Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Schiffl

Publications and source records attributed to H Schiffl.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Dosing pattern of renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure: current status and future directions.

Acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with poor clinical outcome, particularly in critically ill patients. Different renal replacement techniques are available for treatment of ARF, but a general consensus of standardization of treatment dose is lacking. Recent prospective investigations in critically ill patients with ARF utilizing either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy established a clear dose-outcome relationship. However, several surveys of current practices of renal replacement therapy dosing in acute renal failure revealed, that the majority of ICU patients with ARF received dialysis doses lower than prescribed for stable end-stage renal disease patients. Most nephrologists did not perform formal dose calculation. Future patterns of dosing renal replacement therapy should focus both on an earlier start and a higher dose to reduce the excess mortality associated with ARF in critically ill patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Daily haemodialysis in acute renal failure. Old wine in a new bottle?

Acute renal failure (ARF) is a frequent complication in hospitalized patients. Despite advances in intensive care and renal replacement therapy, outcomes in ARF are distressingly poor. The high mortality of critically ill patients with ARF relates at least in part to fatal non-renal organ complications of ARF itself. However, adequacy of dialysis therapy in the setting of ARF is still in its infancy. At present, neither for intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) nor continuous renal replacement therapies specifically designed techniques have been developed or validated to measure the delivered dose of in ARF. Furthermore targets of optimal or required dose have not been defined. Problems intrinsic to ARF that hinder accuracy of dialysis dose measurements utilizing urea kinetic modelling include a lack of urea eubolism, uncertainty about the true patient total water volume and volume of distribution of urea, and significant access recirculation. The difference in prescribed versus delivered dialysis dose in patients with ARF undergoing IHD may exceed 20% and more and the majority of ARF patients will receive dialysis doses less than 1.2, which is considered the minimal level for end-stage renal disease patients undergoing regular dialysis. Nonetheless retrospective data from the Cleveland Clinic clearly demonstrate an influence of delivered Kt/V urea on survival in patients with intermediate ICU ARF severity scores. Our group prospectively compared outcomes in patients with ARF receiving IHD daily or on alternate days. Daily HD was associated with fewer dialysis-related hypotensive episodes, a shorter time and smoother course to recovery of renal function and a significantly reduced mortality compared to conventional HD. This article highlights also the facts that patients in the conventional group (the standard treatment in North America) treated every other day for 3 to 5 hours have been inadequately dialyzed, having a mean blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of 104 mg/dl and significantly more respiratory failure, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding or changes in mental status. To avoid significant underdialysis, conventional estimates of total body water should be increased by a factor of 1.2. Strategies associated with improved outcomes that have emerged thus far in ARF should aim at a time-averaged BUN of less than 60 mg/dl with IHD. IHD should be prescribed in varying frequency if necessary with daily sessions in hypercatabolic oliguric or heavy weight critically ill patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Ultrapure dialysis fluid lowers the cardiovascular morbidity in patients on maintenance hemodialysis by reducing continuous microinflammation.

The aims of our prospective 3-year investigation were (1) to clarify whether high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are an intermittent or a continuous phenomenon in individual hemodialysis patients and (2) to evaluate a possible relationship between ultrapure dialysis fluid associated CRP levels and an increased prevalence of atherosclerosis in a group of 60 hemodialysis patients treated either with conventional (n = 38) or on-line-produced ultrapure dialysis fluid (n = 22). Primary end points of the study were angiographically confirmed cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, or peripheral vascular events. Measurements of the CRP levels were done every 3 months using a highly sensitive assay. The CRP levels were normal (<0.5 mg/dl) in 45 patients and raised in 15 patients at the time of recruitment. In 87% of the patients with normal CRP levels, ultrapure dialysis fluid was used. The CRP levels measured at recruitment and at various time points thereafter did not differ significantly within patient groups. However, patients with increased CRP concentrations experienced significantly more vascular events as compared with patients with normal CRP levels (11 events vs. 1 event; p < 0.001). The data indicate that continuous induction of acute-phase proteins represents a nontraditional vascular risk factor contributing to the development and progression of atherosclerosis in dialysis patients. Ultrapure dialysis fluid lowers cardiovascular morbidity by preventing/reducing chronic microinflammation.

