Impact of surgical innovation on liver transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
H P Grewal
Publications and source records attributed to H P Grewal.
Improving results in solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage and thymoglobulin induction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Rhodococcus equi pulmonary infection in a pancreas-alone transplant recipient: consequence of intense immunosuppression.
We report the case of a pancreas-alone transplant recipient who developed Rhodococcus equi pneumonia after receiving multiple courses of antilymphocyte therapy for the treatment of recurrent acute pancreas allograft rejection. We also review and discuss the diagnosis, clinical course, and treatment of 18 cases of R. equi infection reported in solid organ transplant recipients. The lung is the most common primary site of infection, but R. equi infection is difficult to diagnose because of the pleomorphic, gram-positive, and partially acid-fast nature of the organism. Treatment usually involves a combination of antibiotics including rifampin, macrolides, vancomycin, and ciprofloxacin. The optimal duration of therapy is unknown, but relapse is common if the duration of treatment is less than 14 days. The duration of therapy should be guided by clinical recovery, culture results, and radiographic findings. Monitoring levels of immunosuppressive agents-such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine-is needed in order to avoid clinically significant drug interactions with rifampin or the macrolides when these agents are used in order to treat R. equi infection in the transplant population.
Actinomycetales Infections↗
Evolving experience of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis in liver transplantation.
Passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is important to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for chronic HBV cirrhosis. With availability of lamivudine (3TC), the use of combination prophylaxis with long-term HBIG/3TC has been shown to prevent short-term HBV recurrence. This report compares HBV recurrence rates between groups receiving no/short-term HBIG, long-term HBIG alone, or HBIG/3TC prophylaxis, and describes HBIG requirements during the first 6 and 12 months in the latter two groups. This study involved patients undergoing OLT at the University of Tennessee-Memphis between May 1990 and July 2001. During this period, 388 liver transplants were performed at our center. All hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients (n = 27) were included in this retrospective analysis. The groups were similar with regard to pre-transplant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, weight, and pre-transplant diagnosis. Owing to the retrospective study design, median follow-up was longer for the no-prophylaxis (5.6 years) and the HBIG-alone (6.0 years) groups compared to the HBIG/3TC group (4.2 years). Patient survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 71% in the HBIG-alone groups compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.09). When censored for death with a functioning graft, graft survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 86% in the HBIG-alone group compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.07). The overall incidence of HBV recurrence in the no-prophylaxis era was 100% and 21% in the HBIG-alone era compared to 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001), despite similar mean and median HBIG trough titers in the HBIG-alone and HBIG/3TC groups. The incidence of HBV recurrence in HBV DNA-positive recipients was 100% in the no-prophylaxis era, 30% in the HBIG-alone era, and 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001). Recipients in the HBIG-alone group had a nearly two-fold increase in HBIG requirement at 6 and 12 months in order to maintain similar HBIG trough titers post-transplant compared to recipients in the HBIG/3TC group despite similar pre-transplant HBV serology. This increased HBIG requirement in the HBIG-alone group resulted in a marked increase in the mean overall cost of HBV prophylaxis in this group ($47,367 US dollars at 6 months; $84,280 US dollars at 12 months) compared to the HBIG/3TC group ($25,931 US dollars at 6 months; $49,599 US dollars at 12 months). These data demonstrate an improvement in patient and graft survival rates in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC prophylaxis compared to the HBIG-alone and no-prophylaxis groups. There was a significant reduction in HBV recurrence in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC when compared to the groups receiving HBIG alone or no prophylaxis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the addition of 3TC to the long-term HBIG regimen led to elimination of the disparity previously described in HBV recurrence rates between HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative recipients. Importantly, our data demonstrates a complete lack of HBV recurrence in the HBIG/3TC group at a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Additionally, the data show that the addition of 3TC to the post-operative prophylaxis regimen resulted in a reduction in the requirement of HBIG at 6 and 12 months, which markedly reduced the overall cost of post-transplant HBV prophylaxis.
Adult↗
A 9-year experience with 126 pancreas transplants with portal enteric drainage.
