Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Kuhl

Publications and source records attributed to H Kuhl.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Plasma profiles of transdermal 17 beta-estradiol delivered by two different matrix patches. A four-way cross-over study in postmenopausal women.

The aim of this study was to investigate the systemic bioavailability and plasma profiles of 17 beta-estradiol (CAS 50-28-2, E2) after the application of two types of matrix patches for the transdermal delivery of E2: MenorestTM (the test patch) with delivery rates of 37.5, 50 and 75 micrograms E2/day and a reference patch with a delivery rate of 50 micrograms E2/day. All 3 test patches were identical in composition, achieving different transdermal E2 delivery rates by variations in the surface area (11.0, 14.5 and 22.5 cm2). All 4 patches were each worn by 24 postmenopausal women over a 4-day period (i.e. 96 h), each of the 4 treatment periods being separated by a 7-day wash-out period according to a randomized, 4-way crossover design. Blood samples were collected before and 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 34, 48, 58, 72, 84, and 96 h after each patch application. Plasma E2 concentrations were determined by a specific direct radioimmunoassay method. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated: AUC0-96h; Cmax, tmax, Cmin, Caverage. The course of the E2 plasma levels over the total test period (96 h) was relatively constant for all patches. For the test patch, a linear relationship between the pharmacokinetic parameters and the different patch areas (i.e. dosages of 37.5, 50, 75 micrograms E2/d) could be shown (correlation coefficient 0.99). The resulting Cmax values for the patch were: 44.2, 58.3, and 92.1 pg E2/ml, corresponding to Caverage values of 39.5, 45.5, and 70.6 pg E2/ml. The reference patch and the test patch, at a dose of 50 micrograms E2/d, were similar in terms of Cmax, while the Caverage, AUC0-96h and Cmin were significantly higher with the test patch. The systemic bioavailability of the reference patch was comparable to that of the test patch at a dose of 37.5 micrograms E2/d: AUC0-->96h 3017.5 +/- 1312.4 pg/ml.h for the reference patch and 3375.9 +/- 1254.7 pg/ml.h for the test patch. A physical model for the calculation of the course of the E2 levels was used to describe the experimentally determined data. However, in the evening, periodically higher E2 plasma levels were observed for all patches than in the morning. From these results it can be concluded that E2 plasma profiles produced by the test patch are reproducible, and in the physiological range consistent with the early to mid follicular level in the premenopausal woman over 4 days (96 h), correlating with the doses administered (37.5-50-75 micrograms E2/d). Additionally, the systemic bioavailability of the test patch at a dose of 37.5 micrograms E2/d is comparable to that of the reference patch at a dose of 50 micrograms E2/d.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1996

Mammary derived growth inhibitor is not a distinct protein but a mix of heart-type and adipocyte-type fatty acid-binding protein.

The amino acid sequence of the mammary derived growth inhibitor (MDGI) from bovine mammary gland (Böhmer, F.-D., Kraft, R., Otto, A. , Wernstedt, C., Hellman, U., Kurtz, A., Müller, T., Rohde, K., Etzold, G., Lehmann, W., Langen, P., Heldin, C.-H., and Grosse, R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 15137-15143) revealed 95% identity to bovine heart fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), explaining the observed immunocross-reactivity. However, a cDNA encoding MDGI has not been found to date. Artificial MDGI cDNA was expressed in an in vitro transcription/translation assay. Analysis by isoelectric focusing of the immunoprecipitated in vitro translation products of lactating bovine mammary gland mRNA did not indicate a protein corresponding to the in vitro translation product of artificial MDGI mRNA. Moreover, two-dimensional electrophoresis of bovine mammary gland proteins confirmed the absence of a protein with the pI of the in vitro translated artificial MDGI mRNA in bovine mammary gland and instead revealed, apart from H-FABP, an unknown protein that was recognized by anti-H-FABP antibodies. From lactating bovine mammary gland the cDNA for adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP) was cloned. The in vitro translation of recombinant mRNA derived from this cDNA yielded a polypeptide that behaved like the unknown immunoreactive protein. Western blotting and immunofluorescence using monospecific antibodies demonstrated the coexistence of H-FABP and A-FABP in the lactating mammary gland. Taking into account that deviations of the MDGI sequence from the bovine H-FABP sequence correspond with A-FABP we attribute the structure originally reported as MDGI to a mix of these proteins.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1996

Effects of progestogens on haemostasis.

