Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H H Parving

Publications and source records attributed to H H Parving.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism and ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy.

The antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients with diabetic nephropathy varies considerably. Therefore, we tested the potential role of an insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on this early antiproteinuric responsiveness in an observational follow-up study. Sixty (II, N = 13; ID, N = 26 and DD, N = 21) young hypertensive IDDM patients suffering from diabetic nephropathy were investigated during three months before and for the initial six month period during ACE inhibition [captopril 44 (SD 22) mg/24 hr, no differences in drug dose between groups]. Blood pressure (MABP) and albuminuria (ELISA) were measured three (1 to 6) times before and three (1 to 13) times during ACE inhibition. At baseline the groups (II/ID/DD) had comparable (1) mean arterial blood pressure (MABP mm Hg) of 113 +/- 10/108 +/- 9/114 +/- 8, (2) albuminuria (geometric mean with 95% CI) 1394 (747 to 2608)/1176 (844 to 1797) and 1261 (827 to 2017) mg/24 hr, and (3) serum creatinine (geometric mean with 95% CI), 80 (68 to 93)/85 (76 to 97)/103 (85 to 119) mumol/liter, respectively. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition induced a significant reduction in MABP, albuminuria and kidney function in all three groups (II/ID/DD; P < 0.05): (1) MABP (mean +/- SD) 12 +/- 7/5 +/- 7/8 +/- 9 mm Hg (ANOVA, P = 0.02); (2) albuminuria [mean (95% CI)] 61 (34 to 77)/22 (3 to 37)/31 (13 to 46) %, (ANOVA, P < 0.01); and (3) increasing serum creatinine [mean (95% CI)] 8 (4 to 12)/9 (3 to 16)/8 (0 to 16) % (ANOVA, NS), respectively. Adjusting for differences in reduction in MABP did not change the association between decrease in albuminuria and ACE/ID genotypes (P < 0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the ACE/ID polymorphism, albuminuria and MABP at baseline independently influenced the decline in albuminuria after initiation of ACE inhibition (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.01). A significant association between changes in MABP and albuminuria was demonstrated (R2 = 0.16, P < 0.01). Our data show that hypertensive albuminuric IDDM patients with the II genotype are particularly susceptible to commonly advocated renoprotective treatment.

Adult↗

Predisposition to essential hypertension and development of diabetic nephropathy in IDDM patients.

Conflicting results have been reported on the relationship between familial predisposition to hypertension and development of diabetic nephropathy in IDDM. In our case-control study, we assessed the prevalence of hypertension among parents of 73 IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN+; persistent albuminuria > 200 microg/min or > 300 mg/24 h) and 73 IDDM patients without diabetic nephropathy (DN-; urinary albumin excretion < 20 microg/min or < 30 mg/24 h). Arterial hypertension, defined as antihypertensive therapy or a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (SpaceLabs 90207) > or = 135/85 mmHg, was present in 57% of parents of DN+ patients compared with 41% of parents of DN- patients (P = 0.034; difference 16% [95% CI 1.3-29.6%]). In addition, the cumulative incidence of hypertension was higher among parents of DN+ patients (log-rank test P < 0.001), with a shift toward younger age at onset of hypertension in this group. However, the difference in prevalence of parental hypertension was not evident using office blood pressure measurements (64 vs. 57%; NS; difference 7% [-5.8-20%). Furthermore, patients with DN+ and with antihypertensive therapy in both parents were themselves more frequently treated for hypertension than were patients with DN+ and without parental treatment for hypertension (100 vs. 61%; P = 0.034; difference 39% [21-57%]). In conclusion, familial predisposition to essential hypertension increases the risk of diabetic nephropathy and may also contribute to the development of systemic hypertension in patients with IDDM and diabetic nephropathy.

