Biomedical subjects

Gillian M Keating

Publications and source records attributed to Gillian M Keating.

96 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Extended-release methylphenidate (Ritalin LA).

An extended-release formulation of methylphenidate (Ritalin LA), a CNS stimulant that inhibits dopamine and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake into presynaptic neurons, has been developed for use in patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In children with ADHD and healthy male adults, extended-release methylphenidate 20mg was rapidly absorbed and demonstrated two distinct peak plasma concentrations approximately 4 hours apart. The absorption pharmacokinetics of extended-release methylphenidate 20mg, which closely mimics those of immediate-release methylphenidate 10mg given in two doses 4 hours apart, permits once-daily administration. In a 2-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 134 evaluable children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD, symptoms improved to a significantly greater extent with extended-release methylphenidate 10 to 40mg once daily than with placebo. Extended-release methylphenidate improved both inattention and hyperactivity symptoms and was effective in children with combined- (inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive) type or predominantly inattentive-type ADHD. In clinical trials, the safety and tolerability profiles of extended-release methylphenidate were consistent with that of the immediate-release formulation.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Etanercept: an updated review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Etanercept is a subcutaneously administered biological response modifier that binds and inactivates tumour necrosis factor-alpha, a proinflammatory cytokine. In patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly was associated with a more rapid improvement in disease activity and a significantly greater cumulative response than methotrexate over 12 months of treatment in a randomised, double-blind trial. In addition, etanercept recipients showed a slower rate of radiographic progression and a more rapid improvement in quality of life than methotrexate recipients. The efficacy of etanercept was maintained at 3 years' follow-up. Etanercept was also significantly better than placebo at reducing disease activity in patients who had an inadequate response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in several well controlled trials. At study end (after 3 or 6 months' treatment), the percentage of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response with etanercept (25mg or 16 mg/m(2) twice weekly) was 59 to 75% as monotherapy and 71% in combination with methotrexate; corresponding placebo response rates were 11 to 14% and 27%, respectively. Response has been maintained in patients who continued treatment for up to 5 years. In patients with psoriatic arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly significantly reduced disease activity and improved skin lesions in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12- to 24-week trials. In the 24-week study, ACR20 response rates (50 vs 13%), psoriatic arthritis response rates (70 vs 23%) and the median improvement in skin lesions (33 vs 0%) were significantly greater in etanercept than in placebo recipients. In patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept resulted in improvements in all measures of disease activity and was significantly more effective than placebo at reducing disease flare. Eighty percent of patients receiving etanercept achieved a >or=30% reduction in disease activity over 7 months of treatment, and this was maintained for up to 2 years in a trial extension. Etanercept was generally well tolerated in children and adults in clinical trials; the most commonly occurring adverse effects included injection site reactions, infection, headache, rhinitis and dizziness. In conclusion, etanercept has emerged as an important new treatment option in inflammatory arthritis. Etanercept provides rapid and sustained improvements in disease activity in patients with early and DMARD-refractory rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to inhibit radiographic progression in those with early disease. Well controlled studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of etanercept in patients with psoriatic arthritis or polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Etoricoxib.

Etoricoxib is a cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2-selective NSAID with a higher COX-1 to COX-2 selectivity ratio than the other COX-2-selective NSAIDs rofecoxib, valdecoxib or celecoxib. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, improvements in tender and swollen joint counts and patient and investigator global assessment of disease activity were significantly greater in etoricoxib than in placebo recipients in two studies. Etoricoxib was also significantly more effective than naproxen in one of these studies. In patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, etoricoxib was significantly more effective than placebo and had similar efficacy to naproxen with regards to improvements in pain and physical function scores and patient global assessment of disease status scores in two studies. Etoricoxib had similar efficacy to diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Single-dose etoricoxib relieved pain in patients with postoperative dental pain in two studies. Similar scores assessing total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8) were reported in etoricoxib and naproxen sodium or ibuprofen recipients, and higher TOPAR8 scores were reported with etoricoxib than with paracetamol (acetaminophen)/codeine. Pain relief was significantly better with etoricoxib than placebo in two studies in patients with chronic low back pain. Etoricoxib had similar efficacy to indomethacin in a study in patients with acute gout, and single-dose etoricoxib had similar efficacy to naproxen sodium in a study in women with primary dysmenorrhoea. Compared with non-COX-selective NSAIDs, etoricoxib was associated with significantly fewer upper gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, ulcers or bleeds, and was significantly less likely to result in treatment discontinuation because of NSAID-type GI symptoms or any GI symptoms.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Bisoprolol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure.