Epidemiological data suggested an involvement of the progestogen component in the pathomechanism of venous and arterial diseases during intake of oral contraceptives. The influence of progestogens on haemostasis parameters depend on type and dose of the progestogen, the presence of an estrogen, the route of application, and the duration of use. Treatment of women with progestogen-only preparations caused only minor effects on coagulation and fibrinolysis. Similarly, during hormone replacement therapy with natural estrogens, the additional application of progestogens induced no unfavourable changes on haemostasis. In contrast, the use of ovulation inhibitors resulted in an acceleration of coagulation and fibrinolysis. This is primarily induced by the marked action of ethinylestradiol on hepatic and vascular function. Progestogens with androgenic properties may counteract the estrogen-induced changes in the hepatic synthesis of platelet aggregation and readiness for coagulation. Estrogen and progesterone receptors are localized in endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the vessel wall, but there are differences in the response of veins and arteries to sex steroids. Estrogens and progestogens may influence collagen and elastin synthesis, and the release of vasoactive compounds and of factors controlling fibrinolysis from endothelium. In veins, progestogens may increase distensibility and capacitance resulting in a decreased blood flow. In predisposed women, this may lead to venous stasis and thrombosis. In arteries, progestogens may act as vasoconstrictors, and may enhance vasospasms at sites of injured endothelium which finally may lead to ischemic diseases.

Arteries↗
PubMed1996

Comparative pharmacology of newer progestogens.

The newer progestogens desogestrel, norgestimate, gestodene, dienogest and nomegestrol share the common property of having weak or no androgenic effects, but there is great variation between agents in their pharmacokinetic properties and hormonal activities. Both desogestrel (acting as 3-keto-desogestrel) and norgestimate (acting mainly through levonorgestrel) are prodrugs. While nomegestrol is derived from 19-norprogesterone, the other compounds are 19-nortestosterone derivatives: desogestrel, norgestimate and gestodene belong to the subgroup of 13-ethyl-gonanes with an ethinyl group at C17 alpha, and dienogest represents an estrane (13-methyl-gonane) with a cyanomethyl group at C17 alpha. Both dienogest and nomegestrol have antiandrogenic properties. In proportion to the dose, the highest serum concentrations are observed after intake of gestodene. When combined with ethinylestradiol, gestodene and 3-keto-desogestrel accumulate in serum during daily treatment because of slowed-down elimination. This is probably caused both by binding to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and by inhibition of inactivating enzymes. Dienogest does not accumulate in serum, although at a dose of 2 mg very high serum concentrations of dienogest are reached. The most potent progestogens are gestodene and desogestrel, while the effect of dienogest and nomegestrol on endometrium and cervix is less, even though in a similar range. As the ovulation-inhibiting effect is brought about not only by receptor-mediated interactions but also by a direct inhibition of steroid biosynthesis, dienogest and nomegestrol are much less effective than gestodene, desogestrel and norgestimate. Ethinylated progestogens, particularly gestodene, have been demonstrated to inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes. Both gestodene and desogestrel may moderately reduce SHBG levels and counteract the stimulating effect of ethinylestradiol on hepatic serum proteins, while dienogest and nomegestrol have no influence. Compared with progestogens with androgenic properties which may restrict the stimulatory action of ethinylestradiol on haemostatic parameters, the newer progestogens do not seem to be superior with respect to haemostasis. There are no data on the direct effect of the compounds on the arterial and venous vessel wall. Due to the less pronounced antagonism on ethinylestradiol-induced changes in lipid metabolism, the newer progestogens appear to be beneficial rather than deleterious, although atherosclerosis was probably not promoted by the older formulations because of the direct effect of ethinylestradiol on the arterial wall. There is no evidence for a lesser impact of the newer progestogens on carbohydrate metabolism, which is mostly impaired by the estrogen component in oral contraceptives. Formulations containing the newer progestogens are, however, preferable in patients with hyperandrogenaemia, the symptoms of which may be improved by the suppression of total and free testosterone and an increase in SHBG; an additional beneficial effect of the antiandrogenic properties of dienogest or nomegestrol remains to be proven.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

[Significance of hereditary thrombophilia for risk of thrombosis with oral contraceptives].

