Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Heikki Osterman

Publications and source records attributed to Heikki Osterman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of microdiscectomy in lumbar disc herniation patients with 6 to 12 weeks of symptoms but no absolute indication for surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited evidence in favor of discectomy for prolonged symptoms of lumbar disc herniation. However, only one randomized trial has directly compared discectomy with conservative treatment. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (age range, 20-50 years) with a lumbar disc herniation, clinical findings of nerve root compression, and radicular pain lasting 6 to 12 weeks were randomized to microdiscectomy or conservative management. Fifty patients (89%) were available at the 2-year follow-up. Leg pain intensity was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences between the groups in leg or back pain intensity, subjective disability, or health-related quality of life over the 2-year follow-up, although discectomy seemed to be associated with a more rapid initial recovery. In a subgroup analysis, discectomy was superior to conservative treatment when the herniation was at L4-L5. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar microdiscectomy offered only modest short-term benefits in patients with sciatica due to disc extrusion or sequester. Spinal level of the herniation may be an important factor modifying effectiveness of surgery, but this hypothesis needs verification.

Adult↗

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

Risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy: a population-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study of patients undergoing multiple (two or more) reoperations after initial lumbar discectomy using an administrative database. OBJECTIVES: To identify the population-based risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy and to analyze factors associated with the risk. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although multiple reoperations after initial lumbar discectomy are likely uncommon, research to better understand reasons for and outcomes of reoperations is needed because of the large number of discectomies performed. METHODS: Data on all lumbar spine operations during 1987-1998 were obtained from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. The patient's initial disc operation during the study period was linked to subsequent operations, and patients with two or more reoperations were analyzed further. The risk of multiple reoperations was determined using the methods of event history analysis. RESULTS: Among 35,309 patients undergoing an initial discectomy, 4943 (14.0%) had at least one reoperation and 803 (2.3%) had two or more reoperations. A total of 63% of the second reoperations were discectomies, 14% were fusions, and the remaining 23% were decompressions. Patients with one reoperation after lumbar discectomy had a 25.1% cumulative risk of further spinal surgery in a 10-year follow-up. Reduced risk was seen when the first reoperation took place more than 1 year after the initial discectomy (relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.96), in patients for whom the first reoperation had been a fusion (relative risk 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.61), and in patients 50-64 years of age (relative risk 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.79). CONCLUSION: Patients with one reoperation after lumbar discectomy are at considerable risk of further spinal surgery.

Adult↗