Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H W Reesink

Publications and source records attributed to H W Reesink.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

New strip immunoblot for the confirmation of HTLV-I/II infection.

In The Netherlands, anti-human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) blood donor screening became mandatory in January 1993. Donations reactive in the enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test are confirmed with Western blot analysis (WB). Only WB-positive or indeterminate blood donors are notified and retested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [1]. In accumulated data of the Dutch Blood Banks, only 2% of donors repeatedly positive in the anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA were WB-positive and all of these were also PCR-positive. However, 75% of the ELISA-positive blood donors have indeterminate WB results. In these cases the ELISA reactivities are nonspecific since all WB-indeterminate donors are negative in PCR [2]. Current WB confirmation thus leads to the notification and often to the deferral of many WB-indeterminate blood donors as well as to high costs for PCR testing, illustrating the need for a more specific serological confirmatory assay. The aim of our study was to evaluate a newly developed anti-HTLV-I/II Recombinant Immunoblot Assay (RIBA) to confirm samples reactive to screening tests with a special emphasis on the ability of this test to resolve WB-indeterminate results in blood donors, without compromising the sensitivity.

Blotting, Western↗

Look-back study of infectivity of anti-HCV ELISA-positive blood components.

The infectivity of blood components from donors who were later found to be anti-HCV ELISA-positive was investigated in recipients who were enrolled in a look-back programme. Recipients received ELISA-positive blood components from donors who were PCR-positive and/or RIBA-2-positive (n = 22, group A) or PCR-negative and indeterminate or negative on RIBA-2 (n = 105, group B). 26 of 32 (81%) recipients of group A donors and none of 140 of group B were HCV-infected. All stored serum samples of previous donations (n = 172) of group A donors were anti-HCV-positive in RIBA-3, indicating a chronic carrier state of HCV in these donors.

Blood Donors↗

Hepatitis C infection and viremia in Dutch hemophilia patients.

Serum samples from 316 patients visiting the Dutch National Hemophilia Center were collected from 1979 to 1993 and stored at -30 degrees C. Patients were placed into three different groups: 1) patients ever treated with large pool non-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-safe concentrate (n = 179); 2) patients treated with cryoprecipitate (n = 125); and 3) patients treated exclusively with HCV-save concentrate (n = 12). In order to examine the prevalence of HCV infection in the different treatment groups serum samples were tested retrospectively for anti-HCV antibody using second generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2). Significant differences in the prevalence of HCV infection were found between these 3 groups (group 1: 99%, group 2: 66%, group 3: 0%). The safety of currently administered clotting products is demonstrated in 57 patients who remained without HCV markers between 1989 and 1993. To examine the natural course of HCV infection fresh-frozen plasma samples were obtained recently from a subgroup of 277 hemophilia patients for HCV-RNA detection by a well-validated cDNA-PCR assay. In contrast to other reports, no evidence was found for seronegative HCV carriers. None of 52 patients without anti-HCV had detectable HCV-RNA. Of 225 patients with anti-HCV, 182 (81%) were HCV-RNA positive. None of 39 anti-HCV positive patients with a negative HCV-RNA reaction had serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels above 50 U/l, whereas 44% of HCV-RNA positive patients had persistently elevated ATL levels above 50 U/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alanine Transaminase↗

Detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma by isothermal amplification (NASBA) irrespective of the stage of HIV-1 infection.

Using an experimental assay for isothermal amplification of HIV RNA in plasma (NASBA, Organon Teknika, Boxtel, The Netherlands), 70 samples from 59 HIV-1-infected persons and 29 samples from 28 uninfected volunteer blood donors were tested for the presence of HIV-1 RNA. The HIV-1-positive plasma samples were drawn from patients at various stages of infection: two samples from persons with signs of acute HIV infection (CDC stage I); 29 samples from 25 symptom-free persons (CDC stage II) and 39 samples from 32 persons with AIDS-related symptoms (CDC stage IV). All samples from HIV-1-infected persons had HIV-1 RNA, irrespective of the stage of infection (100% sensitivity). Testing the donor samples in duplicate, initially 54/58 samples (93%) tested negative for HIV-1 RNA. Repeated testing of the 4 samples with inconsistent test results showed all samples to be negative (specificity 100%). Detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma by isothermal amplification (NASBA) promises to be a valuable alternative to the detection of HIV-1 RNA or DNA by the polymerase chain reaction.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

