Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H T Cuypers

Publications and source records attributed to H T Cuypers.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C patients after a 6- and a 36-month interferon-alpha2b treatment schedule: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) Interferon-alpha (IFN) treatment for 12-18 months is more effective than 6 months in inducing a sustained virological response. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 88 patients with chronic HCV were enrolled (47 treated with IFN-alpha2b and 41 constituted an untreated control group). Treatment consisted of 5 million units (MU) IFN thrice a week (tiw) for 8 weeks and subsequently 2.5 MU IFN tiw for 16 weeks ('standard treatment'). After week 24 ('long-term treatment'), in virological non-responders treatment was continued using 5 MU IFN tiw for up to week 156, whereas in virological responders IFN was discontinued. In case of a virological relapse, treatment with 5 MU IFN tiw was restarted and continued up to week 156. RESULTS: Sustained virological response rate was 6/47 (13%) after standard treatment and increased to 19/47 (40%) after long-term treatment (McNemar paired test; P = 0.002). Of the 18 patients with a breakthrough or relapse during or after standard treatment, 14 (78%) became sustained virological responders upon long-term treatment. Of the 4 patients who did not have a sustained virological response after long-term treatment, 3 did not receive complete treatment due to side effects and/or non-compliance. In patients who failed to respond to standard treatment, no virological response was observed during long-term treatment. In the control group, no spontaneous clearance of HCV was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IFN (re)treatment enhanced the virological sustained response rate significantly and was particularly effective in patients with a breakthrough or relapse following standard treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A survey of liver pathology in needle biopsies from HBsAg and anti-HBe positive individuals.

AIMS: To use laboratory data and liver biopsies, prospectively obtained from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) positive patients, for the assessment of: (1) the relation between biopsy length/number of portal tracts and sampling error; (2) the relation between the severity of piecemeal necrosis and the new grading terminology (minimal, mild, moderate, and severe chronic hepatitis); and (3) liver pathology, which has not been studied in patients with this specific serological profile. METHODS: The study group (n = 174) included 104 patients with normal aminotransferase concentrations and no cases with clinically apparent cirrhosis. The specimen length and number of portal tracts were measured at light microscopy examination. Sampling error analysis was related to the discrepancies between aminotransferase concentrations versus histological grade. Detailed histological scorings were undertaken by the reference pathologist and compared with laboratory and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA precore sequence data. RESULTS: Sampling error seemed to be a constant feature, even for biopsies > or = 20 mm, but increased dramatically in biopsies < 5 mm long and/or containing less than four portal tracts. Between 25% and 30% of biopsies, graded as "mild" or "moderate" activity showed features of moderate and severe piecemeal necrosis, respectively. Ten per cent of the patients with normal aminotransferase values had stage III-IV hepatic fibrosis, and 20% had piecemeal necrosis. Only cytoplasmic, not nuclear, core antigen expression was a strong predictor of high hepatitis B viraemia. There was no association between precore stop codon mutations, grade/stage of liver disease, and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) expression. CONCLUSIONS: The specimen available for light microscopical examination should be > 5 mm long and should contain more than four portal tracts. In addition, the new grading terminology might give the clinician an inappropriately mild impression of the severity of piecemeal necrosis. Furthermore, even in the presence of normal aminotransferase concentrations, considerable liver pathology can be found in 10-20% of HBsAg and anti-HBe positive individuals; such pathology is not associated with the occurrence of precore stop codon mutations.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMed1999

European multi-centre validation study of NucliSens Extractor in combination with HCV Amplicor 2.0 assay for HCV-NAT screening of plasma pools.

