Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H F Noller

Publications and source records attributed to H F Noller.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

A functional pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA.

Several lines of evidence indicate that the universally conserved 530 loop of 16S ribosomal RNA plays a crucial role in translation, related to the binding of tRNA to the ribosomal A site. Based upon limited phylogenetic sequence variation, Woese and Gutell (1989) have proposed that residues 524-526 in the 530 hairpin loop are base paired with residues 505-507 in an adjoining bulge loop, suggesting that this region of 16S rRNA folds into a pseudoknot structure. Here, we demonstrate that Watson-Crick interactions between these nucleotides are essential for ribosomal function. Moreover, we find that certain mild perturbations of the structure, for example, creation of G-U wobble pairs, generate resistance to streptomycin, an antibiotic known to interfere with the decoding process. Chemical probing of mutant ribosomes from streptomycin-resistant cells shows that the mutant ribosomes have a reduced affinity for streptomycin, even though streptomycin is thought to interact with a site on the 30S subunit that is distinct from the 530 region. Data from earlier in vitro assembly studies suggest that the pseudoknot structure is stabilized by ribosomal protein S12, mutations in which have long been known to confer streptomycin resistance and dependence.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Interaction of antibiotics with A- and P-site-specific bases in 16S ribosomal RNA.

We have studied the interactions of the antibiotics apramycin, kasugamycin, myomycin, neamine and pactamycin with 16S rRNA by chemical probing of drug-ribosome complexes. Kasugamycin and pactamycin, which are believed to affect translational initiation, protect bases in common with P-site-bound tRNA. While kasugamycin protects A794 and G926, and causes enhanced reactivity of C795, pactamycin protects G693 and C795. All four of these bases were previously shown to be protected by P-site tRNA or by edeine, another P-site inhibitor. Apramycin and neamine, which both induce miscoding and inhibit translocation, protect A1408, G1419 and G1494, as was also found earlier for neomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin and paromomycin. A1408 and G1494 were previously shown to be protected by A-site tRNA. Surprisingly, myomycin fails to give strong protection of any bases in 16S rRNA, in spite of having an apparently identical target site and mode of action to streptomycin, which protects several bases in the 915 region. Instead, myomycin gives only weak protection of A1408. These results suggest that the binding site(s) of streptomycin and myomycin have yet to be identified.

Aminoglycosides↗
PubMed1991

Molecular basis of tetracycline action: identification of analogs whose primary target is not the bacterial ribosome.

Tetracycline analogs fell into two classes on the basis of their mode of action. Tetracycline, chlortetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline, and 6-demethyl-6-deoxytetracycline inhibited cell-free translation directed by either Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis extracts. A second class of analogs tested, including chelocardin, anhydrotetracycline, 6-thiatetracycline, anhydrochlortetracycline, and 4-epi-anhydrochlortetracycline, failed to inhibit protein synthesis in vitro or were very poor inhibitors. Tetracyclines of the second class, however, rapidly inhibited the in vivo incorporation of precursors into DNA and RNA as well as protein. The class 2 compounds therefore have a mode of action that is entirely distinct from the class 1 compounds, such as tetracycline that are used clinically. Although tetracyclines of the second class entered the cytoplasm, the ability of these analogs to inhibit macromolecular synthesis suggests that the cytoplasmic membrane is their primary site of action. The interaction of class 1 and class 2 tetracyclines with ribosomes was studied by examining their effects on the chemical reactivity of bases in 16S rRNA to dimethyl sulfate. Class 1 analogs affected the reactivity of bases to dimethyl sulfate. The response with class 2 tetracyclines varied, with some analogs affecting reactivity and others (chelocardin and 4-epi-anhydrotetracycline) not.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1990

Single base alterations upstream of the E. coli 16S rRNA coding region result in temperature-sensitive 16S rRNA expression.