Adult↗

Improved visual function in IDDM patients with unchanged cumulative incidence of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in visual acuity and the cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy in a clinic-based observational follow-up study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients visiting Hvidore Hospital in 1984 whose diagnosis of IDDM had been made before 41 years of age and between 1965 and 1979 (n = 356) were followed until 1994 or until their deaths. All patients were Caucasians and resided in Copenhagen. Patients were divided into three prevalence cohorts based on time of diabetes onset: group A, 1965-1969 (n = 113); group B, 1970-1974 (n = 130); and group C, 1975-1979 (n = 113). RESULTS: Fifteen years after diabetes onset, the visual acuity was significantly improved in patients with increasing calendar year of the disease onset. The median (interquartile range) visual acuity was 1.0 (0.8-1.0), 1.0(0.9-1.0), and 1.0 (1.0-1.0) in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P < 0.01 overall; P = 0.28 for group A vs. group B; and P < 0.01 for group A vs. group C) with 60, 66, and 93 having a visual acuity of 1.0 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The cumulative incidence (+/-SEM), expressed as a percentage and calculated according to the life-table method, of proliferative retinopathy, maculopathy, and laser-treated retinopathy 15 years after onset of diabetes were, respectively, 13+/-3, 11+/-3, and 12+/-3 in group A; 16+/-3, 12+/-3, and 21+/-4 in group B; 11+/-3, 5+/-2, and 12+/-3 in group C, respectively (NS). The development of proliferative retinopathy was associated with the degree of retinopathy and albuminuria at baseline and the mean HbA1c during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed an improvement in visual acuity with increasing calendar year of diabetes onset but an unchanged cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy.

Adult↗

Beneficial impact of ramipril on left ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive nonalbuminuric NIDDM patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the ACE inhibitor ramipril as compared with placebo on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in normotensive, nonalbuminuric NIDDM patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Patients with NIDDM are characterized by excessive cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and LVH, an independent risk factor for cardiac events, is often present in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 38 normotensive, nonalbuminuric (albuminuria < 100 mg/24 h) NIDDM patients with LVH (LVMI > 131 g/m2 in men and > 100 g/m2 in women) were enrolled in a 6-month randomized, double-blind parallel group study to compare the effects of ramipril (5 mg/day) with placebo on LVMI (echocardiography, Vingmed CFM725, Diasonics Sonotron), QTc dispersion determined as the interlead variation in QTc interval on standard electrocardiogram (ECG), and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (A&D TM2420, Tokyo, Japan). A total of 16 ramipril (10 men, 60 +/- 9 years [mean +/- SD]) and 15 placebo-treated (8 men, 55 +/- 10 years) patients completed the study, and their data are presented. RESULTS: Ambulatory blood pressure was almost identical at baseline (132/76 +/- 3/1 vs. 133/74 +/- 5/2 mmHg [mean +/- SEM]) and remained stable during follow-up (134/76 +/- 3/1 vs. 136/74 +/- 6/2 mmHg) in the ramipril and placebo group, respectively. LVMI was comparable at baseline (137.1 +/- 7.0 vs. 129.6 +/- 3.7 g/m2) in the ramipril and placebo group, respectively, and decreased significantly more in the ramipril group as compared with the placebo group (17.6 +/- 3.0 vs. 5.7 +/- 4.6 g/m2, respectively, 11.9 [0.7-23.1] g/m2, mean difference [95% CI]; P = 0.037). QTc dispersion was comparable at baseline (60.2 [5.5] vs. 64.1 [6.5] ms) and did not change significantly during follow-up: -2.5 [7.0] vs. -12.2 [9.5] ms; mean difference 9.8 (-14.2 to 33.8 ms) in the ramipril and placebo group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril induces regression of LVH in normotensive, nonalbuminuric NIDDM patients, independent of reduction in systemic blood pressure.

Aged↗

Increased left ventricular mass in normotensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic nephropathy increases the risk of premature cardiovascular disease and sudden death, particularly in type 1 diabetic patients. One possible mechanism for this risk may be left ventricular hypertrophy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate left ventricular structure and function in normotensive type 1 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: M-mode and Doppler echocardiography was performed in 17 type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy (albuminuria [median (range)], 345 (135-2,846) mg/24 h) and compared with 34 normotensive, normoalbuminuric (10 [3-30] mg/24 h) type 1 diabetic patients matched for arterial blood pressure (mean +/- SD) ([134/77] +/- [13/7] vs. [129/78] +/- [12/7] mmHg), age (40 +/- 11 vs. 42 +/- 10 years), duration of diabetes (28 +/- 7 vs. 28 +/- 6 years), and BMI (24.2 +/- 4.2 vs. 24.6 +/- 2.4 kg/m2). RESULTS: Left ventricular mass (LVM) index was significantly higher in patients with nephropathy compared with patients with normoalbuminuria (100.8 +/- 10.3 vs. 88.2 +/- 21.0 g/m2, respectively; P = 0.02). Greater ventricular septum width was demonstrated in the nephropathic group compared with the control group (9.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 8.2 +/- 1.3 mm, respectively; P = 0.002). No significant difference in posterior wall thickness was apparent. The nephropathic group tended to have reduced diastolic function (E/A ratio, 1.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4; P = 0.09). Fractional shortening was normal and about the same in the two groups. The groups did not differ with respect to serum creatinine or hemoglobin, while metabolic control (assessed by HbA1c) and plasma renin and prorenin levels were elevated in the nephropathic group compared with the normoalbuminuric group. CONCLUSIONS: A blood pressure-independent increase in LVM may contribute to the increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in normotensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Glycemic abnormalities and activation of the renin-angiotensin system may lead to the ventricular enlargement.

