Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Nordman

Publications and source records attributed to H Nordman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

High-resolution computed tomography in the early detection of asbestosis.

A group of 21 former asbestos sprayers was studied with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and the findings were compared with radiographic, exposure and lung function variables. HRCT was superior to plain radiography in detecting parenchymal and pleural changes. It showed changes indicative of lung fibrosis, especially septal lines and parenchymal bands, in 9 of the 12 subjects (75%) with a plain radiographic category of 0/0 in the International Labour Office (ILO) 1980 classification of radiographs of pneumoconioses. The HRCT findings were classified according to a method developed by the authors, and an HRCT parenchymal score was calculated. The HRCT revealed pleural plaques in 19 of the 21 (90%) asbestos sprayers, whereas plain radiography detected pleural plaques in only 5 (24%) sprayers. Changes in the visceral pleura were detected twice as often with HRCT as with plain radiography. In the group without radiographic evidence of lung fibrosis (ILO < 1/0) and without evidence of emphysema in either the radiographs or the HRCT examination, there was a correlation between the HRCT parenchymal score and diffusion capacity (r = -0.64, P = 0.03) and total lung capacity (r = -0.61, P = 0.04). This finding indicates that parenchymal changes seen only with HRCT are of clinical importance. The study strongly suggests that for asbestos-exposed workers with an ILO classification of < 1/0 and functional impairment, an HRCT examination should always be considered.

Adult↗

Pharyngeal edema caused by occupational exposure to cellulase enzyme.

Enzymes can cause allergic asthma and rhinitis. Although patients sometimes complain of symptoms in their throat, we have not been able to find any published report of pharyngeal edema caused by exposure to enzymes. We present the case of a maintenance foreman who worked in a factory producing enzymes, and who had pharyngeal edema, asthma, and rhinitis at work. Prick tests for cellulase enzyme and cellulase RAST were positive. The causal association between his pharyngeal symptoms and cellulase was demonstrated with inhalation provocation tests in an exposure chamber.

Bronchial Provocation Tests↗

Occupational asthma--time for prevention.

Incidence figures show that occupational asthma is increasing. It often takes a deteriorating course. Follow-up studies of workers suffering from the disease have uniformly reported persistence of symptoms over long periods, even among formerly exposed workers. New initiators of occupational asthma are continuously being reported. Still "old" agents, such as diisocyanates and flours, remain major causes. There seems to be some disconnection in the dialogue between the medical and the technical parties involved. For prevention, it is essential to ensure that important information not only reaches those who are responsible for designing and maintaining processes, but that it is presented in an intelligible form. Occupational asthma has become an important occupational disease that merits high priority. Recent achievements should facilitate preventive actions. However, prevention is a multidisciplinary enterprise needing the commitment of industrial hygienists and engineers, chemists, and allergologists, in addition to that of occupational health personnel.

Asthma↗

Role of occupational exposure to airway irritants in the development of asthma.

In order to study the role of occupational exposure in the etiology of asthma, 78 asthmatics and 56 nonasthmatics from the Finnish twin cohort were investigated by means of a postal questionnaire. Among those studied were 31 identical twin pairs discordant with regard to asthma (i.e., only one member of the pair had asthma). The questionnaire inquired into the diagnosis and status of the asthma, smoking habits, atopic background, smoking history of the parents, and history as regards pets, and requested a detailed description of occupational exposure to airway allergens and irritants. Classification into asthmatics and nonasthmatics was based on the information gathered with the questionnaire, supplemented by other information whenever possible. Estimation of exposure was based on the subject's own report, on the work descriptions, and on the general knowledge about the exposure levels associated with work tasks in question. Exposure to organic solvents was found only in the asthmatic members of the discordant pairs, and none of the nonasthmatic persons had been exposed to solvents. There were no statistically significant differences as regards exposure to other unspecific irritants. Combined exposure to organic allergens and airway irritants was more common in the asthmatics than in the nonasthmatics (P = 0.009). Exposure to irritants was also more common among the asthmatics than the nonasthmatics with similar exposure to organic allergens (P = 0.004).

Adult↗

Experiences of specific IgE in asthma due to diisocyanates.

The specific IgE antibodies were studied with the Phadebas RAST technique in 35 patients with asthma due to diisocyanates. Two had been sensitized to toluene diisocyanate (TDI), 17 to methylene diisocyanate (MDI) and 16 to hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI). In each case the diagnosis was confirmed with a bronchial provocation test (BPT). The asthmatic reaction was immediate in 17 cases, of which three had also a late reaction (dual). Eighteen patients reacted only with a late reaction. Seven (20%) had specific IgE to diisocyanates. All RAST-positive patients had an immediate asthmatic reaction. None of the late reactors and referents had positive RASTs. RAST inhibition tests with 94-100% inhibition confirmed the specificity of the method. There was cross-reactivity between different diisocyanates, however. The patients with positive RAST to diisocyanates had a higher level of total IgE than the RAST negative group and the referents.

Antibody Formation↗

Formaldehyde asthma--rare or overlooked?

A total of 230 persons who had been exposed to formaldehyde and suffered from asthma-like respiratory symptoms were examined between January 1, 1977, and May 31, 1983. All the subjects had a bronchial provocation test with formaldehyde. On the basis of the medical and occupational history of the patients, the specific bronchial provocation test, and other test results, 12 cases were considered to be caused by specific sensitization to formaldehyde. All subjects had been exposed occupationally. An exposure period of between 1 mo and 19 yr preceded the onset of symptoms. Three persons displayed no bronchial hyperreactivity as assessed with a histamine or metacholine provocation test. Eleven of the 12 reactions were triggered by about 2.5 mg/m3 and one reaction by about 1.2 mg/m3 of formaldehyde. The late reaction in 1 patient was completely blocked by the inhalation of 100 micrograms of beclomethasone di-isoproprionate before the challenge with formaldehyde. Seventy-one of the 218 subjects who did not react when they were challenged with formaldehyde demonstrated bronchial hyperreactivity. We conclude that formaldehyde asthma, although apparently a rare disease, is under reported. Removal from exposure has a favorable effect on the symptoms. Low domestic exposures, however, may maintain the symptoms in individuals already sensitized.

Adult↗