We have isolated three new temperature-sensitive mutants of 16S rRNA, using the U1192 spectinomycin resistance as a selectable marker. These differ from our previously characterized ts mutants in that they map in the upstream leader region of the rRNA precursor (at positions -13, -30 and -59). The relative distribution of plasmid and chromosome-derived 16S rRNA is similar between 30S subunits, 70S ribosomes and polysomes at the permissive and restrictive temperatures. Processing of the 5' end of the RNA does not appear to be affected by the mutations. Second-site suppressors were found, and all of these except one (which is within 16S rRNA) were also due to point mutations in the upstream leader.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

Binding of tRNA to the ribosomal A and P sites protects two distinct sets of nucleotides in 16 S rRNA.

Transfer RNA protects a characteristic set of bases in 16 S rRNA from chemical probes when it binds to ribosomes. We used several criteria, based on construction of well-characterized in vitro ribosome-tRNA complexes, to assign these proteins to A or P-site binding. All of these approaches lead to similar conclusions. In the A site, tRNA caused protection of G529, G530, A1492 and A1493 (strongly), and A1408 and G1494 (weakly). In the P site, the protected bases are G693, A794, C795, G926 and G1401 (strong), and A532, G966, G1338 and G1339 (weak). In contrast to what is observed for 23 S rRNA, blocking the release of EF-Tu.GDP from the ribosome by kirromycin has no detectable effect on the protection of bases in 16 S rRNA.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed1990

Dominant lethal mutations in a conserved loop in 16S rRNA.

The 530 stem-loop region in 16S rRNA is among the most phylogenetically conserved structural elements in all rRNAs, yet its role in protein synthesis remains mysterious. G-530 is protected from kethoxal attack when tRNA, or its 15-nucleotide anticodon stem-loop fragment, is bound to the ribosomal A site. Based on presently available evidence, however, this region is believed to be too remote from the decoding site for this protection to be the result of direct contact. In this study, we use a conditional rRNA expression system to demonstrate that plasmid-encoded 16S rRNA genes carrying A, C, and T point mutations at position G-530 confer a dominant lethal phenotype when expressed in Escherichia coli. Analysis of the distribution of plasmid-encoded 16S rRNA in ribosomal particles, following induction of the A-530 mutation, shows that mutant rRNA is present both in 30S subunits and in 70S ribosomes. Little mutant rRNA is found in polyribosomes, however, indicating that the mutant ribosomes are severely impaired at the stage of polysome formation and/or stability. Detailed chemical probing of mutant ribosomal particles reveals no evidence of structural perturbation within the 16S rRNA. Taken together, these results argue for the direct participation of G-530 in ribosomal function and, furthermore, suggest that the dominant lethal phenotype caused by these mutations is due primarily to the mutant ribosomes blocking a crucial step in protein synthesis after translational initiation.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Intermediate states in the movement of transfer RNA in the ribosome.

Direct chemical 'footprinting' shows that translocation of transfer RNA occurs in two discrete steps. During the first step, which occurs spontaneously after the formation of the peptide bond, the acceptor end of tRNA moves relative to the large ribosomal subunit resulting in 'hybrid states' of binding. During the second step, which is promoted by elongation factor EF-G, the anticodon end of tRNA, along with the messenger RNA, moves relative to the small ribosomal subunit.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1989

Isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants of 16 S rRNA in Escherichia coli.

Temperature-sensitive mutants have been isolated following hydroxylamine mutagenesis of a plasmid containing Escherichia coli rRNA genes carrying selectable markers for spectinomycin resistance (U1192 in 16 S rRNA) and erythromycin resistance (G2058 in 23 S rRNA). These antibiotic resistance alleles, originally identified by Morgan and co-workers, enable us to follow expression of cloned rRNA genes in vivo. Recessive mutations causing the loss of expression of the cloned 16 S rRNA gene were identified by the loss of the ability of cells to survive on media containing spectinomycin. The mutations were localized by in vitro restriction fragment replacement followed by in vivo marker rescue and were identified by DNA sequence analysis. We report here seven single-base alterations in 16 S rRNA (A146, U153, A350, A359, A538, A1292 and U1293), five of which produce temperature-sensitive spectinomycin resistance and two that produce unconditional loss of resistance. In each case, loss of ribosomal function can be accounted for by disruption of base-pairing in the secondary structure of 16 S rRNA. For the temperature-sensitive mutants, there is a lag period of about two generations between a shift to the restrictive temperature and cessation of growth, implying that the structural defects cause impairment of ribosome assembly.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1989

Defining the structural requirements for a helix in 23 S ribosomal RNA that confers erythromycin resistance.