Adult↗

Benefits and cost of antihypertensive treatment in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.

PREVALENCE: The prevalence of abnormally elevated urinary albumin excretion rate (> 30 mg/24 h) is approximately 40% in insulin-dependent and in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Diabetes has become the leading cause of end-stage renal failure in Europe, USA and Japan. Approximately 90% of the direct and indirect costs of caring for diabetic patients are spent on the complications of diabetes. RISK FACTORS: Identification of patients at high risk of developing diabetic nephropathy is possible by screening for microalbuminuria (30-300 mg/24 h). Additional risk factors/ markers for development of nephropathy are male sex, genetic predisposition, ethnic conditions, early onset of diabetes, poor metabolic control, hyperfiltration, elevated prorenin and smoking. Elevated urinary albumin excretion rate indicates a substantially increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk in diabetic patients. PREVENTION OF NEPHROPATHY: Randomized controlled trials in normotensive insulin-dependent and in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria indicate that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors diminish urinary albumin excretion rate, and postpone and may even prevent progression to clinical overt nephropathy. These findings indicate that screening and intervention programs could probably save lives and lead to considerable economic savings. TREATMENT OF NEPHROPATHY: Systemic blood pressure elevation to a hypertensive level is an early and frequent phenomenon in diabetic nephropathy. Furthermore, nocturnal blood pressure elevation (non-dippers) occurs more frequently in patients with nephropathy. Systemic blood pressure elevation, hyperglycaemia, albuminuria and the D polymorphism in the ACE gene accelerate the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Studies of the impact of other potential progression promoters (i.e. smoking, hyperlipidaemia and protein intake) have yielded conflicting results. Effective blood pressure reduction using ACE inhibitors or drugs of other classes, or both, frequently in combination with diuretics reduces albuminuria, delays the progression of nephropathy, postpones renal failure and improves survival in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Antihypertensive treatment for diabetic nephropathy extends life and saves money.

Albuminuria↗

Risk factors for development of incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate putative risk factors for the development of incipient diabetic nephropathy (persistent microalbuminuria) and overt diabetic nephropathy (persistent macroalbuminuria) in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of a cohort of white, non-insulin dependent diabetic patients followed for a median period of 5.8 years. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in tertiary referral centre. SUBJECTS: 191 patients aged under 66 years with non-insulin dependent diabetes and normoalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion rate < 30 mg/24 h) who attended the clinic during 1987. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were lost to follow up. Thirty six of the 176 remaining developed persistent microalbuminuria (30-299 mg/24 h in two out of three consecutive 24 hour urine collections) and five developed persistent macroalbuminuria (> or = mg/24 h in two out of three consecutive collections) during follow up. The five year cumulative incidence of incipient diabetic nephropathy was 23% (95% confidence interval 17% to 30%). Cox's multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed the following risk factors for the development of incipient or overt diabetic nephropathy: increased baseline log urinary albumin excretion rate (relative risk 11.1 (3.4 to 35.9); P < 0.0001); male sex (2.6 (1.2 to 5.4); P < 0.02); presence of retinopathy (2.4 (1.3 to 4.7); P < 0.01); increased serum cholesterol concentration (1.4 (1.1 to 1.7); P < 0.01); haemoglobin A1c concentration (1.2 (1.0 to 1.4); P < 0.05); and age (1.07 (1.02 to 1.12); P < 0.01). Known duration of diabetes, body mass index, arterial blood pressure, serum creatinine concentration, pre-existing coronary heart disease, and history of smoking were not risk factors. CONCLUSION: Several potentially modifiable risk factors predict the development of incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy in normoalbuminuric patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes.

Adult↗

Left ventricular hypertrophy in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy.

