Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Zeidler

Publications and source records attributed to H Zeidler.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Epidemiology, manifestations and complications of chronic polyarthritis].

Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory systemic disease mainly affecting the joints. Frequent extra-articular manifestations are often recognized too late. Particularly the skin, the cardiovascular system, the kidneys, the eyes, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, the nervous system and the blood may be involved. Examples of important complications affecting different organs are bacterial infections, AA-amyloidosis and hyperviscosity syndrome. Current data on the different disease manifestations and complications provide the basis for the assessment of the morbidity and mortality relevant for insurance purposes.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed1999

[Spondylarthritis].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1999

Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial.

OBJECTIVE: To consider the relevance of the duration of a clinical trial in ankylosing spondylitis: long-term (i.e. 1 yr) vs short-term (i.e. 6 weeks) assessment of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-placebo controlled study. METHODS: The design was a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 6 weeks duration with a 12 months double-blind extension. Study drugs were placebo (n = 121) or active NSAID (n = 352). A decrease of at least 50% in pain and/or global assessment and/or functional impairment during the study defined the response to treatment. The percentage of patients discontinuing the study drug over time (life table analysis) permitted the evaluation of both the efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS: Among the 473 recruited patients, the percentage of responders was similar at 1 yr and week 6 with a highly statistically significant difference in favour of the active NSAID groups when compared to placebo (at 1 yr, 17% in the placebo group vs 37, 50 and 43% in the piroxicam 20 mg, meloxicam 15 mg and meloxicam 22.5 mg, respectively, for the patient's overall assessment) without any statistically significant difference between the three active groups. However, evaluation of the patients discontinuing the study drug during the 1 yr of the study permitted the detection of a statistically significant difference between the active NSAID groups. A lower percentage of patients taking meloxicam 22.5 mg had to discontinue the study drug when compared to either meloxicam 15 mg or piroxicam 20 mg (37% vs 53% and 53%, respectively, P < 0.05). By 52 weeks, drug-related upper gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 13, 32, 20 and 18% in the placebo, piroxicam 20 mg, meloxicam 15 mg and meloxicam 22.5 mg groups, respectively. Some of the adverse events occurred only after week 6. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a 1 yr trial might be of optimum value compared to a 6 week assessment in order to define better the efficacy and tolerability of NSAIDs in ankylosing spondylitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Interpreting the clinical significance of the differential inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2.

The International Consensus Meeting on the Mode of Action of COX-2 Inhibition (ICMMAC) brought together 17 international experts in arthritis, gastroenterology and pharmacology on 5 6 December 1997. The meeting was convened to provide a definition of COX-2 specificity and to consider the clinical relevance of COX-2-specific agents. These compounds are a new class of drugs that specifically inhibit the enzyme COX-2 while having no effect on COX-1 across the whole therapeutic dose range. The objectives of the meeting were to review the currently available data regarding the roles and biology of COX-1 and COX-2, and to foster a consensus definition on COX-2 specificity. At the present time, no guidelines exist for the in vitro and in vivo assessment of COX specificity, and it was felt that consensus discussion might clarify some of these issues. The meeting also reviewed recent clinical data on COX-2-specific inhibitors. The following article reflects discussion at this meeting and provides a consensus definition of COX-2-specific inhibitors.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1999

Defining disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: is a combination of variables (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) an appropriate instrument?

OBJECTIVE: Disease activity has been defined using a self-administered instrument, focusing on fatigue, axial pain, peripheral pain, enthesopathy and morning stiffness [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)]. This validated instrument is simple and takes 40 s to complete, but whether the index is an accurate expression of the component parts, or whether additional weighting would enhance its efficacy, is unclear. METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-three patients with ankylosing spondylitis received placebo or active non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for 6 weeks, and changes between entry and completion were captured by BASDAI and the individual components. Principle component analysis (PCA) was used to explore the best combinations of variables in decreasing order of explained total dispersion and to assess whether a single sum (or algebraic expression) best defined disease activity status. RESULTS: At entry, the correlation between BASDAI and the first axis was 0.99, 0.11 with the second, and zero thereafter. Data at study end and relating to change revealed a 100% correlation (R = 1) between the first axis and the sum, with zero for the remainder. CONCLUSIONS: The data support BASDAI as being a valid and appropriate composite to define disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. Developed as a simple sum of its components, BASDAI has excellent content validity.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Optimised sample preparation of synovial fluid for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by polymerase chain reaction.

OBJECTIVE: To optimise sample preparation of synovial fluid for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: Serial dilutions of purified CT elementary bodies in synovial fluid were prepared. The synovial fluid pellet was processed by eight different methods of sample preparation. Then samples were analysed by CT specific PCR. The sensitivity of PCR was the basis of ranking of the eight different methods. RESULTS: Highest sensitivity was achieved by methods including an additional step of DNA isolation. Additional extraction of protein and polysaccharides by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) increased sensitivity. Addition of hyaluronidase did not increase sensitivity of QIAEX-DNA extraction but was necessary, however, before phenol-chloroform-DNA extraction. CONCLUSIONS: The method of synovial fluid sample preparation significantly influences the sensitivity of subsequent PCR. Additional DNA isolation and extraction of PCR inhibitors by CTAB led to higher sensitivity.

