[Clinical research. Socioeconomic factors exemplified by endoscopic surgery].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Biomedical subjects
H Troidl
Publications and source records attributed to H Troidl.
[Allocation of resources in surgery--the role of waiting lists and scoring systems].
International authors who have applied scoring systems to reduce waiting lists conclude that the hope that scoring systems will help is an illusion. Data on queue management are extremely rare.
Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
Randomized comparison of pulmonary function after the 'French' and 'American' techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The 'French' and 'American' techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which differ in the position of the surgeon and ports, have not been compared directly. The authors' hypothesis was that the 'French' technique results in better postoperative pulmonary function than the 'American' technique. Patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were randomized, 25 patients to have the 'French' method and 24 the 'American' method. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured before operation, and 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain and fatigue were also measured. Both FVC and FEV1 at 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation were significantly less in the 'American' group (FVC at 24 h: 71 versus 86 per cent of preoperative value; P = 0.001, Student's t test; 95 per cent confidence interval 7-24). Two cases of atelectasis occurred in the 'American' group and none in the 'French' group. Differences in access to Calot's triangle were also noted. One patient in the 'French' group sustained a diathermy injury of the duodenum, related to defective equipment. It is concluded that the 'French' method leads to less impairment of pulmonary function.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
[Possibilities and limits of scores. Theoretical considerations about scores].
Scores are intended to facilitate an accurate appreciation of the overall situation from a few characteristic, reasonably weighted parameters. This definite result in the form of a score means a reduction of reality. For the individual it cannot reasonably be applied in practice. Despite a long list of problems and limitations, a score can describe a collective and thus make it comparable to some extent. Because of the different compositions of the collectives, the value of scores for quality control is limited. The more physiological variables a score contains the more difficult it is to distinguish between the effect of therapy and the clinical course. Therefore, repeated measurement of scores is not useful to verify a therapeutic effect, but it can indicate a trend regarding the endpoint.
Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer. A comparison.
BACKGROUND: After the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 18 patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 16 patients with conventional surgery. METHODS: The endpoint adverse events (complications), pain intensity, operation time, fever, leucocytosis, and duration of hospital stay showed no clinically relevant differences. RESULTS: Consumption of analgesics was lower in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer is technically feasible. The safety of the method and the benefit for the patient need proof by means of a randomized controlled trial.
Adult↗
["No complications"--the dream of every surgeon?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Confidence Intervals↗
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it really safe?
The prospectively collected data from 530 cholecystectomies performed in a university clinic from October 1989 to March 1991 were analyzed after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis with that for routine symptomatic gallbladders. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters of 424 routine (noninflamed) LCs and 54 LCs for acutely inflamed gallbladders were compared under the "intention to treat" principle. Operating time was longer in the inflamed group (median 97 minutes versus 75 minutes; p < 0.0001). Significantly more adhesions (20% versus 8%), more blood loss (48% versus 19%), a higher incidence of bile spillage (28% versus 12%), and lost stones (19% versus 8%) were encountered in patients with acute cholecystitis. Common bile duct (CBD) injuries were also more frequent in that group (5.5% versus 0.2%; p = 0.005). The rate of conversion to open surgery was higher than with routine LCs (13% versus 4%). There were two deaths in the routine LC group and none in the acutely inflamed group. There was no difference in postoperative pain intensity or postoperative fatigue according to visual analog scale measurements. Patients with acute cholecystitis stayed only 1 day longer (median 4 days versus 3 days) in hospital. The quality of life scores indicate return to almost normal values by the 14th postoperative day. Long-term follow-up (1-3 years) did not reveal any delayed clinical adverse effects. In summary, LC for inflamed gallbladders has a higher conversion rate than LC for routine symptomatic gallbladders. If successfully performed, it has definite benefit for the patient in terms of better postoperative recovery. The trade-off is that the risk of CBD injury is significantly higher.
Acute Disease↗
[Postoperative pain therapy in inpatient treatment].
