Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

George Freeman

Publications and source records attributed to George Freeman.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Is success in postgraduate examinations associated with family practitioners' attitudes or patient perceptions of the quality of their consultations? A cross-sectional study of the MRCGP examination in Great Britain.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate examinations are ubiquitous in medicine worldwide, but studies to validate them are rare. The Royal College of General Practitioners of the UK, over the years in an evolving format, has offered a membership examination (MRCGP) which it believes acts as a quality marker for those who sit it and also positively influences the development of family practice generally. It is not clear, however, if this process identifies quality markers that patients can perceive. OBJECTIVES: To determine if possession of the MRCGP (a doctor defined measure of doctor quality) is associated with the patient enablement score (a patient based consultation outcome measure) and family practitioners' attitudes to the work of family practice. METHODS DESIGN: survey using the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) with linked survey data on family practitioner (FP) demography and possession of the MRCGP, and FPs' attitudes and beliefs using the Cockburn attitudinal questionnaire. SUBJECTS: 15 534 adult patients attending 154 FP principals. SETTING: 50 family practices in the UK. OUTCOME MEASURES: the association between possession of MRCGP, and PEI and Cockburn scores was assessed using regression analysis controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: There was no association between PEI score and possession of the MRCGP. Only one scale of the Cockburn attitude questionnaire (the belief that patients should be involved in decision making) was positively associated with possessing the MRCGP. CONCLUSION: Any advantage in physician quality conferred by passing the MRCGP exam was not detected in this study. Further research into the predictive validity of postgraduate examinations is required preferably using a wider variety of patient and audit based methods.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2003

How important is personal care in general practice?

OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' perceptions of the features of personal care and how far these are shared by healthcare providers; whether a continuing relationship between a health professional and a patient is essential for personal care; and the circumstances in which a continuing relationship is important. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews using the "framework" approach. SETTING: Six general practices in Leicestershire. PARTICIPANTS: 40 patients aged > or = 18 years, 13 general practitioners, 10 practice and community nurses, and six practice administrative staff, recruited through participating practices. RESULTS: Patients' and healthcare providers' accounts cited human communication, individualised treatment or management, and whole person care as features of personal care. Personal care was described in three different contexts-a continuing relationship, a single consultation, and from the practice as a whole. The extent to which a continuing relationship was important for personal care was determined by the reason for consulting, as well as patients' consulting history and lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, general practitioners, primary care nurses, and administrative staff hold similar views on the meaning of personal care, despite differences of emphasis reflecting their different roles. Personal care is promoted by but not always dependent on a continuing provider-patient relationship; human communication and individualised care emerged as important in making care personal whatever the context. Most respondents valued relationships in primary care and had clear ideas about when care in the context of a relationship was most valuable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Twelve tips for promoting significant event analysis to enhance reflection in undergraduate medical students.

The facilitation of reflection and development of reflective abilities are increasingly considered to be an important component of professional development (Eraut, 1994). It is known that students find the process of reflection difficult and that it does not come naturally to all, requiring a safe trusting environment in which students can develop with staff support (Woodward, 1998). The structured and deliberate review of significant events has been advocated as a useful way to encourage reflection (Brookfield, 1990). These tips are based on recent research, which revealed that students' difficulties with significant event analysis arise from a range of unforeseen emotional reactions or conflicts. We pass on our tips for minimizing these conflicts and enhancing the reflective and creative aspects of significant event analysis.

Creativity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: We determined the reported value general practitioners/family physicians in 3 different health care systems place on the various types of continuity of care. METHODS: We conducted a postal questionnaire survey in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands. The participants were 1,523 general practitioners/family physicians (568 from England and Wales, 453 from the United States and 502 from The Netherlands). Our main outcome measures were the perceived importance of the types of continuity of care and doctor or practice characteristics that may influence attitudes toward personal continuity of care. RESULTS: The response rates were England and Wales 60% (568/946), United States 47% (453/963) and Netherlands 76% (502/660). The doctors in all 3 countries felt strongly that personal continuity remained an important aspect of good-quality care to their patients. Within a given health care system, doctors' personal and practice characteristics explained only a small part of the variance in attitudes toward the provision of personal continuity of care (England and Wales and The Netherlands r2 = 0.04, United States r2 = 0.01). The doctors in all 3 countries felt that they were currently able to provide all 3 types of continuity of care, although doctors in England and Wales were least positive about the provision of informational and management continuity across the primary-secondary care divide. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners/family physicians from 3 differing health care systems all place high value on being able to provide personal continuity of care to patients. Personal continuity of care remains a core value of general practice/family medicine and should be taken account of by policy makers when redesigning health care systems.

Adult↗