Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Zincke

Publications and source records attributed to H Zincke.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Salvage radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with recurrent cancer following radiation therapy. This study was conducted to identify predictors of survival for patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The authors studied 86 prostate carcinoma patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy for locally persistent or recurrent prostate carcinoma at Mayo Clinic between 1967 and 1996. The mean interval from radiation therapy to biopsy-proven recurrence was 3.7 years (range, 6 months to 17 years). Patient age at surgery ranged from 51 to 78 years (median, 66 years). The mean follow-up after surgery was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-15.2 years). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Actuarial distant metastasis free survival, cancer specific survival, and overall survival were 83%, 91%, and 85% at 5 years and 69%, 64%, and 54% at 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, radical prostatectomy Gleason score and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postirradiation Gleason score and DNA ploidy were highly predictive of the clinical outcomes of patients treated by salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status.

BACKGROUND: A proposed pathologic (pTNM) classification system for prostate carcinoma was analyzed for its impact on survival outcome in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era. The impact of margin status on the survival outcome of patients with otherwise organ-confined disease (i.e., without extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle involvement) was assessed. METHODS: Among 5467 patients, the original pathologic classification was T2 in 2094 patients; those with evidence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle involvement were initially classified as having pT3 disease (2920 patients) or pT4 residual disease (211 patients). According to the proposed pTNM system, 1512 patients for whom margin status was considered independent of T classification were reclassified. RESULTS: After reclassification, 803 specimens had been down-classified to pT2, resulting in 2932 (54%) with pT2N0 organ-confined disease and a margin positivity rate of 27%; originally, only 38% of patients had been classified as pT2N0. When the old and new classifications were compared, 5-year progression free survival to the combined endpoint of clinical and/or PSA progression (< or = 0.2 ng/mL) was 86% versus 84% and 70% versus 67% for disease classified as pT2N0 and pT3N0, respectively. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of margin status on 2334 pT2N0 patients (classified according to the proposed pTNM system) who did not receive adjuvant therapy; adjustments were made for Gleason grade, preoperative PSA, and DNA ploidy. In this analysis, the relative risk (with 95% confidence interval) associated with positive margins was 1.65 (1.24-2.18); this was significant for the combined endpoint of clinical/PSA progression. The 5-year survival, free of clinical/PSA progression, was 86% for those without versus 75% for those with positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the adoption of the proposed pTNM system, which will allow for uniform reporting of pathologic data on prostate carcinoma. For patients with organ-confined disease, positive margins are associated with higher rates of PSA progression. Accordingly, patients should be stratified based on margin positivity in addition to pT classification.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Long-term outcome in patients with pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of prostate treated with radical prostatectomy and early androgen ablation.

