Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H S Goodman

Publications and source records attributed to H S Goodman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Oral pharyngeal cancer prevention and early detection. Dentists' opinions and practices.

BACKGROUND: The five-year survival rate for patients in the United States diagnosed with oral pharyngeal cancer is 52 percent, which suggests that these cancers are diagnosed at late stages. The authors conducted this study to determine U.S. dentists' opinions and practices regarding oral cancer prevention and early detection. METHODS: The authors mailed a pretested survey to 7,000 randomly selected general practitioners. A total of 3,200 dentists provided information on how they conduct oral cancer examinations, their use of health history questions to assess patients' oral cancer risks and their oral cancer training and practices. The authors carried out analyses using unweighted data; both bivariate and logistic analytical techniques at a P < or = .01 level of significance were used. RESULTS: On average, dentists assessed about five of the eight health history items on the survey. Eighty-six percent indicated that they did not conduct oral cancer examinations on edentulous patients 18 years of age or older; 81 percent, however, reported that they conducted oral cancer examinations for 100 percent of their patients 40 years of age or older on their initial appointment. CONCLUSIONS: The reported practices of these dentists regarding oral cancer, in conjunction with their opinions about key aspects of these practices and their training, point to a need for systematic educational updates in oral cancer prevention and early detection. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists need to determine their patients' risks for oral cancers and provide routine and comprehensive oral cancer examinations.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Survey of U.S. dentists' knowledge and opinions about oral pharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oral pharyngeal cancer constitutes the most life-threatening of all dental and craniofacial conditions. The U.S. five-year survival rate of 52 percent for these cancers is one of the lowest and has not changed in decades. METHODS: The authors mailed a pretested survey to 7,000 randomly selected general dentists. They obtained information on 3,200 dentists' levels of knowledge about oral pharyngeal cancer risks and diagnostic procedures for providing an oral cancer examination, as well as about related opinions and interest in continuing education, or CE, courses on the topic. The authors carried out analyses using unweighted data; they used both bivariate and logistic analytical techniques and evaluated at a significance level of P < or = .01. RESULTS: Based on responses to 14 questions, the average knowledge of oral cancer risks score was 8.4. About one-half of dentists surveyed knew the two most common sites of intraoral cancer and that most oral cancers are diagnosed at a late stage. CONCLUSIONS: The reported knowledge of these dentists regarding oral cancer suggests that they are not as knowledgeable as they could be about cancer prevention and early detection and that they recognize these deficiencies. Most of the dentists were interested in oral cancer CE. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists need to know where in the mouth to look and what types of lesions to look for to provide a comprehensive oral cancer examination.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

An assessment of oral cancer prevention curricula in U.S. medical schools.

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer is readily detectable through routine examination, but five-year survival rates remain low. Physicians bear the same responsibilities as dentists in the early detection of oral cancers, because high-risk patients utilize medical services more often than dental services. METHODS: Because physicians' practices are largely influenced by their training, this study assessed the level of oral cancer education provided to undergraduate U.S. medical students. Health history and physical diagnosis course curricula were assessed for relevant content. RESULTS: The response rate from the U.S. medical schools was 63.2%. When compared with the "gold standard," the average score was 43% of the optimum. Seven percent of the schools did not require inspection of the mouth, 29% required inspection of all oral structures, and intraoral palpation was advocated by 43% of the schools. Although most schools included questions about alcohol and tobacco use, only 13% asked about sunlight exposure. CONCLUSION: Preliminary oral cancer training in medical schools regarding physical assessment and elicitation of signs, symptoms, and high-risk behaviors lacks both adequacy and comprehensiveness.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1998

Maryland veterans' knowledge of risk factors for and signs of oral cancers and their use of dental services.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outpatient veteran'í knowledge about risk factors for and signs of oral cancers, and their utilization of dental services. DESIGN: Patients receiving primary health care services were surveyed during August 1997. SETTING: Primary health care services at three medical centres within the VA Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS). SUBJECTS: A total of 135 outpatient veterans were interviewed. INTERVENTION: Questionnaire administered by trained interviewers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fifteen percent of the sample were eligible for dental care at the VA, while over 40% of those veterans participating in the study were unaware of their VA eligibility for dental services. Fifty six percent of the total sample received dental services from a private dentist, while 13% reported they had no provider of dental care. Of those not eligible for dental care at the VA (n = 115), the majority (67%) received dental care from a private dentist. Current use of tobacco and alcohol was reported by 27% of the sample. Nonsmokers were more likely to visit the dentist in the previous year than smokers (OR = 2.39, 95% C.I. 1.11,5.12). Although 84% correctly identified tobacco use as a risk factor, only 39% correctly identified regular alcohol use as a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans at higher risk for oral cancers were less likely to have visited the dentist in the previous year, and, overall, were ill informed and misinformed about these cancers.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1998

