Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Grosjean

Publications and source records attributed to H Grosjean.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Construction of a UGA suppressor tRNA by modification in vitro of yeast tRNACys.

In this paper we describe the construction of a yeast tRNACys UGA suppressor. After specific hydrolysis of the parent molecule, the first base of the anticodon GCA was replaced by a uracil. The resulting molecule, harboring a UCA anticodon, was injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes in order to test its biological activities. The level of aminoacylation was similar to that of the parent molecule. Readthrough of the UGA termination codon in beta-globin mRNA, coinjected with the tRNA, indicated suppressor activity; however, tRNACys (anticodon UCA) was a much less efficient suppressor than others tested under the same conditions. We see no post-transcriptional modification of the uracil in the anticodon wobble position after injection into oocytes. This may be related to the low suppressor activity; however, it is also possible that other features of tRNACys structure may be unadapted to efficient UCA anticodon function.

Animals↗

Post-transcriptional modification of the wobble nucleotide in anticodon-substituted yeast tRNAArgII after microinjection into Xenopus laevis oocytes.

An enzymatic procedure for the replacement of the ICG anticodon of yeast tRNAArgII by NCG trinucleotide (N = A, C, G or U) is described. Partial digestion with S1-nuclease and T1-RNAase provides fragments which, when annealed together, form an "anticodon-deprived" yeast tRNAArgII. A novel anticodon, phosphorylated with (32P) label on its 5' terminal residue, is then inserted using T4-RNA ligase. Such "anticodon-substituted" yeast tRNAArgII are microinjected into the cytoplasm of Xenopus laevis oocytes and shown to be able to interact with the anticodon maturation enzymes under in vivo conditions. Our results indicate that when adenosine occurs in the wobble position (A34) in yeast tRNAArgII it is efficiently modified into inosine (I34) while uridine (U34) is transformed into two uridine derivatives, one of which is probably mcm5U. In contrast, when a cytosine (C34) or guanosine (G34) occurs, they are not modified. These results are at variance with those obtained previously under similar conditions with anticodon derivatives of yeast tRNAAsp harbouring A, C, G or U as the first anticodon nucleotide. In this case, guanosine and uridine were modified while adenosine and cytosine were not.

Animals↗

Site-directed in vitro replacement of nucleosides in the anticodon loop of tRNA: application to the study of structural requirements for queuine insertase activity.

We have investigated the specificity of the enzymes Q-insertase and mannosyl-Q transferase that replace the guanosine at position 34 (wobble base) in the anticodon of several tRNAs by Q or mannosyl-Q derivatives. We have restructured in vitro the normal anticodon of yeast tRNA-Asp-GUC, yeast tRNAArgICG and yeast tRNALeuUAG. With yeast tRNA-Asp-GUC, we have replaced one or several nucleotides in the vicinity of G34 by one of the four canonical nucleotides or by pseudouridylic acid; we have also constructed a tRNAAsp with eight bases instead of seven in the anticodon loop. With yeast tRNAArgICG and yeast tRNALeuUAG, we have replaced their anticodon by the trinucleotide GUC, coding for aspartic acid. The chimerical tRNAs were microinjected into the cytoplasm of Xenopus laevis oocytes and after 72 h the amount of Q34 and mannosyl-Q34 incorporated was measured. Our results show that the U33G34U35 sequence, within an anticodon loop of seven bases in chimerical yeast tRNA-Asp-GUC, tRNAArgGUC or tRNALeuGUC, is the main determinant for Q-insertase activity at position 34; the rest of the tRNA sequence has only a slight influence. For mannosyl-Q transferase, however, a much broader structural feature of the tRNA than just the U33G34U35 sequence is important for the efficiency of Q34 transformation into mannosyl-Q34.

Animals↗

Codon:anticodon and anticodon:anticodon interaction: evaluation of equilibrium and kinetic parameters of complexes involving a g:u wobble.

In order to learn about the effect of the G:U wobble interaction we characterized to codon:anticodon binding between triplets: UUC, UUU and yeast tRNAPhe (anticodon GmAA) as well as the anticodon:anticodon binding between Escherichia coli tRNAGlu2, E. coli tRNALys (anticodons: mam5s2UUC, and mam5S2UUU, respectively) and tRNAPhe from yeast and E. coli (anticodon GAA) using equilibrium fluorescence titrations and temperature jump measurements with fluorescence and absorption detection. The difference in stability constants between complexes involving a G:U pair rather than a usual G:C basepair is in the range of one order magnitude and is mainly due to the shorter lifetime of the complex involving G:U in the wobble position. This difference is more pronounced when the codon triplet is structured, i.e., is built in the anticodon loop of a tRNA. The reaction enthalpies of the anticodon:anticodon complexes involving G:U mismatching were found to be about 4 kcal/mol smaller, and the melting temperatures more than 20 degrees C lower, than those of the corresponding complexes with the G:C basepair. The results are discussed in terms of different strategies that might be used in the cell in order to minimize the effect of different lifetimes of codon-tRNA complexes. Differences in these lifetimes may be used for the modulation of the translation efficiency.