The NucliSens Extractor in combination with the 2.0 version of the Roche Cobas HCV Amplicor test has been validated by five European blood screening laboratories in a multi-centre study. For testing the performance characteristics of this HCV-NAT method, the European Pharmacopoeia validation guidelines were followed. The CLB VQC reference reagents were used for testing robustness and sensitivity. After a technical improvement in the extraction stations, the NucliSens Extractor appeared to be contamination-free as was proved by testing negative controls alternating with samples containing a high HCV-RNA concentration. The Pelicheck HCV-RNA genotype 1 dilution panel was tested 74 times in the five laboratories and an overall 95% detection limit of 80 genome equivalents (geq)/ml was found. In one laboratory the Pelicheck panel was tested in 25 runs and here a 95% detection limit of 32 geq/ml was achieved. In this laboratory the Pelispy HCV-RNA run control samples of 140 geq/ml were consistently picked up in all extractor stations. In addition the laboratories have tested a WHO HCV-RNA genotype 1 standard dilution series 39 times and a Pelicheck HCV-RNA genotype 3 reference panel in 32 test runs. The limiting dilution analysis enabled us to compare the detection efficiency of the NucliSens-Amplicor method for the genoype 1 and genotype 3 isolates and to calibrate the reference reagents against each other. The combined Nuclisens-Amplicor method was found to detect the genotype 3 isolate in the Pelicheck HCV-RNA panels with 2-3 fold lower efficiency than the genotype 1 standard (assuming that the historical calibration of the genotype 3 against the genotype 1 standard is correct). In this study of a single method 1 IU of the WHO HCV-RNA standard was found to be equivalent to 5.1 geq of the VQC HCV-RNA standard (95% confidence intervals 3.1-9.1 geq). To avoid confusion with the use of the CLB VQC reagents we accept the NIBSC collaborative study in which calibration by a variety of methods showed that the Pelispy 380 geq/ml run control is equivalent to 100 IU/ml of the WHO standard. This multi-centre validation study demonstrates that the 95% detection limit of the NucliSens HCV Amplicor method lies far below the detection limits required by the international regulatory bodies.

Europe↗
PubMed1999

Characterization of the quantitative HCV NASBA assay.

A quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay (NASBA-QT) for detection of hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) was evaluated and compared with the HCV branched-DNA (bDNA) assay (Chiron Corporation) and the HCV MONITOR assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems). For this evaluation five panels were designed: (1) serial dilutions of genotype 1b in-vitro HCV-RNA; (2) standards of in-vitro HCV-RNA genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, and 5; (3) a proficiency panel consisting of 12 HCV-RNA positive plasma samples of different genotypes and HCV-RNA concentrations and a genotype 1a and 1b 3-fold dilution series; (4) a panel of 67 HCV-RNA positive plasma samples obtained from patients with HCV infection and (5) an HCV-RNA positive control sample, diluted 50-fold in 25 different HCV-RNA negative plasma samples. The quantitative detection limit was found to be 10(3) copies per 100 microl and the qualitative detection limit 10(2.3) per 100 microl. The amplification efficiency was independent of the plasma matrix, but dependent on the HCV genotype. The HCV NASBA-QT assay was more than 10 times as sensitive as the bDNA assay while the quantitative results of both assays were highly concordant. The HCV NASBA-QT assay was comparable in sensitivity with the HCV MONITOR assay, but the HCV MONITOR assay yielded consistently lower values. It is concluded that the HCV NASBA-QT assay is a reliable assay for quantitative HCV-RNA detection in various settings.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed1998

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus-E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion history.

The prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV)-RNA and HGV-E2 antibodies was studied in a cohort of Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to clotting products used, age, and coinfection with hepatitis C. Between 1991 and 1995, blood samples were taken from 294 patients with hemophilia A, B, or von Willebrand disease. From each patient one fresh frozen sample was tested for HGV cDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV cDNA PCR. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tests were performed on plasma samples of all patients. The presence of HGV-E2 antibodies was tested on plasma samples from a subset of 169 patients representing all age groups. Based on the origin and viral safety of the products used, three subgroups of patients were distinguished. Group A: patients who used viral noninactivated factors derived from small and large donor pools; group B: patients who used factors prepared with inadequate viral inactivation techniques derived from small and large donor pools; and group C: patients treated only with optimally viral inactivated large pool clotting factor or recombinant clotting factor concentrate. The prevalence of HGV-RNA was 18%. In group A patients the prevalence was 71%, in group B 50%, and in group C 6%. When related to age, the highest prevalence of HGV-RNA (35%) was seen in patients born between 1980 and 1989. The prevalence of HGV-E2 antibodies increased with age. Of HGV-RNA-negative patients born before 1950, 96% tested positive. HGV viremia did not affect ALT levels, neither in HCV-RNA positive nor in HCV-RNA negative patients. HGV infection is frequently seen in patients with hemophilia. In older age groups a lower rate of HGV-RNA positivity is seen coinciding with a higher rate of antienvelope antibodies.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Relation between laboratory test results and histological hepatitis activity in individuals positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) commonly coexist, and laboratory tests are often requested to assess histological hepatitis activity. An optimum panel of tests has not been found and the usefulness of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA assays in this context has not been established. We assessed various blood tests to find which best predicted hepatitis activity. METHODS: Routine plasma biochemical liver tests and serum HBV DNA (hybridisation and PCR assays) were assessed prospectively in 123 patients positive for HBsAg and anti-HBe. We scored histological hepatitis activity (hepatitis activity index) and determined whether chronic active hepatitis (chronic hepatitis with portal and periportal lesions) was present. We analysed the relation between laboratory data and the hepatitis activity index or risk of chronic active hepatitis by multiple regression and multiple logistic regression, respectively. FINDINGS: The analyses provided models for predicting either the hepatitis activity index or the risk of chronic active hepatitis. Aspartate aminotransferase was the most important test in the two models. The contribution of HBV DNA and other assays, especially alanine-aminotransferase activity, were of no practical importance. INTERPRETATION: Because screening by aspartate-aminotransferase activity could not be improved by the addition of other assays or HBV DNA, patients positive for HBsAg and anti-HBe could be screened for chronic active hepatitis with a single assay and counselling of patients can be improved if proper reference values are used.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Stability of hepatitis C virus RNA during specimen handling and storage prior to NASBA amplification.

The influence of different anticoagulants and pre-amplification storage conditions on the stability of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA, as detected by the quantitative HCV NASBA assay (NASBA-QT), was studied. The HCV-RNA load remained stable for at least 15 months when serum or plasma samples (EDTA and heparin) were directly frozen at -70 degrees C in lysis buffer. At 4 degrees C, the HCV-RNA load in serum or plasma stored with lysis buffer did not decline for at least 14 days. At 30 degrees C, however, the load declined significantly after 7 days. When clotted, whole blood was stored at 4 degrees C, the HCV-RNA load was stable for 72 h. However, when EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood was stored at 4 degrees C, the HCV-RNA load declined significantly after 48 h. In paired plasma and serum samples at baseline the HCV-RNA levels were similar. Heparin did not influence the efficiency of the HCV NASBA-QT assay. Clotted blood as well as EDTA or heparin anticoagulated blood can be used for quantifying HCV-RNA using the NASBA-QT assay. Blood samples should be stored at 4 degrees C after collection and serum or plasma separated within 24 h. Preferably, after separation, samples should be frozen in lysis buffer at -70 degrees C until NASBA-QT analysis.

Buffers↗
PubMed1998

New hepatitis B virus mutant form in a blood donor that is undetectable in several hepatitis B surface antigen screening assays.