Pain therapy is a central medical task and a legal duty. Not the anaesthetist but the pain-causing surgeon is responsible for therapy of pain. Pain as a negative sensation is subjective and individual. Postoperative pain is an essential aspect of the topic "pain in surgery". Therapy starts with the awareness of the problem. Effective pain therapy requires clinical competence and application of available therapeutic options. Initial steps of successful pain treatment include: an informative dialogue with the patient, conveying of confidence, and skillful choice of diagnostic and/or therapeutic options. Application of drugs presupposes detailed knowledge of their specific effects. For convincing therapeutic results, one has to analyse different causes of pain. Acute surgical pain is classified and treated according to a three-step scheme: intense pain with strong opioids, intermediate pain with weaker opioids or non-opioids, and slight pain with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Opioids are used with caution in abdominal surgery because of their negative effects (obstipation), the same is the case with Novalgin in trauma patients because of its effect on temperature and leukopenia. Patient-controlled analgesia with appropriate devices means further progress for suitable patients. Effective pain therapy within the framework of successful surgery is feasible and influences patients' comfort and possibly even their morbidity and mortality.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗
Duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Introduction--the different ways to reach consensus.
The many interrelated issues concerning administration of antibiotics following operations for abdominal contamination and infection were a powerful impetus to create this Discussion Forum in The European Journal of Surgery, which focuses on the duration of administration-a previously neglected topic. The guidelines presented herein are not based on previous randomised trials alone, nor are they prescribed by dictatorship of one person. Instead, they are proposed by a steering committee in the form of a table and are confirmed by consensus of many experts. The science of consensus has to be recognized in surgery. The Discussion Forum offers written judgements that provide more details than the usual Consensus Development Conference statements. It can be used for a nominal group process organized by sepsis trial groups and may be of value for a consensus-based treatment of individual patients.
Abdomen↗
Duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Minimal antibiotic therapy: technology assessment instead of clinical trials.
In modern medicine which already uses maximal resources, additional improvements involve huge extra efforts. With increasing complexity of diseases, specific treatments have only a limited influence on the "whole process". In complex clinical situations (including sepsis and SIRS) the available methodology to identify groups of patients who may benefit from a specific treatment are weak. This is why prospective randomised "megatrials" may be needed to detect small differences in outcome. We suggest that careful prospective assessment of cohorts of well stratified patients, subjected to a specific and standardised treatment, may replace prospective controlled trials.
Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
[Assessment of critical care costs of an intensive care unit with TISS (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System)--an economic analysis of intensive care].
The parallel documentation of Apache II and TISS scores on a surgical intensive care unit allows detailed cost-effectiveness analyses. 929 patient were observed over 18 months with an average Apache score of 12.8 and 32.3 TISS points per patient-day. A value of 44.46 DM per TISS point resulted from a detailed cost analysis.
APACHE↗
[Laparoscopic colon resection in carcinoma--beneficial or not?].
It was the aim of our study to investigate the role of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection for cure. Postoperative morbidity, pain and hospital stay (n = 21) was reduced and patients' recovery accelerated compared to conventionally operated patients (n = 54). The number of resected lymph nodes and tumor distances were comparable; however, portal recurrences remain the main problem.
Colon↗
[Technology: training centers--a new method for learning surgery in visceral surgery].
The importance of training centers can be best described after first answering a few questions like: 1. What kind of surgery will we deal with in the future? 2. What kind of surgeon do we need for this surgery, if it is basically different? 3. How will this surgeon have to be educated/trained for this different surgery? Although I am aware of the fact, that statements about future prospects are usually doomed to fail, I maintain that endoscopic surgery will be an essential part of general surgery. If this is so, surgery will be dominated by extremely complicated technology, new techniques and new instruments. It will be a "different" surgery. It will offer more comfort at the same safety. The surgeon of the future will still need a certain personality; he will still need intuition and creativity. To survive in our society, he will have to be an organiser and even a businessman. Additionally, something new has to be added: he will have to understand modern, complicated technology and will have to use totally different instruments for curing surgical illness. This makes it clear that we will need a different education/training and may be even a different selection of surgeons. We should learn from other professions sharing common interests with surgery, for example, sports where the common interest is achieving most complicated motions and necessarily highly differentiated coordination. Common interest with airline pilots is the target of achieving absolute security. They have a highly differentiated selection and training concept. Training centers may be-under certain prerequisites-a true alternative for this necessary form of training. They must have a concept, i.e. contents and aims have to be defined, structured and oriented on the requirements of surgery for the patient. Responsibility for the concept, performance and control can only be in the hands of Surgical Societies and Universities. These prerequisites correspond most likely to training centers being established by universities and managed by them. Training centers set up by the industry contain some trouble spots, from "sponsoring" over "normal business" to "corruption". Being aware of the fact that training centers will replace traditional "surgery schools"-teaching in their current state is technology and techniques-they are a true alternative for learning/training in general surgery.
