Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Wulf

Publications and source records attributed to H Wulf.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Practice of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a German survey.

Epidural analgesia is one of the preferred methods of analgesia for labour. The aim of the present survey was to evaluate current practice in obstetric analgesia in departments of anaesthesia and to make a comparison with former surveys from Germany and other countries. Questionnaires on the practice of pain relief, especially epidural analgesia, during labour and delivery were sent to 1178 anaesthetic departments in Germany in the second half of 1996. Five hundred and thirty-two completed replies were received, which represent 46.9% of all German obstetric units. The majority of the departments of anaesthesia practising epidural analgesia have an epidural rate of less than 10% and 10.2% of the departments do not offer this method to their parturients. In 86.8% of all units performing epidural analgesia, the epidural catheter is placed by an anaesthetist. Only 6.5% of the units provide a 24-h epidural service which is exclusively assigned to labour and delivery. In 77.8% of the units, this service is not exclusively assigned to obstetrics, but also to other duties. Of the obstetric units offering epidural analgesia, 14.7% have no epidural service at night. Plain local anaesthetics for epidural analgesia are used by 55.9% of the departments, a combination of local anaesthetics with epidural opioids by 28.7%. Epidural analgesia is predominantly (82.2%) maintained by intermittent bolus administration. Although the rate of epidural analgesia increased during recent decades, this method is not offered to all parturients. Further improvements in the use of epidural analgesia for labour seem to be necessary.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1999

Ropivacaine epidural anesthesia and analgesia versus general anesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in the perioperative management of hip replacement. Ropivacaine Hip Replacement Multicenter Study Group.

UNLABELLED: The aim of our study was to compare epidural anesthesia and analgesia (EDA) with ropivacaine versus general anesthesia followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (GA/PCA) after hip replacement regarding pain, side effects, and discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. After ethics committee approval, randomization, and informed consent, 90 patients were enrolled. In Group EDA, epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 10 mg/mL, 15-25 mL) was followed by an epidural infusion (2 mg/mL, 4-6 mL/h for 24 h, plus top-up doses of 6-10 mL for 48 h). GA/PCA patients received general anesthesia (isoflurane/N2O/fentanyl) followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine postoperatively. Pain was assessed by using visual analog scales (0-100 mm) at rest and during physiotherapy. Pain at rest was less in the EDA (n = 43) group than in the GA/PCA (n = 45) group (at 10 h: 11.8+/-12.9 vs. 28.4+/-17.1 [P< 0.001]; at 24 h: 14.3+/-11.7 vs. 24.0+/-17 [P<0.01]; in 48 h: 14.3+/-9.3 vs. 21.1+/-17.4 [P = 0.1]). Whereas EDA patients were deemed ready for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit earlier than GA/PCA patients (5.6+/-8.9 vs. 39.7+/-41.5 min), the actual discharge time was comparable. The median time for first passage of flatus was shorter in the EDA group than in the GA/PCA group (26 vs. 47 h). Nausea and vomiting were more common in the GA/PCA group than in the EDA group (16% vs. 28% and 11% vs. 22%, respectively), whereas hypotension (11% vs. 4%) and bradycardia (14% vs. 2%) were less frequent. Under the conditions of the present study, EDA with ropivacaine provided pain control after hip replacement superior to that provided by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, particularly during the first 24 h. Both approaches to pain management were equally safe. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with general anesthesia and postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, epidural anesthesia and analgesia with the new local anesthetic ropivacaine enables patients to be discharged sooner from a postanesthesia care unit and provides superior pain relief during the first 24 h after hip replacement.

Amides↗
PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, or 7.5 mg/mL after ilioinguinal blockade for inguinal hernia repair in adults.

