Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerald Kidd

Publications and source records attributed to Gerald Kidd.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Informational masking caused by contralateral stimulation.

Although informational masking is thought to reflect central mechanisms, the effects are generally much stronger when the target and masker are presented to the same ear than when they are presented to different ears. However, the results of a recent study by Brungart and Simpson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2985-2995 (2002)] indicated that a speech masker that is presented contralateral to a speech signal can produce substantial amounts of informational masking when a second speech masker is played simultaneously in the same ear as the signal. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments that paralleled those of Brungart and Simpson but used a pure-tone signal and multitone informational maskers in a detection task. Both the signal and the maskers were played as sequences of short bursts in each observation interval. The maskers were arranged in two types of spectrotemporal patterns. One type of pattern, called "multiple-bursts same" (MBS), has previously been shown to produce very large amounts of informational masking while the other type of pattern, called "multiple-bursts different" (MBD), has been shown to produce very small amounts of informational masking. Several conditions of ipsilateral, contralateral, and combined presentation of these maskers were tested. The results showed that presentation of the MBS masker in the contralateral ear produced a substantial amount of informational masking when the MBD masker was simultaneously presented to the ipsilateral ear. The results supported the earlier findings of Brungart and Simpson indicating that listeners are unable to selectively focus their attention on a single ear in some complex dichotic listening conditions. These results suggest that this contralateral masking effect is not restricted to speech and may reflect more general limitations on processing capacity. Further, it was concluded that the magnitude of the contralateral masking effect was related both to the informational masking value of the contralateral masker and the complexity of the stimulus and/or task in the ear in which the signal was presented.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Previous work has indicated that target-masker similarity, as well as stimulus uncertainty, influences the amount of informational masking that occurs in detection, discrimination, and recognition tasks. In each of five experiments reported in this paper, the detection threshold for a tonal target in random multitone maskers presented simultaneously with the target tone was measured for two conditions using the same set of five listeners. In one condition, the target was constructed to be "similar" (S) to the masker; in the other condition, it was constructed to be "dissimilar" (D) to the masker. The specific masker varied across experiments, but was constant for the two conditions. Target-masker similarity varied in dimensions such as duration, perceived location, direction of frequency glide, and spectro-temporal coherence. Group-mean results show large decreases in the amount of masking for the D condition relative to the S condition. In addition, individual differences (a hallmark of informational masking) are found to be much greater in the S condition than in the D condition. Furthermore, listener vulnerability to informational masking is found to be consistent to at least a moderate degree across experiments.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2003

Discriminating harmonicity.

Simultaneous tones that are harmonically related tend to be grouped perceptually to form a unitary auditory image. A partial that is mistuned stands out from the other tones, and harmonic complexes with different fundamental frequencies can readily be perceived as separate auditory objects. These phenomena are evidence for the strong role of harmonicity in perceptual grouping and segregation of sounds. This study measured the discriminability of harmonicity directly. In a two interval, two alternative forced-choice (2I2AFC) paradigm, the listener chose which of two sounds, signal or foil, was composed of tones that more closely matched an exact harmonic relationship. In one experiment, the signal was varied from perfectly harmonic to highly inharmonic by adding frequency perturbation to each component. The foil always had 100% perturbation. Group mean performance decreased from greater than 90% correct for 0% signal perturbation to near chance for 80% signal perturbation. In the second experiment, adding a masker presented simultaneously with the signals and foils disrupted harmonicity. Both monaural and dichotic conditions were tested. Signal level was varied relative to masker level to obtain psychometric functions from which slopes and midpoints were estimated. Dichotic presentation of these audible stimuli improved performance by 3-10 dB, due primarily to a release from "informational masking" by the perceptual segregation of the signal from the masker.

Acoustics↗
PubMed2003

Informational masking and musical training.

