Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Lorino

Publications and source records attributed to H Lorino.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments.

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a noninvasive method with which to measure respiratory mechanics. FOT employs small-amplitude pressure oscillations superimposed on the normal breathing and therefore has the advantage over conventional lung function techniques that it does not require the performance of respiratory manoeuvres. The present European Respiratory Society Task Force Report describes the basic principle of the technique and gives guidelines for the application and interpretation of FOT as a routine lung function test in the clinical setting, for both adult and paediatric populations. FOT data, especially those measured at the lower frequencies, are sensitive to airway obstruction, but do not discriminate between obstructive and restrictive lung disorders. There is no consensus regarding the sensitivity of FOT for bronchodilation testing in adults. Values of respiratory resistance have proved sensitive to bronchodilation in children, although the reported cutoff levels remain to be confirmed in future studies. Forced oscillation technique is a reliable method in the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adults and children. Moreover, in contrast with spirometry where a deep inspiration is needed, forced oscillation technique does not modify the airway smooth muscle tone. Forced oscillation technique has been shown to be as sensitive as spirometry in detecting impairments of lung function due to smoking or exposure to occupational hazards. Together with the minimal requirement for the subject's cooperation, this makes forced oscillation technique an ideal lung function test for epidemiological and field studies. Novel applications of forced oscillation technique in the clinical setting include the monitoring of respiratory mechanics during mechanical ventilation and sleep.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of the forced oscillation technique and the interrupter technique for assessing airway obstruction and its reversibility in children.

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) and interrupter technique are particularly attractive for pediatric use as they require only passive cooperation from the patient. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for detecting airway obstruction and its reversibility in 118 children (3-16 yr) with asthma or chronic nocturnal cough. FOT (R(0) and R(16)) and interruption (Rint) parameters were measured at baseline and after bronchodilator inhalation (n = 94). Rint was significantly lower than R(0), especially in children with high baseline values. Baseline parameters were normalized for height and weight [R(SD)]. In children able to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 93), the best discrimination between those with baseline FEV(1) < 80% or > or = 80% of predicted values was obtained with R(0)(SD). At a specificity of 80%, R(0)(SD) yielded 66% sensitivity, whereas Rint(SD) yielded only 33% sensitivity. Similarly, postbronchodilator changes in R(0)(SD) [DeltaR(0)(SD)] yielded the best discrimination between children with and without significant reversibility in FEV(1). At a specificity of 80%, DeltaR(0)(SD) yielded 67% sensitivity and DeltaRint(SD) yielded 58% sensitivity. In children unable to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 25), FOT, contrary to the interrupter technique, clearly identified a subgroup of young children with high resistance values at baseline, which returned to normal after bronchodilation. We conclude that, in asthmatic children over 3 yr old, FOT measurements provide a more reliable evaluation of bronchial obstruction and its reversibility compared with the interrupter technique, especially in young children with high baseline values.

Adolescent↗

Respiratory impedance response to continuous negative airway pressure in awake controls and OSAS.

The aim of the study was to determine whether the response of respiratory impedance (Zrs) to decreasing levels of continuous negative airway pressure (CNAP) during wakefulness, differs in controls and subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). Zrs was measured by the forced oscillation technique (4-32 Hz) in 15 controls and 21 patients with OSAS (apnoea/hypopnoea index >20 per sleep hour) with normal lung function, in the basal state and with application of decreasing CNAP of -5, -10, and -15 hPa. Respiratory resistance was extrapolated to 0 Hz (R0) and estimated at 16 Hz (R16) by linear regression analysis of respiratory resistive impedance versus frequency. Respiratory elastance (Ers) and inertance (Irs) were estimated by multilinear regression analysis of respiratory reactance versus frequency, and resonance frequency (RF) was determined as RF=(1/2pi)(Ers/Irs)0.5. In both groups, R0, R16, Ers and RF significantly increased as the CNAP level decreased (p <0.0001 for all). R0, Ers, and RF increased significantly more in OSAS than in controls (p < 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively), independently of the severity of obesity. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed that the parameter which best detected OSAS was RF, with a sensitivity of 81% and 93% specificity for the 13.6 Hz cut-off point. The results of the present study suggest that the response of respiratory impedance to decreasing continuous negative airway pressure levels, might allow detection of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in subjects with normal lung function.