UNLABELLED: The aim of our study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ropivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric blocks (IIB). After ethics committee approval and informed consent, 80 male adults scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were enrolled and randomized into four groups. After induction of general anesthesia, an IIB was performed double blinded in Groups 1, 2, and 3 with 0.25 mL/kg ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, or 7.5 mg/mL and with saline in the Control group. Plasma concentration of ropivacaine was determined in venous blood using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. IIB with ropivacaine resulted in peak plasma concentrations of 0.3+/-0.15 microg/mL (Group 1) (mean +/- SD), 0.75+/-0.45 microg/mL (Group 2), or 1.57+/-0.82 microg/mL (Group 3). These concentrations occurred after 30 (15-60) min, median (range), 30 (10-60) min, and 45 (15-60) min, in the respective groups. Three of 19 patients in Group 1, 6 of 18 in Group 2, and 5 of 20 in Group 3 did not need any additional analgesics within 24 h postoperatively, but all 20 control patients did. Time to the first demand for analgesia was significantly shorter in the Control group (median 0.3 h [range 0-2.8]) compared with 1.5 h (0.5-24 h), 2 h (0.5-24 h), and 2 h (1.0-24 h) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three patients in Group 3 had a postoperative motor block of the femoral nerve. In conclusion, a ropivacaine dose of 0.25 mL/kg of 5 mg/mL seems adequate for IIB accompanying general anesthesia for postoperative pain relief. However, the pharmacokinetic results obtained suggest that even larger doses (0.25 mL/kg of 7.5 mg/mL ropivacaine) for IIB do not result in plasma concentrations in a toxic range. IMPLICATIONS: Ropivacaine, a new local anesthetic, proved to be effective for pain relief after hernia repair in ilioinguinal blocks accompanying general anesthesia. Plasma concentrations peaked after 30-45 min, and were within safe limits after application of 0.25 mL/kg of 2, 5, or 7.5 mg/mL ropivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Surveys on the use of regional anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Regional anaesthetic techniques in obstetrics have gained more and more importance during the last few years. Several surveys published recently show a remarkable increase in caesarean sections performed under regional anaesthesia, in many countries. Furthermore, epidural analgesia has proved to be one of the most effective methods of pain relief during vaginal delivery. Especially in patients at risk of an abdominal delivery, an epidural catheter already in place during labour can be used for consecutive caesarean section without delay and is used as a strong argument in favour of epidural anaesthesia. This article gives an overview of recent surveys of regional anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.

PURPOSE: To determine the magnitude of the potentiation of rocuronium by desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane 1.5 MAC anaesthesia. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, study in 80 patients, the cumulative dose-effect curves for rocuronium were determined during anaesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane (with N2O 70%, 15 min steady state) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography (TOF-Guard) after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve (2 Hz every 12 sec, 200 microseconds duration). Rocuronium was administered in increments of 100 micrograms.kg-1 until first twitch (T1) depression > 95%. RESULTS: Rocuronium led to more pronounced T1 depression with desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia than with TIVA. The ED50 and ED95 were lower during desflurane (95 +/- 25 and 190 +/- 80 micrograms.kg-1) and sevoflurane (120 +/- 30 and 210 +/- 40 micrograms.kg-1) than with TIVA (150 +/- 40 and 310 +/- 90 micrograms.kg-1) (P < .01), while the difference was not significant for isoflurane (130 +/- 40 and 250 +/- 90 micrograms.kg-1). Following equi-effective dosing (T1 > 95%) the duration to 25% T1 recovery, recovery index (25/75), and TOF0.70 was: 13.2 +/- 1.8, 12.7 +/- 3.4, and 26.9 +/- 5.7 min during anaesthesia with desflurane; 15.5 +/- 5.0, 11.4 +/- 3.8, and 31.0 +/- 6.0 min with sevoflurane; 13.9 +/- 4.7, 10.7 +/- 3.3, and 26.3 +/- 8.9 min with isoflurane; and 13.9 +/- 3.9, 11.3 +/- 5.7, and 27.5 +/- 8.2 min with TIVA anaesthesia (P: NS). CONCLUSION: Interaction of rocuronium and volatile anaesthetics resulted in augmentation of the intensity of neuromuscular block but did not result in significant effects on duration of or recovery from the block.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Current practices in anesthesia for cesarean section in german university clinics. Results of a survey in the year 1996].

