Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Branch Coslett

Publications and source records attributed to H Branch Coslett.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Limitations of attentional orienting. Effects of abrupt visual onsets and offsets on naming two objects in a patient with simultanagnosia.

It has been proposed that the underlying deficit for some simultanagnosics is the inability to bilaterally orient attention in space due to parietal damage. In five experiments, we examine the performance of a patient with simultanagnosia secondary to bilateral occipito-parietal lesions, IC, in naming pairs of line-drawings. With simultaneous presentation and disappearance of objects (Experiment 1), IC typically named a single object. IC's performance dramatically improved when the two drawings alternated every 500 ms (Experiment 2). This improvement was not due to the abrupt onset of the second drawing "capturing attention", as indicated by the results of Experiment 3. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that the crucial factor in improving IC's performance with simultaneous presentation of visual objects was the offset of one of the two stimuli. We propose that IC's impairment in naming two objects is attributable to the inability to "unlock" attention from the first object detected to other objects in the array. Visual offset of the first object disengages attention from the first object, allowing it to be allocated to the second object.

Aged↗

The man who executed "imagined" movements: evidence for dissociable components of the body schema.

We examined the nature of representations underlying motor imagery and execution in a patient (CW) with bilateral parietal lesions. When imagining hand movements, CW executed the imagined motor act but was unaware of the movements. These movements were significantly more accurate than volitional movements for the left but not right hand. CW also exhibited preserved motor imagery for the left but not right hand. Consistent with previous accounts, these findings suggest that motor imagery may normally involve the inhibition of movements. CW's unawareness of movements during motor imagery may reflect inattention or misattribution of the unexpected sensory feedback. Furthermore, in line with current models of motor control, motor imagery may depend on the integrity of a "forward model" derived from motor outflow information to generate a prediction of the consequences of a motor command. Such predictions appear to be preserved for imagery of left but not right hand movements in CW. Action may additionally depend on precise updating of effector position derived from the comparison of predicted and actual sensory information. We propose that CW's impaired volitional movements may be attributable to the degradation of such an updating mechanism.

Aged↗