Use of Carmeda-coated femoral-femoral bypass during repair of traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysms.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results and outcomes of three different approaches to posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm repair: clamp and sew, left heart bypass, and the most recent approach, cardiopulmonary support using femoral-femoral bypass. DESIGN: Retrospective series. SETTING: A university-based, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-two consecutive patients treated for posttraumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm whose mean (+/- SEM) Injury Severity Score was 37 +/- 1.7. INTERVENTION: Methods of repair included clamp and sew in nine patients, left heart bypass in 24 patients, and cardiopulmonary support in nine patients. METHODS: Student's t test was used to compare interoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, and aortic cross-clamp time. Complications and mortality were also reviewed. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SEM) aortic cross-clamp time for clamp and sew was 28.1 +/- 3.3 minutes vs 52.5 +/- 3.7 for left heart bypass and 49.3 +/- 5.6 for cardiopulmonary support. Blood loss and the need for transfusion were comparable between groups. Complications were also comparable. CONCLUSION: Femoral-femoral cardiopulmonary support is safe to use, has a very low risk of complications, and should provide protection for the spinal cord during aortic repair. We encourage a randomized prospective trial to determine if cardiopulmonary support has a significantly lower rate of paraplegia than the clamp- and -sew technique.