Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Graeme J Walker

Publications and source records attributed to Graeme J Walker.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Molecular characterization of a t(9;12)(p21;q13) balanced chromosome translocation in combination with integrative genomics analysis identifies C9orf14 as a candidate tumor-suppressor.

A large number of nevi (LNN) is a high risk phenotypic trait for developing cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). In this study, the breakpoints of a t(9;12)(p21;q13) balanced chromosome translocation were finely mapped in a family with LNN and CMM. Molecular characterization of the 9p21 breakpoint identified a novel gene C9orf14 expressed in melanocytes disrupted by the translocation. Integrative analysis of functional genomics data was applied to determine the role of C9orf14 in CMM development. An analysis of genome-wide DNA copy number alterations in melanoma tumors revealed the loss of the C9orf14 locus, located proximal to CDKN2A, in approximately one-fourth of tumors. Analysis of gene expression data in cancer cell lines and melanoma tumors suggests a loss of C9orf14 expression in melanoma tumorigenesis. Taken together, our results indicate that C9orf14 is a candidate tumor-suppressor for nevus development and late stage melanoma at 9p21, a region frequently deleted in different types of human cancers.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12↗

Evidence for BRAF mutation and variable levels of microsatellite instability in a syndrome of familial colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, an alternative pathway of tumorigenesis has been identified in the colorectum associated with serrated precursor lesions, variable levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-V), and driven in part by activating mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene (V599E). Somatic BRAF mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) are rarely observed. Here, we discuss their role in the development of other familial colorectal cancers (CRC). We studied non-FAP, non-HNPCC CRC families characterized by tumors that varied in their level of MSI between individual members. METHODS: A subset of tumors from a total of 55 collected (25 polyps and 30 cancers) from 43 individuals across 11 families underwent pathology review, examination for V599E using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, and for methylation of the MINT31 CpG island. RESULTS: All MSI-V families met the current revised Bethesda Guidelines and 6 of 11 (55%) met the Amsterdam I criteria. V599E was observed in 12 of 19 (63%) polyps and 14 of 20 (70%) cancers (4 of 4 high MSI, 2 of 4 low MSI, and 8 of 12 stable MSI), a significant increase over HNPCC (0 of 15 or 0%), and unselected CRC (30 of 197 or 15.2%) ( P < .05). Eight of the 10 (80%) cancers that underwent analysis showed hypermethylation of MINT31. CRCs showed early age at onset and were more likely to show a serrated architecture than unselected CRCs ( P < .05). CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that the families described here represent a syndrome of familial CRC that is distinct from HNPCC. High levels of BRAF mutation and MINT31 hypermethylation suggest an origin in the serrated pathway of CRC development.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Microarray expression profiling in melanoma reveals a BRAF mutation signature.

We have used microarray gene expression profiling and machine learning to predict the presence of BRAF mutations in a panel of 61 melanoma cell lines. The BRAF gene was found to be mutated in 42 samples (69%) and intragenic mutations of the NRAS gene were detected in seven samples (11%). No cell line carried mutations of both genes. Using support vector machines, we have built a classifier that differentiates between melanoma cell lines based on BRAF mutation status. As few as 83 genes are able to discriminate between BRAF mutant and BRAF wild-type samples with clear separation observed using hierarchical clustering. Multidimensional scaling was used to visualize the relationship between a BRAF mutation signature and that of a generalized mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation (either BRAF or NRAS mutation) in the context of the discriminating gene list. We observed that samples carrying NRAS mutations lie somewhere between those with or without BRAF mutations. These observations suggest that there are gene-specific mutation signals in addition to a common MAPK activation that result from the pleiotropic effects of either BRAF or NRAS on other signaling pathways, leading to measurably different transcriptional changes.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Deletion mapping suggests that the 1p22 melanoma susceptibility gene is a tumor suppressor localized to a 9-Mb interval.

Loss of the short arm of chromosome 1 is frequently observed in many tumor types, including melanoma. We recently localized a third melanoma susceptibility locus to chromosome band 1p22. Critical recombinants in linked families localized the gene to a 15-Mb region between D1S430 and D1S2664. To map the locus more finely we have performed studies to assess allelic loss across the region in a panel of melanomas from 1p22-linked families, sporadic melanomas, and melanoma cell lines. Eighty percent of familial melanomas exhibited loss of heterozygosity (LOH) within the region, with a smallest region of overlapping deletions (SRO) of 9 Mb between D1S207 and D1S435. This high frequency of LOH makes it very likely that the susceptibility locus is a tumor suppressor. In sporadic tumors, four SROs were defined. SRO1 and SRO2 map within the critical recombinant and familial tumor region, indicating that one or the other is likely to harbor the susceptibility gene. However, SRO3 may also be significant because it overlaps with the markers with the highest 2-point LOD score (D1S2776), part of the linkage recombinant region, and the critical region defined in mesothelioma. The candidate genes PRKCL2 and GTF2B, within SRO2, and TGFBR3, CDC7, and EVI5, in a broad region encompassing SRO3, were screened in 1p22-linked melanoma kindreds, but no coding mutations were detected. Allelic loss in melanoma cell lines was significantly less frequent than in fresh tumors, indicating that this gene may not be involved late in progression, such as in overriding cellular senescence, necessary for the propagation of melanoma cells in culture.

Base Sequence↗

Pathways to melanoma development: lessons from the mouse.

Because of subtle differences between mouse and human skin, mice have traditionally not been an ideal model to study melanoma development. Understanding of the molecular mechanisms of melanoma predisposition, however, has been greatly improved by modeling various pathway defects in the mouse. This review analyzes the latest developments in mouse models of melanoma, and summarizes what these may indicate about the development of this neoplasm in humans. Mutations of genes involved in human melanoma have been recapitulated with some unexpected results, particularly with respect to the role of the two transcripts (Ink4a and Arf) encoded by the Cdkn2a locus. Both the Ink4a/pRb and Arf/p53 pathways are involved in melanoma development in mice, and possible mechanisms of cross-talk between the two pathways are discussed. We also know from mouse models that Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation is very important in melanoma development, either through direct activation of Ras (e.g., Hras G12V), or via activation of Ras-effector pathways by other oncogenes (e.g., Ret, Hgf/Sf). Ras can cooperate with the Arf/p53 pathway, and probably the Ink4a/Rb pathway, to induce melanoma. These three growth regulation pathways (Ink4a/pRb, Arf/p53, and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase) seem to represent three major "axes" of melanoma development in mice. Finally, we summarize experiments using genetically modified mice that have given indications of the intensity and timing of ultraviolet radiation exposure that may be most responsible for melanoma development.

Animals↗