Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H H Samson

Publications and source records attributed to H H Samson.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Response to diazepam in sons of alcoholics.

Alcohol exerts several of its actions via the chloride channel associated with the central GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex. To explore a possible role for this receptor complex in risk for alcoholism, and to determine whether risk for alcoholism is associated with risk for benzodiazepine abuse, the authors administered intravenous diazepam to 18 sons of male alcoholics (SOAs) and 18 control subjects. Four logarithmically increasing doses of diazepam and matched volumes of placebo were given in randomized order on separate days about 1 week apart. SOAs were significantly more likely than controls to report euphoric responses to diazepam. At some diazepam doses, SOAs were more likely to report feeling "high" and "intoxicated." SOAs and controls did not differ in feeling "drugged." SOAs and controls may differ in expectations regarding the subjective effects of drugs and/or in the function of the central GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex. These findings also add further evidence for increased pleasurable effects, and thus possibly increased risk for benzodiazepine abuse, in a subgroup of SOAs.

Adolescent↗

The influence of early postweaning ethanol exposure on oral self-administration behavior in the rat.

The effects of three early ethanol home cage consumption procedures on the maintenance of operant lever responding reinforced by ethanol presentation were examined in the rat. Two groups of rats, 25 and 31 days of age, were exposed to 10% (v/v) ethanol as the only fluid in the home cage for 3 or 10 days. A third group, 31 days of age, were exposed to 10% ethanol or tap water for 24 h, with the fluid alternating daily for 18 days. All animals were subsequently trained to lever press using 10% ethanol reinforcement under a decreasing water restriction schedule. All three groups were found to have substantial ethanol consumption levels during the initial exposure in the home cage, ranging from 11.2 to 11.9 g/kg/day. The animals were all successfully trained to lever press in the operant chamber with ethanol as the reinforcer when limited to 15 ml/day of water in the home cage. The average number of reinforcements per day ranged from 29 to 43.5, yielding ethanol intakes from 1.06 to 1.97 g/kg in the 30-minute operant session. However, when 50 ml/day of water was available in the home cage, ethanol reinforcements were substantially reduced, with intakes which ranged from 0.14 to 0.18 g/kg/day. The data suggest that early exposure does not enhance ethanol's reinforcing properties later in the animal's life. These results were discussed in terms the effect of early ethanol exposure on later ethanol consumption and the role of ethanol initiation procedures in oral self-administration.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Effects of d-amphetamine injected into the nucleus accumbens on ethanol reinforced behavior.

Rats, initiated to self-administer 10% (v/v) ethanol in an operant situation using the sucrose-fading procedure, received bilateral n. accumbens microinjections of d-amphetamine prior to operant sessions. Doses of 4 micrograms, 10 micrograms and 20 micrograms/brain were administered and some animals also received a 4 microgram/brain dose of LY171555. Three different effects were observed: increased, decreased and no change in total session responding. There was no clear relation between injection area in the n. accumbens and type of effect observed. For either an increase or decrease in total session responding, momentary response rates were decreased. Both d-amphetamine and LY171555 produced similar results. The data support the hypothesis that dopamine in the n. accumbens is involved with ethanol reinforced operant responding but in a complex manner.

Amphetamine↗

The effects of ethanol initiation procedures on ethanol reinforced behavior in the alcohol-preferring rat.

Rats from the alcohol preferring (P) line developed at Indiana University were initiated to self-administer ethanol orally without food or water restriction using either a sucrose-fading or a secondary-conditioning procedure. Following initiation, they were tested under a variety of operant conditions to examine the ability of ethanol to reinforce lever pressing behavior. Regardless of initiation procedure, the animals maintained lever pressing behavior with ethanol reinforcement, even at ethanol concentrations as high as 40% (v/v). Slightly higher daily session intakes (g/kg) were found at the higher ethanol concentrations following the secondary-conditioning initiation procedure compared with the sucrose-fading technique. When both ethanol and water were concurrently available, the rats showed a high preference for ethanol reinforcement. When varying concentrations of sucrose were substituted for water, the amount of ethanol ingested decreased as the concentration of the alternative sucrose increased. However, if the response requirement for the sucrose was substantially greater than that for ethanol, the rats shifted their responding to the lever associated with ethanol presentation. The results are discussed in relation to prior work using similar procedures with Long-Evans non-selected rats and with the alcohol non-preferring (NP) rat line.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Reduction in oral ethanol self-administration in the rat by the 5-HT uptake blocker fluoxetine.

Long-Evans rats (N = 4) maintained on ad lib food and water were initiated to self-administer ethanol using the sucrose-substitution procedure. Following initiation, the rats received IP injections of fluoxetine HCl in sterile water 30 minutes before selected daily self-administration sessions. On other sessions, the rats were injected with sterile water only. Doses of 1, 2, 3, and 5 mg/kg were tested in a random order. Only one drug dose was given each week and each dose was tested at least twice except the 5 mg/kg dose. As dose increased, responding for ethanol decreased with significant reductions at both the 3 and 5 mg/kg dose. The nature of the decrease was such that the duration of continuous responding at the beginning of the session was reduced respective to control and noninjection performance. Overall, the findings of this study support prior work with fluoxetine and other 5-HT blockers which appear to affect satiety mechanisms and possibly reinforcement efficacy.

