Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gavin J Kilpatrick

Publications and source records attributed to Gavin J Kilpatrick.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Drug development in anaesthesia: industrial perspective.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we summarize the new drugs in development in the anaesthesia field. RECENT FINDINGS: There are some interesting approaches, including pro-drugs of propofol such as Aquavan (MGI Pharma, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA) and novel 'soft-drug' sedatives and hypnotics (e.g. CNS-7259X and TD-4756) as well as a novel approach to terminate the action of steroidal neuromuscular blockers (sugammadex). There is also significant activity in the field of novel analgesics. Particularly addressing the fields of sedatives, hypnotics and neuromuscular blockers, however, there is relatively little drug discovery activity currently. Part of the reason for this may be that the mechanisms of action of anaesthetics are not fully understood. This cannot be the whole story, however, since attractive new targets have recently been identified. For example, an agent with selective actions at the beta3-containing subunit of the gamma-amino butyric acid-A receptor is likely to have the hypnotic effects of propofol without the cardiac depressant side-effects. SUMMARY: We consider the main reason for low activity is the perception in industry that there is little need for new drugs in anaesthesia because the needs are well addressed by existing agents. If this is not the case then anaesthesiologists need to be more effective in communicating their requirements.

Analgesics↗

Morphine-6-glucuronide: actions and mechanisms.

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) appears to show equivalent analgesia to morphine but to have a superior side-effect profile in terms of reduced liability to induce nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence behind this statement and to identify the possible reasons that may contribute to the profile of M6G. The vast majority of available data supports the notion that both M6G and morphine mediate their effects by activating the micro-opioid receptor. The differences for which there is a reasonable consensus in the literature can be summarized as: (1) Morphine has a slightly higher affinity for the micro-opioid receptor than M6G, (2) M6G shows a slightly higher efficacy at the micro-opioid receptor, (3) M6G has a lower affinity for the kappa-opioid receptor than morphine, and (4) M6G has a very different absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile from morphine. However, none of these are adequate alone to explain the clinical differences between M6G and morphine. The ADME differences are perhaps most likely to explain some of the differences but seem unlikely to be the whole story. Further work is required to examine further the profile of M6G, notably whether M6G penetrates differentially to areas of the brain involved in pain and those involved in nausea, vomiting, and respiratory control or whether micro-opioid receptors in these brain areas differ in either their regulation or pharmacology.

Animals↗

Memantine. Merz.

Memantine hydrochloride, an NMDA antagonist, was launched in Germany by Merz in 1989 for the treatment of dementia, an indication for which development was continuing in other markets. It is also under development by Merz, Lundbeck, Neurobiological Technologies Inc (NTI) Forest Laboratories and Suntory for the potential treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), AIDS-related dementia and pain in patients with neuropathy, and by Allergan for the potential treatment of ocular disease. By July 2001, a regulatory filing for neuropathic pain was expected in 2003. In February 2002, the CPMP recommended to the EU commission to approve memantine for the treatment of moderately severe-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. At this time, marketing authorization was expected late in the first half of 2002, and Lundbeck planned to launch memantine under the brand name Ebixa during the second half of 2002. Merz and Lundbeck, filed memantine for AD in the EU in September 2000 and an NDA was submitted in November of that year. The compound was in phase H trials in the US for the treatment of AIDS-related dementia and pain by August 1996 and phase III trials for glaucoma and neuroprotection by 1999. Analysts at Merrill Lynch predicted in October 2001 that Allergan would make regulatory filings in the US for memantine in glaucoma and ocular hypertension in 2005, and that Forest Laboratories would file for memantine in the US as a supplement to Alzheimer's disease data in early 2002, and for the treatment of neuropathic pain in 2003. Sales of $25 million in 2004, rising to $75 million in 2005, were predicted by Merrill Lynch for this product.

Animals↗