BACKGROUND: Third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are now implemented in most laboratories in Europe, but have not yet been fully implemented in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two ELISAs (Ortho 3.0 and Ortho 2.0, Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) were compared by tests on various serum panels: A) blood donor samples (n = 530) that tested positive in first- or second-generation anti-HCV ELISA; B) samples from persons with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (n = 185); C) samples from multiply transfused patients (n = 79); D) samples from patients on hemodialysis (n = 473); and E) samples from Dutch random blood donors (n = 2153). RESULTS: In panels A, B, and C, 247 (100%) of 247 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive and 278 (100%) of 278 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-positive specimens were detected by Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 (sensitivity, 100%). In the sera of panel D, used to represent a group of patients with a high risk for HCV, no additional positives were found by Ortho 3.0. In panel E, of 2153 blood donor samples, 2 (0.1%) were positive in Ortho 2.0 and 8 (0.4%) in Ortho 3.0. Two samples that were positive in both Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 were also positive in RIBA-2; one was positive on PCR. From the 6 remaining Ortho 3.0-positive (Ortho 2.0-negative) samples, 1 was positive in RIBA-2 (isolated anti-c100) and 3 were positive in third-generation RIBA (1/3 isolated anti-c100, 2/3 isolated NS5). All 6 samples were PCR negative. In first-time donors, no difference in specificity was found. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the Ortho 3.0 ELISA are comparable to those of the Ortho 2.0 ELISA.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay↗

Reliability of the third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay for hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: In a confirmatory laboratory, the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) was replaced by the third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3) in March 1993. The aim of this validation study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 in a routine setting, by using a validated hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA polymerase chain reaction to establish plasma viremia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RIBA-2 testing was performed (March 1991-March 1993) in 593 HCV RNA-positive and 1498 HCV RNA-negative subjects. RIBA-3 testing was performed (March 1993-May 1994) in 220 HCV RNA-positive and 530 HCV RNA-negative subjects. All samples reacted for anti-HCV in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In HCV RNA-positive individuals, the sensitivity of RIBA-3 was significantly higher than that of RIBA-2 (99.5% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.0005). This was not caused by inclusion of the NS5 antigen, but by a higher sensitivity of the antigens c33 and c100 (RIBA-2: 94.3% and 62.6%; RIBA-3: 99.5% and 88.6%). Replacement of the c22 and c100 recombinant proteins by synthetic peptides significantly reduced nonspecific reactivity against these antigens (p < 0.0001). Unfortunately, increased nonspecific reactivity against the modified c33 antigen and the new NS5 antigen canceled out this effect. Two-band reactivity occurred more often in nonviremic persons than in viremic persons (32.7% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.0001). Risk factors for HCV infection were less frequently observed in 11 blood donors with two-band reactivity than in 6 blood donors with other positive RIBA-3 patterns (18% vs. 83%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The higher sensitivity of RIBA-3 significantly reduced the number of indeterminate test results in HCV RNA-positive persons. Confirmatory laboratories must be aware of the frequent occurrence of nonspecific, isolated reactivity and even nonspecific, two-band reactivity in anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-reactive blood donors.

Hepacivirus↗

Evaluation of a combined lysate/recombinant antigen anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA in high and low endemic areas of HTLV-I/II infection.