UNLABELLED: Obviously there is a world-wide trend towards regional anaesthesia for caesarean section (CS). Data on the current practice in Germany are lacking. METHODS: In 1996 questionnaires on obstetric anaesthesia were mailed to all University departments of anaesthesia. RESULTS: All 38 University Hospitals with obstetric units replied (100%). Mean annual delivery rate was 1156 with a mean CS-rate of 24%. For scheduled CS the University departments used general anaesthesia in most cases (60%), followed by epidural (31%) and spinal anaesthesia (9%). General anaesthesia was predominantly used for more urgent (87%) or emergency deliveries (99%). Spinal anaesthesia was offered to patients as an option of anaesthesia for CS in 16 of 38 departments, epidural anaesthesia in 36 of 38. The majority of university hospitals (22 of 38) performed more than 25% of their CS in epidural anaesthesia; 14 departments had a ratio of at least 50% of regional anaesthesia. 28 of 32 centres administered some kind of acid aspiration chemoprophylaxis as a routine management. Special devices for the management of a difficult airway were provided in 61% of the hospitals within the delivery unit. In 70% the anaesthesiologist was responsible for the postoperative pain management following CS. CONCLUSION: A significant trend towards regional anaesthesia for CS has taken place in German university hospitals: According to a former survey regional anaesthesia was used in less than 10% of CS in 1977, whereas in the current evaluation from 1996 this figure was significantly higher (40%). Nevertheless, compared to other countries the rate of general anaesthesia still is rather high.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1998

[Eduard C. H. von Siebold: "The use of sulfur ether vapor in obstetrics" (1847). A contribution to the beginning of modern obstetric analgesia and anesthesia in Germany].

In 1847 J.Y. Simpson in Scotland was the first to describe the administration of ether for analgesia in painful deliveries. Only a few days later E.C.J. von Siebold (1801 in Würzburg-1861 in Göttingen) performed the first systematic study on ether in obstetrics. Following a preceding evaluation of the action of ether on non-pregnant woman and on pregnant women not in active labour, he administered ether for analgesia during the second stage of labour in eight parturients. The first administration was on February 25th 1847. While he was satisfied with the good analgesia without sequelae of the new-born, he was discouraged by the termination of uterine contractions observed in all his patients. He concluded that ether was not a useful substance for analgesia during vaginal delivery, since it disturbed the natural course of labour. On the other hand, von Siebold was very pleased with the administration of ether for operative obstetric procedures such as forceps deliveries or placental retention.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1998

[Epidural analgesia in postoperative pain therapy. A review].

This review highlights the advantages of regional anaesthesia techniques, especially of epidural analgesia, for the management of postoperative and posttraumatic pain: excellent pain relief and a high degree of patient satisfaction, even compared to the gold standard of acute pain therapy, i.v. PCA with opioids. Further advantages of epidural analgesia (EA) are discussed, such as early recovery of gastrointestinal function, reduction of postoperative respiratory complications, lower incidence of myocardial ischema, better mobilisation, reduced risk of thromboembolism, lower incidence of chronic pain problems (such as phantom limb pain) etc. Nevertheless, many studies failed to show significant effects on outcome (e.g. mortality). Weighing the risks, costs and benefits of EA, this technique is indicated in case of significant postoperative pain, especially in case of painful mobilisation, in patients with significant pulmonary risk factors (ASA 3 or IV), in patients where an improved perfusion or gastrointestinal motility is deemed essential, and if chronic pain syndromes are common problems that should be prevented (e.g., amputation). For the praxis of epidural analgesia it is emphasised to place the catheter in an appropriate segment to obtain sufficient analgesia without side effects. Organisational structures (such as an acute pain service) and appropriate monitoring allow to continue EA with local anaesthetics and/or opioids on surgical wards. Recommendations are given for the monitoring of EA on surgical wards. Clear cut agreements should define the role of anaesthesiologists, surgeons and nurses in the management of patients treated with postoperative EA on surgical wards.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1998

[Current practices in obstetrical analgesia in German university clinics. Results of a 1996 survey. Part 2].

