Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Glenda L Lawrence

Publications and source records attributed to Glenda L Lawrence.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Australia's notifiable diseases status, 2004, annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.

In 2004, 60 diseases and conditions were nationally notifiable in Australia. States and Territories reported a total of 110,929 cases of communicable diseases to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS): an increase of 4 per cent on the number of notifications in 2003. In 2004, the most frequently notified diseases were sexually transmissible infections (46,762 cases; 42% of total notifications), gastrointestinal diseases (25,247 cases; 23% of total notifications) and bloodborne diseases (19,191 cases; 17% of total notifications). There were 13,206 notifications of vaccine preventable diseases, 6,000 notifications of vectorborne diseases, 1,799 notifications of other bacterial infections (includes, legionellosis, leprosy, meningococcal infections and tuberculosis) and 877 notifications of zoonotic diseases.

Adolescent↗

Annual report: surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia, 2004.

This report summarises Australian passive surveillance data on adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for 2004 and describes reporting trends over the five years, 2000 to 2004. AEFIs are notified to the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee by state and territory health departments, hospitals, doctors and other health providers, vaccine manufactures, and the public. There were 975 AEFI records for vaccines received in 2004. This is an annual AEFI reporting rate of 4.8 per 100,000 population, the lowest since 2000, and a 33 per cent decrease compared with 2003 (1,460 records; 7.1 AEFI records per 100,000 population). Dose-based AEFI reporting rates in 2004 were 1.8 per 100,000 doses of influenza vaccine for adults aged > or = 18 years and 11.8 per 100,000 doses of scheduled vaccines for children aged < 7 years. The majority of records described non-serious events while nine per cent (n = 88) described AEFIs defined as 'serious'. There were no reports of death related to immunisation. The most frequently reported individual AEFI was injection site reaction in children following a fifth dose of an acellular pertussis-containing vaccine (67 reports per 100,000 doses). The marked reduction in the AEFI reporting rate in 2004 coincided with the removal of the fourth dose of acellular pertussis vaccine, due at 18 months of age, from the vaccination schedule in September 2003 and fewer people receiving meningococcal C vaccine through the national catch-up vaccination program for those aged 1-19 years in 2004, compared with 2003. The consistently low reporting rate of serious AEFIs demonstrates the high level of safety of vaccines in Australia.

Adolescent↗

Effectiveness of the linkage of child care and maternity payments to childhood immunisation.

In 1998, Australia enacted comprehensive national legislation making receipt of the maternity immunisation allowance (MIA) and the child care benefit (CCB) conditional on evidence of age-appropriate immunisation. We assessed the impact of this policy on immunisation status using a nationally representative population-based case-control study of 589 fully immunised controls and 190 incompletely immunised cases, aged 28-31 months. Immunisation status was significantly associated with parent awareness of the MIA (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.34, 95% CI = 2.28 - 4.91) and CCB (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.30 - 3.34). Only 31% of the 219 control parents who were receiving the CCB reported that they could continue to afford child care without the assistance of the CCB. The use of legislated financial immunisation incentives for parents appears to be widely accepted among Australian parents and to have had an impact on immunisation uptake. The policy may serve as a model for other comparable countries.

Australia↗

Age-related risk of adverse events following yellow fever vaccination in Australia.

Reports of six deaths internationally, including one from Australia, plus other cases of severe systemic adverse events following yellow fever (YF) vaccination have raised concern about the safety of YF vaccine, particularly among older vaccinees. We investigated the age-related reporting rates of adverse events following YF vaccination reported to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee for the period 1993 to 2002. The reporting rate of systemic adverse events leading to hospitalisation or death was significantly higher among vaccinees aged > or = 65 years [reporting rate ratio (RRR) 8.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-53.5] or > or = 45 years (RRR 5.30, 95% CI 1.33-21.2) compared with younger YF vaccinees. The higher reporting rates among older vaccinees are similar to those identified in the United States of America. The data highlight the importance of assessing the destination-specific risk, especially for older travellers to yellow fever endemic areas, and careful monitoring of those who are vaccinated.

Adolescent↗

Reasons for incomplete immunisation among Australian children. A national survey of parents.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete immunisation among Australian children may be due to parents disagreeing with immunisation rather than medical contraindications or access issues. SETTING AND METHODS: The parents of 1338 children recorded on the ACIR as incompletely immunised were telephoned and interviewed. RESULTS: Of the 462 parents who confirmed their child was incompletely immunised, 270 (58%) disagreed with or were concerned about immunisation; 190 (70%) of these were concerned about vaccine side effects. The disagreeing 270 parents were significantly more likely to be highly educated and have a child with no vaccinations recorded on the ACIR. No vaccinations were recorded on the ACIR for 81% of children of both these parents, and of parents registered as conscientious objectors to immunisation. Together these two groups accounts for 2.5-3.0% of the annual birth cohort. DISCUSSION: In order to achieve the 95% immunisation rates necessary for disease control, tailored approaches to promote immunisation among parents are required.