The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA (Murex Diagnostics) was evaluated in 7800 samples of various serum panels. Repeat activity was found by Wellcozyme in (A) 1/2181 (0.05%) Dutch blood donors, (B) 44/3036 (1.4%) Curaçao (Caribbean area) blood donors, (C) 46/2533 (1.8%) individuals of different Ethiopian population subsets, (D) 30/30 (100%) confirmed anti-HTLV-I positive samples and (E) 20/20 (100%) HTLV-II PCR-positive samples. All 91 Wellcozyme-positive samples were tested for confirmation by Western blot (WB, Diagnostic Biotechnology). Among Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA-positive individuals, HTLV-I/II WB positivity was found in 0/1 Dutch blood donors, 40/44 (88.9%) Curaçao blood donors and 20/46 (43.5%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-I positivity was found in 40 (1.3%) WB-positive Curaçao blood donors and in 9 (0.35%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-II positivity was found in 11 (0.43%) WB-positive Ethiopian individuals. The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA had a specificity of 99.95% in Dutch blood donors and a sensitivity of 100% on confirmed HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-positive samples. In Ethiopia 55% of the HTLV-I/II WB-positive individuals were exclusively HTLV-II positive, whereas in Curaçao no HTLV-II infections were found.

Blotting, Western↗

Sensitivity and specificity of three third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus ELISAs.

Three commercially available 3rd-generation anti-HCV ELISAs (Abbott, Murex and Ortho) were evaluated in various serum panels: (A) blood donor samples (n = 403) with 1st- or 2nd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (various manufacturers) positive test results; (B) non-A, non-B hepatitis patients (n = 212); (C) multitransfused patients (n = 253); (D) serial dilutions of HCV confirmed (RIBA and PCR) positive blood donors (n = 24), and (E) first-time blood donors (n = 1,055). All samples of panels A, B and C were tested in PCR and RIBA-2. In panels A, B and C, 398 samples were HCV PCR positive: all were detected by Abbott and Ortho, and 397 (99.7%) by Murex. The sample missed by the Murex ELISA showed an isolated anti-C33c reactivity in RIBA-2. In panels A-C, 442 samples were RIBA-2 positive and all were detected by the 3 tests. With Probit analysis on results of panel D, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between the 3 evaluated ELISAs. Specificities of Abbott, Murex and Ortho in 1,055 blood donors were 99.7, 99.3 and 99.9%, respectively (NS, chi 2). We conclude that the sensitivity and specificity of the 3 ELISAs are comparable although the C33c antigen in the Murex VK47 test should be improved.

Blood Donors↗

Transmission of hepatitis C virus by anti-HCV-negative blood transfusion. Case report.

Acute posttransfusion hepatitis C was reported in a recipient of 3 units of red cells. The recipient became acutely icteric 6 weeks after transfusion, and HCV infection was diagnosed. Stored serum samples of the 3 implicated donations, which were negative with ELISA-2, were retested by PCR and 3rd-generation antibody tests. One implicated donation was PCR positive, but anti-HCV negative. Both other donations were negative in all tests. The donor was recalled to the Blood Bank 13 weeks after the implicated donation and was found to be ELISA-3 plus RIBA-3 positive. Eight months after the implicated donation, the donor is still PCR and RIBA-3 positive, whereas the recipient became PCR negative but remained anti-HCV RIBA-3 positive. The case shows that blood products from donors collected during the open window period of an HCV infection can transmit HCV to recipients.

DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase↗

Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: Wellcozyme VK45 and Ortho 2.0.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare 2 anti-HCV ELISA tests with respect to sensitivity and specificity in detecting Hepatitis C antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3rd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Wellcozyme anti-HCV VK45) was compared with a 2nd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Ortho HCV 2.0) in various serum panels: A) anti-HCV ELISA-positive samples of blood donations (n = 536), B) non-A, non-B hepatitis patients (n = 188), C) multi-transfused patients (n = 79), D) hemodialysis patients (n = 473), and E) random blood donors (n = 1,080). RESULTS: Of 248 cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA-PCR) positive samples in panels A, B, and C, ELISA-VK45 detected 247 (99.6%) and Ortho-2 248 (100%). The cDNA-PCR-positive sample missed by ELISA-VK45 showed isolated anti-C33c reactivity in a 2nd-generation recombinant immunoblot (RIBA-2). Of 281 RIBA-2-positive samples, ELISA-VK45 detected 274 (97.5%) and Ortho-2 279 (99.3%). ELISA-VK45-negative, RIBA-2-positive samples showed combined anti-C100/5-1-1 reactivity in RIBA-2 in 6/7 cases and anti-C22 and C33c reactivity in one. Ortho-2-negative, RIBA-2-positive samples showed combined anti-C100/5-1-1 reactivity in RIBA-2 in 2/2 cases. The specificities of ELISA-VK45 and Ortho-2 were not significantly different in 1,080 blood donors. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the ELISA-VK45 lacks sensitivity because a cDNA-PCR-confirmed positive sample was missed in the assay. The specificity of both ELISAs was comparable.