Adult↗

Combined effects of a nasal dilator and nasal prongs on nasal airflow resistance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Nasal prongs (NPs), when used to assess nasal flow, can result in dramatic increases in nasal airflow resistance (NR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the NP-induced increases in NR could be corrected by the simultaneous use of an internal nasal dilator (ND). DESIGN: NR was estimated by posterior rhinomanometry, in the basal state (NRb), and while breathing with NP (NRp), with ND (NRd), and with both ND and NP (NRd + p). PARTICIPANTS: The study was performed in 15 healthy subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: NR (mean NRb [+/- SEM], 2.5 +/- 0.4 cm H(2)O/L/s) significantly decreased with ND (NRd = 1.4 +/- 0.2 cm H(2)O/L/s; p < 0.001) and significantly increased with NP (NRp = 3.8 +/- 0.8 cm H(2)O/L/s; p < 0.001). A significant logarithmic relationship was found between NRd and NRb (r(2) = 0.95; p < 0.0001), and a significant exponential relationship was found between NRp and NRb (r(2) = 0.99; p < 0.0001). While breathing with both ND and NP, NRd + p was significantly lower than NRb (1.9 +/- 1.4 cm H(2)O/L/s; p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the ND tends to slightly overcorrect the NP-induced increase in NR and suggest that, in view of the possible effects of NPs on upper airway resistance, the combination of both devices might be used for nasal airflow monitoring during nocturnal polysomnography in patients presenting with highly resistive nares.

Adult↗

Inaccuracy of tidal volume delivered by home mechanical ventilators.

Ideally, the inspired (tidal) volume (V(T)) provided by a volume-controlled ventilation device should not change when the pressure imposed on the ventilator varies. A bench study evaluation of V(T) versus pressure was performed on 10 commercially available devices. The difference between the desired V(T) and the observed V(T) reached 100 mL for some devices when inspiratory resistance was at its lowest, rising to 150 mL when inspiratory resistance was increased to obtain peak airway pressure of 60 cmH2O. The present data indicate that some home ventilators are inaccurate in delivering the preset tidal volume when the pressure imposed on the ventilator is increased to simulate high airway resistance.

Airway Resistance↗

Use of the forced oscillation technique to assess airway obstruction and reversibility in children.

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is particularly attractive in a pediatric setting as it requires only passive cooperation from the child. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of this method for detecting airway obstruction and its reversibility in 313 children (3 to 16 yr of age) with asthma or chronic nocturnal cough. Baseline and post-bronchodilator (n = 251) resistance were measured (R(0)) with the FOT. Baseline R(0) was normalized for height and weight [R(0)(SD)]. In children able to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 181), R(0)(SD) was independently correlated with FEV(1) (p < 0.02) and maximal expiratory flow at 50% (MEF(50)) (p < 0.004). The optimal R(0)(SD) cutoff value given by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to discriminate between children with baseline FEV(1) < 80% or >/= 80% of predicted values yielded 84% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Post-bronchodilator changes in R(0)(SD) [DeltaR(0)(SD)] were mostly correlated to changes in MEF(50). The optimal DeltaR(0)(SD) cutoff value to discriminate between children with the presence or absence of significant reversibility in FEV(1) yielded 69% sensitivity and 78% specificity. In children unable to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 132), this DeltaR(0)(SD) cutoff clearly identified a subgroup of young children with high R(0) values at baseline, that returned to normal after bronchodilation. We conclude that FOT measurements allow reliable evaluation of bronchial obstruction and its reversibility in asthmatic children over 3 yr old.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Effects of mandibular advancement on respiratory resistance.

