Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Gérald Raverot

Publications and source records attributed to Gérald Raverot.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic testing and reporting: What the endocrinologists should know and can expect (Joint position paper of the ENDO-ERN).

Over the last decade, next generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for diagnostic DNA testing in human genetics. To improve the understanding of available genetic testing strategies and to facilitate the request of genetic testing in daily endocrine practice, clinical and laboratory experts in the field have summarized the major issues which should be known and considered. In this joint position paper of the ENDO-ERN, the roles and responsibilities of the health care professionals involved in the diagnostic workflow are described, and the major issues concerning genetic testing workflows are overviewed. These issues encompass all relevant steps, including test request and pre-analytical procedures, laboratory and data processing workflows, quality assurance, and reporting. As NGS procedures result in an increasing number of variants of unknown significance and incidental findings, these aspects are addressed as well. Accompanied by illustrations of the genetic diagnostic workflow and of concise reports for a fast orientation about the major aspects of genetic testing, this joint paper should support the health care professionals during a request for genetic testing.

VUS

Genomic characterization of aggressiveness in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive evolution of PitNETs is rare; metastatic spread is even more. Defining aggressiveness and malignancy is challenging, subsequently hard to predict, and to understand. The aim was to provide a molecular definition of aggressiveness using genomic approaches. METHODS: PitNETs from 206 patients were included. Associations between 9 clinicopathological features of aggressiveness and PitNETs' omics were explored. Omics included transcriptome, DNA methylation, chromosomal alterations, and mutations. Clonal tumor evolution was monitored in 7 patients. RESULTS: Among the 9 clinicopathological features of aggressiveness, only rapid progression, progression after radiotherapy, Ki67/MIB1 proliferation index ≥10%, temozolomide treatment, metastases, and specific death were associated with specific omics signatures, while tumour maximal diameter ≥40 mm, cavernous, and sphenoid invasion were not. The omic signatures associated with these features of aggressiveness overlapped but remained distinct between corticotroph and mammo-somato-thyrotroph lineages. For each lineage, a common signature of aggressiveness was identified, associating a proliferative transcriptome signature and DNA hypermethylation. Alterations in specific genes were associated with aggressive features, including a novel PitNET gene, LRP1B, and known cancer genes (TP53, CDKN2A), while USP8 and GNAS alterations were not. Integration of gene alterations with methylome and transcriptome signatures isolated a subset of molecularly aggressive PitNETs. Molecular signatures were stable during the course of the disease, despite evolution toward aggressiveness and potential clonal divergence. CONCLUSION: This systematic analysis of clinicopathological features of aggressiveness using an integrated multiomic approach establishes a histomolecular definition of aggressiveness in PitNETs. Prospective cohort studies are needed to validate these molecular signatures and establish their prognostic value.

Humans