Anticodon↗

Enzymatic replacement in vitro of the first anticodon base of yeast tRNAAsp: application to the study of tRNA maturation in vivo, after microinjection into frog oocytes.

A combination of several enzymes, RNase-T1, nuclease S1, T4-polynucleotide kinase and T4-RNA ligase were used to prepare and modify different fragments of yeast tRNAAsp (normal anticodon G U C). This allowed us to reconstitute, in vitro, a chimeric tRNA that has any of the four bases G, A, U or C, as the first anticodon nucleotide, labelled with (32p) in its 3' position. Such reconstituted (32p) labelled yeast tRNAAsp were microinjected into the cytoplasm or the nucleus of the frog oocyte and checked for their stability as well as for their potential to work as a substrate for the maturation (modifying) enzymes under in vivo conditions. Our results indicate that the chimeric yeast tRNAsAsp were quite stable inside the frog oocyte. Also, the G34 was effectively transformed inside the cytoplasm of frog oocyte into Q34 and mannosyl-Q34; U34 into mcm5s2U and mcm5U. In contrast, C34 and A34 were not transformed at all neither in the cytoplasm nor in the nucleus of the frog oocyte. The above procedure constitutes a new approach in order to detect the presence of a given modifying enzyme inside the frog oocyte; also it provides informations about its cellular location and possibility about its specificity of interaction with foreign tRNA.

Animals↗

Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

By considering the nucleotide sequence of several highly expressed coding regions in bacteriophage MS2 and mRNAs from Escherichia coli, it is possible to deduce some rules which govern the selection of the most appropriate synonymous codons NNU or NNC read by tRNAs having GNN, QNN or INN as anticodon. The rules fit with the general hypothesis that an efficient in-phase translation is facilitated by proper choice of degenerate codewords promoting a codon-anticodon interaction with intermediate strength (optimal energy) over those with very strong or very weak interaction energy. Moreover, codons corresponding to minor tRNAs are clearly avoided in these efficiently expressed genes. These correlations are clearcut in the normal reading frame but not in the corresponding frameshift sequences +1 and +2. We hypothesize that both the optimization of codon-anticodon interaction energy and the adaptation of the population to codon frequency or vice versa in highly expressed mRNAs of E. coli are part of a strategy that optimizes the efficiency of translation. Conversely, codon usage in weakly expressed genes such as repressor genes follows exactly the opposite rules. It may be concluded that, in addition to the need for coding an amino acid sequence, the energetic consideration for codon-anticodon pairing, as well as the adaptation of codons to the tRNA population, may have been important evolutionary constraints on the selection of the optimal nucleotide sequence.

Anticodon↗

Structure in tRNA data.

260 sequences of tRNA are compared, after their classification into six categories: prokaryotic (83 sequences) and eukaryotic (83 sequences) elongators, prokaryotic (10 sequences) and eukaryotic (11 sequences), initiators, lower eukaryotic mitochondrial tRNA (53 sequences) and archaebacterial tRNA (20 sequences). Beside the presence of invariable and semi-invariable positions in tRNA, non-random base distribution in almost all positions is also evident; most of them being characteristic of each class of tRNA. Therefore, during evolution it would seem that selectional pressures do act in so called variable positions as well as invariant positions of tRNA molecules. Results are discussed in relation to possible restrictions depending on functional and/or structural constraints of tRNA.

Animals↗

Usage of the three termination codons in a single eukaryotic cell, the Xenopus laevis oocyte.

Oocytes from Xenopus laevis were injected with purified amber (UAG), ochre (UAA), and opal (UGA) suppressor tRNAs from yeasts. The radioactively labeled proteins translated from the endogenous mRNAs were then separated on two-dimensional gels. All three termination codons are used in a single cell, the Xenopus laevis oocyte. But a surprisingly low number of readthrough polypeptides were observed from the 600 mRNAs studied in comparison to uninjected oocytes. The experimental data are compared with the conclusions obtained from the compilation of all available termination sequences on eukaryotic and prokaryotic mRNAs. This comparison indicates that the apparent resistance of natural termination codons against readthrough, as observed by the microinjection experiments, cannot be explained by tandem or very close second stop codons. Instead it suggests that specific context sequences around the termination codons may play a role in the efficiency of translation termination.

Animals↗

Usage of the three termination codons: compilation and analysis of the known eukaryotic and prokaryotic translation termination sequences.