BACKGROUND: Envelope mutant forms of hepatitis B virus (HBV), impairing HBV antibody recognition, have been reported with mutations in single or multiple sites of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) group-specific "a" determinant. Blood donors infected with such an HBsAg mutant form of HBV may escape detection by HBsAg screening assays and therefore may affect the safety of the blood supply. CASE REPORT: A repeat blood donor became HBsAg-reactive in an enzyme immunoassay. Confirmatory testing yielded negative results for HBsAg in a radioimmunoassay and in four enzyme immunoassays used in blood donor screening. The specificity of the HBsAg reactivity in the first enzyme immunoassay was confirmed by HBsAg neutralization with antibody to HBsAg. Additional HBV confirmatory test results were positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; negative for antibody to HBsAg and for hepatitis B e antigen; and positive for HBV DNA. DNA sequence analysis of the "a" determinant region of HBsAg revealed amino acid substitutions from Q (Gln) to R (Arg) at codon 129 and from M (Met) to T (Thr) at codon 133. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the presence of HBsAg mutant forms of HBV in a West European blood donor population that were undetected by several HBsAg screening assays. Adaptation of HBsAg screening is indicated to overcome deficiencies in sensitivity in detecting HBsAg mutant forms of HBV. Screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen or HBV DNA may also detect blood donors infected with HBsAg mutant forms of HBV

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Validation of a new immunoblot assay (LiaTek HIV III) for confirmation of human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Used as a supplemental assay, new anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunoblots, employing recombinant and synthetic antigens, appeared to resolve the majority of samples with false-reactive Western blot results. Would it be possible to completely replace the Western blot by an immunoblot for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of the new LiaTek HIV III immunoblot assay (Organon Teknika, Turnhout, Belgium) was tested on 416 Western-blot positive samples (386 HIV-1, 22 HIV-2, 1 HIV-1/2, and 7 HIV-O) and on 45 HIV-1 seroconversion samples. The specificity was tested on 146 samples from noninfected donors with false-positive results on a HIV screening test. RESULTS: All Western-blot-positive samples tested positive in the immunoblot (sensitivity: 100%). The immunoblot could not discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection in 22 of 416 (5%) samples. The LiaTek assay showed reactivity in 28 of 45 seroconversion samples, whereas the Western blot reacted in 30 of 45 seroconversion samples. With false-positive donor samples, the immunoblot was indeterminate in 10 of 146 samples (specificity: 93%), and the Western blot was indeterminate in 44 of 146 samples (specificity: 70%). CONCLUSION: Like the Western blot, the immunoblot runs the risk of missing samples that are reactive by enzyme immunoassay during the early stage of HIV infection. Nevertheless, considering its superior specificity on false-positive donor samples, it appears that the immunoblot offers a cost-effective alternative to the Western blot assay for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed1997

Stability of HIV-1 RNA in blood during specimen handling and storage prior to amplification by NASBA-QT.

The influence of different storage temperatures and anticoagulation conditions on the HIV-1 RNA load as measured by NASBA-QT was examined. Blood specimens from 14 HIV-1 infected individuals were processed within 2 h after collection. The HIV-1 RNA load remained stable for at least 6 months when samples were frozen directly at -70 degrees C in lysis buffer. This lysis buffer fully inactivated the virus. When whole EDTA blood was stored, the HIV-1 RNA load was stable for 72 h at 25 degrees C, but it declined within 24 h at 4 degrees C. The HIV-1 RNA load in whole heparinized blood declined significantly after 24 h at both 4 and 25 degrees C. It was slightly lower (average of 0.18 log ml-1) than in whole EDTA blood. At 4 degrees C, the HIV-RNA load in serum and EDTA-plasma stored with lysis buffer did not decline up to 14 days. At + 30 degrees C, however, the load declined significantly after 2 days. Of clinical significance, the mean load in EDTA plasma was 0.5 log ml-1 higher than in serum. This difference was patient dependent (range 0.1-0.7 log ml-1). We thus recommend, for quantifying HIV-1 RNA by NASBA, to use preferably EDTA blood which is kept at room temperature until plasma separation. When using heparinized blood, the plasma should be stored frozen within 8 h.

