.001). In B6 and ob mice, REM sleep enhancement by neostigmine was blocked by atropine. Differences in control amounts of sleep and wakefulness between B6 and the congenic ob mice also were identified. After PnO injection of saline, ob mice spent significantly (P < 0.05) more time awake and less time in non-REM sleep. B6 mice displayed more (P < 0.01) baseline locomotor activity than ob mice, and PnO neostigmine decreased locomotion (P < 0.0001) in B6 and ob mice. Whole body plethysmography showed that PnO neostigmine depressed breathing (P < 0.001) in B6 and ob mice and caused greater respiratory depression in B6 than ob mice (P < 0.05). Western blot analysis identified greater (P < 0.05) expression of M2 muscarinic receptor protein in ob than B6 mice for cortex, midbrain, cerebellum, and pons, but not medulla. Considered together, these data provide the first evidence that pontine cholinergic control of sleep and breathing varies between mice known to differ by a spontaneous mutation in the gene coding for leptin.

Acetylcholine↗

GABAA receptors inhibit acetylcholine release in cat pontine reticular formation: implications for REM sleep regulation.

This study used in vivo microdialysis in cat (n=12) to test the hypothesis that gamma aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors in the pontine reticular formation (PRF) inhibit acetylcholine (ACh) release. Animals were anesthetized with halothane to hold arousal state constant. Six concentrations of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mM) were delivered to a dialysis probe in the PRF, and endogenously released ACh was collected simultaneously. Bicuculline caused a concentration dependent increase in ACh release (maximal increase=345%; EC50=1.3 mM; r2=0.997). Co-administration of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol prevented the bicuculline-induced increase in ACh release. In a second series of experiments, the effects of bicuculline (0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mM) on ACh release were examined without the use of general anesthesia. States of wakefulness, rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, and non-REM sleep were identified polygraphically before and during dialysis delivery of bicuculline. Higher concentrations of bicuculline (1 and 3 mM) significantly increased ACh release during wakefulness (36%), completely suppressed non-REM sleep, and increased ACh release during REM sleep (143%). The finding that ACh release in the PRF is modulated by GABAA receptors is consistent with the interpretation that inhibition of GABAergic transmission in the PRF contributes to the generation of REM sleep, in part, by increasing pontine ACh release.

Acetylcholine↗

Differential cholinergic activation of G proteins in rat and mouse brainstem: relevance for sleep and nociception.

Murine models are increasingly used for investigations of sleep, yet no previous studies have characterized cholinergic activation of guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) in mouse brainstem nuclei known to regulate sleep. This study used in vitro [(35)S]guanylyl-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) autoradiography to test the hypothesis that muscarinic cholinergic receptors activate G proteins in C57BL/6J (B6) mouse brainstem. The nuclei studied are homologous to those known in rat and cat to modulate sleep and nociception. In B6 mouse, carbachol significantly increased specific binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS in the pontine reticular nucleus, caudal part (79%); pontine reticular nucleus, oral part (131%); laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (56%); pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (86%); dorsal raphe nucleus (53%); dorsal medial periaqueductal gray (54%); and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (52%) when compared with basal binding. Carbachol-induced G protein activation was concentration-dependent and blocked by atropine, demonstrating mediation by muscarinic receptors. G protein activation by carbachol was heterogeneous across B6 mouse brainstem nuclei. Comparison of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding between mouse and rat revealed different magnitudes of G protein activation in the pontine reticular formation. In the same pontine reticular formation area of B6 mouse where in vitro treatment with carbachol activates G proteins, in vivo microinjection of cholinomimetics causes a rapid eye movement sleep-like state. These data provide the first direct measurement of muscarinic receptor-activated G proteins in B6 mouse brainstem nuclei known in other species to regulate sleep.

Animals↗

Muscarinic and GABAA receptors modulate acetylcholine release in feline basal forebrain.