The relationship between musical training and informational masking was studied for 24 young adult listeners with normal hearing. The listeners were divided into two groups based on musical training. In one group, the listeners had little or no musical training; the other group was comprised of highly trained, currently active musicians. The hypothesis was that musicians may be less susceptible to informational masking, which is thought to reflect central, rather than peripheral, limitations on the processing of sound. Masked thresholds were measured in two conditions, similar to those used by Kidd et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3475-3480 (1994)]. In both conditions the signal was comprised of a series of repeated tone bursts at 1 kHz. The masker was comprised of a series of multitone bursts, gated with the signal. In one condition the frequencies of the masker were selected randomly for each burst; in the other condition the masker frequencies were selected randomly for the first burst of each interval and then remained constant throughout the interval. The difference in thresholds between the two conditions was taken as a measure of informational masking. Frequency selectivity, using the notched-noise method, was also estimated in the two groups. The results showed no difference in frequency selectivity between the two groups, but showed a large and significant difference in the amount of informational masking between musically trained and untrained listeners. This informational masking task, which requires no knowledge specific to musical training (such as note or interval names) and is generally not susceptible to systematic short- or medium-term training effects, may provide a basis for further studies of analytic listening abilities in different populations.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Measures of energetic and informational masking were obtained from 46 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The task was to detect the presence of a sequence of eight contiguous 60-ms bursts of a pure tone embedded in masker bursts that were played synchronously with the signal. The masker was either a sequence of Gaussian noise bursts (energetic masker) or a sequence of random-frequency 2-tone bursts (informational masker). The 2-tone maskers were of two types: one type that normally tends to produce large amounts of informational masking and a second type that normally tends to produce very little informational masking. The two informational maskers are called "multiple-bursts same" (MBS), because the same frequency components are present in each burst of a sequence, and "multiple-bursts different" (MBD), because different frequency components are presented in each burst of a sequence. The difference in masking observed for these two maskers is thought to occur because the signal perceptually segregates from the masker in the MBD condition but fuses with the masker in MBS. In the present study, the effectiveness of the MBD masker, measured as the signal-to-masker ratio at masked threshold, increased with increasing hearing loss. In contrast, the signal-to-masker ratio at masked threshold for the MBS masker changed much less as a function of hearing loss. These results suggest that sensorineural hearing loss interferes with the ability of the listener to perceptually segregate individual components of complex sounds. The results from the energetic masking condition, which included critical ratio estimates for all listeners and auditory filter characteristics for a subset of the listeners, indicated that increasing hearing loss also reduced frequency selectivity at the signal frequency. Overall, these results suggest that the increased susceptibility to masking observed in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss is a consequence of both peripheral and central processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

This study examined whether increasing the similarity between informational maskers and signals would increase the amount of masking obtained in a nonspeech pattern identification task. The signals were contiguous sequences of pure-tone bursts arranged in six narrow-band spectro-temporal patterns. The informational maskers were sequences of multitone bursts played synchronously with the signal tones. The listener's task was to identify the patterns in a 1-interval 6-alternative forced-choice procedure. Three types of multitone maskers were generated according to different randomization rules. For the least signal-like informational masker, the components in each multitone burst were chosen at random within the frequency range of 200-6500 Hz, excluding a "protected region" around the signal frequencies. For the intermediate masker, the frequency components in the first burst were chosen quasirandomly, but the components in successive bursts were constrained to fall in narrow frequency bands around the frequencies of the components in the initial burst. Within the narrow bands the frequencies were randomized. This masker was considered to be more similar to the signal patterns because it consisted of a set of narrow-band sequences any one of which might be mistaken for a signal pattern. The most signal-like masker was similar to the intermediate masker in that it consisted of a set of synchronously played narrow-band sequences, but the variation in frequency within each sequence was sinusoidal, completing roughly one period in a sequence. This masker consisted of discernible patterns but not patterns that were part of the set of signals. In addition, masking produced by Gaussian noise bursts--thought to produce primarily peripherally based "energetic masking"--was measured and compared to the informational masking results. For the three informational maskers, more masking was produced by the maskers comprised of narrow-band sequences than for the masker in which the frequencies were not constrained to narrow bands. Also, the slopes of the performance-level functions for the three informational maskers were much shallower than for the Gaussian noise masker or for no masker. The findings provided qualified support for the hypothesis that increasing the similarity between signals and maskers, or parts of the maskers, causes greater informational masking. However, it is also possible that the greater masking was a consequence of increasing the number of perceptual "streams" that had to be evaluated by the listener.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

The effect of spatial separation of sources on the masking of a speech signal was investigated for three types of maskers, ranging from energetic to informational. Normal-hearing listeners performed a closed-set speech identification task in the presence of a masker at various signal-to-noise ratios. Stimuli were presented in a quiet sound field. The signal was played from 0 degrees azimuth and a masker was played either from the same location or from 90 degrees to the right. Signals and maskers were derived from sentences that were preprocessed by a modified cochlear-implant simulation program that filtered each sentence into 15 frequency bands, extracted the envelopes from each band, and used these envelopes to modulate pure tones at the center frequencies of the bands. In each trial, the signal was generated by summing together eight randomly selected frequency bands from the preprocessed signal sentence. Three maskers were derived from the preprocessed masker sentences: (1) different-band sentence, which was generated by summing together six randomly selected frequency bands out of the seven bands not present in the signal (resulting in primarily informational masking); (2) different-band noise, which was generated by convolving the different-band sentence with Gaussian noise; and (3) same-band noise, which was generated by summing the same eight bands from the preprocessed masker sentence that were used in the signal sentence and convolving the result with Gaussian noise (resulting in primarily energetic masking). Results revealed that in the different-band sentence masker, the effect of spatial separation averaged 18 dB (at 51% correct), while in the different-band and same-band noise maskers the effect was less than 10 dB. These results suggest that, in these conditions, the advantage due to spatial separation of sources is greater for informational masking than for energetic masking.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone↗