Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Maisonneuve

Publications and source records attributed to H Maisonneuve.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Scientific writing: the choice of references].

Only "acceptable" references can be cited, i.e. references that the reader can find easily. Only published work must be referenced, and the author must only cite those papers he or she has actually read. These should be avoided, as they are always difficult to obtain. Conference abstracts are published either in the conference report handed to participants alone, or in special issues of journals. Only the latter should be cited, when necessary. References to oral presentations are not accepted. References to personal communications should not be included in the list of references. The author cited must have given express permission. "Secondhand" references, i.e. those the author has not taken time to read yet quotes nonetheless, are prohibited. Manuscripts submitted for publication should not be cited. Articles accepted for publications can be referenced as "In press; "name of journal"".

Bibliographies as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The educated societies and the development of medical evaluation].

The French National Agency for Medical Evaluation (ANDEM) is regularly cooperating with scientific societies. In 1995, for the clinical guidelines and medical references program, ANDEM sent a request to 167 scientific societies. Societies were asked to select topics in which they had an involvement, to provide their guidelines, or recommendations they published, and to provide experts' names. 73 (44%) out of 167 scientific societies answered: 53 (77%) out of the 73 proposed themes, 20 (27%) sent a documentation, and 53 (73%) provided experts' names. Twenty (27%) out of the 73 wished to cooperate with ANDEM to draft clinical guidelines. Thirty (41%) out of the 73 gave a similar answer with less information. Twelve wished to cooperate but did not show any evidence for such a goal. The answering lag time, the presence of scientific society headings on the letter, the absence of arguments against the request showed that some scientific societies were better organized. It seems that many scientific societies did not have a good organization to efficiently answer to ANDEM request; they have not sufficient resources to afford all their objectives. Learned societies are not well defined, and their functioning is unknown. They wish to be recognized by professionals, institutions and all organizations. The scientific production does not seem to be much developed, even if such production is their first objective.

France↗