The helix spanning nucleotides 1198 to 1247 (helix 1200-1250) in Escherichia coli 23 S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is functionally important in protein synthesis, and deletions in this region confer erythromycin resistance. In order to define the structural requirements for resistance, we have dissected this region using in vitro mutagenesis. Erythromycin resistance is established after a minimal deletion of three bases, CAU1231 or AUG1232. The maximum deletion observed to confer resistance is 25 bases. The level of erythromycin resistance conferred by intermediate sized deletions is variable and some deletion mutants show a sensitive phenotype. Deletions that extend into the base-pairing between GCC1208 and GGU1240 result in non-functional 23 S RNAs, which consequently do not confer resistance. A number of phylogenetically conserved nucleotides have been shown to be non-essential for 23 S RNA function. However, removal of either these or non-conserved nucleotides from helix 1200-1250 measurably reduces the efficiency of 23 S RNA in forming functional ribosomes. We have used chemical probing and a modified primer extension method to investigate erythromycin binding to wild-type and resistant ribosomes with a 12-base deletion in 23 S RNA. Erythromycin interacts as strongly with mutant 23 S RNA as with wild-type 23 S RNA. Deletions in the 1200-1250 helix do not therefore confer resistance by reducing erythromycin binding, but by suppressing the effects of the drug at the level of its mechanism of action.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Mutations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12 influence the higher order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA.

We have studied the effects of protein mutations on the higher order structure of 16 S rRNA in Escherichia coli ribosomes, using a set of structure-sensitive chemical probes. Ten mutant strains were studied, which contained alterations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12, including double mutants containing both altered S4 and S12. Two ribosomal ambiguity (ram) S4 mutant strains, four streptomycin resistant (SmR) S12 mutant strains, one streptomycin pseudodependent (SmP) S12 mutant strain, one streptomycin dependent (SmD) S12 mutant strain and two streptomycin independent (Sm1) double mutants (containing both-SmD and ram mutations) were probed and compared to an isogenic wild-type strain. In ribosomes from strains containing S4 ram mutations, nucleotides A8 and A26 become more reactive to dimethyl sulfate (DMS) at their N-1 positions. In ribosomes from strains bearing the SmD allele, A908, A909, A1413 and G1487 are significantly less reactive to chemical probes. These same effects are observed when the S4 and S12 mutations are present simultaneously in the double mutants. An interesting correlation is found between the reactivity of A908 and the miscoding potential of SmR, SmD, SmP and wild-type ribosomes; the reactivity of A908 increases as the translational error frequency of the ribosomes increases. In the case of ram ribosomes, the reactivity of A908 resembles that of wild-type, unless tRNA is bound, in which case it becomes hyper-reactive. Similarly, streptomycin has little effect on A908 in wild-type ribosomes unless tRNA is bound, in which case its reactivity increases to resemble that of ram ribosomes with bound tRNA. Finally, interaction of streptomycin with SmP and SmD ribosomes causes the reactivity of A908 to increase to near-wild-type levels. A simple model is proposed, in which the reactivity of A908 reflects the position of an equilibrium between two conformational states of the 30 S subunit, one of which is DMS-reactive, and the other DMS-unreactive. In this model, the balance between these two states would be influenced by proteins S4 and S12. Mutations in S12 generally cause a shift toward the unreactive conformer, and in the case of SmD and SmP ribosomes, this shift can be suppressed phenotypically by streptomycin, ram mutations in protein S4 cause a shift toward the reactive conformer, but only when tRNA is bound. This suggests that the opposing effects of these two classes of mutations influence the proof-reading process by somewhat different mechanisms.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed1989

Interaction of tRNA with 23S rRNA in the ribosomal A, P, and E sites.

