Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

H Pancherz

Publications and source records attributed to H Pancherz.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

[The "automatic activation" of labial arch wires during orthodontic treatment with expansion plates].

In laboratory experiments, progressive transversal jaw expansion with screw plates was simulated and the resulting increase in labial archwire force and deflection (autoactivation) was analysed. The results showed that progressive activation of a screw plate caused an initial increase in labial archwire force, which was subsequently followed by a minor reduction, and which stabilised after 90 seconds. Archwire force increases with the diameter of the wire, spring-hard wires developing higher forces than hard wires, and deflection decrease progressively with increasing size of the single activation step, as well as with increasing total activation. These results may have the following practical implications: on adjustment of the screw of the plate, the labial archwire is automatically activated to a reasonable degree for retroclination of the front teeth in screw plate treatment. This is particularly true when an 0.8 mm spring-hard wire is used. More constant archwire force is obtained by applying frequent small activations of the screw rather than a few large ones. To maintain the labial archwire force at a useful level, throughout treatment, fabrication of a new plate is recommended before the full range of screw adjustment is exhausted.

Activator Appliances

[The orthodontic treatment needs of young adults. An epidemiological study of recruits].

In an epidemiological study of 370 recruits, the need for orthodontic treatment was investigated. Subjects who had previously received orthodontic treatment (n = 135) were compared with untreated subjects (n = 234). An unequivocal need for orthodontic treatment was ascertained in 50% of the recruits. Differences between previously treated subjects and untreated subjects were not Some 60% of the orthodontic measures had been carried out by an orthodontist, and 40% by a nonspecialist dentist. The results of treatment were generally unsatisfactory, although the success rate achieved by the orthodontists did appear somewhat higher than that seen with nonspecialist dentists.

Adolescent

Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of Herbst appliance treatment in relation to normal growth and development. The sample consisted of 32 subjects (16 boys and 16 girls) with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated successfully with the Herbst appliance for an average period of 7 months. The patients were reinvestigated 6 months post-treatment when the occlusion had settled and at the end of the growth period, an average of 6.7 years (SD = 1.1 years) after therapy. The control group comprised of 32 subjects (16 boys and 16 girls) with excellent occlusion (Bolton Standards). Sagittal, skeletal, and dental changes occurring during three observation periods were evaluated on lateral cephalograms in centric occlusion. On a long-term basis, Herbst treatment improved the sagittal jaw base relationship, but did not normalize it. The sagittal dental arch relationship, on the other hand, was almost normalized.

Activator Appliances

The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the number of, and the interrelation between, skeletal and dental components that contribute to Class II relapse after Herbst treatment. A comparison was made between 15 relapse and 14 stable cases at least 5 years after treatment. Lateral cephalograms taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment, as well as 6 months and 5 to 10 years after treatment, were analyzed. The results revealed that relapse in the overjet and sagittal molar relationship resulted mainly from posttreatment maxillary and mandibular dental changes. In particular, the maxillary incisors and molars moved significantly (p less than 0.05) to a more anterior position in the relapse group than in the stable group. The interrelation between maxillary and mandibular posttreatment growth was favorable and did not contribute to the occlusal relapse. It is hypothesized that the main causes of the Class II relapse in patients treated with the Herbst appliance were a persisting lip-tongue dysfunction habit and an unstable cuspal interdigitation after treatment.

Adolescent

Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study.

The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the dentofacial complex with special reference to the growth period in which the patients were treated. The sample consisted of 40 male subjects with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated successfully with the Herbst appliance for an average period of 7 months. The patients were reinvestigated at the end of the growth period, on average 6.6 years (SD = 1.0 years) after therapy. Nineteen patients were treated before the maximum of pubertal growth (prepeak), 15 at the maximum (peak) and 6 after the pubertal growth maximum (post-peak). Sagittal skeletal and dental changes occurring during and after Herbst treatment were evaluated on lateral radiographs in centric occlusion. At the time of follow-up examination no group differences were seen in sagittal dental arch relationships. During the follow-up period after Herbst treatment maxillary and mandibular growth development were favourable and comparable in all three groups: mandibular growth exceeding maxillary growth by an average of 4.3 mm (SD = 2.4 mm). For natural reasons, however, the amount of jaw growth during the follow-up period was larger in the subjects treated before the maximum of pubertal growth than in the subjects treated at the later stages. The conclusion of this study was that the growth period in which Herbst treatment was performed did not seem to have any conclusive effect on the long-term results. However, in order to favour occlusal stability after treatment and to reduce the time of post-treatment retention, Herbst therapy in the permanent dentition at or just after peak height velocity of growth is recommended.

Activator Appliances

Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the occlusion and craniofacial growth. The material consisted of twenty growing boys with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Ten of the boys were treated with the Herbst appliance for 6 months. The other ten boys served as a control group. Dental casts, profile roentgenograms, and TMJ radiographs were analyzed before and after 6 months of examination. The following treatment results were found: 1. Normal occlusal conditions occurred in all patients. 2. Maxillary growth may have been inhibited or redirected. The SNA angle was reduced slightly. 3. Mandibular growth was greater than average. The SNB angle increased. 4. Mandibular length increased, probably because of condylar growth stimulation. 5. Lower facial height increased. The mandibular plane angle, however, remained unchanged. 6. The convexity of the soft- and hard-tissue profile was somewhat reduced.

Cephalometry

The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment.

The long-term results of activator treatment were investigated in 15 subjects with a small and 13 subject with a large pretreatment mandibular plane angle. The results of the investigation revealed the following: 1. Activator treatment resulted in a general improvement in the sagittal and vertical incisor relationship in both large and small angle cases. 2. Overjet relapse was more frequent and overbite relapse less frequent in large angle cases than in small angle cases. 3. During the period before treatment follow-up examination the frequency of patients with open bite increased in the large angle group and decreased in the small angle group. 4. The mandibular intercanine arch width was smaller and the frequency of crowding in the mandibular incisor segment was higher in the large angle group than in the small angle group. 5. A large pretreatment mandibular plane angle, per se, was not a primary factor in treatment failure. However, an unfavourable mandibular growth in combination with an atypical tongue function seemed to be the main reason for the relapse found in the large angle subjects.

Activator Appliances

Masticatory function after activator treatment. An analysis of masticatory efficiency, occlusal contact conditions and EMG activity.

Masticatory function was investigated in nine patients with relapse and ten patients without relapse of overjet after activator treatment, Masticatory efficiency, evaluated by a chewing test, was related to the number of intermaxillary tooth contacts and the electromyographic (EMG) activity from the temporal and masseter muscles during chewing. The results of the investigation indicated that a reduced masticatory efficiency was connected with fewer intermaxillary tooth contacts and less EMG activity from the temporal and masseter muscles. In patients with relapse of overjet, masticatory efficiency and muscle activity was reduced in comparison with patients without relapse. The relationship between the number of tooth contacts and masticatory efficiency was poor in the relapse patients. Unstable occlusal conditions and atypical tongue function may be an explanation.

Activator Appliances

[My dissertation].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Activator Appliances

Long-term effects of activator (Andresen appliance) treatment. A clinical, biometric, cephalometric roentgenographic and functional analysis.

The purpose of this investigation was to analyse the long-term effects of activator treatment on the dental arches and arch relationships, the dento-facial skeleton and the function of the masticatory system. A follow-up study was performed on 112 patients treated 10-20 years previously with activators as the sole orthodontic appliance. In connection with activator treatment extractions of permanent teeth were performed on 66 patients while 46 patients were treated without tooth extractions. The investigation consisted of four separate portions (Parts I-IV).

Activator Appliances