Administration, Oral↗

Antagonism of ethanol-reinforced behavior by the benzodiazepine inverse agonists Ro15-4513 and FG 7142: relation to sucrose reinforcement.

The partial inverse benzodiazepine agonist Ro15-4513 has been shown to antagonize many of ethanol's actions, including the reduction of behavior reinforced with ethanol presentation. The studies reported here compared the effects of the Ro compound on sucrose reinforcement alone and concurrently available with ethanol reinforcement. Also, a second inverse agonist, FG 7142, was tested. The result indicated that ethanol reinforcement was more sensitive to the inverse agonists compared to sucrose reinforcement. This was seen as a graded effect upon ethanol responding at doses which failed to have any effect upon sucrose-reinforced behavior. The Ro compound was approximately three times more potent than the FG compound in suppressing ethanol-reinforced responding. Possible explanations for the greater sensitivity of ethanol reinforcement compared to sucrose reinforcement was discussed in terms of ethanol's potential actions at the benzodiazepine-GABA receptor complex.

Animals↗

Ethanol reinforcement in the alcohol nonpreferring rat: initiation using behavioral techniques without food restriction.

Genetic selection of rats can markedly alter their ethanol consumption. The manner in which environmental factors interact in these genetically selected animals to influence ethanol consumption has not been thoroughly investigated. Using the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) line of rats selectively bred at the Indiana University School of Medicine, alcohol self-administration in an operant situation was initiated using either a sucrose-fading or a secondary-conditioning procedure. These initiation procedures do not require any food or fluid restriction. Initiation was successful in 10 out of 12 NP animals, with the initiated rats self-administering ethanol at concentrations as high as 40%. Following initiation, a retest of home-cage ethanol preference found increases in ethanol acceptability. When tested in a concurrent operant situation, the initiated NP rats also chose ethanol over water. However, the NP rats had lower alcohol intakes and a different pattern of drinking over time when compared to that of nonselected Long-Evans rats. While the NP rats could be initiated to lever-press for ethanol, at no time did their intake approach that of the selected line of alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Thus, while an upward shift from the genetic baseline in ethanol preference and intake can result from the environmental initiation manipulations employed in these studies, genetic factors would appear to limit the extent to which ethanol ingestion can be increased.

Alcohol Drinking↗

The relation of initial alcohol experiences to current alcohol consumption in a college population.

Male and female undergraduate college students were surveyed to examine whether age and circumstances of initial taste and intoxication experiences with alcohol would be predictive of current alcohol usage. Age of initiation, nature of the experience (pleasant vs unpleasant), social setting and type of beverage were examined. Only age of initial experience was found to be minimally predictive of subsequent heavier alcohol use. The negative effects of early experiences with alcohol were predictive for abstinence in both sexes, but did not differentiate between moderate and heavy alcohol users in either.

Adult↗

Adjunctive alcohol drinking in humans.

In an attempt to validate the animal model of adjunctive ethanol drinking in people, human subjects were allowed access to ad lib beer while playing a game that delivered monetary reinforcements on a FI schedule. Subjects exposed to a longer FI schedule drank significantly more than those exposed to a shorter schedule, confirming the prediction made by the animal model. A pattern of ingestion characteristic of adjunctive drinking was also observed in the longer FI condition, providing evidence that ethanol drinking in humans can be schedule-induced.

Adult↗

Haloperidol and apomorphine effects on ethanol reinforcement in free feeding rats.

Free feeding male Long Evans rats were trained to lever press on a Fixed Ratio 8 schedule for 10% ethanol reinforcement. Mean ethanol intake in 30-minute sessions was 0.38 g/kg. Subcutaneous apomorphine (APO: 0.025 to 0.5 mg/kg) and haloperidol (HAL: 0.005 to 0.0625 mg/kg) administered 15 minutes before sessions dose-dependently reduced responding, but only APO reduced momentary response rates. Low doses of HAL reduced the effect of 0.3 but not 0.05 mg/kg APO. When the rats were food-restricted, control response rates decreased, and APO (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg) had no further effect. Results were discussed in terms of dopamine involvement in the mechanism of ethanol reinforcement.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Suppressed ethanol intake by CER following the sucrose-fading initiation procedure.

Lever responding maintained with sweetened ethanol reinforcement (3% sucrose in 10% ethanol) was initiated in food- and water-sated rats with the sucrose-fading procedure. Four tone-shock pairings, one per session, were superimposed on this behavioral baseline [conditioned emotional response (CER) paradigm]. A profound and sustained ethanol response suppression was found. Baseline levels of ethanol responding were recovered by repeating the original initiation procedure. Subsequent exposure to the CS tone alone (no shock) led to a nonsignificant reduction in ethanol responding. These results were discussed in terms of anxiolytic action of ethanol.