Oral contraceptives increase the natural incidence of venous thromboses of 1-2/10,000 women per year 3-to 4fold. Recent investigations have shown that during intake of desogestrel or gestodene containing formulations the risk is twice that with older low-dose ovulation inhibitors. This difference is larger in first time users than in women who had previously used an oral contraceptive. During pregnancy, the incidence of thromboses rises up to 10/10,000 women-years and post partum up to 40/10,000 women-years. In about 60 % of thromboses no causal explanation can be found. It is suggested that in 40 % of all cases an inherited thrombophilia is present. Among the hereditary types of thrombophilia, the resistance against activated protein C (APC-resistance) represents nearly 50 %, while altogether 15 to 20 % is based on a deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S. APC-resistance the prevalence of which is 3-5 % in the general population, increases the risk of thrombosis 8fold and in users of oral contraceptives 35fold. Protein C-deficiency (prevalence 0.1-0.5 %) increases the risk of thrombosis 9fold and in users of oral contraceptives 15fold, while antithrombin III-deficiency (prevalence 0.02-0.05 %) enhances the risk in pill-users 8fold. Ovulation inhibitors do not influence risk of thrombosis in women with protein S-deficiency. Antiphospholipid-antibodies the concentration of which may increase during treatment with oral contraceptives, represent a considerably enhanced risk of thrombosis, too. A positive family history (before age of 40 years) indicates an inherent thrombophilia. In these risk groups, the cost/benefit ratio of a selective screening is unfavorable, as at most 70 % of the hereditary thrombophilias can be diagnosed by laboratory analysis, and only very few patients will actually experience a thrombotic event: only 3 of 1000 carriers of APC-resistance will suffer from thrombosis during oral contraception per year. On the other hand, a negative result of laboratory tests does not exclude a hereditary thrombophilic disorder which as yet cannot be substantiated. It is not yet clarified whether a selective screening is superior to a careful assessment of individual and family history. A general screening cannot be justified because of the unfavorable cost/benefit ratio. If the individual or family history or pathological laboratory parameters indicate an enhanced risk of thrombosis, this risk has to be carefully weighed against the consequences of discontinuation of pill use. Those few individuals with risk factors who will experience a thrombosis, cannot be identified in advance. If in patients with thrombophilic disorders and/or other risk factors the use of oral contraceptives represents a particularly high risk, other contraceptive methods should be taken into consideration. If a patient with risk factors decides for the use of oral contraceptives, she has to be informed that in the case of symptoms indicating a thrombosis, the physician has to be consulted immediately. The earlier an appropriate therapy is initiated, the more effectively an acute pulmonary emboli or permanent damages, e.g. the post-thrombotic syndrome, can be prevented.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Risk of thrombosis with oral contraceptives: value of a thrombophilia screening test].

Oral contraceptives increase the natural incidence of venous thrombosis of 1-2/10,000 women per year 3- to 4-fold. Recent studies have shown that desogestrel or gestodene containing formulations bear twice the risk of older low-dose ovulation inhibitors. During pregnancy, the incidence of thrombosis rises to 10/10,000 women-years and post partum up to 40/ 10,000. For 60% of thromboses no causal explanation can be found. In approximately 40% of the patients an inherited thrombophilia can be presumed. Among the hereditary types of thrombophilia, a resistance to activated protein C (APC-resistance) represents nearly 50%, while in 15 to 20% a deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S is found. APC-resistance, with a prevalence of 3-5% in the general population, increases the risk of thrombosis 8-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 35-fold. Antithrombin III-deficiency carries a comparable risk. Protein C-deficiency increases the risk of thrombosis 9-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 15-fold. Ovulation inhibitors do not influence the risk of thrombosis in women with protein S-deficiency. Anti-phospholipid-antibodies increase during treatment with oral contraceptives and represent a considerably enhanced risk of thrombosis. Inherent thrombophilia is suspected in a patient with a positive history or family history of thrombosis, especially with thrombosis before the age of 40 or with atypical localisation. Even in these risk groups, the cost-benefit ratio of selective screening is unfavorable, as today at most 70% of the hereditary thrombophilias can be diagnosed by laboratory analysis, and only very few of the patients will actually experience a thrombotic event: only 3 of 1000 carriers of APC-resistance will suffer from thrombosis during oral contraception. On the other hand, a negative result of laboratory tests does not exclude a hereditary thrombophilic disorder. At present, it is unclear whether a selective screening process is superior to a careful assessment of individual and family history. A general screening, however, cannot be justified because of the unfavorable cost/benefit ratio. If the individual or family history or pathological laboratory parameters indicate an increased risk of thrombosis, this risk has to be carefully weighed against the consequences of discontinuation of pill use. Those few individuals with risk factors who will experience a thrombo-embolic event, cannot be identified in advance. If oral contraceptives represent a particularly high risk in patients with thrombophilic disorders and/or other risk factors, other contraceptive methods should be considered. If a patient with risk factors decides on the use of oral contraceptives, she must be informed that in the case of symptoms indicating a thrombosis, a physician should be consulted immediately. The earlier an appropriate therapy is initiated, the more effectively pulmonary thrombo-embolism and permanent damage, such as the post-phlebitic syndrome, can be prevented.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effect of two oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene or norgestimate upon androgen parameters and serum binding proteins.