Acetylcholine (ACh) release within the basal forebrain changes significantly as a function of sleep and wakefulness, hence identifying the neurochemical modulators of basal forebrain ACh release will contribute to a mechanistic understanding of sleep cycle regulation. This study tested the hypothesis that muscarinic and gamma aminobutyric acid(A) (GABAA) receptors modulate basal forebrain ACh release. Cats were anaesthetized with halothane to hold arousal state constant and a microdialysis probe was aimed stereotaxically for the substantia innominata region of the basal forebrain. Four concentrations of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 10 nm) and five concentrations of the GABAA antagonist bicuculline (3, 10, 30, 100, and 300 micro m) were delivered by reverse dialysis from the same probes used to collect ACh. These results are based on 27 experiments in nine animals. Scopolamine and bicuculline each caused a concentration dependent enhancement of ACh release. Scopolamine increased ACh by 118% above control levels whereas bicuculline was more effective, causing a 287% increase in ACh release. Scopolamine was more potent (EC50 = 0.16 nm) than bicuculline (EC50 > or = 90 micro m) for increasing ACh release. The results support the hypothesis that substantia innominata ACh release is modulated by muscarinic autoreceptors and inhibited by GABAA receptors. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that inhibition of basal forebrain cholinergic neurotransmission by GABA contributes to the generation of sleep.

Acetylcholine↗

Hypocretin-1 causes G protein activation and increases ACh release in rat pons.

The effects of the arousal-promoting peptide hypocretin on brain stem G protein activation and ACh release were examined using 16 adult Sprague-Dawley rats. In vitro[35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography was used to test the hypothesis that hypocretin-1-stimulated G protein activation is concentration-dependent and blocked by the hypocretin receptor antagonist SB-334867. Activated G proteins were quantified in dorsal raphe nucleus (DR), locus coeruleus (LC) and pontine reticular nucleus oral part (PnO) and caudal part (PnC). Concentration-response data revealed a significant (P < 0.001) effect of hypocretin-1 (2-2000 nm) in all brain regions examined. Maximal increases over control levels of [35S]GTPgammaS binding were 37% (DR), 58% (LC), 52% (PnO) and 44% (PnC). SB-334867 (2 micro m) significantly (P < 0.002) blocked hypocretin-1 (200 nm)-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in all four nuclei. This is the first autoradiographic demonstration that hypocretin-1 activates G proteins in arousal-related brain stem nuclei as a result of specific receptor interactions. This finding suggests that some hypocretin receptors in brain stem couple to inhibitory G proteins. In vivo microdialysis was used to test the hypothesis that PnO administration of hypocretin-1 increases ACh release in PnO. Dialysis delivery of hypocretin-1 (100 micro m) significantly (P < 0.002) increased (87%) ACh release. This finding is consistent with the interpretation that one mechanism by which hypocretin promotes arousal is by enhancing cholinergic neurotransmission in the pontine reticular formation.

Acetylcholine↗

Dialysis delivery of an adenosine A1 receptor agonist to the pontine reticular formation decreases acetylcholine release and increases anesthesia recovery time.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine modulates cell excitability, acetylcholine release, nociception, and sleep. Pontine cholinergic neurotransmission contributes to the generation and maintenance of electroencephalographic and behavioral arousal. Adenosine A(1) receptors inhibit arousal-promoting, pontine cholinergic neurons, and adenosine enhances sleep. No previous studies have determined whether pontine adenosine also modulates recovery from anesthesia. Therefore, the current study tested the hypotheses that dialysis delivery of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N6-p-sulfophenyladenosine (SPA) into the pontine reticular formation would decrease acetylcholine release and increase the time needed for recovery from halothane anesthesia. METHODS: A microdialysis probe was positioned in the pontine reticular formation of halothane-anesthetized cats. Probes were perfused with Ringer's solution (control) followed by the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist SPA (0.088 or 8.8 mm). Dependent measures included acetylcholine release and a numeric assessment of recovery from anesthesia. An intensive, within-subjects design and analysis of variance evaluated SPA's main effect on acetylcholine release and anesthetic recovery. The adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 100 microm) was coadministered with SPA to test for antagonist blocking of SPA's effects. RESULTS: SPA significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased acetylcholine release in the pontine reticular formation and significantly (P < 0.0001) delayed recovery from anesthesia. Coadministration of SPA and DPCPX caused no decrease in acetylcholine release or delay in postanesthetic recovery. Dialysis delivery of SPA into the cerebellar cortex confirmed that the SPA effects were site-specific to the pontine reticular formation. CONCLUSION: The results provide a novel extension of the sleep-promoting effects of adenosine by showing that pontine delivery of an adenosine A(1) receptor agonist delays resumption of wakefulness following halothane anesthesia. This extension is consistent with a potentially larger relevance of the current findings for efforts to specify neurons and molecules causing physiologic and behavioral traits comprising anesthetic states. These data support the conclusion that adenosine A(1) receptors in medial regions of the pontine reticular formation, known to modulate sleep, also contribute to the generation and/or maintenance of halothane anesthesia.

