Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Gregory E Idos

Publications and source records attributed to Gregory E Idos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bayesian Integration of Tumor Mutational Signatures and Somatic Features Refines Pathogenicity Assessment of Germline Mismatch Repair Variants.

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in mismatch repair (MMR) genes represent a persistent bottleneck in germline interpretation for Lynch syndrome, creating a critical opportunity to leverage tumor biology to refine pathogenicity assessment. Although tumor features such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are routinely evaluated, they are typically interpreted separately from germline classification, and their quantitative contribution within ACMG/AMP frameworks remains poorly defined. We therefore analyzed paired germline and tumor sequencing data from 1110 tumors across 1073 patients with colorectal or endometrial cancer to determine whether mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-d) mutational signatures can be quantitatively integrated into Bayesian germline variant interpretation. Using COSMIC single-base substitution signatures, tumors were classified as MMR-d or MMR proficient, and an empirically derived likelihood ratio (LR) quantified the association between MMR-d signatures and pathogenic germline MMR variants. The presence of an MMR-d signature increased the likelihood of an underlying pathogenic germline MMR variant approximately eightfold (LR ≈ 8; log10 LR ≈ 0.90), whereas its absence provided moderate-to-strong benign evidence (LR ≈ 0.156; log10 LR ≈ -0.81). Applying this integrative framework to 45 germline MMR VUS, joint modeling of tumor mutational signatures with additional somatic and variant-level evidence resulted in clinically significant reclassification of 38 (84.4%) variants, including three reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 35 as likely benign. A total of 16 downgraded variants were independently downgraded by Invitae. These findings demonstrate that tumor mutational signatures can be formally incorporated into Bayesian germline interpretation, transforming tumor data into quantitative pathogenicity evidence and offering a principled strategy to reduce VUS burden in hereditary cancer genetics.

Humans

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomatous Colorectal Polyposis Syndromes.

The hereditary adenomatous colorectal polyposis syndromes are incurable, systemic, cancer risk predisposition syndromes with substantial morbidity and mortality. They differ in their mode of inheritance, age at disease onset, phenotypic expression, and cancer risk. The most common cancer risks involve the gastrointestinal tract including the colon, rectum, duodenum, ampulla, and stomach. Identifying these syndromes through personal and family history risk assessment and germline genetic testing, along with timely surgical and endoscopic management, can reduce cancer incidence and mortality. These guidelines use the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to provide clinical guidance on the selection of individuals who should undergo a risk assessment for a hereditary adenomatous colorectal polyposis syndrome, modality and timing of germline genetic testing, cancer risk mitigation through endoscopic and surgical interventions, and the role of chemoprevention. This document reviews the approach to genetic testing in patients with phenotypic colorectal polyposis and the impact of presymptomatic diagnosis in families with a known familial germline pathogenic variant or clinical features suggestive of a hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Management strategies for patients based on genetic test results or without genetic testing are provided. We also review colorectal and extracolonic phenotypic benign and malignant manifestations of the known hereditary syndromes with a focus on the 2 most common hereditary colorectal polyposis syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis. The document concludes with recommendations on polyposis and cancer risk mitigation strategies and highlights updates to management since the previous guideline was published.

Humans