The effect of a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene (EE/GSD) on various serum hormonal parameters was compared with that of a monophasic formulation containing 35 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 250 micrograms norgestimate (EE/NGM). Blood samples were collected from 46 women on days 2, 11, and 21 of the preceding control cycle and of the third, sixth and twelfth treatment cycle. There was no significant difference in the influence on any hormonal parameter between both formulations. Both EE/GSD and EE/NGM caused a time-dependent suppression of serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) by 20-30% (p < 0.01) and a reduction of 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diol glucuronide by 50-60% (p < 0.01) during each treatment cycle, while androstenedione levels were reduced by 25% (p < 0.01). There was also a significant decrease in the levels of total testosterone by 30-35% (p < 0.01) and free testosterone by 60% (p < 0.01), while sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was increased by 200-240% on days 11 and 21 (p < 0.01). During the pill-free interval the SHBG levels were reduced to a certain degree but remained elevated by 100% as compared to the pretreatment values. The serum levels of corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) which is known to be influenced only by the estrogenic component of combination pills, increased significantly by 170% (p < 0.01) during each treatment cycle. During the pill-free interval of 7 days, the CBG levels decreased but were still elevated by 90-100% as compared to the control cycle. Similarly, the serum levels of cortisol were significantly elevated by 110-140% (p < 0.01) during treatment with both preparations. The results demonstrate a profound suppression of androgen levels and peripheral androgen metabolism.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Formation of ethinylestradiol in postmenopausal women during continuous treatment with a combination of estradiol, estriol and norethisterone acetate.

Previous studies indicated that during treatment of postmenopausal women with preparations containing norethisterone, a small proportion of the progestogen is aromatized into ethinylestradiol. We therefore investigated the serum concentrations of estradiol, ethinylestradiol and norethisterone in 25 patients of a gynecological practice who were continuously treated for climacteric complaints with a combination of 2 mg estradiol, 1 mg estriol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate for a time period between 4 months and 6 years. Blood sampling occurred between 1 and 20 h after intake of the last tablet. The mean serum concentration of estradiol was 138 +/- 50 (53-279) pg/ml, of ethinylestradiol 18.1 +/- 13.5 (0-44) pg/ml, and of norethisterone 5.1 +/- 3.5 (0.7-11.6) ng/ml. The serum concentrations of estradiol showed a broad maximum between 1 and 14 h, and those of norethisterone a steep rise to maximum within 1-4 h after intake followed by a subsequent decline. Contrary to this, the ethinylestradiol levels were not related to the time after application indicating that the aromatization of norethisterone mainly occurs in peripheral tissue. There was no correlation between age, body mass index or duration of treatment and the ethinylestradiol levels. It is concluded that in the presence of the high estradiol concentrations the low conversion rate of norethisterone into ethinylestradiol is probably without clinical significance.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Gestodene-containing contraceptives.