Cetrimonium↗
PubMed1999

Combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, controlled, double blind 52 week clinical trial of sulphasalazine and methotrexate compared with the single components.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a combination therapy. METHODS: 205 patients fulfilling the ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not treated with disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs previously, with an early (< or = 1 year duration), active (Disease Activity Score (DAS) > 3.0), rheumatoid factor and/or HLA DR 1/4 positive disease were randomised between sulphasalazine (SASP) 2000 (maximum 3000) mg daily (n = 68), or methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 (maximum 15) mg weekly (n = 69) or the combination (SASP + MTX) of both (n = 68). RESULTS: The mean changes in the DAS during the one year follow up of the study was -1.15, -0.87, -1.26 in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively (p = 0.019). However, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of either EULAR good responders 34%, 38%, 38% or ACR criteria responders 59%, 59%, 65% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively. Radiological progression evaluated by the modified Sharp score was very modest in the three groups: mean changes in erosion score: +2.4, +2.4, +1.9, in narrowing score: +2.3, +2.1, +1.6 and in total damage score: +4.6, +4.5, +3.5, in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SASP + MTX group 91% versus 75% in the SASP and MTX group (p = 0.025). Nausea was the most frequent side effect: 32%, 23%, 49% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that an early initiation therapy of disease modifying drug seems to be of benefit. However, this study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant superiority of the combination therapy although several outcomes were in favour of this observation. The tolerability of the three treatment modalities seems acceptable.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Diagnostic evaluation of classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and reactive arthritis in an early synovitis outpatient clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and reactive arthritis (ReA) in an early synovitis outpatient clinic. METHODS: In a prospective two year survey consecutive patients with early synovitis of less than one year duration were documented using a standardised registry and were classified after an expert diagnosis. Of a total of 320 patients 39 (19%) were diagnosed as having RA, 24 (11%) patients had ReA, 117 (54%) patients did not have an unequivocal diagnosis, and were considered as undifferentiated arthritis. RESULTS: The retrospective application of the revised 1987 ACR criteria for the classification of RA in this data set revealed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%. The positive predictive value was 0.67, the negative predictive value 0.98. Similarly, the criteria for ReA of the French Society of Rheumatology (FSR) showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 90% with a positive predictive value of 0.55 and a negative predictive value of 0.97. Both criteria sets had a satisfying likelihood ratio of 9 and 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both the 1987 ACR criteria for RA and the criteria of the FSR for ReA have a reasonable diagnostic validity in patients with early synovitis, including a large portion of undifferentiated arthritis.

Arthritis, Reactive↗
PubMed1999

Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in axial involvement of ankylosing spondylitis.

To evaluate C-reactive protein (CRP) as a potential useful criterion of symptomatic severity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), we conducted both a cross sectional and a longitudinal (6 week) clinical study in 443 patients with axial involvement in AS. During the 6 weeks of the study, patients received either a placebo or an active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). At baseline, CRP was increased in 173 patients (39%). A multivariate analysis in which CRP was the dependent variable and all clinical assessment criteria (pain, range of motion, functional disability, hemoglobin, platelet count) the independent variables showed that range of motion and laboratory signs of inflammation were the most significant variables to explain the CRP values. A similar multivariate analysis conducted on the changes in the variables during the 6 weeks of the study concluded that night pain and laboratory signs of inflammation were the most significant variables explaining the changes in CRP values. The capacity of CRP to discriminate between an active NSAID and a placebo was moderate. This study suggests than an increase in CRP in patients with AS with axial involvement is not a rare phenomenon and might be correlated with the clinical severity of the disease. This outcome measure does not seem to be of great interest in the short term evaluation of fast acting drugs. However, the longterm clinical significance of such an increase in CRP remains to be investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Outcome variables in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of their relevance and discriminant capacity.

The clinical status of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can be defined by several domains (e.g., pain, function, metrology, laboratory) and subcomponents within each domain (e.g., pain using visual analog scale, Schober's within metrology). Our aim was (1) To define groups of highly correlated variables in order to determine the most relevant; and (2) to evaluate the capacity of different clinical and biological variables that best discriminate between placebo and active nonsteroidal drugs in AS. Patients with active AS (n=423) were followed prospectively over 6 weeks while receiving placebo (n=121) or active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (n=352). Eighteen variables were studied, including global assessment, pain, stiffness, functional indices, metrology, disease activity index, and laboratory markers. Statistics included (1) Evaluation of the relevance of the different domains by multivariate analysis (CART tree-structure classification; variable clustering); and (2) evaluation of the discriminant capacity by univariate analysis [i.e., differences in the standardized response mean (SRM) (mean change/SD) between placebo and active drug. A value > or =0.60 was considered relevant]. Four clusters were identified (patient's subjective perception, inflammatory symptoms, metrology, laboratory data) with multiple correlation R2 revealing the most relevant variables to be the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI; 0.75), night pain (0.62), Schober's test (0.58), and platelet count (0.55), respectively, within each cluster. In terms of discriminant power (SRM) the patient perceived global status (0.84), lumbar pain (0.73), night pain (0.71), physician global assessment (0.66), and BASFI (0.65) were most relevant in the univariate analysis. Among the 4 most relevant domains are subjective perception, inflammatory symptoms, metrology, and laboratory. Multivariate analysis of the data reveals that the spinal pain and the patient global assessment are the variables that best discriminate between placebo and active nonsteroidal drug in short term studies.

Adult↗