The aim of our cross-sectional case-control study was to evaluate putative mechanisms of the increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in NIDDM patients with or without diabetic nephropathy. Fifty-one NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy (38 males, age 61 +/- 8 years, group 1), 53 NIDDM patients with normoalbuminuria (42 males, 61 +/- 7 years, group 2), and 22 non-diabetic control subjects (15 males, 58 +/- 8 years, group 3) were investigated. Previous antihypertensive treatment was withdrawn 2 weeks before the study. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and systolic function were determined by echocardiography. LVMI was elevated, mean +/- SE, in group 1: 157 +/- 6 g m(-2), and in group 2: 139 +/- 7 g m(-2), as compared with group 3: 95 +/- 5 g m(-2) (p < 0.001, for both), and in group 1 as compared with group 2 (p = 0.05). The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (LVMI > 131 g m(-2) in men and > 100 gm(-2) in women) was much higher in group 1: 75% (95% CI, 60-86), and group 2: 51% (95% CI, 37-65), as compared with group 3: 9% (95% CI, 1-29) (p < 0.001, for both), and in group 1 as compared with group 2 (p < 0.01). Shortening fraction of the left ventricle, % +/- SE, was relatively reduced in group 1: 32.5 +/- 1.1%, and group 2: 33.4 +/- 1.1%, as compared with group 3: 41.2 +/- 1.2% (p < 0.01, for both). In a subgroup of 26 normoalbuminuric normotensive NIDDM patients, LVMI was higher than in 14 normotensive non-diabetic control subjects: 137 +/- 10 g m(-2) vs 96 +/- 7 g m(-2), respectively (p < 0.005). The prevalence of LVH was 42% (95% CI, 23-63) and 14% (95% CI, 2-43) (p = 0.07) in these two groups, respectively. In conclusion, normotensive and hypertensive NIDDM patients with and without diabetic nephropathy frequently suffer from LVH and relatively reduced systolic function which may constitute independent risk factors for fatal and non-fatal cardiac events.

Age Factors↗

Microalbuminuria as an early indicator of osteopenia in male insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD), termed diabetic osteopenia, has been reported in patients with insulin-dependent (Type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM). To examine BMD in long-term IDDM patients with normal kidney function, but with different degrees of urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), compared to that of patients with elevated plasma creatinine, 36 IDDM male patients (mean duration 27 years) were subdivided according to UAER (<30, 30-300, >300, >300 mg 24 h(-1) and plasma creatinine 0.120-0.350 mmol l(-1)) and 15 controls were recruited. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and UAER by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. BMD was normal in IDDM patients with normal UAER and reduced in the femoral neck, the trochanter major, and the Wards triangle in patients with increased UAER (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.02). BMD correlated to creatinine clearance in both cortical and cancellous bone sites (p < 0.001, p < 0.0001), and inversely to the levels of plasma PTH (p < 0.0005). We conclude that BMD is normal in long-term IDDM male patients with normal kidney function and normal UAER and reduced in patients with increased UAER. Diabetic osteopenia seems to be a progressive phenomenon related to diabetic nephropathy and associated with the decrease in creatinine clearance and with the resulting rise in plasma PTH.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Impaired autoregulation of GFR in hypertensive non-insulin dependent diabetic patients.

We investigated the effect of acute lowering of blood pressure (BP) upon glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients, 14 with diabetic nephropathy and 12 with normoalbuminuria. The study was performed twice with the subjects receiving an intravenous injection of either clonidine (150 to 225 micrograms) or saline (0.154 mmol/liter). We assessed GFR, albuminuria, and BP. The two groups were well matched with respect to demographic data, baseline GFR and BP. Clonidine induced similar reductions in mean arterial blood pressure 19 (SE +/- 4) and 21 (SE +/- 3) mm Hg in patients with and without nephropathy, respectively. In the nephropathy group GFR diminished in average from 90 (SE +/- 6) to 81 (SE +/- 7) ml/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.006), fractional clearance of albumin (x 10(-6)) declined from a geometric mean of 219 (antilog SE /divided by 1.3) to 186 (antilog SE /divided by 1.3) (P = 0.04), and four patients had a complete pressure-passive vasculature, defined as delta GFR% = delta MABP%. A significant correlation between relative reductions in MABP and GFR (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) was demonstrated in albuminuric patients. None of the normoalbuminuric patients had a complete pressure-passive vasculature and there were no significant differences in GFR between the two examinations, but five had abnormal autoregulation of GFR. Mean difference between changes in GFR (95% confidence interval) between the nephropathic and normoalbuminuric group was 5.5 (divided by 2.7 to 13.7) ml/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.18). Our study suggests that hypertensive NIDDM patients, particularly patients with nephropathy, frequently suffer from impaired or abolished autoregulation of GFR.