Mandibular advancing devices are proposed as nonsurgical treatment for certain patients with an obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Since they act by increasing the upper airway calibre, the aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in respiratory resistance (Rrs) resulting from mandibular advancement. Rrs was measured at the nose by the forced oscillation technique (4-32 Hz). Ten normal subjects were studied under three conditions: resting mandibular position, passive mandibular advancement steadied by a wax bite, and voluntary advancement, in random order. Respiratory resistance was extrapolated to 0 Hz (R0) and estimated at 16 Hz (R16) by linear regression analysis of respiratory resistive impedance versus frequency. R0 (mean+/-SEM=3.5+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) x s in the resting position) decreased significantly with passive advancement (2.9+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) x s, p<0.001), but remained unchanged with voluntary mandibular advancement (3.6+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) s). Similar results were obtained for R16. The results of this study demonstrate that the effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway resistance differ, depending on whether advancement is passive or active, and suggest that in order to simulate the actual effects of therapeutic devices, mandibular advancement should be passive.

Adult↗

Effects of nasal prongs on nasal airflow resistance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether nasal prongs, which have been proposed to assess nasal flow during sleep, affect nasal airflow resistance (NR). DESIGN: NR was estimated by posterior rhinomanometry at a 0.5 L/s flow, under eight conditions: in the basal state, and with seven different nasal prongs. PARTICIPANTS: The study was performed in 17 healthy supine subjects, 8 of whom had basal NR values within the normal range (< or = 2 cm H(2)O.L(-1).s, group 1), and 9 had increased basal NR values (> 2.5 cm H(2)O.L(-1).s, group 2), because of nare narrowness and/or deviated nasal septum. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: NR increased significantly while breathing with nasal prongs (p < 0.0001 in both groups). The changes in NR (DeltaNR) induced by the different nasal prongs were characterized by large intersubject and intrasubject variability, with a maximum DeltaNR of 24.2 cm H(2)O.L(-1).s. Significant differences were found between the DeltaNR induced by the different nasal prongs (p < 0.001 in group 1, and p < 0.0003 in group 2), and for six of them, DeltaNR was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that nasal prongs can markedly increase NR in subjects presenting with nare narrowness and/or deviated nasal septum. Further investigations that would include nocturnal polysomnography are still required to evaluate the possible influence of nasal prongs on the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and its severity.

Adult↗

Effects of continuous negative airway pressure on lung volume and respiratory resistance.

This study was designed to determine the responses of lung volume and respiratory resistance (Rrs) to decreasing levels of continuous negative airway pressure (CNAP). Twenty normal subjects were studied in the basal state and under CNAP levels of -5, -10, and -15 hPa. Rrs was measured by the forced oscillation technique (4-32 Hz). End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and tidal volume (VT) were measured by whole body plethysmography. Rrs was extrapolated to 0 Hz (R(0)) and estimated at 16 Hz (R(16)) by linear regression analysis of Rrs vs. frequency. Specific Rrs, SR(0) and SR(16), were then calculated as R(0) (EELV + VT/2) and R(16) (EELV + VT/2), respectively. EELV significantly decreased, whereas R(0), R(16), SR(0), and SR(16) significantly increased, as the CNAP level decreased (P < 0.0001 for all). At the lowest CNAP level, R(0) and R(16) reached 198 +/- 13 and 175 +/- 9% of their respective basal values. The CNAP-induced increase in R(0) was significantly higher than that in R(16) (P < 0.004). Our results demonstrate that the CNAP-induced increase in Rrs does not result from a direct lung volume effect only and strongly suggest the involvement of other factors affecting both intrathoracic and extrathoracic airway caliber.

Adult↗

Combined effects of a mechanical nasal dilator and a topical decongestant on nasal airflow resistance.

