Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Mosbech

Publications and source records attributed to H Mosbech.

86 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

The predictive value of bronchial histamine challenge in the diagnosis of bronchial asthma.

A prospective survey aiming to study the predictive value of bronchial histamine challenge was performed on 151 patients with a forced expiratory volume1 (FEV1) above 60% of predicted. According to variations in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and medical history the patients were classified as asthmatics (n = 97) or non-asthmatics (n = 54). The diagnostic properties of the challenge were calculated using the statement of Baye. Considering PC20 values below 4.00 mg/ml as positive, the predictive value of a positive test was about 0.80 and the predictive value of a negative about 0.76. When PC20 was below 0.125 mg/ml the predictive value of a positive test was 1.00, but an increase in PC20 in the range from 4.00 to 16 mg/ml did not increase the predictive value of a negative test. In this study the prevalence of asthma was about 0.6. We therefore conclude that bronchial histamine challenge is a valuable test for detection and exclusion of bronchial asthma, when the prevalence of the disease is high. In populations with a lower frequency of bronchial asthma the diagnostic value of a positive bronchial challenge will be negligible.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Insect allergy. A comparative study including case histories and immunological parameters.

One hundred and seventeen persons all stung by yellow jacket (YJ) and/or bee were examined by means of skin prick test with venom of these insects, skin prick test with 10 inhalant allergens and analyses of total IgE, specific IgE and IgG against honey bee and YJ venom. Eighty-seven persons had had a systemic reaction to YJ or bee sting, the rest had reacted normally or with a large local reaction. Positive correlations (P less than 0.05) were found between results of skin prick tests and specific IgE against venoms and, for YJ, between the severity of symptoms after sting and the size prick test with the venom. That some of the more severe symptoms could have been caused by non-immunological mechanisms could explain why a significant correlation was present only between the results of the prick test and specific IgE and not between these tests and the clinical symptoms. Specific IgE values against YJ and honey bee venom showed covariation, although no correlation could be demonstrated between the clinical symptoms after stings from these insects, or between skin prick test results using the two different extracts. The severity of the sting reactions was not correlated to age, atopic disposition, amount of total IgE, number of stings during life, or positive skin prick test to inhalant allergens. It is concluded that in insect allergy, specific IgE analysis and skin prick tests are supplementary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Controlled-release theophylline and proxyphylline in asthmatics: a comparative study.

In a short-term study, a new sustained-release preparation of proxyphylline (2400 mg/day) was compared to theophylline (800 mg/day) and placebo. A double-blind crossover design was used, and 10 adult asthmatics participated. No significant differences were found between the treatments with regard to relief of asthma symptoms, need for additional medication or incidence and intensity of side-effects. In the placebo period, morning peak-flow was significantly lower compared to active treatment periods.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Death caused by wasp and bee stings in Denmark 1960-1980.

During a 21-year period in Denmark a total of 26 deaths were caused by wasp or bee stings (according to the National Health Service). The deaths might be classified, with some overlapping, as caused by either anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shocks (between 65% and 80%), suffocation after stings in the airways (about 15%) or preexisting diseases, especially arteriosclerotic heart disease (approx. 20%). Characteristically, in most persons with shock reactions unconsciousness and death occurred very shortly after the sting (within 45 min), while the interval between sting and death was longer (30 min to a couple of hours) when death was caused by suffocation. In more than 21 of the 26 cases it seemed reasonable to assume that insect allergy might have contributed to the fatal outcome. Six of these cases had a previous history of abnormal reactions to insect venom, thus only a small group would have benefited from the prophylactic effect of hyposensitisation. There was no known previous history of reactions to insect stings in the other cases, but it is likely that more than six persons had had severe reactions to insect stings on other occasions. Presumably many deaths where insect stings have been involved--through not verified as causal--are classified as inexplicable or accidental, thus the real number of deaths caused by wasp or bee stings could be substantially greater. Consequently hyposensitisation after severe insect sting reactions of verified allergic genesis can still be advised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.

Skin prick tests with a standard allergen panel were carried out in duplicate (one on each arm) on all patients referred to an allergy out-patient clinic. A new lancet with 1-mm point length and a disposable hypodermic needle were used. Patients were randomized to lancet-needle, lancet-lancet, or needle-needle, and the skin prick tests were done by experienced or inexperienced nurses. The mean of the biggest and smallest diameters was used as a measure of the size of the wheal. Skin reactions from a total of 142 patients were included. For both lancet and needle a significant difference was noted when comparing experienced versus inexperienced investigators' reproducibility expressed as coefficient of variation. There was no significant difference in reproducibility when comparing lancet and needle results, and no significant difference in wheal size when comparing with histamine references. Surprisingly, the reactions on left arms were generally larger than those on right arms.

Allergens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison between specific IgE measured by RAST, two chemiluminescent assays and skin prick test.

Two hundred adult patients referred to a regional outpatient allergy clinic were skin prick tested and their specific IgE against ten inhalant allergens was measured by three different assays: the classical radioallergosorbent assay, Phadebas RAST (P-RAST), (Pharmacia AB, Uppsala, Sweden), the multi-allergosorbent chemiluminescent assay CLA (MAST), (Dome/Hollister-Stier, Miles Ltd., UK), and the immunocheminometric assay, MAGIC LITE SQ Specific IgE (ML), (ALK Laboratorierne, Hørsholm, Denmark). Skin prick test (SPT) was performed with extracts from the same companies. Marked differences between the assays were seen especially in the low range. Specific IgE was detected in 17% of the samples by P-RAST, in 66% by CLA, and in 17% by ML. Frequency distribution of P-RAST and ML measurements showed a peak at zero and a gradual decline towards larger values, whereas distribution for CLA was U-shaped with a peak at zero and another peak close to maximum reactions. Kendall's rank correlation coefficient being 0.80 for P-RAST vs. CLA. Correlation coefficient between measurements of specific IgE and SPT was high for CLA (0.65). Even in the low-level subgroup where IgE was detected by CLA only, a high correlation (0.60) between CLA and SPT was observed. In conclusion marked differences were observed between the three assays for specific IgE measurement. The CLA system seems to be more sensitive than the conventional P-RAST and ML, but further studies should reveal whether this extra sensitivity is clinically useful.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Skin prick testing with standardized extracts from 3 different manufacturers. A comparative randomized study.

The aim of this study was to compare skin reactivity to routine allergen prick test with panels of allergens, supplied by three different manufacturers. The allergens comprised ten aero-allergens commonly used for skin prick test in Northern Europe, and included pollen, dander, house dust mites, and moulds. Two hundred consecutive patients were tested. The methods for standardization of allergen extracts, declaration of allergenic potency, and recommended lancets differed. The equipment were Soluprick SQ (Allergologisk Laboratorium A/S, Denmark) (ALK), Alphatest (Dome/Hollister-Stier, U.K.) (DHS), and Phazet (Pharmacia, Sweden) (PHA). The coefficient of variation for the allergen coated PHA (same lancet was applied twice) was 0.31, and for ALK and DHS allergen extracts 0.13 and 0.18, respectively. The frequencies of patients with positive reactions to the various allergens were generally similar, although DHS appeared to elicit less positive reactions to Timothy, dog, and Dermatophagoides pteronnyssinus. For the individual physician, it may be important to know the allergenic activity of the different allergens in his routine panel compared to the activity in other similar panels.

Adolescent↗