Adult↗

Renal protection in diabetes--an emerging role for calcium antagonists.

The combination of diabetes and hypertension increases the changes of progressive renal disorder and ultimately renal failure. Roughly 40% of all diabetics, whether insulin dependent or not, develop diabetic nephropathy. Diabetic nephropathy is the single most important cause of end-stage renal disease in the western world and accounts for more than a quarter of all end-stage renal diseases. It is also a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Increased arterial blood pressure is an early and common phenomenon in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy. The relationship between arterial blood pressure and diabetic nephropathy is a complex one, diabetic nephropathy increasing blood pressure and blood pressure accelerating the course of nephropathy. Calcium antagonists antagonize preglomerular vasoconstriction. Furthermore, additional putative mechanisms include the ability to retard renal growth and possibly to attenuate mesangial entrapment of macromolecules and to attenuate the mitogenic effects of diverse growth factors. Calcium antagonists (except the old short-acting dihydropyridine drugs) reduce microalbuminuria and preserve kidney function in diabetic patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy. Long-term trials using the new long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists for the treatment of patients with incipient nephropathy are still lacking. A recent 1-year randomized double-blind study in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy showed a more beneficial effect on the decline rate in the glomerular filtration rate of nisoldipine (long-acting dihydropyridine) than angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibition. The mean arterial blood pressure during the study based on 24-hour recordings was nearly identical, 103 (SD 9) and 101 (SD 11) mm Hg in the two groups. Furthermore, a recent 5-year randomized open study in hypertensive noninsulin-dependent patients with diabetic nephropathy has revealed the same beneficial effect of a calcium antagonist and ACE inhibition on the progression of nephropathy. In a third group treated with sympatholytic drugs, more than 50% of the subjects had a doubling of their creatinine as compared to less than 10% in the two other groups mentioned above. However, long-term studies are needed to consolidate these findings and expand them to insulin-dependent diabetic patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Differences between nisoldipine and lisinopril on glomerular filtration rates and albuminuria in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy during the first year of treatment.

Our objective was to compare the effect of a long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) versus an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) on albuminuria, arterial blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy. We performed a 1-year, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled study comparing nisoldipine (20-40 mg once daily) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) in 52 hypertensive IDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy. Three patients dropped out, and results for the remaining 49 (25 nisoldipine, 24 lisinopril) are presented. Diuretics were required in 10 nisoldipine- and 8 lisinopril-treated patients. Every 3 months, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (TM2420, A&D, Tokyo, Japan) and albuminuria in three 24-h samples (enzyme immunoassay) were measured; GFR (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was recorded every 6 months. Mean arterial blood pressure (24 h) was reduced from (mean +/- SE) 108 +/- 3 mmHg at baseline to 101 +/- 2 in average during treatment in the lisinopril group and from 105 +/- 2 to 103 +/- 2 in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.06 comparing changes in the two groups). Albuminuria was reduced 47% (95% CI 21-65) in the lisinopril group versus an increase of 11% (-3 to 27) in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.001). Fractional albumin clearance was reduced 37% (95% CI 4-59%) in the lisinopril versus an increase of 35% (8-69%) in the nisoldipine group (P < 0.01). GFR decreased from 85 +/- 5 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2) to 73 +/- 5 in the lisinopril group and from 84 +/- 6 to 80 +/- 7 in the nisoldipine group (P < 0.05). The effect of study medication on albuminuria and GFR was independent of changes in systemic blood pressure and baseline variables in multiple regression analyses. In summary, lisinopril reduced albuminuria, but also GFR, to a greater extent than did nisoldipine in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy during the 1st year of treatment. Longer follow-up is required to clarify whether these drugs have different renoprotective effects.

Adult↗

Long-term effect of lisinopril and atenolol on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy.

