Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Giovanni Cazzaniga

Publications and source records attributed to Giovanni Cazzaniga.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Blinatumomab for Replacing Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting the CD19 antigen on B cells, may offer an option to safely replace cycles of traditional chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, children with high-risk B-cell ALL to receive two cycles of blinatumomab (blinatumomab group) or two cycles of chemotherapy (control group) after consolidation. The primary end point was event-free survival as evaluated in a time-to-event analysis; the duration of event-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first event among resistance to protocol treatment, relapse, second cancer, or death from any cause. Our primary objective was to evaluate whether the 4-year event-free survival would be 10 percentage points higher in the blinatumomab group than in the control group. RESULTS: Overall, 709 of 768 eligible patients (92.3%) underwent randomization; 358 were assigned to the blinatumomab group and 351 to the control group. A planned interim analysis at a median follow-up of 2.9 years showed an estimated 4-year event-free survival of 83.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.4 to 87.4) in the blinatumomab group and 70.3% (95% CI, 63.8 to 75.9) in the control group (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0002 in an intention-to-treat analysis). The estimated hazard ratio for a primary end-point event (blinatumomab vs. control) was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.73) as assessed with a Cox model. Infection related to the trial treatment occurred in 23.9% of patients in the blinatumomab group and in 69.4% of those in the control group (P<0.001). Life-threatening adverse events occurred in 2 patients (0.5%) in the blinatumomab group, including one (in 0.3%) that was fatal, and in 16 patients (4.7%) in the control group. Neurotoxic events were reported in 12.0% and 3.2%, respectively (P<0.001). Cytokine release syndrome of grade 2 or higher occurred in 1.1% of patients in the blinatumomab group. CONCLUSIONS: In children with newly diagnosed high-risk B-cell ALL, replacement of two cycles of highly toxic conventional chemotherapy with blinatumomab resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients with event-free survival at 4 years. (Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe and others; AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017 EudraCT number, 2016-001935-12; EU Clinical Trials number, 2023-509856-32-00; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03643276.).

Adolescent

Challenges in identifying paediatric cancer predisposition syndromes: international SCOPE survey and SIOPE expert consensus recommendations.

Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPS) are heritable genetic conditions associated with an increased risk of developing various cancers throughout life. While early identification and tumour surveillance can improve outcomes, CPS are often underdiagnosed in clinical practice. To evaluate clinicians' perspectives and identify barriers to CPS identification and care across Europe, we conducted the SCOPE study: a three-part cross-sectional survey of paediatric haematology/oncology professionals, followed by a modified Delphi consensus process with members of the SIOP Europe Host Genome Working Group. A total of 185 paediatric oncologists from 22 countries participated in the survey. More than 40% of participants reported low or uncertain confidence across different CPS-related tasks, particularly in counselling families (64.3%) and interpreting germline genetic findings (57.3%). Access to clinical geneticists and dedicated CPS clinics were predictors of higher confidence for some domains, while individual experience and institutional patient volume had limited influence. Regular use of universal CPS screening tools was low (42.3%), with most clinicians relying on personal judgement rather than structured criteria. The most cited barriers were lack of screening guidelines (57%) and difficulties in interpreting results (35.1%). Regular training and workshops, availability of genetic counsellors or educators for patient support, and patient-friendly education material were most cited as areas of improvement. The Delphi process led to three recommendations: (1) improve clinician training and communication strategies, (2) integrate CPS screening into standard treatment plans, and (3) develop accessible, patient-centred educational materials. These recommendations highlight opportunities to enhance CPS care through structured support, interdisciplinary collaboration, and systematic screening approaches.

Humans