HYPOTHESIS: A novel technique of pancreas transplantation (PTX) with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric exocrine drainage (portal enteric) was developed at our center to improve the PTX procedure. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Single-center experience at a university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: From October 1990 through December 1999, we performed 126 PTXs with portal enteric drainage, including 90 simultaneous kidney PTXs (SKPT) and 36 solitary PTXs (18 sequential PTXs after kidney transplantation and 18 PTXs alone). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and graft survival rates; medical and surgical morbidity. Three groups, representing 3 eras of immunosuppression, were compared. Thirty patients underwent SKPT with muromonab-CD3 induction and cyclosporine-based therapy in era 1 (October 1990 through June 1995); 42 SKPTs received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression without antibody induction in era 2 (July 1995 through May 1998); and 18 SKPTs were performed in era 3 (June 1998 through December 1999) with either basiliximab or daclizumab induction. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates after SKPT were 77% in era 1, 93% in era 2, and 100% in era 3 (P =.03). The 1-year kidney graft survival rates were 77% in era 1, 93% in era 2, and 94% in era 3 (P =.08). The 1-year pancreas graft survival rates after SKPT were 60% in era 1, 83% in era 2, and 83% in era 3 (P =.06). The incidences of rejection (63% vs. 33% vs. 39%; P<.001) and thrombosis (20% vs. 7% vs. 6%; P<.001) were decreased in eras 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous kidney PTXs with portal enteric drainage can be performed with improved outcomes.
Adolescent↗
Initial clinical experience with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.
Since 1996, our standard immunosuppressive protocol for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids without antibody induction. When basiliximab and daclizumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), became available, we selectively added these agents to our standard protocol. The purpose of this prospective, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-2 receptor antagonists in SKPT. From April 1998 to August 1999, 35 SKPTS were performed. One patient with delayed graft function received Thymoglobulin and was excluded; 17 received no induction, and 17 received IL-2R antagonists (9 basiliximab, 8 daclizumab) as induction. Demographic- and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 6 months, patient survival was 88 % (15/17) in the induction arm compared to 100 % (17/17) in the no-induction arm, P = NS. The 2 causes of death were sepsis and hemolytic uremic syndrome, and both patients died with functioning grafts. Death-censored pancreas and kidney graft survival rates in the induction and the no-induction groups were 88 % vs. 100 % respectively, in both groups. The incidence of acute rejection (kidney or pancreas) at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (35 % in both groups). Biopsy proven pancreas and kidney acute rejections were 35 % vs. 24 % and 12 % vs. 12 % in the induction- and no-induction groups, respectively. The incidences of major infection and readmission did not differ between groups. TAC trough levels and mean daily doses of TAC, MMF and steroids did not differ between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The incidence of event-free survival (no death, rejection, or graft loss) at 6 months was 59 % (10/17) in the induction and 65 % (11/17) in the no-induction group. Basiliximab and daclizumab appear to be safe in SKPT. However, the preliminary results of this study do not demonstrate a significant benefit in either reducing the incidence of acute rejection or improving outcomes at 6 months. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y↗
Patterns of cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with ganciclovir prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND: The impact of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid immunosuppression on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in combination with ganciclovir prophylaxis in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 75 SKPTs performed between 1 January 1996 and 7 January 1999. All patients received ganciclovir for 3 months, but CMV donor (D)+ / recipient (R)- patients received ganciclovir for 6 months. RESULTS: 16/74 (22%) were CMV D+/R-, 25 (33%) D+/R+, 16 (22%) D-/R+, and 17 (23%) D-/R- (1 patient with unknown donor serology was excluded). The mean time to CMV infection was 198 days post-transplant. The incidence of either CMV infection or tissue invasive CMV disease was 16/74 (22%), including 9 (12%) with CMV infection and 7 (10%) CMV disease. The one-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 91%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 29 months (minimum of 12 months). CMV infection was not associated with an increased incidence of graft failure or mortality. The D+/R- group had the highest incidence of CMV infection (44%) compared with the other serologic groups (17%, P=0.02). Concurrent CMV and rejection occurred more frequently in the D+/R- than the other serologic groups (25% vs. 7%, P=0.03). The D-/R- group had the best outcomes, with no CMV infection, improved kidney graft survival at the end of follow-up (82% vs. 72%, P=0.04) and the highest event-free survival (no CMV infection, rejection, or graft loss) when compared to the other groups (76% vs. 33%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous studies, ganciclovir prophylaxis delayed the onset and reduced the severity of CMV infection in patients receiving TAC, MMF, and steroids. Despite ganciclovir prophylaxis, CMV seronegative patients receiving CMV D+ organs had worse outcomes than seronegative recipients receiving CMV D- organs.