Abdomen↗
Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder.
The probability of adverse and undesirable events during and after operations that have not yet occurred in a finite number of patients (n) can be estimated with Hanley's simple formula, which gives the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the probability of such an event: upper limit of 95% confidence interval = maximum risk = 3/n (for n > 30). Doctors and surgeons should keep this simple rule in mind when complication rates of zero are reported in the literature and when they have not (yet) experienced a disastrous complication in a procedure.
Confidence Intervals↗
Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument.
At present, an instrument for measuring the quality of life, specifically for patients with gastrointestinal disease, is not available. A new instrument for gastrointestinal disorders that is system-specific has been developed in three phases. In the first phase, questions were collated and then tested on 70 patients with gastrointestinal diseases and those that worked well were retained. In the second phase, the questions were modified and tested on 204 patients and the results verified by international experts. The instrument was also validated against other generic measures of quality of life. During the third phase, the instrument was validated with 168 normal individuals. Reproducibility was tested on 25 patients with stable gastrointestinal disease and responsiveness was tested on 194 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The result is a bilingual (German and English) questionnaire containing 36 questions each with five response categories. The responses to questions are summed to give a numerical score. It is concluded that the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is ready to be used in clinical practice and research.
Adult↗
Long-term results after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
As part of a continuing audit of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (which now numbers over 1500) 468 of the 508 patients (92.1 per cent) operated on between October 1989 and March 1991 were studied between 350 and 988 days after the operation (mean 19 months). A questionnaire was filled in by each patient before operation and at the late follow-up visit. Eight specific symptoms were sought-non-colicky pain, colic, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, flatulence, and dietary restriction. The result of each operation was assessed by two surgeons and by the patient. In 453 patients (96.8 per cent) the symptoms had improved as a result of the operation, but 260 patients (55.6 per cent) had some abdominal symptoms. The result was assessed as excellent in 310 patients (66.2 per cent); 143 (30.5 per cent) still had abdominal complaints but they were willing to cope with those symptoms. In 15 patients (3.2 per cent) the result was unsatisfactory. Statistical analysis of 26 preoperative variables showed few significant differences between patients with excellent results and patients with persisting or new symptoms. The percentage of patients with biliary colic was reduced from 82.9 per cent before to 6.4 per cent after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P < 0.05), and of those with flatulence from 62.6 per cent to 45.3 per cent (P < 0.05). Flatulence persisted in 147 (50.2 per cent) of the 293 patients who had complained of flatulence before the operation, and of the 175 patients who had not complained of flatulence before surgery, 65 (37.1 per cent) reported the symptom for the first time after the operation. It appears that 'flatulent dyspepsia' after cholecystectomy has many causes, one of which may be removal of the gallbladder. It is concluded that the long-term results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were excellent but the prognosis in individual patients was unpredictable.
Abdominal Pain↗
The ileoanal pouch: a risk-benefit analysis.
This review assesses whether the risk of ileoanal pouch construction in patients with ulcerative colitis, compared with that of 'less dangerous' operations, is compensated by a better postoperative outcome. Even though the mortality rate is not greater for pouch construction, the risk of pelvic sepsis and pouchitis increase morbidity. Bowel function after construction of the ileal pouch, although better than that before operation, is not as good as that of normal controls and does not, in itself, justify increased morbidity. Quality of life measurements suggest that the benefit of the ileal pouch procedure is not much greater than that of ileostomy, even though some dimensions of quality of life are improved. However, most patients wish to avoid an ileostomy and surgeons should respect this wish, remembering that the pouch procedure has some risks and that the gain for the patient may be small.
Colitis, Ulcerative↗