UNLABELLED: Obviously there is a world-wide trend towards regional analgesia for pain relief during delivery. Data on the current practice in Germany are lacking. METHODS: In 1996 questionnaires on obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia were mailed to all university departments of anaesthesia. RESULTS: All 38 university hospitals with obstetric units replied (100%). Mean annual delivery rate was 1156. Epidural analgesia (EA) (n = 22), intramuscular injection of opioids (n = 18), and non-opioids as a suppository (n = 17) were often used for pain relief during labour. Intravenous injections (n = 12) or pudendus anaesthesia (n = 7) were practised as well. Entonox (N2O/O2), paracervical blocks or transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) was rarely used. EA for relief of labour pain was offered in all university hospitals. Twelve of them had an epidural rate of less than 10%, in nine the rate was 10-19%, in eight hospitals 20-29% and 30% or more in nine. Indication for EA was a demand by the parturient (n = 34), by the obstetrician (n = 26) or the midwife (n = 18), predominantly because of prolonged labour (n = 32) or significant pain (n = 21). Half of the university departments used an epidural combination of local anaesthetics (bupivacaine) and opioids (sufentanil (n = 12) and/or fentanyl (n = 9)). In all but one department the application of an epidural catheter was performed by anaesthesiologists exclusively. In some hospitals obstetricians (n = 10) or midwives (n = 4) were allowed to give epidural top-up injections. Of the 38 university departments 11 had an anaesthesiologists on duty 24 h a day responsible for the obstetric unit exclusively. CONCLUSION: In 1977, 14 of 18 university departments of anaesthesiology offered epidural analgesia for parturients. This option was available in all university departments in 1996. A mean rate of 10-20% epidurals for vaginal delivery is well within the limits reported from other countries, whereas the rate of regional anaesthesia for scheduled caesarean section (40%) still is rather low in Germany, as reported in part 1 of this survey (Anaesthesist 1998;47:59-63).

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Augmentation of the neuromuscular blocking effects of cisatracurium during desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane or total i.v. anaesthesia.

We have evaluated the enhancement of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block by potent inhalation anaesthetic agents, by constructing dose-effect curves for cisatracurium in 84 patients during anaesthesia with 1.5 MAC (70% nitrous oxide) desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane or total i.v. anaesthesia (TIVA). Acceleromyography (TOF-Guard) and train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were used (2 Hz every 12 s). Cisatracurium was administered in increments of 15 micrograms kg-1 until depression of T1/T0 > 95% was reached. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2). Depression of T1/T0 during potent inhalation anaesthesia was enhanced compared with TIVA. ED50 and ED95 values of cisatracurium were 15 (SD 5) and 34 (10) micrograms kg-1 for desflurane; 15 (4) and 32 (7) micrograms kg-1 for sevoflurane; and 15 (5) and 33 (9) micrograms kg-1 for isoflurane. These were significantly lower than the values for TIVA (21 (4) and 51 (13) micrograms kg-1) (P < 0.01 in each case). After equi-effective dosing, times to T1/T0 = 25% were similar in all groups (19 (7), 19 (5), 20 (5) vs 16 (4) min). Recovery index25-75% and time to a TOF ration of 0.70 were prolonged significantly by desflurane and sevoflurane compared with TIVA (18 (5), 19 (8) vs 12 (4) min and 43 (11), 44 (10) vs 35 (5) min, respectively), whereas the difference was not significant for isoflurane (14 (6) and 41 (7) min).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Anaesthesia for caesarean section--a German survey.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthetic practice for caesarean section has changed during the last decades. There is a world-wide shift in obstetric anaesthetic practice in favour of regional anaesthesia. Current data concerning anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing caesarean section from Germany are not available. A comparison with figures from the UK, USA, Norway and other European countries might be of general interest. METHODS: Questionnaires on the practice of anaesthesia for caesarean section and anaesthetic coverage of the obstetric units were sent to 1178 university, tertiary care, district, community and private hospitals in Germany. RESULTS: The 532 completed replies of this survey represent 46.9% of the German obstetric units. Most hospitals (42.3%) have delivery rates between 500 and 1000 per year. General anaesthesia is the most common anaesthetic technique for elective (61%), urgent (83%) and emergency caesarean section (98%). Epidural anaesthesia is performed in 23% of scheduled and 5% of non-scheduled caesarean sections, and spinal anaesthesia in 14% and 10% respectively. Acid aspiration prophylaxis before elective caesarean section is used in 68.7% of the departments. The majority of the departments provide a 24-hour anaesthetic coverage; however, in only 6.2% of the units, this service is assigned to obstetric anaesthesia, exclusively. CONCLUSION: Compared to data from 1978, anaesthetic practice for caesarean section has changed with an increase in regional anaesthesia. However, German anaesthetists prefer general anaesthesia for caesarean section. In contrast, anaesthetists in other countries predominantly use regional techniques, and the difference to German practice is striking. International consensus discussion and recommendations as well as comparable European instruments of quality control in obstetric anaesthesia are desirable.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