Maryland adults' knowledge of oral cancer and having oral cancer examinations.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine (1) knowledge of risk factors for oral cancer, (2) knowledge of signs and symptoms of oral cancers, and (3) factors associated with having had an oral cancer examination among 916 Maryland adults 18 years of age and older. METHODS: A statewide, random-digit dial, computer-assisted telephone survey was conducted. The pretested instrument consisted of 32 questions that required 12 minutes to complete. RESULTS: Overall, level of knowledge about risk factors for and signs and symptoms of oral cancers was low; misinformation was high. Although 85 percent reported hearing about oral or mouth cancer, only 28 percent of the respondents reported having had an oral cancer examination. Of these, 20 percent had the exam during the past year--the recommended frequency for persons 40 years of age or older. In logistic regression analysis, adults more likely to have had an oral cancer examination included those who thought personal behavior causes more cancer than environmental factors; had more knowledge about risk factors for oral cancer; and were 40-64 years of age, white, and better educated than their counterparts (P < .05). The primary reasons for not having an exam were "no reason/didn't know I should" and "doctor/dentist didn't recommend." CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a need for interventions designed to increase knowledge levels of risk factors for, signs, and symptoms of oral cancers and the need for oral cancer examinations; and to increase oral cancer examinations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Knowledge, opinions and practices of general dentists regarding oral cancer: a pilot survey.

The authors mailed a pilot survey to 500 randomly selected general dentists. Although most dentists reported their knowledge of oral cancer to be current, their actual knowledge of oral cancer risk factors and signs and symptoms was inconsistent. Conflicting data were also found between their level of knowledge and their provision of oral cancer examinations. Most respondents agreed that patients should undergo an oral cancer examination annually, yet many do not provide this service.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The need for health promotion in oral cancer prevention and early detection.

OBJECTIVES: This review paper provides a rationale for using health promotion to help reduce morbidity and mortality due to oral cancers by identifying barriers to prevention and early detection of these cancers and discussing strategies for change. METHODS: A literature review of the following areas was conducted: epidemiology of and risk factors for oral cancers; knowledge, opinions, and practices of health care providers and the public regarding prevention, early detection, and control of oral cancers; and policies and regulations that either enhance or act as barriers to the prevention and early detection of oral cancers. RESULTS: Overall, the public is ill-informed about risk factors for and signs and symptoms of oral cancers and relatively few US adults have had an oral cancer examination. Further, health care providers are remiss in providing oral cancer examinations and detecting early oral cancers. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve the 13 oral cancer objectives contained in "Healthy People 2000," health care providers and the public must know the risk factors for these cancers as well as their signs and symptoms. Further, health care providers need to provide oral cancer examinations routinely and competently. Equally important, the public needs to know that an examination for oral cancer is available and that they can request one routinely. Thus, a vigorous agenda that includes education, policy, and research initiatives is needed to enhance oral cancer prevention and early detection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Assessing physicians' and dentists' oral cancer knowledge, opinions and practices.

Oral cancer is responsible for more than 8,000 deaths each year. This mortality may be attributed to lack of effective oral examinations by dental and medical primary care clinicians. This pilot project assessed the knowledge, opinions and practices of a group of Maryland physicians and dentists in oral cancer prevention, diagnosis and detection. Dentists performed more oral cancer examinations, although physicians saw more high-risk patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Assessment of alcohol and tobacco use in dental schools' health history forms.

Health history forms are an integral component of students' clinical and didactic training in physical assessment and often serve as a model for students to use in their future practices. This study examined how alcohol and tobacco use are assessed in patient health history forms used in the dental schools of the United States and Canada (n = 63). Deans of schools were requested to send a copy of their health history and other supplemental forms used for patient care. The response rate was 98 percent. Almost 25 percent of the schools' forms did not address either alcohol or tobacco use; 37 percent failed to address one or both risk behaviors; 25 percent did not request tobacco information; and 36 percent did not address alcohol use. Major inconsistencies regarding the inclusion, content, and quantity of alcohol and tobacco questions were noted. Consensus among dental schools as to which questions to include in their health forms was not apparent.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1994

Sterilization of dental instruments and devices: an update.

Dental sterilization techniques have become a focus of attention as a result of disclosure of occupational HIV transmission from an infected dentist to a cluster of patients. Although there has never been a confirmed report of a patient acquiring an infectious blood-borne disease from a dental instrument or device, recommendations for universal sterilization of dental handpieces and other devices have recently been implemented. Because of the higher rate of hepatitis B virus transmissability in the dental health care environment, an upgrade in sterilization protocols may be warranted. Stringent sterilization standards are especially necessary in higher-risk institutional dental care settings. However, a high rate of dental sterilization errors has been reported and traced to operator error. Recent institutional dental sterilization policy changes have been developed to reduce the chance of sterilization error, further diminishing the risk of cross contamination.

Dental Equipment↗
PubMed1993

Oral cancer mortality in Maryland.

Oral cancer mortality is one of the most preventable types of cancer deaths when the lesion is detected early. The survival rate is quite low, however, when oral cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage. While the Maryland oral cancer incidence rate is lower than the US average, the state ranks fourth in the country for overall age-adjusted oral cancer mortality; Maryland's African-American population has the highest oral cavity and pharyngeal mortality rate. Delayed diagnosis may explain this occurrence since groups at high risk for developing oral cancer, such as the elderly and minority groups, do not have ready access to the Maryland oral health care system. As the elderly annually use physicians' services almost twice as much as they use dentists' services, physicians are encouraged to routinely complete an oral cavity and pharyngeal examination. Inclusion of oral health services into a Maryland health system reform benefits package would also improve routine screening frequency for oral cancer.

Female↗