Bisoprolol is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist. Administration of bisoprolol to patients with chronic heart failure is associated with increases in left ventricular function and reductions in heart rate; increases in heart rate variability are also seen. Two major randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials have examined the clinical efficacy of bisoprolol in combination with ACE inhibitors and diuretics in patients with stable chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV): the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS; n = 641) and CIBIS II (n = 2 647). All-cause mortality (primary endpoint) was significantly lower in bisoprolol than in placebo recipients in CIBIS II (11.8 vs 17.3%) and was reduced by bisoprolol regardless of dosage. All-cause mortality was also lower in CIBIS (16.6 vs 20.9%) although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. In a meta-analysis of CIBIS and CIBIS II (n = 3 288), a relative reduction of 29% in the incidence of all-cause mortality was seen in bisoprolol versus placebo recipients; this analysis also demonstrated that bisoprolol reduces mortality in patients with chronic heart failure regardless of aetiology or severity. In CIBIS II, there were significantly fewer cardiovascular deaths, admissions to hospital for any reason, or cardiovascular deaths or cardiovascular hospitalisations (combined endpoint) in bisoprolol, compared with placebo, recipients (secondary endpoints). Compared with standard treatment alone, the addition of bisoprolol was a cost-effective option in chronic heart failure in UK, French, German and Swedish pharmacoeconomic studies. Bisoprolol is generally well tolerated in patients with chronic heart failure. In CIBIS II, adverse events occurring more commonly in bisoprolol than placebo recipients, regardless of causal relationship with the study medication, included dizziness, bradycardia, hypotension and fatigue. Bisoprolol recipients were less likely than placebo recipients to experience worsening of heart failure, dyspnoea or tachycardia. In both CIBIS and CIBIS II there was no significant difference between bisoprolol and placebo recipients in the incidence of permanent treatment withdrawal. In conclusion, adding the highly selective beta(1)-blocker bisoprolol to a treatment regimen comprising an ACE inhibitor and a diuretic significantly improves survival in patients with stable chronic heart failure and reduces the need for hospitalisation. The use of bisoprolol in this disorder is generally well tolerated and is cost effective. Thus, bisoprolol should be considered a standard treatment option when selecting a beta-blocker for use in combination with ACE inhibitors and diuretics in patients with stable, moderate to severe chronic heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed2002

Spotlight on ziprasidone in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

UNLABELLED: Ziprasidone is a novel antipsychotic agent with a pharmacological profile distinct from that of other currently available novel or classical antipsychotics. In preclinical studies, ziprasidone was predicted to have efficacy against positive, negative and affective symptoms of schizophrenia with a favourable tolerability profile, including a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal adverse effects. The drug has been administered orally to >300 patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in published 4- to 6-week randomised, double-blind trials. When given twice daily at dosages of between 80 and 160 mg/day, ziprasidone produced significantly greater improvements in overall symptomatology than placebo. In the largest study, ziprasidone 80 or 160 mg/day was also significantly more effective than placebo in reducing negative symptoms and, at 160 mg/day, was significantly more effective than placebo in improving depressive symptoms in patients with associated clinically significant depression. Data from a 4-week trial indicate that ziprasidone 160 mg/day has similar efficacy to haloperidol 15 mg/day. Ziprasidone 40 to 160 mg/day was more effective than placebo with respect to prevention of impending relapse and improvement of negative symptoms in 294 stable patients with chronic schizophrenia who were treated for up to 1 year. In addition, significantly more ziprasidone than haloperidol recipients achieved a negative symptom response in a 28-week study involving 301 stable patients with chronic or subchronic schizophrenia. In general, oral ziprasidone is well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. Importantly, the drug has a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal effects and a negligible effect on bodyweight. Ziprasidone is associated with slight prolongation of the QTc interval; the clinical significance of this is not yet clear. The drug does not appear to be associated with sustained elevation of plasma prolactin levels. Preliminary data indicate that long-term oral ziprasidone treatment is well tolerated. Ziprasidone is the only novel antipsychotic currently available in a rapid-acting intramuscular formulation. Short-term treatment with intramuscular ziprasidone was effective and well tolerated in patients with acute agitation associated with psychosis. In addition, intramuscular ziprasidone reduced agitation scores by a significantly greater extent than haloperidol in a study involving patients with acute agitation associated with psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone is a promising new antipsychotic that has shown significant efficacy in the oral treatment of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The drug is well tolerated with a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal effects and a negligible effect on bodyweight. In addition, intramuscular ziprasidone shows efficacy and good tolerability in the treatment of acute agitation associated with psychotic disorders.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2002

Infliximab: an updated review of its use in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis.

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and neutralises its effects. TNFalpha plays an important role in the development of both Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. In a large, double-blind, randomised study involving patients with active, refractory Crohn's disease, significantly more recipients of intravenous infliximab, compared with placebo, achieved a clinical response after 4 weeks' follow-up. Moreover, infliximab administration was associated with a rapid improvement in endoscopic and histological findings in clinical trials involving patients with active, refractory Crohn's disease. The results of the A Crohn's Disease Clinical Trial Evaluating Infliximab in a New Long-Term Treatment Regimen (ACCENT) I study showed that maintenance infliximab therapy prolonged response and remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. In patients with enterocutaneous fistulae associated with Crohn's disease who were involved in a double-blind, randomised study, significantly more patients who received multiple infusions of infliximab, compared with placebo, experienced a > or=50% reduction from baseline in the number of draining fistulae at > or =2 consecutive study visits. In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to treatment with methotrexate who were enrolled in a large, double-blind, randomised study [the Anti-TNF Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy (ATTRACT) study], American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70% response rates were seen in significantly more patients who received multiple infusions of infliximab plus methotrexate, compared with methotrexate plus placebo, after 30 and 54 weeks' treatment. Moreover, the ACR 20% response rate was maintained after 102 weeks' treatment. In addition, significantly less radiographic progression was seen in infliximab plus methotrexate, compared with methotrexate plus placebo, recipients after 54 weeks' treatment. Infliximab therapy was also associated with improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials with the most common adverse events including upper respiratory tract infection, headache, nausea, coughing, sinusitis and diarrhoea. Infliximab therapy may be associated with an increased risk of reactivation of tuberculosis in patients with latent disease. In conclusion, infliximab is an important treatment option in patients with active Crohn's disease who have not responded to conventional therapy and in patients with Crohn's disease who have fistulae. Moreover, infliximab plus methotrexate is effective in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have not responded adequately to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in terms of reducing symptoms and signs, improving physical function and delaying the progression of structural damage.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