The goal of this study was to compare the isolated and combined effects of two treatments being used to reduce nasal airflow resistance (NR): an internal nasal mechanical dilator (Nozovent; Prevancure; Sté Pouret, Paris, France) and a topical decongestant, fenoxazoline hydrochloride (Aturgyl; Synthelabo; Le Plessis-Robinson, France). The study was performed in 17 healthy subjects. NR was estimated by active posterior rhinometry at a 0.5 L/s flow under four conditions: in the basal state, with the internal nasal mechanical dilator, after treatment with fenoxazoline hydrochloride, and with both fenoxazoline hydrochloride and the mechanical dilator. The mean NR (+/- SD) decreased from 1.65+/-0.54 cm H2O/L/s in the basal state to 1.02+/-0.27 cm H2O/L/s with the mechanical dilator (p < 0.001), 1.03+/-0.47 cm H2O/L/s with fenoxazoline hydrochloride (p < 0.001), and 0.48+/-0.15 cm H2O/L/s with both the mechanical dilator and fenoxazoline hydrochloride (p < 0.001). The decreases in NR observed after using either the mechanical dilator (deltaNR(N)) or fenoxazoline hydrochloride (deltaNR(A)) were not significantly different. The decrease in NR observed with both (deltaNR(N + A)) was not significantly different from the sum deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A): 1.16+/-0.53 cm H2O/L/s vs 1.25+/-0.63 cm H2O/L/s, respectively (p > 0.05). deltaNR(N + A) strongly correlated with deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A): deltaNR(N + A) = 0.80 (deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A)) + 0.15 (r = 0.96; p < 0.0001). However, the slope of the regression line of deltaNR(N + A) vs deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A) was significantly lower than unity (p < 0.003). These results demonstrate that, although not totally additive, the effects of using the mechanical dilator and fenoxazoline hydrochloride are cumulative. Further studies that include patients with nasal obstruction would allow us to better evaluate the benefit of a therapy combining both treatments.

Administration, Topical↗

Heavy snoring with upper airway resistance syndrome may induce intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure.

We studied eight heavy snorers with upper airway resistance syndrome to investigate potential effects of sleep on expiratory airway and lung resistance, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, hyperinflation, and elastic inspiratory work of breathing (WOB). Wakefulness and non-rapid-eye-movement sleep with high- and with low-resistance inspiratory effort (H-RIE and L-RIE, respectively) were compared. No differences in breathing pattern were seen across the three conditions. In contrast, we found increases in expiratory airway and lung resistance during H-RIE compared with L-RIE and wakefulness (56 +/- 24, 16 +/- 4, and 11 +/- 4 cmH2O . 1(-1) . s, respectively), with attendant increases in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (5.4 +/- 1.8, 1.4 +/- 0.5, and 1.3 +/- 1.3 cmH2O, respectively) and elastic WOB (6.1 +/- 2.2, 3.7 +/- 1.2, and 3.4 +/- 0.7 J/min, respectively). The increase in WOB during H-RIE is partly caused by the effects of dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation produced by the increased expiratory resistance. Contrary to the Starling model, a multiple-element compliance model that takes into account the heterogeneity of the pharynx may explain flow limitation during expiration.

Adult↗

Respiratory resistive impedance as an index of airway obstruction during nasal continuous positive airway pressure titration.

Esophageal pressure amplitude (DeltaPes), inspiratory pulmonary resistance (RLI) and inspiratory flow limitation score (FS) are used as indices of upper airway obstruction for the titration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). This study was designed to determine whether oscillatory respiratory resistive impedance at 16 Hz (RFO) might be proposed as an alternative index. Eleven OSAS patients were studied during a night of polysomnography-controlled nCPAP titration. Nasal flow (V) and airway opening and esophageal pressures (Pao and Pes, respectively) were continuously measured during nasal breathing, and forced-flow oscillations (FO) were applied for 5 min at each nCPAP level. RLI was calculated by linear regression analysis of resistive pressure versus V over inspiration. R FO was obtained by linear regression analysis of respiratory resistive impedance versus frequency. Application of FO affected neither sleep nor pulmonary mechanics. RFO correlated with RLI in all patients. RFO did not correlate with DeltaPes in two patients, and was not significantly related to FS in five patients. This study demonstrates the applicability of the FO technique in sleeping patients receiving nCPAP, and the reliability of RFO for assessing pulmonary resistance. RFO might therefore be proposed as a quantitative index of airway obstruction for nCPAP titration.

