Biomedical subjects

Gisa Aschersleben

Publications and source records attributed to Gisa Aschersleben.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Perceiving while acting: action affects perception.

In two experiments we studied how motor responses affect stimulus encoding when stimuli and responses are functionally unrelated and merely overlap in time. Such R-S effects across S-R assignments have been reported by Schubö, Aschersleben, and Prinz (2001), who found that stimulus encoding was affected by concurrent response execution in the sense of a contrast (i.e., emphasizing differences). The present study aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying this effect. Experiment 1 studied the time course of the R-S effect. Contrast was only obtained for short intertrial intervals (ITIs). With long ITIs contrast turned into assimilation (i.e., emphasizing similarities). Experiment 2 excluded an interpretation of the assimilation effect in terms of motor repetition. Our findings support the notion of a shared representational domain for perception and action control, and suggest that contrast between stimulus and response codes emerges when two S-R assignments compete with each other in perception. When perceptual competition is over, assimilation emerges in memory.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Cortical activations associated with auditorily paced finger tapping.

We investigated neuromagnetic responses during an auditorily paced synchronization task using a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. Eight healthy right handed subjects were asked to synchronize left and right unilateral finger taps to a regular binaural pacing signal. Synchronization of the right hand with an auditory pacing signal is known to be associated with three tap-related neuromagnetic sources localized in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex. While the first source represents the neuromagnetic correlate of the motor command the second one reflects somatosensory feedback due to the finger movement. The functional meaning of the third source, which is also localized in the primary somatosensory cortex is still unclear. On the one hand this source represents a neuromagnetic correlate of somatosensory feedback due to the finger tap. On the other hand it has been suggested that the function of this source could additionally represent a cognitive process, which enables the subject to monitor the time distance between taps and clicks. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the function of this source, which would fundamentally reform the meaning of the primary somatosensory cortex in the timing of movements with respect to external events. The data of the present study demonstrate that the three sources in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex are stronger related to the tap than to the click. This result contradicts the assumption of a cognitive process localized in the primary somatosensory cortex. Thus, activation in the primary somatosensory cortex most likely represents exclusively somatosensory feedback and no further cognitive processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.

On a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with two hands as compared to one-hand tapping. Because this bimanual advantage can be attributed to timer variance (Wing-Kristofferson model, 1973a, b), separate timers have been proposed for each hand, whose outputs are then averaged (Helmuth & Ivry, 1996). An alternative notion is that action timing is based on its sensory reafferences (Aschersleben & Prinz, 1995; Prinz, 1990). The bimanual advantage is then due to increased sensory reafference. We studied bimanual tapping with the continuation paradigm. Participants first synchronized their taps with a metronome and then continued without the pacing signal. Experiment 1 replicated the bimanual advantage. Experiment 2 examined the influence of additional sensory reafferences. Results showed a reduction of timer variance for both uni- and bimanual tapping when auditory feedback was added to each tap. Experiment 3 showed that the bimanual advantage decreased when auditory feedback was removed from taps with the left hand. Results indicate that the sensory reafferences of both hands are used and integrated into timing. This is consistent with the assumption that the bimanual advantage is at least partly due to the increase in sensory reafference. A reformulation of the Wing-Kristofferson model is proposed to explain these results, in which the timer provides action goals in terms of sensory reafferences.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization.

Under conditions in which the temporal structure of events (e.g., a sequence of tones) is predictable, performing movements in synchrony with this sequence of events (e.g., dancing) is an easy task. A rather simplified version of this task is studied in the sensorimotor synchronization paradigm. Participants are instructed to synchronize their finger taps with an isochronous sequence of signals (e.g., clicks). Although this is an easy task, a systematic error is observed: Taps usually precede clicks by several tens of milliseconds. Different models have been proposed to account for this effect ("negative asynchrony" or "synchronization error"). One group of explanations is based on the idea that synchrony is established at the level of central representations (and not at the level of external events), and that the timing of an action is determined by the (anticipated) action effect. These assumptions are tested by manipulating the amount of sensory feedback available from the tap as well as its temporal characteristics. This article presents an overview of these representational models and the empirical evidence supporting them. It also discusses other accounts briefly in the light of further evidence.

Feedback↗

PubMed2002

The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.

In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands, as opposed to single-handed tapping. This bimanual advantage can be attributed to timer variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model). Separate timers have been proposed for each hand whose outputs are then averaged (Helmuth & Ivry, 1996, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 278-293). Alternatively, timing might be based on sensory reafference and the bimanual advantage due to the enhancement of sensory reafferences. This alternative hypothesis was tested in three experiments. In the first experiment, we replicated the bimanual advantage in tapping with two fingers of the same hand compared with single finger tapping. In the second experiment, we demonstrated that the bimanual advantage decreased when tactile reafferences from left-hand taps were omitted (by contact-free tapping). In the third experiment, participants tapped bimanually with the index fingers of both hands firmly mechanically coupled. The bimanual advantage was replicated for this condition. Results are consistent with the assumption that the bimanual advantage is due to the sensory reafferences of the second hand. We suggest that our results are best explained by a reformulation of the Wing-Kristofferson model, in which the timer provides action goals in terms of sensory reafferences.

Adult↗