Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H John

Publications and source records attributed to H John.

95 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions.

A total of 111 patients referred with a diagnosis of suspected "appendicitis" were entered into a prospective study. The surgeon and radiologist in charge of ultrasonography made separate diagnoses, and their findings were then combined and discussed as indications for surgery. Clinically, a history of pain migration proved to be reliable (p < 0.0001) as a diagnostic indicator, in contrast to nausea and initial irregularity of bowels. The duration of symptoms was significantly shorter in patients with proved appendicitis than among patients with negative findings (median 24 hours compared with 41 hours, p < 0.04). Among patients with perforated appendicitis, the symptomatic history was prolonged (not significantly) by 3 hours. Peritoneal signs such as pain on percussion, rebound tenderness, guarding, and a leukocytosis of more than 13,000/mm3 were indicative of appendicitis (p = 0.0001 for each sign). Lively bowel sounds excluded the possibility of appendicitis (p = 0.001). Scanty bowel sounds, rectal tenderness, axillorectal temperature difference, and a left shift in leukocytes were of no diagnostic significance. The doctor's "clinical experience" is significant at the level of p < 0.03. On ultrasonography, the following signs were indicative of appendicitis: periappendicular infiltration (p = 0.0003), a visible "cockade," and an appendix larger than 12 mm in diameter (p = 0.04). For 75% of the patients the surgeon was sure of his own clinical diagnosis and did not allow himself to be influenced by the sonographic findings. In 12% of doubtful cases ultrasonographic results decisively favored operation, and in 4.5% (n = 5) it prevented an unnecessary laparotomy in the presence of positive clinical symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Neurovascular bundle block as predictor of postoperative erectile function after radical prostatectomy.

We assessed audiovisually induced erections after nerve block of the neurovascular bundle during prostate biopsy. We evaluated neurovascular bundle nerve block to mimic non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in an experimental setup. Patients undergoing a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were randomized to bilateral injection of 5 ml ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.75% or NaCl 0.9% into the neurovascular bundle. The patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function 5-item questionnaire (IIEF-5) questionnaire, and a detailed patient history was obtained. A routine prostate biopsy was performed. Thereafter, patients were exposed to 60 min of audiovisual stimulation. Erections were recorded using a Rigiscan-Plus device. A total of 11 patients were randomized. Five patients received NaCl (group 1) and six patients ropivacaine (group 2). Patient characteristics were comparable in terms of age (group 1: 59.8 y; group 2: 61.8 y), mean PSA (4.1 vs 4.7 ng/ml), mean IIEF-5 score (20.5 vs 22) and risk factors for erectile dysfunction, respectively. Patients of group 1 showed significantly stronger and longer erections after audiovisual stimulation than patients in group 2. Patients with bilateral infiltration of saline solution to the neurovascular bundle showed significantly stronger erections than patients receiving local anesthesia of the neurovascular bundle. Thus, this experiment might serve as a model to assess postoperative erectile function after a unilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Amides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Stress relief of the hip joint by the Thomas splint].

The Thomas Splint is mainly administered to relieve weight from the hip joint. Theoretically the leg is bypassed by transmitting the body weight directly from the pelvis to the floor.--Load transmission via a Thomas Splint was measured with an orthosis strain gauged at the ischial interface area and at the foot plate. The results show, that about one half of the weight will bypass the joint through the orthosis. The Thomas splint ist unsuitable in cases when complete weight relief from the hip joint is necessary.--These results did not depend on whether the floor was flat or ascending, or whether stairs were climbed. The lateral bar never carried more then 25% of the force transmitted.

Adult↗