Aged↗

Effects of different mechanical treatments on nasal resistance assessed by rhinometry.

The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three treatments aiming to reduce nasal airflow resistance (NR): an external nasal strip device (Respir+), an internal nasal mechanical dilator (Nozovent), and a topical decongestant (Pernazène). NR was estimated by active posterior rhinometry at both a 0.5 L/s flow (NRF) and a 1 cm H2O pressure (NRP), under four conditions: in the basal state, with Respir+, with Nozovent, and after treatment with Pernazène. The efficacy of each treatment was assessed by the percentage changes in NRF and NRP (%NRF and %NRP, respectively). The study was performed in 15 healthy subjects. The efficacy of the treatments was significantly different, depending on whether it was evaluated by NRF or by NRP (p<0.02), with %NRF and %NRP values, respectively, equal to the following: 88+/-20% and 91+/-14% with Respir+, 58+/-17% and 70+/-13% with Nozovent, and 55+/-29% and 69+/-22% with Pernazène. NRF remained unchanged with Respir+, whereas it significantly decreased with Nozovent and Pernazène (p<0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the effects of the two latter treatments. These results demonstrate that Nozovent, which involves no risk of side effects or drug interactions, is an effective treatment to improve nasal breathing. Nozovent might therefore be recommended as an alternative to topical decongestants, for certain subjects presenting with nasal obstruction.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Nasal airflow resistance measurement: forced oscillation technique versus posterior rhinomanometry.

This study was designed to determine whether nasal airflow resistance (Rn) which is nonlinear during tidal breathing, can be assessed by the forced oscillation (FO) technique. Rn values obtained by the FO technique and extrapolated to 0 Hz (Rn,FO) were compared to those assessed by posterior rhinomanometry at maximal tidal inspiratory flow (Rn,m), at a 0.5 L x s(-1) flow (Rn,F), and at a 1 hPa transnasal pressure (Rn,P). All Rn estimates were derived from the same inspiratory and expiratory nasal flow and transnasal pressure signals obtained during tidal nasal breathing whilst a forced flow was applied at the nose via a rigid nasal mask in 23 healthy volunteers, of whom 14 had additional measurements after vasoconstrictor treatment. In the basal state, no significant difference, and significant correlations (p<0.0001) were found between Rn,FO and the other Rn estimates. Only the regression line of Rn,FO versus Rn,m was not significantly different from the identity line. After nasal decongestion, Rn,P became significantly higher than the other Rn estimates (p<0.005). The regression line of Rn,FO versus Rn,m remained nonsignificantly different from the identity line. Similar results were observed regarding the percentage values of the different Rn estimates after decongestant treatment. This study shows that, despite its nonlinearity, Rn can be assessed by the FO technique, and that Rn,FO and Rn,m could be indifferently used as physiological indices of nasal patency. As the FO technique is more difficult to implement than the conventional rhinomanometry, its interest in rhinology appears not to be obvious.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Influence of thoracoabdominal pattern of breathing on respiratory resistance.

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that voluntary changes in thoracoabdominal pattern of breathing may increase total respiratory resistance. Thirty-one normal subjects were asked to control their thoracoabdominal pattern of breathing by using a visual feedback. Thoracic and abdominal volume changes were measured by inductance plethysmography. Respiratory resistance and elastance were measured by forced oscillometry. The mean (+/-SD) percent thoracic contributions to tidal volume during thoracic or abdominal breathing were 75 (+/-11) and 25% (+/-9), respectively. These changes induced small but significant increases in resistance (P < 0.005) and elastance (P < 0.002). The increased resistance was observed in 22 subjects for thoracic breathing (P < 0.016) and in 21 subjects for abdominal breathing (P < 0.043). The mean value (+/-SD) of individual increases in resistance during thoracic or abdominal breathing, compared with normal breathing, were 9.2 +/- 17.5 and 9.4 +/- 19.9%, respectively. The fact that departing from spontaneous pattern increases respiratory resistance is consistent with the notion that breathing pattern is optimally adjusted on the basis of mechanical criteria.