Aged↗

Effects of ultrapure dialysis fluid on nutritional status and inflammatory parameters.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and chronic systemic inflammatory response syndrome not only coexist in uraemia, but may also have a bi-directional cause-and-effect relationship. To evaluate the role of dialysate-related cytokine induction in inflammatory response and nutritional status, we conducted a prospective comparison of two dialysis fluids differing in their microbiological quality. METHODS: Forty-eight early haemodialysis patients were assigned to either treatment with conventional (potentially microbiologically contaminated) or on-line produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. Study parameters were bacterial growth, markers of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6), and parameters of nutritional status (estimated dry weight, upper mid-arm muscle circumference, serum albumin concentration, insulin-like growth factor 1, leptin, and protein catabolic rate). Patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in demographic and treatment characteristics, degree of bacterial contamination of the dialysate, markers of systemic inflammation, or parameters of nutritional status among the two treatment groups at recruitment. Changing from conventional to ultrapure dialysis fluid reduced significantly the levels of IL-6 (19+/-3 pg/ml to 13+/-3 pg/ml) and CRP (1.0+/- 0.4 mg/dl to 0.5+/-0.2 mg/dl), and resulted in significant increases in estimated dry body weight, mid-arm muscle circumference, serum albumin concentration, levels of the humoral factors, and in protein catabolic rate after 12 months. Continuous use of conventional dialysis fluid (median 40-60 c.f.u./ml) was not associated with significant alterations in markers of inflammation (IL-6 21+/-4 pg/ml vs 24+/-6 pg/ml, CRP 0.9+/-0.3 mg/dl vs 1.1+/-0.4 mg/dl) or of nutritional status at any time of the study. All differences in systemic inflammation and nutritional parameters observed during the study period (from recruitment to month 12) were significant between the two patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokine induction by microbiologically contaminated dialysis fluid has a negative impact on nutritional parameters of early haemodialysis patients. The microbiological quality of the dialysis fluid represents an independent determinant of the nutritional status in addition to known factors, such as dose of dialysis and biocompatibility of the dialyser membrane. Ultrapure dialysis fluid adds to the cost of the dialytic treatment, but may improve the nutritional status in long-term haemodialysis patients.

Aged↗

Clinical manifestations of AB-amyloidosis: effects of biocompatibility and flux.

BACKGROUND: Highly permeable biocompatible dialysis membranes may postpone the development of AB-amyloidosis, but the relative contribution of enhanced flux or reduced inflammation by highly biocompatible membranes and sterile dialysis fluid remains unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective investigation, 89 patients with end-stage renal disease maintained on regular haemodialysis for at least 10 years and treated with one type of dialysis membrane exclusively were selected for analysis. They were divided into three groups: low-flux, bioincompatible cellulose (I), low-flux, intermediately biocompatible polysulphone or PMMA (II), or high-flux, highly biocompatible polysulphone or AN69 (III). In addition, the patients were analysed according to the microbiological quality of the dialysis fluid, which had been tested regularly and was classified either as standard or as intermittently contaminated. The clinical manifestations indicative of AB-amyloidosis, namely, carpal tunnel syndrome, arthropathy and bone cysts, were diagnosed after recruitment. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms were most pronounced in group I, intermediate in group II, and lowest in group III. Patients treated with intermittently contaminated dialysis fluid showed a higher prevalence of AB-amyloidosis than patients with less contaminated dialysis fluid. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the flux characteristics of the dialyser and the microbiological quality of the dialysis fluid as well as the biocompatibility of the dialyser were independent determinants of AB-amyloidosis. CONCLUSION: It would be prudent clinical practice to employ high-flux biocompatible membranes in conjunction with ultrapure dialysis fluid for the treatment of end-stage renal disease patients who need to remain on long-term haemodialysis.

Acrylic Resins↗

Dialysate related cytokine induction and response to recombinant human erythropoietin in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory disorders or infections represent a major cause of hyporesponsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo). To test the hypothesis that dialysate-related cytokine induction alters the response to rHuEpo, we conducted a prospective study with matched pairs of chronic haemodialysis patients. We compared the effect of two dialysis fluids, differing in their microbiological quality, on the rHuEpo therapy. METHODS: Thirty male patients with end-stage renal disease maintained on regular haemodialysis were assigned either to a group treated with conventional (potentially microbiologically contaminated) dialysate (group I) or to a group treated with online-produced ultrapure dialysate (group II). Randomization was stratified according to the maintenance dose of rHuEpo necessary to maintain a target haemoglobin level of 10-10.5 g/dl. Patients were followed for 12 months. Kt/V was calculated by the formula of Daugirdas. Haemoglobin levels were measured weekly and serum ferritin concentrations were determined at 6-week intervals. C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) was measured by an ELISA at the start of the study and after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: In group I, continuous use of bicarbonate dialysate did not change the rHuEpo dosage given to achieve the target haemoglobin level and was associated with elevated surrogate markers (CRP, IL-6) of cytokine-induced inflammation. The switch from conventional to online-produced ultrapure dialysate in group II resulted in a lower bacterial contamination with a significant decrease of CRP and IL-6 blood levels. It was accompanied by a significant and sustained reduction of the rHuEpo dosage, which was required to correct the anaemia. Using multiple regression analysis, IL-6 levels are shown to have a strong predictive value for rHuEpo dosage in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that dialysate-related factors such as low bacterial contamination can induce the activation of monocytes, resulting in elevated serum levels of IL-6. Dialysate-related cytokine induction might diminish erythropoiesis. The use of pyrogen free ultrapure dialysate resulted in a better response to rHuEpo. Not only would it save money, but it would also help to maintain an optimal haemoglobin level without further increase in rHuEpo dosage.

Bacteria↗