As GSD is the most potent progestogen used in oral contraceptives, the doses of GSD can be lower than those of other progestogen components. The monophasic (30 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms GSD) and the triphasic formulation (30 micrograms EE + 50 micrograms GSD/40 micrograms EE + 70 micrograms GSD/30 micrograms EE + 100 micrograms GSD) suppress gonadotropin release and ovarian function profoundly and inhibit ovulation reliably. The strong anti-estrogenic and progestogenic effectiveness of GSD is based on the high GSD serum concentrations achieved during daily intake. Because of the weak androgenic properties of GSD, both formulations can be characterized as estrogen-dominant with respect to their hepatic effects. Except for the first cycles, both formulations afford good cycle control, and the rate of side effects is similar to that with comparable low-dose oral contraceptives. The levels of total and free androgens and androgen precursors, as well as of peripheral androgen activity, are significantly reduced, resulting in a reduced incidence of acne. The concentrations of SHBG and other serum-binding globulins are elevated considerably, and thyroid function is almost unaffected. The estrogen-dominant effect on hepatic metabolism of both formulations also is reflected by a significant increase in the levels of triglycerides and VLDL, HDL, and some apolipoproteins, while LDL-CH and total CH remain unchanged. Similar to other low-dose oral contraceptives, the GSD-containing preparations cause a slight impairment of glucose tolerance that does not appear to be of clinical relevance. However, a significant increase exists in pro-coagulatory and fibrinolytic activity that leads to a considerable stimulation of fibrin turnover. In predisposed women, this may contribute to an elevated risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic diseases.

Carbohydrate Metabolism↗
PubMed1995

Short- and long-term effects on lipid metabolism of oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel or 3-keto-desogestrel.

During a cross-over study with young female volunteers, the effects of a combination of 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 micrograms desogestrel (DG) or 3-keto-desogestrel (KDG) upon lipid metabolism were investigated on day 3 of the first cycle (day 3/I) and on day 21 of the third cycle of treatment (day 21/III). As compared to the control cycle, total cholesterol (CH), low-density lipoprotein CH (LDL-CH), and the apolipoproteins A-II and B were reduced already on day 3/I, the effects being more pronounced with the DG-containing formulation. On day 21/III of treatment with EE/DG, the levels of total CH, LDL-CH and apolipoprotein B did not differ from controls, while apolipoprotein A-II was significantly increased. The effects of EE/KDG were similar, except that on LDL-CH which was still reduced on day 21/III. The serum concentrations of total triglycerides (TG), very low-density lipoprotein CH (VLDL-CH), VLDL-TG, LD-TG, high-density lipoprotein CH (HDL-CH), HDL-TG, and apolipoprotein A-I were not significantly affected on day 3/I, but elevated on day 21/III. As during treatment with EE/KDG the peak level of KDG was higher than with EE/DG, the results indicate a more pronounced antagonistic effect of EE/KDG on some EE-induced changes on lipoproteins during the first days of intake. These short-term changes possibly reflect a rapid enhancement of hepatic uptake of remnants and LDL by EE. During long-term treatment, the other effects of EE, e.g. the stimulation of hepatic synthesis of TG, VLDL, and HDL and the inhibition of hepatic lipoprotein lipase, become apparent.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Prodrug versus drug effects of 150 micrograms desogestrel or 3-keto-desogestrel in combination with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol on hormonal parameters: relevance of the peak serum level of 3-keto-desogestrel.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 150 micrograms desogestrel (DG) or 150 micrograms 3-keto-desogestrel (KDG) in combination with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE) were compared in a cross-over study. While the EE levels as well as the area under the curve (AUC) of KDG did not differ, significantly higher peak levels of KDG were observed after intake of the KDG-containing formulation. As compared to the control cycle, LH and FSH were not reduced on day 3 of the first treatment cycle (3/I), but markedly suppressed on day 21 of the third cycle (21/III), the effects being more pronounced with the DG-containing pill. The serum levels of testosterone, free testosterone, androstenedione, androstanediol glucuronide, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were significantly reduced already on day 3/I, while sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was unchanged and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) was increased. Thereafter, both SHBG and CBG rose markedly. The progressive decrease in DHEA-S correlated best with free testosterone and androstanediol glucuronide. The results indicate that the peak level of KDG is more important for the biological effectiveness than the AUC of KDG which appears to antagonize the suppressive action of EE on gonadotropin release. The rapid decrease in the androgen levels seems to be due to a direct inhibitory action of the pill on ovarian and adrenal steroid biosynthesis.

Adult↗