Three sets of conserved nucleotides in 23 rRNA are protected from chemical probes by binding of tRNA to the ribosomal A, P, and E sites, respectively. They are located almost exclusively in domain V, primarily in or adjacent to the loop identified with the peptidyl transferase function. Some of these sites are also protected by antibiotics such as chloramphenicol, which could explain how these drugs interfere with protein synthesis. Certain tRNA-dependent protections are abolished when the 3'-terminal A or CA or 2',3'-linked acyl group is removed, providing direct evidence for the interaction of the conserved CCA terminus of tRNA with 23S rRNA. When the EF-Tu.GTP.aminoacyl-tRNA ternary complex is bound to the ribosome, no tRNA-dependent A site protections are detected in 23S rRNA until EF-Tu is released. Thus, EF-Tu prevents interaction of the 3' terminus of the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA with the peptidyl transferase region of the ribosome during anticodon selection, thereby permitting translational proofreading.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

RNA-protein interactions in 30S ribosomal subunits: folding and function of 16S rRNA.

Chemical probing methods have been used to "footprint" 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) at each step during the in vitro assembly of twenty 30S subunit ribosomal proteins. These experiments yield information about the location of each protein relative to the structure of 16S rRNA and provide the basis for derivation of a detailed model for the three-dimensional folding of 16S rRNA. Several lines of evidence suggest that protein-dependent conformational changes in 16S rRNA play an important part in the cooperativity of ribosome assembly and in fine-tuning of the conformation and dynamics of 16S rRNA in the 30S subunit.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic--RNA interactions.

Two of six mutations at a base-paired site in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA confer resistance to nine different aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo. Chemical probing of mutant and wild-type ribosomes in the presence of paromomycin indicates that interactions between the antibiotic and 16S rRNA in mutant ribosomes are disrupted. The altered interactions measured in vitro correlate precisely with resistance seen in vivo and may be attributable to specific structural changes observed in the mutant rRNA.

Aminoglycosides↗
PubMed1988

Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNA.

We have derived a model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA, using interactive computer graphic methods. It is based on (1) the secondary structure derived from comparative sequence analysis, (2) the three-dimensional co-ordinates for the centers of mass of the 30 S subunit proteins, and (3) the locations of sites in 16 S rRNA that interact with specific ribosomal proteins, from footprinting and crosslinking studies. We present a detailed description of the derivation of the model. About 75% of the RNA chain is sufficiently constrained to provide a useful model. This contains most of the universally conserved core of the molecule. In all but a few instances, protected and crosslinked sites can be placed within or very close to their cognate proteins, while obeying stereochemical rules. The overall shape of the model and locations of specific regions of the RNA correspond well to data derived from electron micrographs of 30 S subunits, although such data were not used to construct the model. Phylogenetic variations in the structure are readily accommodated; as an example, we have modeled the 950-nucleotide mammalian mitochondrial 12 S rRNA by superimposing it on the E. coli structure. The three major RNA domains, as defined by secondary structure, appear to exist as autonomous structural units in three dimensions, for the most part. There is an extensive interface between the 5' and central domains, whereas the 3' major domain has relatively little apparent contact with the rest of the structure. The 5', central and 3' major domains form structures that resemble the body, platform and head, respectively, seen in electron micrographs of 30 S subunits. We discuss possible roles for the ribosomal proteins in stabilizing specific structural features of the RNA during ribosome assembly. The decoding site, as deduced from footprinting and crosslinking studies involving the tRNA anticodon stem-loop, is well-localized. Bases protected from chemical probing by the anticodon stem-loop line the cleft of the subunit. The conserved loop at position 530, which contains some of the bases protected by A site-bound tRNA, is remote (approx. 80 A) from the decoding site. Protection of these bases by the anticodon stem-loop is thus unlikely to be due to direct contact.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Interaction of elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu with a conserved loop in 23S RNA.

The elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G interact with ribosomes during protein synthesis: EF-Tu presents incoming aminoacyl transfer RNA to the programmed ribosome as an EF-Tu-GTP-tRNA ternary complex and EF-G promotes translocation of peptidyl-tRNA and its associated messenger RNA from the A to the P site after peptidyl transfer. Both events are accompanied by ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis. Here we use chemical probes to investigate the possible interaction of these factors with ribosomal RNA in E. coli ribosomes. We observe EF-G-dependent footprints in vitro and in vivo around position 1,067 in domain II of 23S rRNA, and in the loop around position 2,660 in domain VI.EF-Tu gives an overlapping footprint in vitro at positions 2,655 and 2,661, but shows no effect at position 1,067. The 1,067 region is the site of interaction of the antibiotic thiostrepton, which prevents formation of the EF-G-GTP-ribosome complex and is a site for interaction with the GTPase-related protein L11 (ref. 3). The universally conserved loop in the 2,660 region is the site of attack by the RNA-directed cytotoxins alpha-sarcin and ricin, whose effects abolish translation and include the loss of elongation factor-dependent functions in eukaryotic ribosomes.

Escherichia coli↗
PubMed1988

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 with 16 S rRNA.

We have examined the effects of assembly of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 on the reactivities of residues in 16 S rRNA towards chemical probes. The results show that S6, S18 and S11 interact with the 690-720 and 790 loop regions of 16 S rRNA in a highly co-operative manner, that is consistent with the previously defined assembly map relationships among these proteins. The results also indicate that these proteins, one of which (S18) has previously been implicated as a component of the ribosomal P-site, interact with residues near some of the recently defined P-site (class II tRNA protection) nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. In addition, assembly of protein S12 has been found to result in the protection of residues in both the 530 stem/loop and the 900 stem regions; the latter group is closely juxtaposed to a segment of 16 S rRNA recently shown to be protected from chemical probes by streptomycin. Interestingly, both S5 and S12 appear to protect, to differing degrees, a well-defined set of residues in the 900 stem/loop and 5'-terminal regions. These observations are discussed in terms of the effects of S5 and S12 on streptomycin binding, and in terms of the class III tRNA protection found in the 900 stem of 16 S rRNA. Altogether these results show that many of the small subunit proteins, which have previously been shown to be functionally important, appear to be associated with functionally implicated segments of 16 S rRNA.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed1988

Probing the assembly of the 3' major domain of 16 S rRNA. Interactions involving ribosomal proteins S2, S3, S10, S13 and S14.

We have used rapid probing methods to follow the changes in reactivity of residues in 16 S rRNA to chemical and enzymatic probes as ribosomal proteins S2, S3, S10, S13 and S14 are assembled into 30 S subunits. Effects observed are confined to the 3' major domain of the RNA and comprise three general classes. (1) Monospecific effects, which are attributable to a single protein. Proteins S13 and S14 each affect the reactivities of different residues which are adjacent to regions previously found protected by S19. S10 effects are located in two separate regions of the domain, the 1120/1150 stem and the 1280 loop; both of these regions are near nucleotides previously found protected by S9. Both S2 and S3 protect different nucleotides between positions 1070 and 1112. In addition, S2 protects residues in the 1160/1170 stem-loop. (2) Co-operative effects, which include residues dependent on the simultaneous presence of both proteins S2 and S3 for their reactivities to appear similar to those observed in native 30 S subunits. (3) Polyspecific effects, where proteins S3 and S2 independently afford the same protection and enhancement pattern in three distal regions of the domain: the 960 stem-loop, the 1050/1200 stem and in the upper part of the domain (nucleotides 1070 to 1190). Proteins S14 and S10 also weakly affect the reactivities of several residues in these regions. We believe that several of the protected residues of the first class are likely sites for protein-RNA contact while the third class is indicative of conformational rearrangement in the RNA during assembly. These results, in combination with the results from our previous study of proteins S7, S9 and S19, are discussed in terms of the assembly, topography and involvement in ribosomal function of the 3' major domain.

Autoradiography↗