Adult↗
Long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients with portal-enteric versus systemic-bladder drainage.
We retrospectively reviewed long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients with portal-enteric (P-E) versus systemic-bladder (S-B) drainage. Forty-five patients were alive with functioning grafts 1 year after SKPT and were followed up for a minimum of 3 years (mean, 5.9 years), including 26 patients with P-E drainage and 19 patients with S-B drainage. Recipient demographic and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. In both groups, hospital admissions decreased significantly with increasing time after SKPT, although significantly fewer readmissions occurred in the first year in the P-E than the S-B group. The most common reason for readmission in both groups was infection, followed by miscellaneous, surgical, and immunologic morbidity. The incidence of readmission for dehydration was significantly less in the P-E group (P < 0.01). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar between groups, although the number of antihypertensive medications was significantly less in the S-B group. Although fasting C-peptide levels were significantly greater in the S-B group, the two groups were similar with regard to carbohydrate (fasting serum glucose, hemoglobin A(1c)) and lipid (total cholesterol) metabolism. Renal and pancreas allograft functions were similar between the two groups. At 1 year post-SKPT, stabilization in most diabetic complications was reported. Four quality-of-life surveys that provided 29 scores were completed 6 to 24 months (mean, 18.5 months) after SKPT. Improved quality of life was reported in all but one of the scales, with many dimensions showing significant improvements. At 3 years after SKPT, no activity limitation was reported in 76% of patients with P-E drainage versus 53% with S-B drainage (P = 0.11). Five-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after P-E versus S-B drainage are 92% and 84%, 81% and 79%, and 88% and 74%, respectively (P = not significant). SKPT with P-E drainage is a safe and effective method to treat advanced diabetic nephropathy and is associated with decreasing morbidity, improving rehabilitation and quality of life, and stablizing metabolic function over time. The long-term prognosis after the first year is excellent and at least similar to the results achieved with S-B drainage.
Adult↗
Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era.
METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.
Adult↗
Surgical technique for right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation without venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting and with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.
OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience with adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) without venovenous bypass and to describe modifications that will allow for a direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Adult living donor liver transplantation is being evaluated as a method to alleviate the organ shortage. Descriptions of the procedure have emphasized the use of venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, and the mandatory use of a Roux-en-Y biliary enteric anastomosis. The authors describe a technique for ALDLT without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping in 11 recipients and describe the modifications to the procedure that may allow a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in certain cases. METHODS: Between March 1999 and March 2000, 11 ALDLTs were performed at the authors' institution. All procedures were performed without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping. After a modification to the procedure, five of the last six recipients underwent biliary reconstruction with a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis. Data regarding donor, recipient, and graft survival, complications, and graft function were collected. RESULTS: Recipients comprised five women and six men, mean age 48 years. Donors comprised five women and six men, mean age 36.5 years. Donor to recipient relationships included sibling, spouse, son, and daughter. Indications for transplantation were hepatitis C, hepatitis C with hepatocellular carcinoma, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, ethanol, and cryptogenic. No case required venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting. The right hepatic vein of the donor graft was anastomosed to the confluence of the left and middle hepatic veins in all cases. All donors are alive and well, with no adverse complications reported. Recipient and graft survival rates were 91% and 82%, respectively, for ALDLT versus 92% and 92% for recipients of cadaveric organs during the same time period. One recipient died of multiple organ failure and sepsis. Biliary reconstruction was performed by Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in the six cases. In five of the last six recipients, direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction with a T tube was used. No anastomotic leaks or strictures occurred in the patients undergoing duct-to-duct reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Adult living donor liver transplantation can be performed safely and may help alleviate the organ shortage. Neither venovenous bypass nor portocaval shunting is necessary to perform the procedure, and modifications to both the donor and recipient hepatectomy procedures may allow biliary reconstruction to be performed by a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis in selected cases.