Acetylcholine↗

Ketamine and MK-801 decrease acetylcholine release in the pontine reticular formation, slow breathing, and disrupt sleep.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Ketamine induces a dissociated state of consciousness by binding to the phencyclidine binding site within the ion channel gated by the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. The brain regions and neurotransmitter systems mediating ketamine-induced alterations in arousal remain incompletely understood. This study used in vivo microdialysis to test the hypothesis that ketamine alters acetylcholine (ACh) release in the medial pontine reticular formation (mPRF). DESIGN: Acetylcholine (ACh) release, sleep, and breathing were quantified following systemic ketamine administration. Microdialysis was used to deliver the NMDA-channel blocker dizocilpine maleate (MK-801) and the R(-)-isomer of ketamine into the mPRF while measuring ACh release. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: N/A. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Systemically administered ketamine disrupted normal sleep-cycle organization, reduced mPRF ACh release, and significantly slowed rate of breathing. Dialysis delivery of MK-801 to the mPRF significantly decreased respiratory rate and mPRF ACh release. Dialysis delivery to the mPRF of the R(-)-ketamine isomer significantly decreased mPRF ACh release. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased mPRF ACh release caused by systemically administered ketamine was mimicked by mPRF dialysis delivery of MK-801 and the R(-)-ketamine isomer. These data are consistent with the conclusion that systemically administered ketamine may alter arousal and breathing, in part, by altering cholinergic neurotransmission in the mPRF.

Acetylcholine↗

The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-Nitro-L-arginine increases basal forebrain acetylcholine release during sleep and wakefulness.

Cholinergic neurotransmission in the basal forebrain changes across the sleep/wake cycle, and considerable data show cortical activation by ACh originating from basal forebrain neurons. These findings have stimulated efforts to elucidate molecular modulators of ACh release within the basal forebrain. Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons contain nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme that produces the gaseous neuromodulator nitric oxide. This study tested the hypothesis that administration of an NOS inhibitor to the basal forebrain would alter basal forebrain ACh release, sleep, and respiratory rate. Seven cats were instrumented for recording sleep and wakefulness and for in vivo microdialysis and microinjection. Compared with Ringer's solution (control), microdialysis delivery of the NOS inhibitor N(G)-nitro-l-arginine (NLA; 10 mm) increased ACh release during wakefulness (33%), non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep (70%), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (16%). Mean +/- SEM ACh levels (pmol/10 min) during control and NLA dialysis, respectively, were 0.58 +/- 0.03 and 0.77 +/- 0.06 in wakefulness, 0.36 +/- 0.01 and 0.61 +/- 0.06 in NREM sleep, and 0.68 +/- 0.06 and 0.79 +/- 0.09 in REM sleep. Increases in ACh release were not evoked by dialysis delivery of the less active enantiomer N(G)-nitro-d-arginine. Dialysis administration of NLA did not alter respiratory rate. Sleep-dependent changes in basal forebrain ACh release were localized specifically to lateral basal forebrain regions and did not occur in medial basal forebrain sites. Microinjection of NLA into the lateral basal forebrain did not significantly alter the sleep/wake cycle. In contrast to NLA-induced depression of REM sleep and ACh release in the cat pons, the present results demonstrate that NLA increased ACh release in the cat basal forebrain and had no effect on sleep. The different effects of NLA on ACh release in the cat pons and cat basal forebrain may prove relevant for developing compounds that differentially alter cholinergic neurotransmission in specific brain regions.

Acetylcholine↗

Hypocretin-1 activates G proteins in arousal-related brainstem nuclei of rat.