Adult↗

Comparison of quantitative cDNA-PCR with the branched DNA hybridization assay for monitoring plasma hepatitis C virus RNA levels in haemophilia patients participating in a controlled interferon trial.

The branched DNA (bDNA) assay was compared with a semi-quantitative cDNA-polymerase chain reaction (cDNA-PCR) assay for monitoring HCV RNA levels in plasma in 17 haemophilia patients participating in a controlled alpha-interferon trial. Good correlation between the HCV RNA levels as detected by the two assays was observed, with a correlation co-efficient of 0.83 (P < 0.0001) and 0.90 (P < 0.0001) at week 0 and 24, respectively. Hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV RNA) levels could be assessed with the bDNA assay in 14/17 (82 percent) HCV cDNA-PCR positive pretreatment samples. The bDNA assay apparently failed to detect low viral titres. Interferon treated patients (n = 11) showed either a complete response, being a large reduction in HCV RNA level to below the detection limit of the HCV cDNA-PCR assay (6/11) or no significant reduction in HCV RNA level (5/11). A "partial" virological response was not observed. The changes in HCV RNA plasma levels in non-responders during interferon (IFN) treatment were similar to the (small) natural fluctuations in viral load observed in controls (untreated patients). Although the bDNA assay was not as sensitive as cDNA-PCR, given its user friendliness and quantitative results, it is concluded that it is a useful test for monitoring HCV RNA levels in patients treated with interferon. However, patients who are non-reactive in the bDNA assay have to be retested by cDNA-PCR because low viral titres are not detected by the bDNA assay.

Alanine Transaminase↗

E2 and NS5: new antigens for detection of hepatitis C virus antibodies.

The value of two new hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens for detection of HCV antibodies was studied. These two recombinant antigens were derived from the nonstructural-5 (NS5) and envelope-2 (E2) region of the HCV genome. In a panel of 33 HCV-RNA positive samples with indeterminate Riba-2 confirmatory test results, 29 samples (88%) showed additional antibody reactivity against E2 and 12 samples (36%) showed additional reactivity against NS5. Among 39 HCV-RNA negative, Riba-2 indeterminate donor samples, no additional E2 or NS5 reactivity was found in 34 samples (87%); while 5 samples (13%) showed additional reactivity against NS5 and/or E2. E2 reactivity thus resolved the majority of hitherto indeterminate samples. In serial samples from nine posttransfusion hepatitis C patients, NS5 and E2 antibodies did not appear earlier than classical HCV antibodies. However, E2 antibodies eventually appeared in all nine patients. The recombinant E2 might be a candidate antigen for future HCV antibody assays.

Antibody Specificity↗

The duration of fixation influences the yield of HCV cDNA-PCR products from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue.

The extent of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA loss during increasing periods of fixation of liver tissue in formalin was examined. For this purpose human liver tissue, known to be HCV RNA positive and stored at -70 degrees C until use, was cut into small slices (n = 9), which were fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin for increasing periods of time before embedding in paraffin. Nucleic acids were extracted from each slice of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue and HCV RNA loss during fixation was semi-quantified by testing 10-fold dilutions of each extract in an HCV cDNA-PCR assay. The endpoint dilution for HCV RNA detection by cDNA-PCR in liver slices fixed in buffered formalin for 8-24 h was comparable to the endpoint dilutions found for 'fresh', non-fixed liver slices. After fixation for 2-3 days the endpoint dilution for HCV RNA detection was 10(2) to 10(3)-fold less. After 2-4 weeks of formalin-fixation, HCV RNA was detectable from undiluted nucleic acid extracts only. It is concluded that formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver biopsies can be used for HCV RNA detection by cDNA-PCR, on condition that the liver tissue has been embedded in paraffin within 24 h of formalin-fixation.

Biopsy↗