Blood Preservation↗
PubMed1997

High prevalence of hepatitis G virus after liver transplantation without apparent influence on long-term graft function.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis G virus is a recently characterized transfusion-transmissible RNA virus. Its pathogenicity remains to be established. We studied its prevalence in liver transplant patients and assessed the long-term influence on the liver graft. METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients without hepatitis B or C were included; median follow-up was 8 years (range 1-17). Serum samples from before and late after transplantation were investigated for the presence of HGV-RNA. HGV-RNA was detected by cDNA-PCR, using primers from the NS3 region of the viral genome. The latest available yearly liver biopsy was assessed in a coded fashion according to established histological criteria. The outcome in the HGV-positive patients was compared with the outcome in the HGV-negative patients with respect to liver tests and liver histology. RESULTS: The prevalence before and after transplantation was 15.4 and 43.6%, respectively. Liver test results and liver histology did not differ between the HGV and non-HGV groups. In both groups more than 50% of the patients showed normal histology. Mild portal and/or lobular inflammation tended to be more prevalent in the non-HGV group (no statistical difference). CONCLUSIONS: HGV infection is highly prevalent in liver transplant patients. In the absence of co-infection with hepatitis B or C virus, no long-term negative influence on the graft occurs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Look-back of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, HCV-RNA PCR-negative donors and recipients of their blood products.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To establish the infectivity of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, but cDNA-PCR-negative blood components transfused before the introduction of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening, we enrolled recipients of such blood products in a look-back programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The blood components were donated by (A) RIBA-2-indeterminate and cDNA-PCR-negative donors, and (B) RIBA-2 and cDNA-PCR-negative donors. The look-back comprised 214 blood products from group A donors and 278 from group B. RESULTS: Of 211 recipients of group A components, 66 (31.3%) were available for testing. All other recipients could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 66, 3 patients had independent risk factors for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 63 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. Of 274 recipients of group B components, 84 (30.7%) were available for testing. All others could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 84, six patients had an independent risk factor for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 78 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. None of the recipients of blood products from previous donations of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, cDNA-PCR-negative, and RIBA-2-indeterminate or negative donors were HCV-infected. CONCLUSIONS: Donors and patients with such reactivities in anti-HCV ELISA, RIBA-2, and cDNA-PCR can be assured that they are not infected with HCV. The donors involved can re-enter the donor pool, provided that future donations are anti-HCV ELISA-negative.

Antigens, Viral↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of a new HTLV-I/II polymerase chain reaction.

AIM: Evaluation of a qualitative HTLV-I/II DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for the detection of HTLV-I/II DNA (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J., USA) in various panels. METHODS: The panels consisted of fresh EDTA blood samples from blood donors who were anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA repeatably reactive: 53 were Western blot (WB) positive, 228 were WB indeterminate and 15 were WB negative. Elevent ELISA-negative blood donors were used as negative controls. Furthermore, specimens from 1 HTLV-II-infected intravenous drug user and from 1 HTLV-II-infected blood donor were included in the panel. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were prepared by red blood cell lysis with the Roche washing solution and stored at < -23 degrees C until processing. Amplification products were analyzed with the HTLV-I/II detection kit. RESULTS: All 53 anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA- and WB-positive samples and both HTLV-II-positive samples tested positively by PCR. All 228 anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA-positive and WB-indeterminate, all 15 ELISA-positive and WB-negative and all II ELISA-negative control samples tested negative by PCR. CONCLUSION: The Roche Amplicor HTLV-I/II test is a simple test, suitable for the confirmation of HTLV-I and-II infection in individuals with indeterminate or positive WB patterns.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1997

New anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoblot assays resolve nonspecific western blot results.