The hypocretin (hcrt) ligand-receptor system contributes to the maintenance of wakefulness. Hypocretin receptors are coupled to guanine nucleotide binding (G) proteins and the present study tested the hypothesis that hcrt-1 would activate G proteins in rat brainstem nuclei known to regulate arousal states. In vitro [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography was performed using coronal brain stem sections from six rats. Hcrt-1 (200 nM) significantly increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding over basal levels in locus coeruleus (24%), dorsal raphe nucleus (12%), pontine reticular nucleus, oral part (28%), and pontine reticular nucleus, caudal part (40%). This is the first study to quantify and localize hcrt-1-induced G protein activation in specific brain stem nuclei. The finding that hcrt-1 stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding suggests that some hcrt receptors in pontine brain stem couple to inhibitory G proteins.

Animals↗

Microinjection of neostigmine into the pontine reticular formation of C57BL/6J mouse enhances rapid eye movement sleep and depresses breathing.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The cholinergic model of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep has contributed significantly to understanding sleep neurobiology and sleep-dependent respiratory depression. The model has been used extensively in cat and rat, but no previous studies have demonstrated cholinergic REM sleep enhancement in mouse. The present study used microinjection of neostigmine into pontine reticular formation of mouse to test the hypothesis that enhancing pontine cholinergic neurotransmission would cause increased REM sleep and sleep disordered breathing. DESIGN: Mice (n=8) were anesthetized and implanted with electrodes for measuring cortical electroencephalogram (EEG). Stainless steel cannulae were stereotaxically implanted to permit subsequent microinjections of 50 nl neostigmine (0.133 microg; 8.8 mM) or saline into the pontine reticular formation. Following recovery, an intensive within-subjects design was used to obtain measures of sleep/wake states, breathing, and locomotor activity. Inferential statistics were provided by t-tests. A probability value of < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. SETTING: NA. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: NA. INTERVENTIONS: NA. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Behavioral observations and manual scoring of polygraphic recordings showed that neostigmine produced a REM sleep-like state. EEG power analysis using Fast Fourier Transformation confirmed that pontine neostigmine caused EEG activation. Plethysmography demonstrated significantly disordered breathing. Compared to waking, pontine microinjection of neostigmine decreased respiratory rate (-64%) and minute ventilation (-75%). Pontine neostigmine significantly increased duration of inspiration (138%) and expiration (140%) above waking levels and decreased inspiratory flow (-69%). Additional studies showed that pontine neostigmine significantly depressed locomotor activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate cholinergic REM sleep enhancement in unanesthetized, intact mouse. The results encourage future studies to characterize similarities and differences in cholinergic REM sleep enhancement in additional inbred strains and in transgenic mice. Such comparisons will help characterize sleep and breathing as intermediate phenotypes that are determined, in part, by the lower level phenotype of pontine cholinergic neurotransmission.

Animals↗

Microinjection of an adenosine A1 agonist into the medial pontine reticular formation increases tail flick latency to thermal stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Both pain and the pharmacologic management of pain can cause the undesirable effect of sleep disruption. One goal of basic and clinical neuroscience is to facilitate rational drug development by identifying the brain regions and neurochemical modulators of sleep and pain. Adenosine is thought to be an endogenous sleep promoting substance and adenosinergic compounds can contribute to pain management. In the pontine brain stem adenosine promotes sleep but the effects of pontine adenosine on pain have not been studied. This study tested the hypothesis that an adenosine agonist would cause antinociception when microinjected into pontine reticular formation regions that regulate sleep. METHODS: The tail flick latency (TFL) test quantified the time in seconds for an animal to move its tail away from a thermal stimulus created by a beam of light. TFL measures were used to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-p-sulfophenyladenosine (SPA). Pontine microinjection of SPA (0.1 microg/0.25 microl, 0.88 mm) was followed by TFL measures as a function of time after drug delivery and across the sleep-wake cycle. RESULTS: Compared with saline (control), pontine administration of the adenosine agonist significantly increased latency to tail withdrawal (P < 0.0001). The increase in antinociceptive behavior evoked by the adenosine agonist SPA was blocked by pretreatment with the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 0.75 ng/0.25 microl, 10 microm). CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical data encourage additional research on the cellular mechanisms by which adenosine in the pontine reticular formation contributes to the supraspinal modulation of pain.

Analgesics↗