PURPOSE: We assessed retrospectively the outcome after bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy for pathological pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of the prostate when treated with or without adjuvant androgen ablation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 790 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma were found to have pTxN+ disease and treated further with or without androgen ablation therapy. Mean patient age was 64 years (range 40 to 79). Mean followup was 6.5 years, (range up to 25). Clinical stages were T2 or less in 60% of the cases, T3 in 38% and N+ in 2%. Gleason scores were 6 or less in 31% and 7 or greater in 69%. Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy was diploid in 43%, tetraploid in 39% and aneuploid in 18%. Of the patients 96 (12%) received no androgen ablation therapy, with the remainder getting androgen ablation therapy within 90 days of radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of the patients 186 (24%) died, with 109 (14%) dying of prostatic anedocarcinoma. Overall (and cause specific) survival probabilities at 5, 10 and 15 years were 87 (91), 69 (79) and 39% (60%), respectively. Patients with diploid tumors had better cause specific survival than those with nondiploid tumors (p = 0.009). Patients with diploid tumors were less likely to have progression biochemically, locally or systemically than those with nondiploid tumors (p = 0.038). Androgen ablation therapy had no effect on cause specific survival in nondiploid patients. Diploid patients treated with androgen ablation therapy for up to 10 years had no improvement in disease specific survival compared to those with no androgen ablation therapy. However, cancer death was significantly reduced after 10 years (p <0.002). The local control rate of pTxN+ cases that receive radical prostatectomy and androgen ablation therapy at 15 years is virtually identical to that of stage pT2c cases at our institution (79 +/- 3.0 versus 80% +/- 3.5%, respectively). There were no deaths secondary to radical prostatectomy, and complications were within the experience of that seen in patients with localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy with androgen ablation therapy is a viable option for patients with pTxN+ disease, particularly in view of excellent local control rates and low morbidity. Patients with diploid tumors have a more favorable outcome than those with nondiploid tumors when treated with androgen ablation therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Influence of prostate-specific antigen testing on the spectrum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends in the clinical stage and pathologic outcome of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice during the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing era. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1987 and June 1995, 5,568 patients with prostate cancer (4,774 with clinically localized disease of stage T2c or less) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution. Patient age, preoperative serum PSA level, clinical stage, pathologic stage, Gleason score, and tumor ploidy were assessed. Outcome was based on clinical and PSA (increases in PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or more) progression-free survival. RESULTS: Patient age (65 to 63 years old; P<0.001) and serum PSA level (median, 8.4 to 6.8 ng/mL; P<0.001) decreased during the study period. The percentage of patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer increased from 2.1% in 1987 to 36.4% in 1995 (P<0.001), and clinical stage T3 cancer decreased from 25.3% to 6.5% (P<0.001). Nondiploid tumors decreased from 38.3% to 24.6% (P<0.001), and the proportion of patients with pathologically organ-confined disease increased from 54.9% to 74.3% (P<0.001). More cT1c than cT2 tumors were diploid (80% versus 72%; P<0.001), had a Gleason score of 7 or less (75% versus 65%; P<0.001), and were confined to the prostate (75% versus 57%; P<0.001). Five-year progression-free survival was 85% and 76% for patients with clinical stage T1c and T2, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Since the advent of PSA testing, patients referred to our institution for radical prostatectomy have shown a significant migration to lower-stage, less-nondiploid, more often organ-confined prostate cancer at the time of initial assessment. Cancer-free survival associated with PSA-detected cancer (cT1c) is superior to that with palpable tumors (cT2). Whether these trends translate into improved long-term cancer-specific survival remains to be confirmed with longer follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Prediction of patient outcome in pathologic stage T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: lack of significance for microvessel density analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with palpable intermediate- and high-grade, margin-free, organ-confined prostate cancer experience recurrence following prostatectomy. We studied the ability of microvessel density and other factors to predict recurrence in such patients with pathologic Stage T2 cancer. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1991, 307 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for Gleason score 6 to 9, margin-free, organ-confined prostate cancer at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Specimens from 147 patients with sufficient cancer tissue for immunohistochemical staining with Factor VIII-related antigen were studied by computer-assisted digital image analysis for optimized microvessel density (OMVD). The correlation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ploidy, Gleason score, OMVD, unilateral disease, bilateral disease, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to cancer recurrence was assessed using the Cox model. Biochemical recurrence was defined as postoperative increase in PSA of greater than 0.2 ng/mL, and clinical recurrence was defined as positive biopsy or metastasis on bone scan. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for all patients was 6.1 years, with 12 deaths (1 due to prostate cancer) and 58 cases of clinical and/or biochemical recurrence. OMVD was not significantly associated with DNA ploidy, Gleason grade, unilateral disease, bilateral disease, or preoperative PSA. Preoperative PSA was the strongest predictor of clinical and/or biochemical recurrence in both univariate and multivariate analysis. OMVD was not a significant univariate or multivariate predictor of clinical and/or biochemical recurrence. The estimated relative risk of clinical and biochemical recurrence associated with a change in OMVD from the 25th percentile (OMVD 45) to the 75th percentile (OMVD 84) was 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PSA was the strongest predictor of clinical and/or biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in this group of patients. Optimized microvessel density did not predict outcome in a select cohort of patients with palpable intermediate- and high-grade, margin-free, organ-confined prostate cancer (TNM stage T2N0M0).

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Cancer volume of lymph node metastasis predicts progression in prostate cancer.

Clinical outcome is variable in prostate cancer patients with regional lymph node metastasis. We studied 269 patients who had regional lymph node metastasis at the time of radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic between January 1987 and December 1992. Two hundred fifty-three (94%) patients received androgen deprivation therapy within 90 days of radical prostatectomy. Patients ranged in age from 47 to 79 years (median, 67 years). Median follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 0.3-10.5 years). Nodal cancer volume (size) was measured by the grid-counting method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the impact of numerous clinical and pathologic findings on systemic progression-free survival. Systemic progression was defined as the presence of distant metastasis documented by biopsies or radiographic examinations (abdominal computerized tomography, plain radiographs, or bone scan). Five-year progression-free survival was 90%. In predicting systemic progression using Cox multivariate analysis, only nodal cancer volume added significantly to the model containing the primary cancer variables (Gleason score, cancer volume, and DNA ploidy). The relative hazard rate for a doubling in nodal cancer volume was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.0; p < 0.0001). Spearman rank analysis showed a correlation between nodal cancer volume and Gleason score of the primary cancer, the number of positive nodes, the aggregate length of metastases, and the largest nodal cancer diameter (correlation efficient = 0.37, 0.63, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively). Our data indicate that nodal cancer volume was the most significant nodal determinant of progression to distant metastasis in lymph node-positive prostate cancer patients. We recommend that the diameter of the largest metastasis be evaluated in patients with metastases, because this is a more powerful predictor of patient outcome than current methods, which recommend mere counting of the number of positive nodes.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Carcinosarcoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the bladder: clinicopathological study of 41 cases.