Abdomen↗

Carbon dioxide respiratory response during positive inspiratory pressure in COPD patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of inspiratory pressure support (IPS) on the respiratory CO2 response in 13 stable COPD patients and in 13 normal subjects. Without IPS, the slopes of the ventilatory response to CO2 were lower in the patients than in the normal subjects (mean +/- SEM, 0.82 +/- 0.19 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.31 l.min-1.mmHg-1). When IPS was applied, both groups showed, at any level of end-tidal CO2 pressure, an increase in ventilation due to an increase in tidal volume (VT) associated with a decrease in occlusion pressure (P0.1). In addition, respiratory parameters (VE, VT, P0.1, inspiratory flow) were insensitive to CO2 as long as PETCO2 remained below a threshold which was slightly above the eupneic value. However, above this CO2-threshold, no differences in slopes were observed between the IPS and control conditions in either group, except for a decrease in the P0.1 slope during IPS in the COPD patients. In conclusion, IPS induced similar respiratory changes during CO2 response in stable COPD patients and in normal subjects. Above the eupneic value, IPS did not change the slope of the ventilatory response to CO2.

Adult↗

Respiratory resistive impedance in obstructive patients: linear regression analysis vs viscoelastic modelling.

The aim of this study was to test the ability of a simple two segment model to describe the frequency dependence of resistive impedance in obstructive patients, and to investigate the significance of parameters derived from this model. The study was performed in 38 patients, in the basal state and after inhalation of 200 micrograms salbutamol. Impedance data measured over 4-32 Hz were fitted by a general four parameter viscoelastic model describing gas redistribution, and completed by an inertial component. This model yielded Newtonian resistance (Rmin) and maximal resistance (Rmax = Rmin plus delayed resistance due to gas redistribution). Resistive impedance data were also submitted to linear regression analysis over the 4-16 and 17-32 Hz frequency ranges, which respectively, yielded resistive impedance extrapolated at 0 Hz (R0) and resistive impedance estimated at 32 Hz (R32). R0 and R32 were compared to Rmax and Rmin, respectively. The airway response to salbutamol inhalation was assessed by the percentage changes in these parameters (R0%, R32%, Rmax%, and Rmin%, respectively). Significant linear correlations (p < 0.0001) were found between R0 and Rmax, R32 and Rmin, and R0% and Rmax%. Furthermore, the linear regression lines of R0 vs Rmax, and R0% vs Rmax%, were not significantly different from the identity line. These results demonstrate that resistive impedance extrapolated at zero frequency is equivalent to maximal resistive impedance, and can be proposed as an index, not only of the level of airway obstruction, but also of its reversibility.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Inspiratory work of breathing in ventilated preterm infants.

In ventilated newborns, part of the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) may be due to the inspiratory efforts preceding inspiratory ventilator flow. This study was designed to quantify the contribution of these efforts to WOB. WOB was evaluated in six intubated preterm infants ventilated by the Dräger Babylog 8000. The ventilatory modes studied were intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and assist-control ventilation at 10 (ACV10) and 15 (ACV15) cmH2O peak pressure. Mouth flow (V) and esophageal pressure (Pe) were recorded, and WOB was estimate from the area delineated by the esophageal pressure-volume curve, where volume is the time integral of V. Calculation of WOB started either at the onset of the infant's inspiratory flow (WOBi), or at the beginning of the infant's inspiratory muscle efforts, detected on Pe and confirmed on the V tracing (WOBm). WOBm was found to be significantly higher than WOBi under all ventilatory conditions studied. The difference in work of breathing (delta W) between WOBm and WOBi did not depend on the type of ventilatory mode. When delta W was related to WOBm, it amounted to about 30% of WOBm in IMV and CPAP, and 60% in ACV (P < 0.05, ACV15 vs. IMV). These results suggest that, in preterm infants connected to a ventilator, inspiratory efforts preceding flow inspiration might account for a large fraction of the inspiratory work of breathing.

Female↗