Biomedical subjects

Genevieve M Vidanes

Publications and source records attributed to Genevieve M Vidanes.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Complicated tails: histone modifications and the DNA damage response.

In recent years, several ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes and covalent histone modifications have been implicated in the response to double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). When a DSB occurs, cells must identify the DSB, activate the DNA damage checkpoint, and repair the break. Chromatin modification appears to be important but not essential for each of these processes, yet its precise mechanistic roles are only beginning to come into focus. Here, we discuss the role of chromatin in signaling by the DNA damage checkpoint pathway.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Damage in transition.

Double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) are a particularly dangerous form of DNA damage because they can lead to chromosome loss, translocations or truncations. When DSBs occur, many proteins are recruited to the break site; these proteins serve to both initiate DNA repair and to activate a checkpoint response. Repair occurs via one of two pathways: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), in which broken DNA ends are directly ligated; or homologous recombination (HR), in which a homologous chromosome is used as a template in a replicative repair process. The checkpoint response is mediated by the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like kinases, Mec1 and Tel1 (ATR and ATM in humans, respectively). Two recent studies in yeast have significantly increased our understanding of when each of the proteins involved in these processes is localized to a break and, in addition, how their sequential localization is achieved. Specifically, these studies support and expand upon a model in which Tel1 and the NHEJ proteins are the first proteins to localize to the break to initiate signaling and attempt repair, but are subsequently replaced by Mec1 and the HR proteins. This transition is mediated by a cyclin-dependent kinase-dependent initiation of 5'-->3' processing (resection) of the DSB. Thus, the cell-cycle stage at which DSBs occur affects the way in which the DSBs are processed and recognized.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Silencing of pi-class glutathione S-transferase in MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b cells.

BACKGROUND: Loss of expression of the glutathione S-transferase-pi (GSTP1) is the most common genetic alteration described in human prostate cancer, occurring in virtually all tumors regardless of grade or stage. Of the available human prostate cancer cell lines, only LNCaP mirrors this phenotype. We investigated whether the prostate cancer cell lines MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b share this phenotype. METHODS: GSTP1 protein and mRNA levels were assessed in the MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b cell lines by Western and Northern blot. DNA methylation was evaluated by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes BssHII, NotI, and SacII. Re-expression of GSTP1 was determined by RT-PCR following treatment with 5-azacytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, and/or the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA). RESULTS: Like all human prostatic carcinomas in vivo, both the MDA PCa 2a and 2b cell lines lack protein and mRNA expression of GSTP1. This lack of expression is associated with methylation in the GSTP1 gene promoter. Treatment with the methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine resulted in re-expression of GSTP1. By itself, TSA did not result in re-expression of GSTP1, nor did it augment expression induced by 5-azacytidine. CONCLUSIONS: MDA PCa 2a and 2b appear to be useful models of human prostatic carcinoma in that they lack expression of GSTP1 due to gene silencing via promoter methylation. Inhibition of histone acetylation does not appear to affect GSTP1 expression.

DNA Methylation↗