Women's health initiative is fundamentally flawed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cardiovascular Diseases↗
Biomedical subjects
Harry Messmore
Publications and source records attributed to Harry Messmore.
Sudden unexpected death.
Sudden unexpected death is a major public health problem. Many cases could be prevented if they were anticipated through means of a better awareness among the medical community, new therapies based on early genetic screening, or corrected by countershock.
Adolescent↗
Biochemical and pharmacologic heterogeneity in low molecular weight heparins. Impact on the therapeutic profile.
Ever since the introduction of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) for clinical use, one of the major questions raised relates to product interchangeability and the differences between each of the individual LMWH preparations. Although differences between various commercially available products have been described in terms of molecular weight profile and biologic properties, very limited information on the direct comparison of individual products in a defined clinical setting is available at this time. European Pharmacopeia (EP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have developed guidelines to characterize these agents in terms of molecular weight and biologic profiles. On a gravimetric basis, these potency assignments differ for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities in terms of U potency per mg. The relative distribution of various molecular weight components has also been reported to vary. The oligosaccharide composition, microstructural differences in terms of specific sugars and the presence of unique structural features and the interaction with endogenous mediators such as antithrombin (AT) and heparin cofactor II (HC II) also differ. At equivalent anti-Xa levels, the amount of the anti-IIa activity and anticoagulant activity differs. Since the bioavailability and relative pharmacokinetics of the anti-Xa and anti-IIa effects are different, the specific pharmacodynamic effects of these drugs also differ. A large preclinical data base is now available on the differences between various LMWHs. However, only limited clinical data is available in the current literature. To date, the LMWHs have been primarily used for the management of post-surgical DVT. Only smaller dosages (30-40 mg or 2,500 to 4,000 anti-Xa U total dose) have been used. In these studies, because of the low dose and subcutaneous route of administration, the differences in clinical effects are rather small. Since LMWHs are now developed for therapeutic use, where relatively higher doses are used, these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic differences will become more apparent. The reported differences in the clinical efficacy of LMWHs in such indications as unstable angina may be due to their pharmacologic properties and molecular composition. There are also major differences in the non-anticoagulant actions of these agents such as their ability to interact with growth factors and antithrombotic effects. Based on the available literature, it can be concluded that each product exhibits individuality.
Anticoagulants↗
Benefit-risk assessment of treatments for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are at high risk of thrombosis and should be treated with alternative anticoagulant therapy to reduce complications. The current treatment of choice is one of the approved direct thrombin inhibitors, argatroban or lepirudin. These drugs have been proven to be safe and effective in multicentre clinical trials where dosage regimens have been established for prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis. Argatroban has also been tested and approved for use in invasive cardiology procedures in the HIT patient. Dosage regimens for other clinical uses, such as cardiac surgery, have not yet been established for either drug. The safety and effectiveness of the thrombin inhibitors is dependent on their use according to established guidelines. Other treatment options that may be effective for the patient with HIT include dextran, plasmapheresis, intravenous gammaglobulin and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Although used historically, these options have not been tested in rigorous clinical trials. For life- and limb-threatening thrombosis, thrombolytic agents and/or surgery may provide benefit. Because the risk of bleeding is high from these procedures, they should be performed only by an experienced practitioner. Several studies have shown that patients with HIT requiring continued anticoagulation are best managed with a warfarin derivative initiated while under full anticoagulation with a thrombin inhibitor. There is a risk of skin necrosis and bleeding if guidelines for dose administration and monitoring of warfarin are not followed. Subsequent use of heparin or a low molecular weight heparin after resolution of the clinical episode of HIT can be hazardous, particularly within the first 3 months. If laboratory testing is negative, heparin may be cautiously reinstituted for short-term use (1-2 hours) with monitoring for platelet count decrease and thromboembolism. The pregnant patient with HIT requiring anticoagulation represents a particular challenge, where there is no drug of choice at present. Although today there are realistic treatment options for the patient with HIT, the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease have not been eliminated. Awareness and early treatment of HIT remain important components of the clinical care for patients exposed to heparins. Future therapeutic developments based on a better understanding of the pathophysiology of HIT may further improve clinical outcomes. Despite some limitations, the current treatment options for patients with HIT provide unparalleled benefit compared with the treatment options available only a few years ago.
Animals↗
Antithrombotic agents in the treatment of severe sepsis.
Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory syndrome, is a response to infection and when associated with multiple organ dysfunction is termed severe sepsis. It remains a leading cause of mortality in the critically ill. The response to the invading microorganisms may be considered as a balance between a pro-inflammatory and an anti-inflammatory reaction. While an inadequate pro-inflammatory reaction and a strong anti-inflammatory response could lead to overwhelming infection and the death of the patient, a strong and uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response, manifested by the release of pro-inflammatory mediators may lead to microvascular thrombosis and multiple organ failure. Endotoxin triggers sepsis via the release of various mediators such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 (IL-1). These cytokines activate the complement and coagulation systems, release adhesion molecules, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. Other mediators involved in the sepsis syndrome include IL-1, -6 and -8; arachidonic acid metabolites; platelet activating factor; histamine; bradykinin; angiotensin; complement components and vasoactive intestinal peptide. These pro-inflammatory responses are counteracted by IL-10. Most of the trials targeting the different mediators of the pro-inflammatory response have failed due to a lack of correct definition of sepsis. Understanding the exact pathophysiology of the disease will enable more advanced treatment options. Targeting the coagulation system with various anticoagulant agents including, activated protein C, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is a rational approach. Many clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate these agents in severe sepsis. While trials on antithrombin and TFPI were not so successful, the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial of recombinant human activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) was successful, creating a significant decrease in mortality when compared to the placebo group. A better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanism of severe sepsis will provide better treatment options, and combination antithrombotic treatment may provide a multipronged approach for the treatment of severe sepsis.
Journal Article↗
A woman's body and her vascular system are unique. How should we care for them?
Women must now gain the phenomenal care justified by new biologic evidence and a comprehensive understanding of fundamental differences from men-that go well beyond secondary sexual characteristics.
Aortic Dissection↗