PURPOSE: Carcinosarcoma of the bladder is a rare neoplasm characterized by an intimate admixture of carcinoma and malignant soft tissue neoplasm. The clinical usefulness of separating carcinosarcoma (carcinoma with sarcomatous component) from sarcomatoid carcinoma (carcinoma with spindle cell carcinomatous component) is uncertain, and it comprises the subject of this report. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 10 men and 5 women a mean of 66 years old with carcinosarcoma, and 21 men and 5 women a mean of 66.5 years old with sarcomatoid carcinoma of the bladder, as documented in the files of the Mayo Clinic between 1936 and 1995. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients in the carcinosarcoma group 9 had urothelial carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, 3 had squamous cell carcinoma and 2 had more than 1 type. The sarcomatous component included chondrosarcoma in 3 cases, leiomyosarcoma in 3, malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 3, osteosarcoma in 2, fibrosarcoma in 1, rhabdomyosarcoma in 1 and more than 1 type in 2. All disease was high stage at presentation. Treatment included cystectomy in 11 patients with (4) and without (7) radiation therapy, and transurethral resection in 4 with (1) and without (3) radiation therapy. Mean followup available in 14 cases was 34 months (range 1 to 144). A total of 11 patients died of cancer at 1 to 48 months (mean 17.2) and 2 survived for 8 to 131 months. Of the 26 patients in the sarcomatoid carcinoma group 18 had urothelial carcinoma, 1 had squamous carcinoma, 2 had urothelial carcinoma combined with squamous cell carcinoma and 5 had spindle cells only with no recognizable epithelium. All but 1 case was high stage at diagnosis. Treatment included transurethral resection in 17 patients with (7) and without (10) radiation therapy, including 1 who also received chemotherapy, and only cystectomy in 5, including 2 who also underwent radiation therapy and 1 who also received chemotherapy. Mean followup available in 21 cases was 49 months (range 1 to 420). A total of 17 patients died of cancer at 1 to 73 months (mean 9.8), 1 was alive at 140 months and 3 died of unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Carcinosarcoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the bladder are highly aggressive malignancies with a similar outcome regardless of histological findings and treatment. Pathological stage is the best predictor of survival.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

[Adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy in prostatic carcinoma (pT3 or pTxN+): prognostic factors and results].

Adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy should ideally be limited to those patients at greatest risk for cancer recurrence, but identification of these patients remains a challenge. The local control rate in a group of 7494 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for patients with pT2a disease of 76% is not different to pN+ disease of 80%. 95% of the pT3 patients were pN+ .90% of them received adjuvant treatment but only few patients with organ-confined cancer. A prognostic scoring system was created using the regression coefficients from the Cox multivariate model to classify patients with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer according to risk of progression. Although tumor volume has traditionally been regarded as the most important prognostic factor in patients with localized prostate cancer, a recent multivariate analysis has shown that tumor volume is not an independent predictor. Moreover, accurate measurement of tumor volume is extremely difficult. Preoperative serum PSA levels, clinical stage, pathological grade and stage, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ploidy were evaluated by multivariate analysis to determine relative value in predicting treatment failure. Patients with the lowest score had a 92% progression free survival rate at 5 years, compared to only 39% of those with the highest scores. Patients believed to be at higher risk for cancer progression despite having organ confined disease might be targeted for adjuvant therapy and closer surveillance, while those at low risk may be followed less often.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1997

Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of a positive surgical margin in otherwise confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy remains unclear. We analyzed the outcome of a large number of patients with organ-confined prostate cancer according to the presence and anatomic site of margin positivity. METHODS: We evaluated 2712 prostatectomy patients with Stage pT2N0 cancer (ie, no evidence of extra-prostatic disease, seminal vesicle or regional node involvement) and no prior therapy who were treated by radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1995 at Mayo Clinic. A total of 697 patients (26%) had positive margins. To assess the effect of margin status in the absence of treatment, 378 patients with postoperative adjuvant therapy were not considered for the study group: the final group consisted of 2334 patients. RESULTS: Overall, 253 (58%) tumors were positive at the apex and/or urethra, 85 (19%) at the prostate base, 11 (2.5%) at the anterior prostate, and 174 (40%) at the posterior prostate; 89 (20%) had at least two margins involved and 21 (8.3%) had more than two involved. The apex/urethra was the only positive anatomic site in 183 (42%). Five-year survival free of clinical recurrence or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemical failure (postoperative serum PSA of 0.2 ng/mL or more) for patients with a single positive margin was 79% for apex or urethra, 78% for anterior/posterior, and 56% for prostate base. Five-year survival free of clinical recurrence or PSA (biochemical) failure was slightly higher for those with one versus two margin-positive regions (77% versus 68%, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margins were a significant predictor of clinical recurrence and PSA (biochemical) failure (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.65 [1.24, 2.18]) after controlling for Gleason grade, preoperative PSA, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ploidy. The effect of margin positivity on recurrence at a specific anatomic site (versus negative margins or positive at a different anatomic site) revealed the prostate base to be the only significant anatomic site when adjusted for grade, PSA, and ploidy. Five-year survival free of the combined clinical or PSA failure end point for those with versus those without positive margins at the prostate base was 56% versus 85%, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive surgical margins are a significant predictor of recurrence in Stage pT2N0 cancer, which is independent of grade, PSA, and DNA ploidy. The impact of positive margin status on recurrence-free survival appears to be anatomic and site-specific, with prostate base positivity significantly associated with poor outcome. The benefit of adjuvant therapy based on anatomic site-specific margin positivity remains to be tested in order to optimize recurrence-free survival.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed1997

Primary surgical therapy for clinical stage T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Radical prostatectomy has not been a widely accepted treatment option in patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer due to the potential for incomplete excision of tumor and the high incidence of lymph node metastases. In addition, the morbidity of surgical therapy in these patients has been questioned. As a result, alternative treatment modalities, including androgen ablative therapy and radiotherapy, are often used in patients with locally advanced disease. However, in terms of local disease control and long-term disease-free survival rates, most alternative treatments have serious limitations in clinical stage T3 tumors. We recently reported our extended experience with radical prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy in a large group of patients with clinical stage T3 disease and this article updates that experience. Although 31% of patients in our series had node-positive disease, 25% had pathologically organ-confined tumors likely to be cured by surgical therapy alone. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 93%, 84%, and 74%, respectively, and operative morbidity paralleled that of patients with clinically localized disease. Our experience suggests that excellent long-term survival with low treatment-related morbidity can be achieved with radical prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy in patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Preoperative androgen-deprivation therapy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.

The widespread availability of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues has renewed interest in androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radical prostatectomy. Neoadjuvant ADT in patients with clinically localized tumors has resulted in decreased margin-positive rates and increased rates of organ-confined disease. Unfortunately, the pathological effects of ADT in patients with locally advanced (cT3) prostate cancer have been less marked. This article reviews our experience with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. In a case-control study of cT3 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1985 and 1992, 72 patients receiving preoperative ADT were compared with a matched group of 144 untreated patients in terms of pathological outcome and long-term disease-free survival. A local downstaging effect in hormonally treated patients was suggested by lower rates of extracapsular extension, but only 31% had organ-confined disease. Hormonally treated patients showed no benefit in survival or disease progression compared with patients who did not receive this therapy. Although preoperative ADT may decrease the incidence of extracapsular extension in clinical stage T3 prostate cancer, our data suggest that it has no significant effect on survival or disease progression in patients with locally advanced disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with seminal vesicle invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify pretherapy factors associated with seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate (CaP), and to develop a model that would allow estimation of the likelihood for SVI at the time of initial diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1988 and December 1993, 2959 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy, with or without pelvic lymph node dissection, as initial therapy for clinical Stage T1a-3bN0-XM0 CaP. Preoperative patient and tumor-related characteristics were evaluated for an association with SVI in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A model was developed and probability plots were constructed to display the estimated likelihood for SVI in the patients with a new diagnosis of localized CaP. RESULTS: Within clinical tumor stage, three groups (T1a-2a, T2b-c, and T3a-b) were observed to have a distinctly different rate of SVI. Gleason primary grades were combined (1-2, 3 and 4-5) because of a similar observation. Univariate analysis identified clinical tumor stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason primary grade (p < 0.0001), and serum prostate-specific antigen level (p < 0.0001) as factors associated with the likelihood for SVI. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent significance (p = 0.0001) of each of these factors. Patient age (p = 0.16) and history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (p = 0.82) were not associated with this end point. Probability plots were constructed to display the likelihood of SVI as a function of pretherapy clinical tumor stage, Gleason primary grade, and serum prostate-specific antigen value. CONCLUSION: In the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP, clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, diagnostic biopsy tumor (Gleason primary) grade, and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value were significant factors for development of a model that estimated the likelihood of SVI. Estimates from this type of model may be of value in the pretherapy diagnostic evaluation of such patients, and may aid in the administration of radiation therapy.

Adult↗