Biomedical subjects

George Kaysen

Publications and source records attributed to George Kaysen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Measurement of intraperitoneal volume by segmental bioimpedance analysis during peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, ultrafiltration during peritoneal dialysis is determined from direct measurement of weight differences between the initial filling and final draining volumes. A new technique based on segmental bioimpedance analysis (SBIA) has been developed to accurately measure intraperitoneal volume continuously during peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: Twenty-two peritoneal dialysis patients were studied in a supine position during peritoneal dialysis consisting of 4 tidal exchanges (TPD). For bioimpedance measurements, 4 electrodes were placed, 1 on each hand and foot, to inject an alternating current. Sensing electrodes were placed on the lower ribs and the buttocks on both sides of the body. Calibration of the SBIA method was performed by first filling a known volume of dialysate to establish the relationship between change in resistance and a known fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity. The increase of fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity during dwell time was considered to be equal to net ultrafiltration volume occurring during this period. These measurements were compared with those obtained by the difference in weight between the total filling and draining volumes. RESULTS: The change in intraperitoneal volumes measured by differences in weight (0.39 +/- 0.29 L) did not differ significantly from those established from SBIA (0.41 +/- 0.31 L). Bland-Altman analysis yielded limits of agreement of 0.12 L. CONCLUSION: The SBIA technique provides a continuous noninvasive approach to the measurement of changes in intraperitoneal fluid volume.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A kinetic model of inorganic phosphorus mass balance in hemodialysis therapy.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that inorganic phosphorus (iP) accumulation in tissues (dTiP/dt) is a risk factor for cardiac death in hemodialysis therapy (HD). The factors controlling iP mass balance in HD are dietary intake (GiP), removal by binders (JbiP) and removal by dialysis (JdiP). If iP accumulation is to be minimized, it will be necessary to regularly monitor and optimize GiP, JbiP and JdiP in individual patients. We have developed a kinetic model (iPKM) designed to monitor these three parameters of iP mass balance in individual patients and report here preliminary evaluation of the model in 23 HD patients. METHODS: GiP was calculated from PCR measured with urea kinetics; JdiP was calculated from the product of dialyzer plasma water clearance (K(pwiP)) and time average plasma iP concentration (TACiP) and treatment time (t); a new iP concentration parameter (nTAC(iP), the TACiP normalized to predialysis CoiP) was devised and shown to be a highly predictable function of the form nTAC(iP) = 1 - alpha(1 - exp[-betaK(pwiP). t/ViP]), where the coefficients alpha and beta are calculated for each patient from 2 measure values for nTAC(iP), K(pwiP).t/ViP early and late in dialysis; we measured 8-10 serial values for nTAC(iP), K(pwiP). t/ViP over a single dialysis in 23 patients; the expression derived for iP mass balance is DeltaTiP = 12(PCR) - [K(pwiP)(t) (N/7)][CoiP(1 - alpha(1 - exp[-beta(Kt/ViP)]))] - k(b).Nb. RESULTS: Calculated nTAC(iP) = 1.01(measured nTAC(iP)), r = 0.98, n = 213; calculated JdiP = 0.66(measured total dialysate iP) + 358, n = 23, r = 0.88, p < 0.001. Evaluation of 10 daily HD patients (DD) and 13 3 times weekly patients with the model predicted the number of binders required very well and showed that the much higher binder requirement observed in these DD patients was due to much higher NPCR (1.3 vs. 0.96). CONCLUSION: These results are very encouraging that it may be possible to monitor the individual effects of diet, dialysis and binders in HD and thus optimize these parameters of iP mass balance and reduce phosphate accumulation in tissues.

Death↗

PubMed2002

Heat accumulation with relative blood volume decrease.

BACKGROUND: Both hypovolemia and heat accumulation act as powerful perturbations of blood pressure control. In hemodialysis, hypovolemia and heat accumulation often develop simultaneously, and the question arises of whether and to what extent these perturbations are linked. METHODS: Heat accumulation was measured by the amount of thermal energy (E) removed from a patient during prescribed ultrafiltration under isothermic hemodialysis conditions, ie, constant patient temperature. Measurement and control of temperatures and thermal energies were performed using the blood temperature monitor. Relative blood volume (RBV) was measured using the blood volume monitor. RESULTS: Thirty-eight treatments were analyzed in 12 patients (3 women). During treatments lasting 189 +/- 28 minutes, 5.1% +/- 1.3% of postdialysis body weight were removed from patients by ultrafiltration at a mean rate of 1.1 +/- 0.3 L/h. Blood volumes decreased to 85% +/- 7% of initial values, and 229 +/- 106 kJ of E were removed from patients at a cooling rate (J) of 20 +/- 8 W, corresponding to 28% +/- 11% of estimated energy expenditure (H%). E, J, and H% significantly increased as RBV decreased (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis between J and RBV showed that approximately 1 W had to be removed from the patient for each percentage of change in blood volume (J = -102.38 + 0.97* RBV; r2 = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Results show that the probability for the effect of heat stress during hemodialysis increases with ultrafiltration-induced blood volume changes. Temperature control is an important aspect of hemodialysis treatment.

Adaptation, Physiological↗