Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H O Conn

Publications and source records attributed to H O Conn.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Distal spleno-renal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials.

Meta-analysis was used to evaluate 4 clinical trials comparing distal spleno-renal shunt (DSRS) with endoscopic sclerotherapy (EVS) in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: the interval between bleeding and therapy ranges from < 14 days to > 100 days. A questionnaire was sent to each author of the published trials concerning methods, definitions and results of the trials in order to obtain more detailed and up-to-date information. The selected end-points for the meta-analysis were: rebleeding, mortality and chronic encephalopathy. Analysis of the results in the questionnaires was made using the method proposed by Collins. The pooled relative risk (i.e. the combined Odds ratio of each trial as an estimate of overall efficacy) of rebleeding was statistically reduced by DSRS (0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27). Despite this, the overall risk of death following DSRS was only marginally decreased (0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.29); the lack of homogeneity in the results does not permit any significant conclusions on this end-point. However, in non-alcoholic patients, the decrease in risk of death was greater, and this without heterogeneity, following DSRS than EVS (0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.50). The overall risk of chronic encephalopathy was slightly increased after DSRS (1.86; 95% confidence interval 0.90-3.86). In conclusion, DSRS significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding compared to EVS without increasing the risk of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. However, DSRS did not significantly affect the overall death risk. Only in non-alcoholic disease did it seem to show an advantage over EVS.

Brain Diseases↗
PubMed1991

Propranolol in the prevention of the first hemorrhage from esophagogastric varices: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The Boston-New Haven-Barcelona Portal Hypertension Study Group.

To assess the effectiveness of propranolol in the prevention of initial variceal hemorrhage, a double-blind, randomized trial was carried out in three centers. Patients with cirrhosis (78% alcoholic), hepatic venous pressure gradients greater than 12 mm Hg and endoscopically proven esophageal varices were randomly assigned to propranolol (51 patients) or placebo (51 patients). Of the 102 patients, 58% were Child's class A, 34% were Child's class B and 8% were Child's class C. Daily dosage was determined by the administration of progressively increasing doses of propranolol with the hepatic vein catheter in place to achieve a 25% decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient, a decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg or a decrease in resting heart rate to less than 55 beats/min. During a mean follow-up period of 16.3 mo, 11 patients in the placebo group (22%) bled from esophageal varices compared with 2 in the propranolol group (4%) during a mean period of 17.1 mo (p less than 0.01). Three additional patients (6%) in the placebo group bled from portal hypertensive gastropathy compared with none in the propranolol group. Propranolol appeared effective in preventing bleeding from large varices. Eleven deaths (22%) occurred in the placebo group compared with eight deaths (16%) in the propranolol group (NS). The mean dose of propranolol was 132 mg/day, and the median dose was 80 mg/day. Using a compliance index (pill count, clinic attendance, alcohol and propranolol levels and alcohol history), 81% of the propranolol patients and 77% of the placebo patients were considered compliant. Complications severe enough to require cessation of therapy occurred in eight patients (16%) in the propranolol group and four in the placebo group (8%) (NS). We conclude that propranolol effectively prevents the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and large esophageal varices but does not improve survival.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1990

Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage.

In a double-blind randomized trial, the hemodynamic events following the administration of propranolol (n = 51) or a placebo (n = 51) were prospectively studied in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. The hepatic venous pressure gradient, heart rate, and variceal size were determined at the baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after the beginning of therapy. Baseline values were similar in both groups. At 3 months, the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased significantly in propranolol-treated patients (from 18.1 +/- 4.2 to 15.7 +/- 3.4 mm Hg; P less than 0.05) but not in patients receiving the placebo (19.6 +/- 6.8 to 17.5 +/- 5.3 mm Hg; NS). At subsequent time intervals this gradient decreased significantly from the baseline value in both groups. Heart rate decreased significantly in the propranolol-treated group at all times (P less than 0.001). Variceal hemorrhage occurred in 13 patients (11 placebo-, 2 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), all of whom had a hepatic venous pressure gradient greater than 12 mm Hg. In 21 patients (14 propranolol-, 7 placebo-treated) the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased to less than or equal to 12 mm Hg; none of them bled from esophageal varices, and their mortality rate also decreased. Because most of the bleeding events occurred during the first year (10 placebo-, 1 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), propranolol seems to have its protective effect during the period associated with the largest reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient. Because a reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg protects from variceal bleeding and increases the rate of survival, this should be the aim of the pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of somatostatin in the management of acute hemorrhage from esophageal varices.

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of intravenous somatostatin (Stilamin; Serono Laboratories, Inc., Randolph, MA) was performed in 102 patients with actively bleeding esophageal varices from August, 1985, to November, 1986. Patients had major hemorrhage indicated by hematemesis or melena and evidence of significant blood loss. For entry, patients had to have endoscopic demonstration of active bleeding from esophageal varices or stigmata of recent hemorrhage and bright red blood in the gastric aspirate with no other source of bleeding found. Randomized patients received identical-appearing somatostatin or placebo for a 30-hr study period. Those given somatostatin received a 250-micrograms bolus and a 250-micrograms per hr infusion with repeat bolus and doubling of the infusion if the bleeding was not controlled. In retrospect, 18 patients could not be evaluated. Of the 84 evaluable patients, 48 received somatostatin and 36 placebo. They were comparable in age, gender, severity of liver disease and history of variceal bleeding. Transfusion requirements were similar in both groups. Bleeding stopped for 12 consecutive hr during 30 hr of the study period in 31 (65%) of the somatostatin group vs. 30 (83%) of the placebo group (p = 0.06). The median time to cessation of bleeding was 2 hr in the placebo group and 3 hr in the somatostatin group. Deaths following the study period were nine (25%) in the placebo group and 15 (31%) in the somatostatin group. Within the limitations of the present study, we conclude that somatostatin was ineffective in the management of active bleeding of esophageal varices.

Adult↗