Animals↗

Oral ethanol self-administration in rats: models of alcohol-seeking behavior.

While various methods have been used to initiate ethanol drinking in animals, the development of models in which animals will perform some specific behavior in order to obtain the opportunity to drink ethanol has been fraught with difficulty. In the past several years, new procedures have been developed in which rats, neither food nor fluid deprived, will perform an operant task reinforced by the presentation of ethanol. This paper reviews some of these recent findings and presents new data concerning these models of oral ethanol self-administration as measured in an operant paradigm.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Oral ethanol reinforcement in the rat: effect of the partial inverse benzodiazepine agonist RO15-4513.

The partial inverse benzodiazepine agonist RO15-4513 has been found to reverse the sedating and anti-conflict effects of acute ethanol administration. In non-food or fluid-deprived rats, orally self-administering 10% ethanol in an operant situation, RO15-4513 resulted in a dose-dependent suppression on ethanol intake. Doses of 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg suppressed responding from approximately 25% to 60% respectively. A dose of 0.1 mg/kg had no significant effect upon responding. These findings were discussed in terms of the potential independence of brain mechanisms related to ethanol reinforcement and sedation.

Administration, Oral↗

Initiation of ethanol-maintained responding using a schedule-induction procedure in free feeding rats.

A schedule-induced adjunctive drinking procedure was used to initiate ethanol self-administration in free feeding rats. The rats were first trained on a FI 90-sec schedule with 20% sucrose reinforcement, and then ethanol was made concurrently available on a CRF schedule on a second lever. After 25 concurrent sessions, the sucrose was removed and the ethanol response requirement was brought to FR8. Finally, ethanol concentrations were varied up to 40%. Of 11 rats, 8 responded for sucrose on the FI 90 sec schedule, and 5 of those responded for 40% ethanol at FR8. These results were compared to previous studies using the same procedure in food-restricted rats and other procedures in free feeding rats. Possible explanations for the lower success using schedule induction in nondeprived rats were discussed.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Effect of pimozide on home cage ethanol drinking in the rat: dependence on drinking session length.

A stimulus-fading procedure was used to initiate ethanol drinking in free-feeding Long Evans rats. During daily half-hour drinking sessions in the home cage, a combination of sucrose and ethanol was first presented to the rats; gradually the sucrose concentration was reduced and the ethanol concentration increased until after 7 weeks the rats were drinking 10% ethanol with no sucrose. After stabilization of intake, either pimozide (PIM, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 mg/kg) was injected 4 h before drinking sessions or (d)-amphetamine (DEX, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg) was injected 15 min before sessions. The 0.50 and 1.00 mg/kg PIM doses and the 0.50 DEX dose significantly reduced intake compared to vehicle injections. In the second part of the experiment, the rats were given 24-h access to 10% ethanol and water in a two-bottle choice procedure. In this condition, 0.50 mg/kg PIM failed to reduce intake compared to vehicle. The critical difference between the two procedures seems to be that with the 30-min sessions, PIM injections were timed to have their maximal effect during testing. With 24-h sessions, decreases in intake produced by PIM could have been compensated for by increases after the drug had worn off. The hypothesis that dopamine is necessary for ethanol reinforcement receives support from the PIM effect on the 30-min sessions. The DEX effect extends the generality of our previous finding that DEX reduces ethanol-reinforced lever pressing in free-feeding rats.

Alcohol Drinking↗

The induction of oral ethanol self-administration by contingent ethanol delivery.

The necessity of delivering a highly reinforcing stimulus (20% sucrose) contingent upon ethanol consumption in order to induce ethanol self-administration in free-feeding rats was investigated. Rats water deprived for 12-16 h were placed in an environment in which ethanol drinking resulted in the presentation of ethanol. This procedure was successful in inducing and maintaining ethanol self-administration over concentrations of 5-20% (v/v). Compared to a group of rats initially reinforced for drinking ethanol with sucrose presentation, contingent ethanol delivery resulted in greater ethanol self-administration behavior. When 20% ethanol was available the group trained with ethanol had average intake of 0.91 g/kg, whereas the group trained with sucrose had a mean intake of 0.69 g/kg in a 30-min session. The results suggest that ethanol's reinforcing properties are sufficient to establish ethanol self-administration within the context of the inducing environment.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Effect of amphetamine on sucrose-reinforced lever pressing: interaction with food deprivation.

Rats were trained to lever press on a Fixed Ratio Schedule 8 using sucrose reinforcement in one of two feeding conditions: ad lib food and water available in the home cage; reduced feeding in order to maintain the animals at 80% of their free feeding body weight. The effect of three doses of d-amphetamine (0.10, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg) on lever pressing was examined for each feeding condition. A systematic decrease in responding as dose increased was found in the ad lib feeding condition while only the highest dose had any effect on responding in the food restricted animals. Thus, it appeared that the effect of food deprivation was to shift the amphetamine dose-response curve to the right.

Animals↗