BACKGROUND: Two new anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) immunoblot assays, which use recombinant and synthetic antigens for antibody detection have become available. These assays might be able to resolve indeterminate anti-HIV Western blot results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The new anti-HIV immunoblot assays were used to test 67 samples from 31 HIV infected and 24 noninfected persons showing various anti-HIV Western blot patterns. RESULTS: The immunoblots correctly identified eight HIV-2-positive samples and five late-stage HIV-1-positive samples. After 30 samples from 18 seroconverting persons were tested, the Western blot showed reactivity in 24 of 30 samples and the immunoblots showed reactivity in 21 of 30 samples (difference not significant). In 16 of 30 seroconversion samples, both immunoblot assays produced HIV-1-positive results. In accordance with various criteria for interpretation, the number of positive Western blot results was as follows: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 16 of 30 and World Health Organization, 13 of 30. When samples from non-HIV-infected persons were tested, both immunoblot assays resolved 20 (83%) of 24 samples showing indeterminate Western blot reactivity. CONCLUSION: Although the sensitivity of the immunoblot assays should be validation in larger studies, the mere specificity of these assays makes them valuable for the exclusion of HIV infection in Western blot-indeterminate, HIV p24 antigen-negative samples.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed1997

Performance of three generations of anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in donors and patients.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of posttransfusion non-A,non-B hepatitis in recipients of blood components improved considerably with the introduction of the second-generation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody tests. In 1993, third-generation HCV antibody assays were introduced in Europe. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The performance of three generations of anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (ELISA-1, -2, -3) was compared in routine blood donor screening (99,394 donations were tested with ELISA-1, 167,999 donations with ELISA-2, and 262,090 donations with ELISA-3) and in serial samples from nine patients with documented acute posttransfusion HCV infection. RESULTS: Eight (0.01%) repeat donors, previously negative in ELISA-1, were found positive in ELISA-2 and were confirmed as positive in second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and/or cDNA polymerase chain reaction. In the donor population, no difference in the sensitivity of ELISA-2 and -3 was observed. The specificity of the three generations of ELISAs was comparable (99.8, 99.7, and 99.7%). In seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 detected HCV antibodies at the same time in seven patients, but in two patients, ELISA-3 found HCV antibodies, respectively, 63 and 77 days earlier than ELISA-2 did. In the seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assays. CONCLUSION: ELISA-3 did not detect more HCV-infected individuals in a donor population that previously tested negative in ELISA-2, but it did detect HCV antibodies earlier in some patients with acute HCV infection. ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assays.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1996

International collaborative study on the second EUROHEP HCV-RNA reference panel.

Eighty-six laboratories participated in a collaborative study and tested the second EUROHEP HCV-RNA reference panel. The coded panel comprised 4 HCV-RNA positive plasma samples (one weak positive), 6 HCV-RNA negative plasma samples and two dilution series of HCV-RNA genotype 1 and 3 plasma standards. The 86 laboratories submitted 136 coded data forms for evaluation. Of these data sets 99 were tested using a PCR assay developed in-house, 28 using a commercially available HCV-PCR test (AMPLICOR, Roche Diagnostic Systems) and 9 using other amplification methods. Twenty-two data forms (16%) had faultless results, 39 (29%) missed the weak positive sample only and 75 data sets (55%) had false positive and/or false negative results. Participants using the commercial HCV-PCR test tended to reach a sufficient quality score more often than investigators using assays developed in-house (64% versus 45%, P = 0.11). The UNG system in the commercial HCV-PCR test did not prevent five laboratories generating false-positive results in the 6 HCV-RNA negative samples. Among the laboratories with satisfactory results, up to 10000-fold differences in sensitivity were observed in the dilution series. The 50% and 90% laboratories detection endpoints in the dilution series of the HCV genotype 1 plasma standard were approximately 600 genome equivalents per ml (geq/ml) and 7750 geq/ml according to a standard applied in a signal amplification assay (bDNA, Chiron). Our results suggest that the detection efficiency for genotype 3 by commercial HCV-RNA assays is lower than by the in-house assays. Internationally characterized HCV-RNA plasma standards should be made available for validation and standardization of HCV-RNA assays for HCV diagnosis and virological safety testing of blood products.

Hepacivirus↗