Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gill Herbert

Publications and source records attributed to Gill Herbert.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Developing practice in breastfeeding.

This paper reports on an approach to practice development in breastfeeding as part of a national programme of work to address inequalities in maternal and child nutrition. The production and dissemination of evidence and guidelines is necessary but not sufficient on its own to effect change in practice, particularly when dealing with complex public health issues. In the case of breastfeeding, review evidence and national guidance have shown that multifaceted changes are essential if policy aspirations are to be realized. The objectives of the programme described here were to (1) inform and enable practice development in breastfeeding in low-income areas; (2) evaluate the impact of approaches used; and (3) develop robust approaches and appropriate material for use nationally. A conceptual framework was established, and a six-stage process is outlined. The recruitment of four sentinel sites across whole health economies, involving professionals and the voluntary sector, was an essential component of the programme. The strength of the model is that it provides a structured, cross-sectoral approach to practice development in public health. A key challenge is to identify whose responsibility it is to resource practice development when a number of disciplines and sectors are involved. This question needs to be addressed if public health guidance is to be of sustained benefit.

Breast Feeding↗

Feasibility study of a primary care-based model for stroke aftercare.

BACKGROUND: A new primary care model for stroke aftercare has been developed to address the longer-term needs of patients who have had a stroke and their families. AIM: To test the feasibility and acceptability of the new model on patients who have had a stroke and their carers. DESIGN OF STUDY: An observational feasibility study. SETTING: Patient and carer assessments and interviews conducted in patients' homes. METHOD: Patients who have had a stroke, and their carers, were assessed using a purposely developed primary care stroke model. Qualified health- and social-care professionals acted as stroke care coordinators and carried out the assessments. Four evaluations were undertaken as part of the study: analysis of care plans, a survey of unmet needs, focus group sessions for staff, and patient/carer interviews. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients and 21 carers were recruited to the study. Analysis of care plans indicated that the assessment process was successful in identifying patient and carer problems (n = 219). Actions were instigated against 190 of these problems and, at 3 months after the assessment, 75% of the problems had been resolved. Patients/carers thought that the review process would be more valuable if conducted sooner after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: The model was acceptable to professionals, encouraging them to work in a manner more consistent with the expressed needs of patients and carers who were adjusting to the longer-term impact of stroke. Essential aspects informing the care process were also identified. Further work is now required to investigate the effects of the intervention on patient and carer outcomes.

Aftercare↗

Delayed discharges. Another fine mess.

A simulation exercise on charging for delayed discharges revealed significant potential for conflict between organisations, and no benefit for service users. Participants thought the charging system would work against the development of community services. They favoured joint NHS/local authority approaches to the development of an effective system for preventing delayed discharges.

Efficiency, Organizational↗