Biomedical subjects

Gabriel Q Shaibi

Publications and source records attributed to Gabriel Q Shaibi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.

The return of secondary genomic findings (ROSF) to participants in observational cohort studies has evolved from a topic of debate to an accepted standard. This Perspective synthesizes the proceedings of a 2024 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-sponsored workshop and the broader literature to provide updated guidance for ROSF. Building on the 2010 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Working Group recommendations and the 2014 Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research/Electronic Medical Records and Genomics 'floor and ceiling' framework, we address four areas: an integrated ethical framework for observational cohort settings; the emerging challenge of returning novel result types beyond monogenic variants, including polygenic risk scores, somatic mosaicism and pharmacogenomic findings; health equity and community engagement as structural prerequisites for ethical ROSF; and scalability challenges, including technology-assisted disclosure. Drawing on implementation experience from large-scale sequencing programs, we offer recommendations that balance researcher obligations with participant autonomy and equitable access to the benefits of genomic research.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Implementing a Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease in a Diverse Cohort.

PURPOSE: We describe a prospective cohort study (NCT05277116) conducted in phase IV of the electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network to implement a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease (PRSCHD: PGS004696) and assess outcomes after return of results (RoR). METHODS: PRSCHD was considered alongside family history (FamHxCHD), monogenic risk from familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and clinical risk factors, to return CHD risk as part of a Genome Informed Risk Assessment (GIRA) report. Participants with high PRSCHD (top 5th percentile) or FH received their results from study personnel, while participants with FamHxCHD were informed by mail/email. Results were placed in the electronic health record and communicated to the primary care provider. The primary outcome of initiation/intensification of lipid lowering therapy within 12 months after RoR is compared between participants with PRSCHD ≥95th percentile and those with PRSCHD 90th-94th percentile, using a regression discontinuity design. Secondary outcomes include ordering of screening tests, a new CHD diagnosis, and lifestyle changes. RESULTS: By April 2025, 20,421 adults were enrolled: mean age 50±15 years (range 18-75 years), 68% female, 50% belonging to health disparity groups, and 40% non-White by self-report. Prevalence of CHD, FamHxCHD, high PRSCHD and FH was 4.0%, 10.2%, 4.3% and 0.7%, respectively; 14.3% had at least one of the three CHD genetic risk factors and CHD risk estimates were highest in those who self-reported as Black. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of increased genetic risk for CHD was high and at least one of the three genetic risk factors for CHD was present in 14.2% of the cohort. Analyses are underway to assess outcomes after PRSCHD implementation in the context of FamHxCHD, FH, and clinical risk, across the age spectrum in a diverse cohort.

PRS↗

PubMed2025

Covering medical care costs for participants in the eMERGE Network: Challenges for equity and implementation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the complexities of covering study-recommended medical care costs for individuals (in order to prevent lack of adherence due to financial reasons), which have received little attention. METHODS: We explored the deliberations, decisions, and challenges faced by the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network during the implementation of a genomic research project recommending clinical care based on high-risk results defined largely by polygenic risk scores. Two surveys were disseminated to eMERGE sites: to identify preferences about payment for specific care recommendations (survey 1) and to understand the operational processes of covering medical care costs (survey 2). RESULTS: Paying for a subset of care recommendations for the funded study duration was identified as the most feasible approach for covering medical care costs for participants who received high-risk genomic results. Each eMERGE site, by necessity, used diverse approaches to pay for medical care costs. CONCLUSION: eMERGE researchers balanced competing concerns about bias, equity, study design, regulatory compliance, and cost in designing a unified approach to cover some of the recommended medical care costs in the study. Many implementation challenges were encountered. Findings can inform researchers and regulatory bodies about the implications and complications of covering medical care costs in translational research studies focused on prevention.

Humans↗