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether inhibition of ACE (lisinopril 10-20 mg/day) can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function more than reducing blood pressure with conventional antihypertensive treatment (atenolol 50-100 mg/day), usually in combination with a diuretic. We performed a prospective, randomized, parallel study for 42 months, double blind for the first 12 months and single blind thereafter. Forty-three (21 lisinopril and 22 atenolol) hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy were enrolled. Data from 36 patients (17 lisinopril and 19 atenolol, 60 +/- 7 years of age, 27 men) who completed at least 12 months of the study period are presented. At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was 75 +/- 6 and 74 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2), mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (A&D TM2420) was 110 +/- 3 and 114 +/- 2 mmHg, and 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate was 961 (range 331-5,727) and 1,578 (476-5,806) mg/24 h in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was similar, 37 and 35 months in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was equally reduced in the two groups, 12 +/- 2 and 10 +/- 2 mmHg in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate declined in a biphasic manner with a faster initial (0 to 6 months) change of 1.25 +/- 0.49 and 0.81 +/- 0.29 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) followed by a slower sustained decline (6 to 42 months) of 0.59 +/- 0.10 and 0.54 +/- 0.13 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in either initial or sustained decline in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups. Urinary albumin excretion was reduced (% reduction of baseline) more in the lisinopril than in the atenolol group, at 55 (95% CI 29-72) and 15% (-13 to 34), respectively (P = 0.01). In conclusion, the relentless decline in kidney function characteristically found in hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy can be reduced equally effectively by two antihypertensive treatments, the beta-blocker atenolol and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril.

Aged↗

Stable glomerular filtration rate in normotensive IDDM patients with stable microalbuminuria. A 5-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in IDDM patients with microalbuminuria in order to identify patients with stable or declining kidney function over a 5-year study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty normotensive (129 +/- 11/80 +/- 8 mmHg) IDDM patients with persistent microalbuminuria (mean urinary albumin excretion [UAE] 84 mg/24 h [range 30-300]) were followed prospectively for 5 years of clinical examinations that included the measurement of GFR (51Cr-labeled EDTA clearance) at least once a year. The mean GFR at baseline was 120 +/- 18 ml x min-1.1 x 73 m-2. RESULTS: Using multiple regression analysis, the rate of decline in GFR was independently correlated to onset of diabetic nephropathy (P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (sBP) at baseline (P < 0.05). Increase in UAE was correlated to the mean HbA1c during the observation period. Out of 40 patients, 14 progressed to diabetic nephropathy (UAE > 300 mg/24 h). These patients had a significant reduction in GFR (mean -2.2 +/- 3.8 ml x min-1 x year-1; P = 0.05), while GFR remained stable in the remaining 26 patients with nonprogressive microalbuminuria (change in GFR 0.5 +/- 2.1 ml x min-1 x year-1; NS). The difference in the rate of decline of GFR was significant (mean 2.7 ml x min-1 x year-1; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Normotensive IDDM patients with nonprogressive microalbuminuria have a stable GFR. Progression of UAE to diabetic nephropathy heralds a progressive loss of kidney function. Efforts should be made to prevent the progression from microalbuminuria to diabetic nephropathy in every IDDM patient with microalbuminuria.

Adult↗

White coat hypertension in NIDDM patients with and without incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Early data have suggested a high prevalence of white coat hypertension (approximately 50%) in NIDDM patients. To study this phenomenon further, we determined the prevalence of white coat hypertension in NIDDM patients with normo- or microalbuminuria or with diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Three groups of hypertensive NIDDM patients (repeated clinic blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg or antihypertensive treatment) attending the Steno Diabetes Center were investigated in a cross-sectional study. Group 1 had normoalbuminuria (a urinary albumin excretion [UAE] rate < 30 mg/24 h, n = 30, age 61 +/- 7 [mean +/- SD] years, 20 men), group 2 had microalbuminuria (UAE rate 30-300 mg/24 h, n = 51, age 55 +/- 7 years, 35 men), and group 3 had diabetic nephropathy (UAE rate > 300 mg/24 h, n = 47, 62 +/- 7 years, 36 men). If given, all previous antihypertensive medication was withdrawn at least 2 weeks before the study (48%). The prevalence of white coat hypertension (clinic hypertension with normal blood pressure values at home) was determined by comparison of clinic blood pressure (Hawksley Random sphygmomanometer) and the ambulatory daytime (7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M.) blood pressure (A&D TM2420). By applying established criteria, white coat hypertension was confirmed if daytime blood pressure was < 135/85 mmHg. RESULTS: The clinic blood pressure was 155/86 (SE 3/2) mmHg, 156/89 (2/1) mmHg, and 171/90 (3/2) mmHg in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.05 comparing group 3 with groups 1 and 2). The prevalence of white coat hypertension was significantly higher in group 1 as compared with groups 2 and 3, 23% (95% CI 10-42) vs. 8% (2-19) and 9% (2-20) (P < 0.05), with no difference between the latter two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of white coat hypertension in normoalbuminuric NIDDM patients resembles that observed in nondiabetic subjects with essential hypertension, whereas the prevalence is significantly lower in NIDDM patients with incipient or overt diabetic nephropathy, suggesting a difference between primary and secondary hypertension.

Albuminuria↗