Adult↗
A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric (SE) versus portal-enteric (PE) drainage in a prospective fashion. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To improve the physiology of pancreas transplantation, the authors developed a new technique of portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions. METHODS: During a 26-month period, the authors prospectively alternated 54 consecutive simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants to either SE (n = 27) or PE (n = 27) drainage. The two groups were well matched for numerous characteristics. Maintenance immunosuppression in both groups consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. RESULTS: Patient survival rates were 93% SE versus 96% PE; kidney graft survival rates were 93% in both groups. Pancreas transplantation survival (complete insulin independence) was 74% after SE versus 85% after PE drainage with a mean follow-up of 17 months. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 12.4 days in the SE group and 12.8 days in the PE group. The SE group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions. The incidences of acute rejection (33%) and major infection (52%) were similar in both groups. The incidence of intraabdominal infection was slightly higher in the SE group. However, the early relaparotomy rate was similar between groups. The composite endpoint of no rejection, graft loss, or death was attained in 56% of SE versus 59% of PE patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with SE or PE drainage can be performed with comparable short-term outcomes.
Adult↗
Combined liver and kidney transplantation in children.
BACKGROUND: Preexisting renal dysfunction has been reported to significantly increase the morbidity and mortality associated with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). OLT alone has been recommended for adults and children with end-stage liver disease and reversible causes of renal failure (i.e., hepatorenal syndrome), whereas combined liver and kidney transplantation (LKT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for adults with combined end-stage liver and kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of LKT in children. METHODS: Between October of 1984 and 1997, 385 children less than 18 years of age underwent OLT at the University of Chicago. During this same time period 12 patients underwent LKT. Data were gathered by retrospective review of the patients medical records and by interviews conducted with the patients' families. RESULTS: Actuarial patient survival was comparable for children who underwent OLT alone and LKT (69% versus 67% at 5 years). All allograft losses in the LKT group were the result of patient death and occurred within the first 90 postoperative days. Factors associated with decreased patient survival included severity of illness as reflected by United Network of Organ Sharing status and LKT after failed OLT or cadaveric renal transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In children with concomitant endstage liver and kidney disease, LKT can be considered an effective therapeutic option in selected patients. Long-term patient survival in patients undergoing LKT is comparable to that of patients with normal renal function undergoing OLT alone.
Child↗
Outcomes of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation in African-American recipients: a case-control study.
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that African-American (AA) ethnicity is a risk factor for rejection and graft loss after kidney transplantation. However, little data is available regarding outcomes after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (SKPT) in AA recipients. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of SKPT in AA patients to matched Caucasian patients as controls. METHODS: From January 1996 to September 1999, we performed 79 SKPTs, including 10 in AA recipients. Ten Caucasian controls were selected and matched for age, gender, weight, timing and technique of transplantation, and immunosuppressive regimen. Clinical outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched for donor and recipient demographic, immunologic and transplant characteristics, including 2 patients in each group with type 2 diabetes. All patients received tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids, and about half in each group received antibody induction therapy. Patient survival was 100% in both groups with a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 6 47). Kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were both 80% in the AA and 100% in the Caucasian groups, respectively (p = 0.14). All but one kidney (in the AA group) and all pancreas grafts experienced immediate function. There were two immunologic kidney and two immunologic pancreas graft losses in the AA group. No grafts were lost due to technical problems. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 16 d in the AA group compared to 10 d in the Caucasian group (p = 0.07). The AA group had a slight increase in the number of readmissions (mean 2.2 AA vs. 1.6 Caucasian, p = 0.08). The incidence of biopsy-proven pancreas acute rejection was significantly higher in the AA group (50%) compared to the Caucasian group (10%) (p = 0.05). The incidence of either kidney or pancreas acute rejection was also higher in the AA group (60% AA vs. 20% Caucasian, p = 0.06). TAC levels were comparable at specific times after transplantation, al-though there was a trend toward higher doses of TAC in the AA group to achieve therapeutic levels. The incidences of relaparotomy (30% AA vs. 20% Caucasian) and major infection (40% AA vs. 60% Caucasian) were similar between groups. Renal and pancreas allograft functions were comparable between groups at specific times after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SKPT in AA recipients may be associated with a higher incidence of rejection and immunologic graft loss compared to matched Caucasian controls.
