Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Droschl

Publications and source records attributed to H Droschl.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Vertical control as an important ingredient in the treatment of severe sagittal discrepancies.

The control of vertical development, in particular in the maxillary molar region, has often been suggested as a method of implementing sagittal change in treatment of Class II skeletal discrepancies. A group of twenty-eight Italian children in the early mixed-dentitional stage, with increased overjet and distal molar relationship, were treated orthodontically with a combination of a removable maxillary splint and high-pull extraoral traction. While only slight dorsal repositioning of the maxilla could be observed, an effective retardation of the vertical maxillary development was recorded, as well as a pronounced forward displacement of the mandibular symphysis. Distal movement of the maxillary dentition contributed likewise to the elimination of overjet observed clinically. The center of mandibular rotation was evaluated for each patient and displayed a pronounced variation illustrating different responses to the same type of appliance by different patients. The clinical implications of the above findings are discussed, and the necessity for constant appraisal of results during treatment is stressed.

Alveolar Process↗

Upper headgear versus lower headgear, yokes, and class III elastics.

The use of a lower headgear-yoke-Class II mechanism on an average works faster than a maxillary headgear. The distal tipping of the molars is greater with HGY-II which may be the result of the quicker tooth movement. The speed of distalization is probably due to the effect of the constant force of the Class II elastics. An orthopedic change on the maxilla could be seen if one can draw any conclusions from a change of only 1 degrees. A reduction of the SNA angle and a slight clockwise rotation of the palatal plane was noticed. These results agree with earlier investigations about cephalometric changes with headgear therapy. We have come to the conclusion that both methods are indicated. We use the upper headgear especially at a time when a complete therapy is not possible because of noneruption of the permanent teeth. The HGY-II mechanism is indicated when most permanent teeth are available and thus the therapy can be completed in one treatment period.

Cephalometry↗