Australia↗

Measles vaccination coverage among five-year-old children: implications for disease elimination in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To (i) assess under-reporting of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations to the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR); (ii) estimate MMR coverage among five-year-old children and the proportion immune to measles infection; (iii) identify factors related to non-uptake of MMR vaccination. METHODS: We analysed ACIR data for a birth cohort of approximately 64,000 children aged five years. The parents of a sample of 506 children with no ACIR record for the second MMR vaccination (MMR2), due at four years of age, were interviewed by telephone to assess under-reporting to the ACIR and reasons for non-uptake of MMR vaccination. RESULTS: Parents reported that 22% (n = 111) of the surveyed 506 children had received MMR2 before their fifth birthday, and 42% (n = 214) by approximately 5.5 years of age. After correcting for this level of under-reporting to the ACIR, MMR2 coverage for the entire cohort at five years of age was 52.9% (95% CI 52.3-53.4), and increased to 84.1% (95% CI 83.4-84.8) by approximately 5.5 years of age. This was 4.3% and 8.2%, respectively, higher than ACIR coverage estimates at the two ages. Based on the corrected MMR coverage estimates, 93% of the cohort was immune to measles due to vaccination. The most common parent-reported reason for incomplete vaccination was lack of knowledge about the MMR vaccination schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Measles elimination in Australia will require continued effort in vaccination coverage and timeliness among pre-school children. School-entry requirements are important for MMR2 uptake. Strategies are needed to improve reporting to the ACIR for more accurate measurement of coverage.

Attitude to Health↗

Immunisation coverage in Australia corrected for under-reporting to the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of under-reporting to the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) and the resulting underestimation of national immunisation coverage using ACIR data, and to correct national immunisation estimates for under-reporting. METHODS: A national population-based telephone survey was conducted in May-July 2001 of two random samples of children born in 1998 and 1999 who were recorded on the ACIR as incompletely immunised at either 12 months or 24 months of age. Parents were asked whether and when their child had received the vaccinations required to qualify as fully immunised. Survey data were then used to correct ACIR-derived coverage estimates at 12 and 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 640 surveyed children in the 12-month group, 258 (40%) met the study definition of 'definitely immunised'. This adjusted the ACIR coverage estimate upwards by 2.7% to 94% (95% CI 93.6-94.1). Of 698 surveyed children in the 24-month group, 387 (55%) met the study definition of 'definitely immunised' at the second birthday. Adjusted coverage for doses due by 24 months was 89.8% (95% CI 89.6-90.1), 5% higher than recorded on the ACIR. CONCLUSIONS: Immunisation coverage in Australia for all scheduled vaccines due by 12 months of age is 94% and for all vaccines due by two years of age is almost 90%. The ACIR underestimates coverage by up to 5%. As the ACIR database relies on provider notification, published estimates of immunisation coverage are unlikely to rise significantly above current levels, unless mechanisms are put in place to further improve notification to the ACIR.

Australia↗

Estimating immunisation coverage: is the 'third dose assumption' still valid?

Immunisation coverage is calculated from Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) data using the 'third dose assumption'. This assumes that if the third in a series of vaccine doses has been recorded on the ACIR, the previous two doses have been received, whether or not they are recorded. The objectives of this study were to validate the 'third dose assumption', and measure the impact of the assumption on immunisation coverage estimates at 12 months of age. A sample of children born in 1999 and assessed as fully immunised at 12 months of age by applying the 'third dose assumption' were selected from the ACIR. Parents were interviewed by telephone to obtain information about vaccinations not recorded on the ACIR. Based on the survey results, the impact of the 'third-dose assumption' on national coverage estimates at 12 months of age was estimated. Of 219 surveyed children assessed as up-to-date at 12 months of age only by applying the 'third dose assumption', 212 (96.8%) met study criteria of 'definite' immunisation for all unrecorded first and second vaccine doses. Of the remaining seven, six believed all doses had been received, while one confirmed that one dose had been missed. The 'third dose assumption' overestimated coverage by 0.2 per cent, based on criteria for 'definite' immunisation. If the assumption were not used, immunisation coverage at 12 months of age in Australia would have been underestimated by 7 per cent. The 'third dose assumption' is valid and important to use in calculating immunisation coverage from the ACIR. Although ACIR reporting and coverage levels continue to improve, under-reporting of vaccine doses due at two and four months of age persists. The 'third dose assumption' may be applicable to comparable immunisation registries in other countries.

Australia↗

Is low immunisation coverage in inner urban areas of Australia due to low uptake or poor notification?

INTRODUCTION: The Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) consistently reveals pockets of lower immunisation coverage in inner urban areas. We investigated whether low uptake or poor notification of immunisation is the main reason for this difference. METHODS: We estimated under reporting by telephone surveying the parents of 640 children recorded as incompletely immunised on the ACIR at 12 months of age. Immunisation status was based on parental report of written records and/or date of receipt. RESULTS: Of the 97 children living in inner urban areas (defined by postcode and population density), 55 (57%) were shown to be 'definitely immunised'. One hundred and thirty-four (53%) of the 253 children in other urban areas were shown to be 'definitely immunised'. Both these groups were significantly more likely to be 'definitely immunised' than the 104 (36%) of 290 children in areas outside capital cities (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Apparent lower immunisation uptake in inner urban areas of Australia may be attributable to reporting error.

Australia↗