IgE autoantibodies monitored in a patient with atopic dermatitis under cyclosporin A treatment reflect tissue damage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Georg Stingl.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Circulating autoantibodies against FcepsilonRI, IgE, or both occur in approximately one third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), but not all autoantibodies initiate histamine release. OBJECTIVE: We sought to classify patients with CIU into subsets on the basis of serum bioactivity and immunoreactivity and to examine the relationship between newly defined subtype and disease severity. METHODS: Sera from patients with CIU (n = 78), dermog-raphism (n = 15), and cholinergic urticaria (n = 10) and sera from healthy subjects (n = 39) were analyzed by means of Western blot analysis for anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies and for histamine release from basophils and dermal mast cells. In vivo reactivity of autologous serum was tested by means of intradermal injection, and CIU severity was determined on the basis of clinical interview. RESULTS: We classified sera from patients with CIU into 5 subsets: immunoreactive histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies (n = 20 [26%]); immunoreactive anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies without histamine-releasing activity (n = 12 [15%]); anti-IgE-like autoantibodies (n = 7 [9%]); serum containing a mast cell-specific histamine-releasing factor (n = 7 [9%]); and sera with no identifiable factor (n = 32 [41%]). Patients with serum histamine-releasing activity had more severe urticaria than patients without such activity. Positive skin test responses to autologous sera were associated with histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies but not with non-histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies. Neither healthy subjects nor patients with dermographism or cholinergic urticaria had his-tamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: These data support the specificity of functional anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies to CIU. The identification of distinctive subsets of patients suggests that other pathogenic mechanisms occur in CIU in addition to direct ligation of FcepsilonRI by autoantibodies causing dermal mast cell degranulation. Elucidating these mechanisms might lead to new treatments for CIU.
Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK) (OMIM 113800) is a generalized skin disease with mostly autosomal dominant inheritance, caused by mutations in keratin 1 or keratin 10. These genes are expressed in suprabasal epidermal layers, resulting in abnormal keratin-intermediate filament cytoskeleton. We present a male patient with generalized hyperkeratosis involving palms and soles. In lesional skin massive hyperkeratosis and cytolysis in the suprabasal layers of the epidermis were observed. Immunohistochemistry staining for keratin 1 (and keratin 10) showed abnormal clumping in suprabasal keratinocytes. By electron microscopy perinuclear intermediate filament clumps were detected in the keratinocytes. A heterozygous missense mutation, designated L187F, was identified in exon 1 of the keratin 1 gene by direct sequencing. This mutation was not detected in his unaffected parents, indicative of a de novo mutational event. The homologous mutation (L187F, also designated L7F) in basal keratin genes keratin 5 or -14 causes epidermolysis bullosa simplex. The amount of keratin 1-mRNA in the patient's skin was not altered compared to controls. We propose that the severe EHK phenotype observed in our patient results from a dominant negative effect of the L187F mutant Keratin 1 allele exerted on keratin 10, the associated partner-keratin. These findings should be helpful for genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and studying molecular structure-function relationship in EHK.