Adult↗
A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Most pancreas transplants are performed with systemic venous delivery of insulin and bladder drainage of the exocrine secretions (systemic-bladder [S-B]). To develop a more physiologic procedure, we performed pancreas transplantations with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]). METHODS: During an 11-month period, we prospectively alternated 32 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients to either S-B (n = 16) or P-E (n = 16) drainage with standardized immunosuppression. RESULTS: Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, and 82% S-B versus 92% P-E, respectively. Pancreas graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplantation were 80% S-B versus 75% P-E. There were no graft losses either to immunologic or infectious complications in either group, but the incidence of acute rejection was slightly higher in the S-B group (44% S-B vs 31% P-E, P = NS). The cost and length of the initial hospital stay were similar between groups. The incidence of operative complications, major infections, and cytomegalovirus infections were likewise comparable. However, the S-B group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions, urinary tract infections, and urologic complications. Furthermore, metabolic acidosis and dehydration were more common in the S-B group. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation with P-E drainage can be performed with short-term results comparable to those of transplantation with S-B drainage.
Adult↗
Choice of surgical technique influences perioperative outcomes in liver transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine how the choice of surgical technique influenced perioperative outcomes in liver transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The standard technique of orthotopic liver transplantation with venovenous bypass (VVB) is commonly used to facilitate hemodynamic stability. However, this traditional procedure is associated with unique complications that can be avoided by using the technique of liver resection without caval excision (the piggyback technique). METHODS: A prospective comparison of the two procedures was conducted in 90 patients (34 piggyback and 56 with VVB) during a 2.5-year period. Although both groups had similar donor and recipient demographic characteristics, posttransplant outcomes were significantly better for the patients undergoing the piggyback technique. The effect of surgical technique was examined using a stepwise approach that considered its impact on two levels of perioperative and postoperative events. RESULTS: The analysis of the first level of perioperative events found that the piggyback procedure resulted in a 50% decrease in the duration of the anhepatic phase. The analysis of the second level of perioperative events found a significant relation between the anhepatic phase and the duration of surgery and between the anhepatic phase and the need for blood replacement. The analysis of the first level of postoperative events found that the intensive care unit stay was significantly related to both the duration of surgery and the need for blood replacement. The intensive care unit stay was in turn related to the second level of postoperative events, namely the length of hospital stay. Finally, total charges were directly related to length of hospital stay. The overall 1-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 94% in the piggyback and 96% in the VVB groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that surgical choices in complex procedures such as orthotopic liver transplantation trigger a chain of events that can significantly affect resource utilization. In the current healthcare climate, examination of the sequence of events that follow a specific treatment may provide a more complete framework for choosing between treatment alternatives.
Extracorporeal Circulation↗
Portal-enteric pancreas transplantation at the University of Tennessee, Memphis.
The UT Memphis group has made a number of important contributions to the field of PTX, including: 1) pioneering studies on the effects of PTX on autonomic neuropathy, 2) comprehensive reports dealing with quality of life after PTX, 3) seminal studies on the metabolic effects of PTX with portal venous delivery of insulin, 4) refining and perfecting a novel technique of PTX with portal venous drainage of insulin and primary enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions, 5) describing a safe outpatient percutaneous technique of pancreas allograft biopsy, 6) developing the use of glucose tolerance for rejection surveillance, and 7) managing PTX patients with biopsy-directed immunosuppression and no anti-lymphocyte induction therapy. The P-E technique has the potential to become the standard of care in the near future because it is more physiologic, normalizes carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and minimizes complications attributed to the transplant procedure. In addition, we have been actively involved in studying new immunosuppressive regimens in order to improve and simplify the care of the PTX recipient. We believe that PTX will remain an important treatment option for IDDM until other strategies are developed that can provide equal glycemic control with less or no immunosuppression and less overall morbidity.
Adult↗
Eighteen years of experience with adult and pediatric liver transplantation at the University of Tennessee, Memphis.
1. Since its inception, the liver program at UT Memphis has been striving to serve its population by stressing access, technical innovation, and by its focus on quality of life. The results for both adult and pediatric transplants over the past 18 years demonstrate that small and medium-sized programs can function efficiently and are valuable for their local communities. 2. Patient and graft survival rates exceeded 85% in the pediatric population in the first year with the 5-, 10-, and 15-year results above 75%. 3. Patient and graft survival rates in adults were 83% at one year, 68% at 5 years, and 60% at 10 years. 4. Innovative techniques in liver transplantation have had a dramatic impact on accessibility of pediatric recipients to liver transplantation and recently are becoming crucial for select populations of adults requiring expedited transplantation.
Adult↗