The published translation termination sequences have been compiled and analysed to aid the interpretation of experiments on termination codon usage in the Xenopus oocyte (Bienz et al. 1981). There are significant differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes concerning the usage of the three termination codons and of tandem stops. In addition viruses show termination strategies that differ from those of their hosts. Preferred context sequences flanking termination codons are described. Contexts vary within the last codon according to the nature of the termination codon, but are uniform within the first triplet following the terminators.

Animals↗

Effect of threonylcarbamoyl modification (t6A) in yeast tRNA Arg III on codon-anticodon and anticodon-anticodon interactions. A thermodynamic and kinetic evaluation.

The effect of N-[9-(beta-D-ribofuranosyl) purin-6-ylcarbamoyl]threonine (t6A) adjacent to anticodon U-C-U of yeast tRNA Arg III (where U is a modified U), compared to its unmodified adenosine counterpart, has been evaluated by three independent methods: (a) the polynucleotide-directed binding of tRNA on ribosomes, (b) the ribosome-free trinucleotide binding to the anticodon, (c) the anticodon-anticodon binding test. The results obtained by these three methods indicate a small but significant stabilization effect of t6A on the binding of yeast tRNA Arg III with (a) poly(A,G) in the presence of Escherichia coli ribosomes, (b) free A-G-A triplet, and (c) E. coli tRNA Ser V (anticodon G-G-A). We therefore conclude that the stabilization effect of t6A occurs on U x A and U x G base pairs adjacent to the 5' side of the modified nucleoside, most probably by stacking.

Adenosine↗

The evolving tRNA molecule.

The study of tRNA molecular evolution is crucial to understanding the origin and establishment of the genetic code as well as the differentiation and refinement of the machinery of protein synthesis in prokaryotes, eukaryotes, organelles, and phage systems. The small size of the molecule and its critical involvement in a multiplicity of roles distinguish its study from classical protein molecular evolution with respect to goals and methods. Here, the authors assess available and missing data, existing and needed methodology, and the impact of tRNA studies on current theories both of genetic code evolution and of the evolution of species. They analyze mutational "hot spots", the role of base modification, synthetase recognition, codon-anticodon interactions and the status of organelle tRNA.

Animals↗

Nonsense suppression in eukaryotes: the use of the Xenopus oocyte as an in vivo assay system.

Amber, ochre, and opal nonsense suppressor tRNAs isolated from yeast were injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes together with purified mRNAs (globin mRNA from rabbit, tobacco mosaic virus-RNA). Yeast opal suppressor tRNA is able to read the UGA stop codon of the rabbit beta-globin mRNA, thus producing a readthrough protein. A large readthrough product is also obtained upon coinjection of yeast amber or ochre suppressor tRNA with TMV-RNA. The amount of readthrough product is dependent on the amount of injected suppressor tRNA. The suppression of the terminator codon of TMV-RNA is not susceptible to Mg++ concentration or polyamine addition. Therefore, the Xenopus laevis oocyte provides a simple, sensitive, and well buffered in vivo screening system for all three types of eukaryotic nonsense suppressor tRNAs.

Animals↗

Convergence and minimal mutation criteria for evaluating early events in tRNA evolution.

The convergence of ancestral sequences independently constructed from different branches of a phylogenetic tree can be used as a test of homology of data sequences. This criterion has shown that all phenylalanine tRNAs are related to a common ancestor, whereas eukaryotic and prokaryotic tyrosine tRNAs may have independent origins. All glycine tRNAs share a common ancestor. The glycine tRNA family splits according to the purine or pyrimidine nature of the first anticodon base prior to the divergence of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The structural similarity between some prokaryotic glycine and and valine tRNAs is the result of their derivation from a common ancestor that existed previous to the divergence of the different glycine tRNAs. These results support models of genetic code evolution involving the incremental elaboration of earlier, simpler codes.

Animals↗

On codon usage.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Codon↗

Evolution of methionine initiator and phenylalanine transfer RNAs.

Sequence data from methionine initiator and phenylalanine transfer RNAs were used to construct phylogenetic trees by the maximum parsimony method. Although eukaryotes, prokaryotes and chloroplasts appear related to a common ancestor, no firm conclusion can be drawn at this time about mitochondrial-coded transfer RNAs. tRNA evolution is not appropriately described by random hit models, since the various regions of the molecule differ sharply in their mutational fixation rates. "Hot" mutational spots are identified in the Tpsic, the amino acceptor and the upper anticodon stems; the D arm and the loop areas on the other hand are highly conserved. Crucial tertiary interactions are thus essentially preserved while most of the double helical domain undergoes base pair interchange. Transitions are about half as costly as transversions, suggesting that base pair interchanges proceed mostly through G-U and A-C intermediates. There is a preponderance of replacements starting from G and C but this bias appears to follow the high G + C content of the easily mutated base paired regions.

Animals↗